Explain this, Sup Forums

Explain this, Sup Forums.

How can science and scentists even pretend they're simply after the objective truth of things and keep a straight face?

Science is totally corrupt, totally owned by big corporations.

A subspecies is categorized by geographical restrictions. Humans have mastered that and is no longer bound by those limitations.

Not a totally accurate comparison.

>Humans [...] is [...]
You are a fucking native English speaker. Fuck you.

Ignoring different phenotypes and different behaviors are we?

They're subspecies of crows but they're still crows, same thing with humans.

The species argument is an infantile one. Different species aren't able to crossbreed. Humans of different races can, very obviously, crossbreed.

That would be called, "Scientism".

Or as we know it, modern science taught since middle school.

And different genetic variation due to environmental variables that fall in line with evolution?

Yeah I think the subspecies argument is more accurate, especially when you look at races like aborigines in Australia.

>A subspecies is categorized by geographical restrictions. Humans have mastered that and is no longer bound by those limitations.
>we have airliners therefore niggers don't come from africa

>How can science and scentists even pretend they're simply after the objective truth of things and keep a straight face?

Because they get their lives destroyed and everything discredited. I'm sure folks have tried.

Thats the case
Corporations pay for the research so they give the direction of them
Thank god for the military research and our development

Subspecies can cross-breed. Bengal Tigers can breed with Siberian Tigers. Therefore humans are still candidates for being divided as subspecies.

>Science applies, except to us.
You're a retard.

>Humans being able to crossbreed means they are the same.
At no point did OP say that races were different species. They're different SUB-species.

Sub-species are able to breed with one another, even though they are not part of the same sub-species. Unless you want to argue that a pug and a golden retriever are one and the same.

Same deal with humans. Yes, we're part of the same species, but we are not the same sub-species, so there is a scientific backing for the idea that different races have different natures. Thus the IQ differences.

Painted hair is disgusting as fuck.

We interconnected the world too soon.

Human biodiversity would be far more interesting if every branch was allowed to evolve separately and then compared purely on performance/specialization

Guys I think we're missing the point entirely. What that image is trying to say is that we're all different due to a variety of evolutionary factors.

What the left conveys is a different narrative, that we're all the same inside and out and the only difference are visual ones (Skin color, eye shape etc).

They ignore evolutionary factors that may for example make Blacks better athletes or whites smarter overall because they had to adapt to a more harsher climate.

You're referring to the basic grade school definition of species and subspecies. When you get into molecular phylogenetics things get much more interesting.

Skin color is the only difference right

I don't think many biologists will argue that there are different races with biological differences.
t. biochemist

>confusing race and species

If science can be applied at all politically it becomes corrupt as shit and is probably controlled by (((them))). Take psychology for example. Faggotry was considered a mental illness until the queers started storming APA meetings and got it removed by force.

A wolf and a coyote can breed but they both act differently and both have differing levels of intelligence.
Blacks and whites evolved and bred in totally different environments for thousands of years to mention nothing of the effects that breeding with Neanderthals had. Then of course there's also the fact that risk taking has a proven link to intelligence and the ancestors of Europeans took a pretty huge risk when they broke off from the Africans and headed towards colder environments in search of better hunting grounds.

birds on the left are both genetically and anatomically different tho. human races are anatomically mostly the same and genetically mostly identical (no shit considering we all have same ancestors)

>Anglo education

Go and read a book before posting, faggot.

>comparing the taxonomy of birds to the taxonomy of mammals

Its like breeds of dogs

You cant apply the same rules and needs to both a golden retriever and a rottweiler - they are vastly different.

However since we live in a society where everyone must be treated the same under the law, having these two breeds together as citizens would be shit. Neither could possibly be happy.

Thats why in Golden Retriever Land its legal for balls to be thrown around because everyone loves to fetch, whereas in the Confederacy of Rottweilers it isnt because Rottweilers would be very angry about these strange balls and strange doggos entering their territory all the time.


And just because Rottweilers make up the overwhelming majority of Guard Doggos doesnt mean we need to campaign for "equal workplace representation" for the Golden Retriever


Just because they can fuck doesnt mean the two breeds belong together in civilized society where laws must be applied equally or you have problems.

Generally they shouldnt fuck to begin with. Then what makes a Retriever a Retriever is lost, and what makes a Rottie a Rottie is lost. You end up with this off-yellow thing with eyebrow markings looking all fugly, territorial and prone to attacking if it feels someones threatened but also has a strong desire to play around strange kids and strange people, it will try to fetch that bird for you but without a soft mouth will ruin it...Its a mix of contradictory traits and ultimately useless for the jobs of either of its parents.

Easier methods of travel did this. As much as I like the idea of being able to travel the world, it's like opening the floodgates, and political boundries don't seem to be enough to hold nations in place.

