If you cheat, take the heat

Why do women fight for being able to cheat on men without any real consequence?

I understand that it's a bit too harsh if a girl i date, cheat on me and she gets executed, but what about marriage?
>both sign a marrige contract that both agree on
>both take a vow that they both agree on

this is a binding contract within the religion you do it in.
>"til death do you part"
i mean, its pretty clear that its a binding contract where breaking it has a consequence.

im not religious, but i do like tradition quite a lot. and in the end its not a religious thing, but a contract. and i think thats fair.
>you dont marry someone without thinking of the consequences just as you dont rob a store or kill someone without thinking of the consequences.

You know the guy picking fights, then running to the teacher when he's in trouble.
>thats women
>cheat on her husband
>protected by the law

and this generation of women are on their phones 24/7, and 90% of their apps are for chatting and showing off.
they are available at any moment to find someone "better".

and i just have to add that the ONLY reason women have ANY power at all, is because their big brother (the government) are protecting them.

Other urls found in this thread:

journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0049294#abstract0
magazine.foxnews.com/love/women-more-likely-cheat-according-new-survery
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Have fun starting blood feuds

Do it to my sister and I don't care if it's a legal contract. I don't care if she fucked 100 niggers in your wedding night.

I'll kill you slowly and painfully. I love my sisters.

Agreed

Socialism is an accidental dysgenics program spawned out of irrational levels of instinctive compassion found in the female and cuckold brain.

Women are not well evolved to have any kind of say in how the material resources of society should be handled, they are better at tackling non-material social issues.

im saying that there should be a physical consequence.
it would be the justice system who would sentence the person cheating to a punishment.
>death
>some years in jail

etc. i dont know what would be best, but what you are saying is that if one of your sisters breaks the law and gets punished, you would kill someone else for it.
who would you kill? the guy owning the store she robbed? the officer arresting her? the judge?

would love to see you reaction if she took a huge loan (wit a signed contract ofc) and didnt pay it back.
you would have to kill some people over it.

or was it blood feud you called it?

Not all women cheat and lots of men cheat. Some people just aren't useful, only some people understand true love and purity.

Maybe something needs to be done about the stupid people, maybe not, who knows. But focus on the good people, first.

yes. lots of men cheats, and the rules would ofc go both ways.

but it hs to be said that its way way easier for girls to cheat than men.
and to quote spiderman (or uncle ben or something)
>with great power comes great responsibility

>Not all women cheat and lots of men cheat.
Yeah.
They say men cheat more than women. Not sure if that's true anymore though.
>Some people just aren't useful, only some people understand true love and purity.
I think they're getting fewer desu.

men and women both want to live without consequence, but women actually tried to make their delusion legal. Then they found out living without consequence makes them inconsequential. They're a living dilemma of wanting to live with consequences but without consequence at the same time and their answer was to create an invisible monster called patriarchy which is actually civilized society, so they are literally trying to tear down civilization.

well said.

>binding contract
>religion

Wew lad

whoa desu

It seems too exploitable. How about we bring back public execution instead? In court, if the offending party is guilty, they will be executed by the court of law.

> I don't care if she fucked 100 niggers in your wedding night.
> I love my sisters.

No you don't, and no one wants to be consanguineous with a hypothetical whore of a sister, or a family the disavows modesty and hegemony.

If you hold on to that sentiment, you will see that your generations will be bastards, slaves, and lacking of the second most crucial aspect of happiness, which is family.

dont forget
>m not religious, but i do like tradition quite a lot. and in the end its not a religious thing, but a contract. and i think thats fair.

you must have learned to write from CNN senpai

It's the way women go about cheating that pisses people off, and the bullshit justifications and lies they create out of thin air. Of course there are piece of shit scumbag men, but women take your belongings, your soul, and your fucking life first THEN get dick on the side.

"I understand that it's a bit too harsh if a girl i date, cheat on me and she gets executed"

Why is it too harsh?

its like a big loop-hole. honestly i dont FEEL its too harsh, but it wouldnt work within our justice system, and would just turn into sandnigger laws.

It isn't. A generation of heartbroken, incredibly pissed off gen z boys are growing up learning to hate. Libs should be very scared.

