Was the SS height requirement a mistake?

Seems like manlets are better at war, historically. Why would the Nazi's require SS soldiers to be tall? Could this have been the real reason they lost the war?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Väinö_Myllyrinne
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Manlets are a smaller target and they consume less resources.
In a perfect army every foot soldier would be under 1.50m.

War wastage is a real thing, British height requirements during WW1 were continually lowered and eventually abolished. The expeditionary forces early war comprised of taller males but as they fell in battle and the need for manpower necessitated a lowering of standards.

If you send your best and brightest, war is reverse eugenics.

>Seems like manlets are better at war, historically
no shit
manlets - fast, small targets
lanklets - big targets sluggish

This is the one reason I don't feel bad about being 5'9".

When the happening finally happens, I'll be one of the least tempting targets.

also killing the manlets give rise to a taller gene pool

manlets make the best cannon fodder

>Small fag with height issues

Go drink some milk

Chink Detected, pol is an english board

Can you grab that ammo box on the top shelf for me?

/thread

>If you send your best and brightest, war is reverse eugenics.
its not reverse eugenics, its just eugenics with a different goal.

>cram a fuckton of manlets into a an opel blitz
>send them out somewhere the enemy can see
>they all scramble out like little rats running everywhere
>enemy artillery barrages them and sprays their mgs
>meanwhile real men fire in on half tracks
>get out and huck grenades 80m into their trenches/bunkers
>literally tear apart their arty
>save the day

I'm 6'2 and going to say compared to smaller blokes i have more of an advantage. Can run faster, bigger muscles (more room to grow), carry heavier things, navigate obstacles better. I'm not sure how being small is a benefit. We're more intimidating too.

>We're more intimidating too.
Ever heard of manlet rage?

>6'2
>not small

>australia
>intimidating

I'd rather have a 5'5 scrappy American manlet having my back than a 6'2 abo-kangaroo fucker

maybe in abo land where war consists of people throwing rocks at each other

The Romans had height requirements to join the Post-Marian Legion despite being a race of manlets. The minimum was I believe 5'10, which was a lot higher for them back then than it would be for us today. Then again Vegetius could've just been full of shit.

...

>6'2
>Not manlet

Taller than the average, obviously i work with a few guys taller than me though. I'm just saying in the modern infantry, height is beneficial. Not that you'd know faggot, probably wouldn't even have the balls to enlist and die.

Sounds queer

>Sounds queer
You won't be saying that when i fuck you in the arse

>probably wouldn't even have the balls to enlist and die

You won't have any balls after this fucker rips them off you weak cunts.

>tfw prince of manlets
Everything is built for my height. It's perfect.

Fuck as long as i get to put my knife through the little shits neck, he can take my balls and swallow for all i care.

>5'9
>tall

wew midget, stop bitching

This is coming for some 5'6 retard with no friends

I'm not a manlet if Im 5'11, right?

6'11 masterace reporting

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Väinö_Myllyrinne
Tallest man in military history served in the finnish army. Stay mad, manlets.

Height is irrelevant, lol.

Most of these guys are manlets.

>below 6 feet
Hahahahahahahahaahahahahahhahahaaahhhahahaha user

In Nam they shoved short guys down gook holes, i imagine mouse-holing would be easier for manlets as well.

>Manlets
>In Northern Europe

>Eat less food
>Generally less prone to broken bones.
>Longer lifespans


Manlets are the future

>tfw hitler actually wanted to exterminate the tall aryan

never trust manlets

Was he wrong?

>Tall aryans of Europe allowing their countries to be invaded by ficki fickis
>Generally timid and spineless

I don't think so, the Anglos are at least starting to uncuck themselves. Aryans are fucking spineless these days.

>6'2"

user I'm so sorry.

Manlet cutoff is 6'5" even 12 years are 6'2" nowadays

>mfw towering 6' masterrace
>Mfw all the butthurt 5'10 manlets itt

5'8" here and I feel the same tbqh

There's some truth to this but there's obviously a goldilocks zone of strength and size

Being scrappy and small is good when guns are being used. Hide and pop shots like a Viet Cong.

On the flipside, big guys might survive gunshots more and be able to carry heavier equipment and weapons.

I think their requirement was 5'9, and that's pretty average.

5'9 is the best height, only downside is retarded lanklets always asking you to headbutt them.

>can you explore this vietnamese tunnel for me?
Also don't /thread your own post fagtron

At the time that was spot on average

Being tall doesn't really let you carry anything extra.

There are always exceptions, everyone has the big dumb country corn fed motherfucker in their unit who is 6'5" 270, runs a 5 minute mile, does his 12mi ruck in 1 hour. Everyone else who comes in at 5:01 and 60:01 is 5'9-6'0

They're somewhat rare, but they do exist.
They're also fairly deadly when provoked.

Not relevant when you consider the Russians just threw bodies at them.

>manlets
Just hit the gym you lazy pricks jesus

I call them Finnjas

This chart is outdated. Girls are now reaching 7ft

>5'9 is the best height

keep telling yourself that Pablo

>7ft womanlets in USA
LMAOing at your life, girls here are at least 8ft.