So is this how black people cope with being slaves to their former handlers?

So is this how black people cope with being slaves to their former handlers?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=sk17NoHmbP4&feature=youtu.be
youtube.com/watch?v=IJCVVbDlYhQ
youtube.com/watch?v=fbOx_aSgjg0
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

I'm waiting for the wigs party to make a big come back.

>"""""switched platforms"""""

Bull-moose when?

>the Republicans were for slavery

said no history book ever

DR3!!!!

All you claps are slaves to big business anyway

No, she's pushing the meme that the parties switched in the 60s and the Republicans are the real racists now. The Democratic party has always been the party of leftism and increased government. The Republican party has always been anti-racist, but their political ideology has evolved since their founding in the 1840s.

Your little rain island will be free one day. I promise :^)

>switched platforms

So Abraham Lincoln was President of the Confederacy and Jefferson Davis was fighting for the cause of the Union.

>only Dem to ever like blacks was JFK
>Dems kill JFK for being a nigger lover
>put LBJ in charge to rangle the blacks
>niggers think the Dems like them still

Sure sure.

Meanwhile in the real world the California democrats are threatening to secede because Trump wants to take a way their illegal Mexican slave labour

Retarded fucking meme, the main reason the south is republican is when GOP got more christian support, and blacks went to democrats because Johnson pushing for welfare to enslave them once again.

>The Democratic party has always been the party of leftism and increased government.
WRONG

>Hijab
>False information
>Shitty reaction pic
>24k likes
I'm triggered famalam

About 4% of white southerners - and about 1.7% of whites total - owned slaves. This is compared to about 10% of free blacks who owned slaves.

I fucking hate that stupid picture and that stupid >Them: >me: meme.

four lines of absolute bullshit. congratulations.

This is such a huge lie. Fucking commies changing history. Leftists can never even explain how the parties "switched", they just assume it's true.

She's right though?

After Barry Goldwater's infamous vote against civil rights and Dwight Eisenhower's poverty programs, poor negroes flocked to the Dem's while working class Christians flocked to the Rep's. You can argue that the regional voting patterns changed as opposed to the party platforms, but its still the case.

American passive-aggressive butthurt is so great.

The best part is you always think others will fight your battles for you

"I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so."

Abraham Lincoln

>The best part is you always think others will fight your battles for you

when has that ever happened.

>one post by this ID

Dems advocated hard for continued segregation and are still keeping blacks on the government's tit

Look at the '60 and then '64 election map. The south turned Republican that year thanks to Barry Goldwater who voted against civil rights which pissed off muh normies. Big geographic and political realignment.

and only about 3% of all african slaves were delivered to north america in the first place. It just seems much more now because they were treated better and thus survived. The average slave in the Spanish colonies lasted half a year.

That's what you get for treating people better. Everyone hates you and they will never let you get over it.

no good deed goes unpunished. ever

Pretty much the most republican thing he could have said.

Republicans don't generally want a federal government telling states what to do.

Ironic, because Lincoln killed state's rights.

just voting for a republican makes you racist

the former "blue wall" is now "racist"

How is that related to the point she's trying to make? The Republicans were the ones against slavery, there's no changing that.

It's okay. Your cold country will be under sharia law one day. I promise! :D

states flip all the time

someone will post a better picture

but look at Louisiana here

1960s civil rights law was unconstitutional and any reasonable person should have voted against it.

It's called states rights and limited federal interference. It's how this country is meant to be governed.

Fucking retarded man. Parties have never changed in basic ideology since they were founded, the only thing that's changed is the demographics. Why do you think it's called the fucking GOP?

huh...
and slavery still exists today and is 100% African and Muslim

really activates one's almonds

He didn't kill states rights. They seceded as soon as he was inaugurated. If they would've stayed they could have kept their slaves but in new states slavery would've been illegal

And it was the British literally on the high seas taking out slave ships when they declared the slave trade illegal. Who do you see marching with, "I'm sorry," signs and other bullshit, fucking British.

Wew what an effective argument! You sure schooled us

Liberals love to parade this meme until you remind them that FDR, the Democrat Golden boy, was a Democrat before the 60s.

IE: he'd be a Republican today.

In other words, Democrats are and have always been in favor of slavery. The only difference between now and then is that they changed their methods of enslavement (force vs welfare).

Thomas Jefferson that founded the Democratic party was a supporter of communist type agrarian society. Who was it in the 30s that exponentially increased the government? Oh right, a democrat, FDR.

they call them illegal immigrants now

>if you deport the illegals who will pick your fruit? checkmate republicans

>massive government programs and social security are conservative

LOL no.
>> Sup Forums history time

The "Big Switch" is stupid Leftism promoted by the fraud of a book that is Howard Zinn's "A People's History of the US".

