Why do you enjoy sucking bourgeois dick Sup Forums?

Is this related to your cuckolding fetish?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finns_Party
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Because there are no more workers parties that aren't infested with limousine liberals whose only interest is in white genocide. How does importing lumpenproletariat from backwards shitholes have any beneficial impact on a global revolution? Do you not realise that they would destroy the hypothetical communist state in a heartbeat and replace it with a theocratic islamic state?

I actually agree with this completely.

But don't you realize that you're nothing but a foot soldier of the bourgeoisie?

>Implying I support Antifa faggots.

I used to vote labour until they basicaly told their core constituents to fuck off and go die in a ditch.

I think it's quite apt that laffypole steals and makes shitty edits of Sup Forums memes considering they want to steal our income too. Sage all raid threads.

Also, defund UC Berkeley.

That's why I hate liberals and anarchist faggots. Their autism has killed most worker movements all over the world.

>implying he was calling you ANTIFA

You're getting very defensive about ANTIFA. I noticed the sudden disappearance of all those threads gloating about Spencer getting punched almost straight after the riots... Let me guess laffypole decided those tactics were making you look like retards and making centrists more hostile?

>falling for the money jew and lying to themselves that they are free to and can do anything (just too busy/would rather avoid extra expenditures at the moment)
So you're pretty much right, it's cuckolding fetish.

Giving the faggots who wear che shirts and keffiyehs a chance to "contribute" to the party was a mistake.

I don't represent /leftypol/. With that said, the people who punched spencer were retards. I'm not sure what they thought they were accomplishing.

Reminder that taxation is theft and that the freer the market, the freer the people

I don't trust them, nor do I hate them or grovel at their feet. I recognize their place in society will always exist and are necessary to us the working class. We thrive off of each other. This blatant hatred of the rich is asinine.

They weren't trying to "accomplish" anything. The rioting and violence is just part of a nihilistic outburst with no goal in mind beyond harming people and property for the sake of catharsis. Ironically enough communism is also a nihilistic outburst that accomplishes nothing.

I'm a socialist but I'm not a communist. Internationalism is autistic.
>inb4 be a natsoc
Unfortunately, Hitler sold out to industrialists and lost a war that has cucked Germany for the next 100 years. So I'll never follow him either.

But you do understand that without organized labour and strong defense of labour rights, the rich will simply prey upon the workers, which is basically what has been going on since the 1980s and that a significant part of Trump's appeal was acknowledging this problem?

Unions had their place, now they are nothing but money racketeering schemes for mobs and crooks. They harm production and impose strict doctrine on members. If companies prey upon workers again, we will stand and oppose them as we always have in the past, but no companies are opposing workers in the west at all in the present

no, I hire burly negroes for that

why do you want to starve?

Only in Binland

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finns_Party

I am bourgeois, fuck off.

This guy: Beat me to it

Unions fundamentally should not be mandated to exist by the government as they are now, this is the origin of the problem. It should be a free association between the workers and not another layer of autocracy they have to kowtow to. Unions are partisan organizations (have been for probably 60 years now), and factory workers in the rust belt defied their union leaders by voting for Trump which shows a clear cut disagreement between what the union leaders want and what the members of the union want. If it was truly a worker's union, the agenda of the union would match the agenda of the majority of its members. That said there's a culture of fear and intimidation (maybe not so much nowadays) that's used against workers who don't want to strike with the union. Back in the seventies they turned over the cars and beat up workers who went in on a day that was meant to be a strike because the union gang "said so". Utter cancer

>Implying that you aren't a member of that same class OP

Bourgeoisie means those who live in boroughs you illiterate retard. It's a French Revolutionary term.

Why the fuck did you make the post then faggot?

>no companies are opposing workers in the west at all in the present

This is a blatant lie, the entire outsourcing-mass immigration-globalism complex is nothing more than society undermining, nation-wrecking predatory capitalism that is being pushed by the cucked parties of both the left and the right. The western world is drowning in this mudslide because some people are getting fantastically wealthy of the present circumstanses while they leave the bill of terrorism, immigrant crimes, shuttered factories and broken, debt riddled families with the workers.

What do you british commies think of morality man? He says that a strong, truly conservative worker's party that caters to old labour voters and desinfrashised tories would be the only political change you have. Is that true? Also, I think he accepted that it may be too late for even that.

I agree with you here though, but unions can't stop this process, only sound governance can with an agenda that opposes these symptoms pseudo-capitalism. Remember, the USA has not been under actual capitalism for a long time now, as the large corporations push for economic reforms and trade deals that help them maintain their monopolies at the expense of the potential small businesses might have to rise to the corporate level. You can not give selective subsidies, or dish out government licenses to monopoly (copyright law and patent law) and still claim to be a capitalist free market.

Sup Forums tries to identify with winner and delude themselves into believing they are winners too. Faggots here always refer to their new leaders as "we" and they actually believe Sup Forums is influental. It's pretty much just inflated sense of self importance

symptoms of*

>Is this related to your cuckolding fetish?

globalist jews invented this, and its target audience is dickless communists

If it is inflated why do you laffypole users take so much time away from greasing up Chomsky's cock with your rectal slime to come here and "convert" us?