>Cat
>Race
>Not species.

Because their careers can be destroyed, for example the Nobel prize winner James Watson.

read some biology stupid moron

Cats are separated into different breeds as well, fag. Maine Coon, Japanese Bobtail, Siamese, Ragdoll, Savannah....And with cats it often is skin deep - the differences in cat behavior do not vary as much as humans except for some specific separate breeds (like the Siamese meowing a lot more, very clearly distinct from other cats).

>cat
>race

Well, I couldn't put it simpler. Had to make up something even the mentally challenged OP can understand. But the point still stands: cats are cats, humans are humans, you just have shitton of diversity (cat breeds and human "races"). They are the same species/race/whatever, just pulled through some sweet-sweet evolution.

Kinda like what says, but remembering what "breed" stands for and not drawing bullshit-y parallels.

So you mean there are different breeds of humans? That's just semantics.

>different behaviours
>humans

ayyyy lmao

Anyway, you have to consider geographical distribution of populations, genotype, phenotype, even behaviour, yes, and many other factors to define what a species, sub species and even a gender is. ""Science" doesn't say those supposedly different crows are different subspecies of the same species, that would be the opinion of one or more scientistic using the information they collected, and someone using the exact same information could and con conclude that the difference is not enough to consider them to be different sub species of the same species, and so on and on.

Point being, taxonomy and what you define as a species or any other level varies a lot and while in some cases there can be a consensus in the community on what should be considered a gender, a species or whatever, nothing is written on stone and you just have to be able to back up what you define as species or any other taxa. If you want, you could say that there are many species of human living today, Homo negroid, H. caucasoid, H. mongoloid, or whatever, you wouldn't be the first one arguing something like that.

>le if they can breed and produce fertile offspring they are part of the same species

This is false and I don't see why public education everywhere keeps pushing it

Also

>le different humans ""species""" are even more different than wolfs and dog memes
>proceeds to post that link to stormfront which is the only source of such claim

a phenotype is an expression of the genotype. there is one 'race' or 'species' of humans.

consider it like this, the genotype is a dictionary and the phenotype are books written from the dictionary. that is what the (((science))) and the (((bible))) community believe

>what is polymorphism

Are you actually implying that the polymorphism of cats is the same as the anatomic and evolutionarily geographic differences subspecies as well as humans possess?

I know you're worried about this discussion as you'd rather not emphasise the fact that Hungarians are the shit-tier of the white subspecies, but take that slav cock out your ass and learn some science.

I agree, goyim are subhuman.

>Cat is apparently a race and not a species of it's own.
>Hungarian education.

>How can science and scentists even pretend they're simply after the objective truth of things and keep a straight face?

Geneticists do study the biodiversity of humans. It has not yet filtered down to (modern/marxist) sociology or public discourse.

How long would it have taken for human subspecies to not be able to interbreed anymore?

>different breeds of cats
>different breeds of humans

Are you retarded? You're proving our point.

>Liberals think these things are on par with themselves
Maybe with you faggots at least.
I on the other hand am of the human variety.

>liberals think these things are on par with themselves

>liberals think these are the same

science has long been the plaything of people of influance

Sure as shit shut the retarded ass liberals up.

You're alright.

>buy horse
>move horse to africa
>horse is now zebra
"""""""SCIENCE"""""""""

It's a joke, so called science is a big joke. My professor of anthropology would still talk about different races in the human species, but he would warn us that the argument for races could no longer be made due to PC bullshit. Any other explanation than that is a blue pill.

>Different species aren't able to crossbreed.
are you retarded?

That can still occur within a species to be honest.

>It is the retarded OP

Oh boy, I just ->knew

Here's your reply.

Maybe you should look at actual biological differences rather than a picture comparing variant phenotypes of your race and some birds.

>what is a sub species.
See

How would you even begin to classify every individual human and dog?

And what do you get when you breed two ligers?

.....by their differences?

Right? Is that reasonable? Rationable?

so every individual is going to have a huge ass list of what their specific mixture is? it's arbitrary as fuck

There's at least 20 human sub species.
We've got 3 in Europe.
>Med, Germanic, Slav
We've got like 7 in Asia, 4 in Africa, Several in North and South America, and the various islands of the pacific.
I'm not even sure if Abos are human.
It's not the hard dumbass, use the same guidelines we'd use for any other species.
This isn't new frontier.
Stop acting like it is.
>skull shape
>size
>skin color
>IQ
To name a few.

How is that arbitrary?

Sounds like you're just lazy.

Who cares how long this "list" is......I mean, the longer it is, the more sense it'll make.

this

Abos look the most different.

Fuck niggers
Fuck liberals
Fuck subhumans

>Explain this, Sup Forums.
Mostly republitard strawman.

>Your cat might be a nigger