If you look at every single southern politician during that period only a few switched.

The reason the South went heavily red after being heavily blue (Democrats did support slavery and denounce republicans) is due to reconstruction impoverishing the South. Republicans started promoting business and industry and jobs so the South started to gravitate more to the Republicans despite anti-slavery and civil rights for blacks. African Americans went heavily Democrat due to.......

Welfare and other social programs like that. First advocated by the relief from the Great Depression and then the "Great Society".

>FDR was actually a hardcore conservative.
>Calvin Coolidge was a SOCIALIST.

I'm so tired of this 60s shift meme. Parties used to have conservative and liberal factions, hence why The Democratic Party in the 60s could have George Wallace and Robert Kennedy, while the Republicans had both Martin Luther King Jr. and Barry Goldwater.

Civil Rights Act of 1964 - 80% of republicans voted for it only 65-ish% of democrats did. Same basic numbers for the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Fair Housing Act of 1968. The three pillars of the civil rights movement in government.

Blacks moved to the democrats in the 30's, mostly, because of the New Deal.

Andrew Jackson founded the modern day Democratic Party, not Jefferson.

Another German retard thinking he understands America better than Americans.

>"Whenever I hear any one arguing for slavery I feel a strong impulse to see it tried on him personally." The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln edited by Roy P. Basler, Volume VIII, "Speech to One Hundred Fortieth Indiana Regiment" (March 17, 1865), p. 361.

>"I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong. I can not remember when I did not so think, and feel." The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln edited by Roy P. Basler, Volume VII, "Letter to Albert G. Hodges" (April 4, 1864), p. 281.

>"I think slavery is wrong, morally, and politically. I desire that it should be no further spread in these United States, and I should not object if it should gradually terminate in the whole Union." The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln edited by Roy P. Basler, Volume III, "Speech at Cincinnati, Ohio" (September 17, 1859), p. 440.

>"In giving freedom to the slave, we assure freedom to the free - honorable alike in what we give, and what we preserve. We shall nobly save, or meanly lose, the last best hope of earth. Other means may succeed; this could not fail. The way is plain, peaceful, generous, just - a way which, if followed, the world will forever applaud, and God must forever bless." Lincoln's Second Annual Message to Congress, December 1, 1862.

>"I do not wish to be misunderstood upon this subject of slavery in this country. I suppose it may long exist, and perhaps the best way for it to come to an end peaceably is for it to exist for a length of time. But I say that the spread and strengthening and perpetuation of it is an entirely different proposition. There we should in every way resist it as a wrong, treating it as a wrong, with the fixed idea that it must and will come to an end." The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln edited by Roy P. Basler, Volume III, "Speech at Chicago, Illinois" (March 1, 1859), p. 370.

Do I need to go on?

It's funny that most people didn't actually read the introduction to that book, where he clearly states that he has, and is writing the book, in his heavily biased opinion loosely based on the facts, so that it presents a different side of what was commonly accepted.

Oh, my mistake. That proves my point even further since Jackson was an anti-federalist that supported a massively powerful central government.

>They seceded as soon as he was inaugurated
American education

>Goldwater was a liberal

When will this meme die?

It makes me sad that it's actually taken seriously and used as a textbook to indoctrinate our children. I was forced to read it in high school. I hated every page.

I didn't say he was pro-Slavery. However labeling the Republican party as an anti-slavery party is also not correct. They were critics of slavery.

So by the same logic America is exonerated for exactly the same reason right?

>hmm America owned slave
>yeah but then they switched policy so it's okay

But, more importantly, she's a muslim and therefore not part of my group and therefore I don't have to listen to her. Also, all muslims are in favor of slavery and Islam does not have the moral resources to stop it because it's the very force that condones it.

>Inaugurated

You fucking retard, they began seceding long before he was inaugurated.

is this one of those useful idiots I keep hearing about

>the parties switched sides
>but we're still going to fellate the memory of racist FDR every chance we get

>hillary managed to fuck up this hard

lmao, I bet everyone who she thought were her allies and friends just give her dirty looks

>expressionless botox face

HAHA SO ME XD

Jesus Christ I want to face fuck Kim.

>tfw you realize fiction isn't reality

>After Barry Goldwater's infamous vote against civil rights

Because it's unconstitutional. Freedom of association.

Their logic, not mine.

youtube.com/watch?v=sk17NoHmbP4&feature=youtu.be

youtube.com/watch?v=IJCVVbDlYhQ

God damn it...