Communists are not human.

Communists deserve to have their throats torn out and fed to the Communist beside them. Every Communist on this planet is going to die or go into hiding again within the next decade.

What about National Bolshevism? Just don't trust Mensheviks, they'll sell you out to bourgeois.

I don't know about Internationalism, isn't bourgeois Cosmopolitanism that calls for no borders "every one is a human bean!" and denies national culture more autistic?

No such thing as bourgeois faggot, you just were born poor.

Oohhhh well gee if that etymology is what the bourgeoisie is, then I guess we've all been duped, never mind folks let's go home and let the bourgies keep the factories, because apparently we all own factories now.

Unions shouldn't be tied to government, it's hard to disagree with this, the point is that the very mechanism of capitalism leads to the owners of production having to exploit workers. This is what is meant by "capitalist greed", it's not that the people are inherently bad, it is that the system they are in requires them to do bad things, like push workers to the brink as much as they can.

>Guy who gets exploited and is fine with it is calling those resisting hierarchies cucks.

Not an argument.

The time for arguments is over. The leftist have failed to see reason and now they will see blood.

Literally every protester is being mind controlled by those very people you mention.

Mike Pence defeated everyone with one line and that was no one cares about your projection based insult campaign

>He thinks liberals and progressives are leftists.

They are useful idiots controlled by the Communist Globalist (((Consortium))).

Unions in their present form are cancerous, there is no disagreement with me here, but to blame the workers themselves for this is not the correct response either. Many of these problems in britain can be blamed directly on new labour and despite most working class people bitching about thatcher like she was some sort of great satan, she was surviveable and could have even turned out great in the end.

Unions in their current form are as incapable of stopping change as water is from boiling when it reaches 100c at sea level, but the future must always include organized labour in some form or other, because that is the only way for the little guy to ensure their interests are protected. Sound governance can only be achieved when all segments of society are in harmony with each other and united against the dysplastic elements that crop up from the cucked left and the stateless shifty globalist right.

Literally no. You are suffering from the dunning-kruger effect right now.

And Communists will be suffering from bullet in head effect soon. Leftists are mentally ill and death is the most compassionate way to deal with them.

>communist globalists
Deadsince 1991 m8, those faggots you see rioting in the streets for black lives matter and what ever social cause becomes trendy are mostly not from the working classes, but the upper middle classes and even actual millionaires.

The real globalists are the shifty, stateless weeds that pay £40,000 to attend Davos and they are disproportionately ancaps/venture capitalists.

>calling those resisting hierarchies cucks

you are cucks

none of you believe in resisting hierarchies, just the ones currently in place, because they don't directly benefit you

each and every one of you mongrels would either be locked up, killed, or stuck working like dogs for pennies in a glorious communist state while your "equals" rule over you from a palace

and the jew created cuckoldry to appeal to your sense of suicidal altruism, the idea of giving away the most precious things you have and getting off to it sexually like the feral degenerates you are

>blame the workers themselves

I didn't? I said the workers were in disagreement with the unions.

>but the future must always include organized labour in some form or other, because that is the only way for the little guy to ensure their interests are protected

Yes the little guy needs to ensure his interests are protected, but there'd been a long standing way of doing this that had propelled the USA to the position of economic superpower over the course of around 150 years. The right to bear arms and the free association of people, along with a *relatively* homogeneous nation created all the unionization necessary just by its own virtue. Living standards were going up, wages were keeping up with inflation , people were owning their own houses and starting families young, then in the late 60's into the 70's it took a turn for the worse. Detroit unions chased off industry, unions became more powerful and violent, domestic tax law became draconian and convoluted and all of a sudden the USA is now a "service based economy" to quote globalist apologists.

...

>s that true?
Yes

>Also, I think he accepted that it may be too late for even that.
I don't think that there is ever a thing such as too late after november 2016. We'll find a way.

bourgeois is the middle class you dumb shit

>bourgeois
Huh...thats a funny way of writing "Jew"?

That would be the Petite bourgeoisie

>none of you believe in resisting hierarchies, just the ones currently in place, because they don't directly benefit you
No government and no class = not resisting hierarchies? YOU do not benefit from the system either, you're just uninformed enough that you don't realize this.

>each and every one of you mongrels would either be locked up, killed, or stuck working like dogs for pennies in a glorious communist state while your "equals" rule over you from a palace
He thinks there is such a thing as a communist government

>and the jew created cuckoldry to appeal to your sense of suicidal altruism
Socialism is not necessarily altruistic, there is no selfish reason to want to be a capitalist, unless you are able to exploit your worker's. Keep in mind that you're also talking about Jews, the ones who are rich and powerful, correct? And yet you say others are the ones who are cucked. You are arguing to maintain jewish power.

>the idea of giving away the most precious things you have and getting off to it sexually like the feral degenerates you are
What? Capitalism is giving away things, not socialism. You are giving away your hard work to someone else.

>not wanting your property to be stolen at gun point is being a cuck

Guess we cucks now boys

>implying the left isn't ran by and for the bourgeois

You don't fool me, Piggy!