We fought a fucking CIVIL WAR over it, you fucking stupid ass kraut. Somewhere between 650-800,000 of our own citizens died over it. The same percentage of our population that, if it were to happen again today, approximately 6.8 million would die.

God fucking damn it.

Who cares what some thot says.

She's actually getting beat up over this one. Someone brought up LBJ. Kinda makes her argument invalid.

does this thing have a name yet?
youtube.com/watch?v=fbOx_aSgjg0

>mfw even most modern academics know the Southern Strategy meme is bullshit

When will it end?

Saw that. Still disgusting how many RT and likes it got. She's just spreading ignorance.

All they "switched" was tactics, not goals or idealogy

Proud Know-Nothing

...

the only way it switched was by making people thin it had changed, they just changed the form of slavery to a small check in the mail, they dont pick cotten anymore they pick candidates. ((( that was their plan at least )))

So? That still doesn't negate the statement that democrats were for slavery.

Democrats are still up to the same tricks they were 100 years ago

This guy is right. Really it's stupid to treat Democrats and Republicans as some stable entity over time. Both parties have changed and are changing all the time. Just look at Trump Republicans vs Regan Republicans vs Neoconservatives and radical Republicans that were around in reconstruction.

she really couldnt have made that point without a picture, damn

At first I was like
Then I was like

You fought a civil war because the Confederate Army attacked Fort Sumter.

Lincoln personally was against slavery, but he only took the political stance against after he knew would crush the South and thereby had the politcal opportunity.

Why would you count the traitorous Southerners as among your dead.

>anti-federalist
>supported a massively powerful central government
Isn't it an oxymoron?

Ah the final red pill, being altruistic is degenerate, a shame most of the board is christian and refuse to take this pill

>the parties switched platforms in the 60s

This argument is garbage.

Leftists say that racism is "institutional/systemic" and never truly goes away one the one hand; but two political parties can completely change their ways in a matter of a few decades?

Nah, that's bullshit.

They werent traitors

They were americans

>So is this how black people cope with being slaves to their former handlers?

Not even close. The northern new england and surrounding states were liberal when they were republican, and they are still liberal now that they're democrats; the south was conservative when they were democrats, and they're still conservative now that they're republicans. The parties evolved over the 20th century but the people haven't changed in the least.

It isn't false information. It's only inaccurate in that the parties actually began switching platforms much earlier in the 20th century.

you know what, fuck it. being back slavery.

Care to expand for those who don't care a whole lot about American political history?

Yes, he is an idot.

Do the world a favor and end your life.

LBJ came in after kennedy got shot and said WATCH ME TRICK ALL THESE NIGGERS INTO VOTING DEMOCRAT FOR THE NEXT 200 YEARS TOP KEK LADS

the sad thing is they really truly believe it

Keeping a permanent underclass to exploit for votes is slavery in a sense

They became pro-slavery in the 1960s, obviously.

They disagreed with that. They saw themselves as their own nation and died for it, most through some dire disease in the dirt.

>they switched sides in the 60's

>who won the South in the 1960 election
>Byrd
>Democrat (ran as an Independent)

>who won South the 1968 election?
>Wallace
>Democrat (ran as an Independent)

>Nixon planned his entire 1968 campaign around the fact that he would lose the South, as he refused to budge on his Civil Rights platform


>Wallace and Byrd both ran on pro-Jim Crow platforms.
>Wallace was a lynch pin of anti-Civil Rights, pro-Jim Crow politics
>You may know him as the man responsible for the "Stand at the Schoolhouse Door"

>Wallace later re-joined the Democratic party, winning the Governorship of Alabama
>he ran on a "progressive" platform.
>progressive platform

One of the biggest red-pills is realizing that Progressivism is nothing more than well marketed racism.

PS:
>There are ~20 "Dixiecrat's" of Repute
>Only 3 joined the GOP
>the remaining ~17 were all welcomed back into the DNC

>I was told the parties switched in the 60's
>I believed it without question and never once researched it for myself

This creature has the same voting power as one of you, gentlemen.......never forget that.

Republicans were always pro-civil rights and anti-liberalism. The Dems were the only ones who switched, so that Lyndon B. "I'll have those niggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years" Johnson could then trash his rival Barry Goldwater as some kind of bigot for opposing the unconstitutional 1964 "civil rights" act which went against freedom of association.

Lincoln did not want to crush the South he wanted to preserve the Union. And yes, that's why we counted them among our dead and still count them among our dead.

We did not fight a 4 year long Civil War just because the Confederates attacked Fort Sumter.

Just stop, Donnie. You're out of your element.