>implying men don't cheat

Cheaters should be branded. It'll save people a lot of time. If you choose to date someone who is branded that is your business but don't say you were not warned.

someone didnt read any posts

>Not all women cheat and lots of men cheat.

>yes. lots of men cheats, and the rules would ofc go both ways.

but it hs to be said that its way way easier for girls to cheat than men.
and to quote spiderman (or uncle ben or something)
>with great power comes great responsibility

it's way easier for girls to cheat if you're a beta male. it works on both ends of the spectrum. If you're a smart and attractive male, you have every bit the odds and chances women have. stop making excuses

best post in thread

actually a really good idea

There's always the all-to-common parlance, "Not all women." but it is significant to see the disproportionate amount of fornicators and annulment types that favor their own interests before their children or community.

Women are pandered too for the sake of only boning, and men are naturally cucked to being partial in a women's favor. Most homicide stems from aggravated or passionate pretenses, which in turn brings out the innate capacity to commit violence.

It's not appropriate for a civil society to kill adulterers, but that cheating is a conduit to violence. If anything, adulterers and promiscuous people need to be flogged and shamed, for they transgress against the principles of a human heart.

They did that in the middle ages, it was a necklace not a brand though. Adulterers were given a scarlet letter to wear forever.
>the old ways are usually the best IMO

Bad feeling scoob

Woah. I actually really support this one.

>lot of words to say essentially nothing
>"the system is fine goy! focus on the parts that work!"

>no true scotsman

do any of you newniggers even bother to read the sticky?!
oh and, rhetorical question you dumb fucks

Imagine growing up with a coalburner mom who rides the cock carousel and gives three times the attention to her phone as she does to her kid. I see this everywhere, and it's even making me feel more aggressive and angry via empathy. Just imagine being them. Anyways, you're completely on point about infidelity being a conduit to violence.

>lots of words

Two sentences isn't a lot of words, it might be if you're used to reading little at a time.

nice smartass retort, nigger. that superiority attitude you're projecting adds absolutely nothing to your argument though

While women are surely have an easier time cheating cause it's easier for them to find partners men are just as bad. Friend tried taking a girl to his room during his bachelor's party and only 2/8 of us tried to stop him. Marriage is a problem on our horizon and idk how it can be dealt with

>I don't care if [my sister] fucked 100 niggers in your wedding night.
Get out.

I'll avenge him if you dare touch a single hair for enacting just revenge.
I won't borther to torture you, though you'd deserve it, but i would go after the rest of your family in case they go after me.

Just a warning, degenerate.

And this, kids, is why we will always have violence in the world.

And war.

Praise Allah.

Please remind me. Why are you guys opposing Sharia laws?

Idiot cuck.

How can you prove to the legal system that your partner cheated on you, tho?

It handles family finance in a way that promotes inbreeding, resulting in pic related.
Since rich people have high IQ, it level the high-end immensely since mostly people with wealth have an interest in exploiting the laws to the fullest to keep said wealth.

Islam is a surefire way to ruin your genepool in under 8 generations, though as long as wealth and sharia exist, it will continue to be a race to the bottom until any semblance of civilisation becomes unsustainable.

Sharia is fucking based.

Lol , I'm sure you do hick

You just described feudal tribalism.

Fuck you and your white sisters.

Never interact with me again, sandnigger.

Found the dune-coon
>I thought they stopped letting in you sub-humans

you have to make her believe that the second she cheats on you, you can get a new girlfriend. If your a fucking autistic cunt who barely talks to other women beside her chances are good she will cheat on you

Checked. Next time use an argument. Also why the kneejerk? Let me guess, Islam is a jewish invention, secretly controlled by jews, for the explicit purpose if destroying the West with immigrated low IQ sandniggers.

What are you 12?

Marriage is really foolish. It used to give security that the partner won't cheat on you, or if he does, it will have severe consequences. today? only severe consequences for the man. reminds me of the monkey-ladder experiment in pic related.

People marrying is similar to the monkeys in this experiment - they do it because it was a good idea in the past, but the underlying reason for it has evaporated yet men still foolishly believe its a good idea "because of it". similarly to the monkeys thinking they shouldn't climb the latter.

Thanks retard. Very insightful. I think your shitty teeth are digging into your brain. Get that checked bonglord. I know, I care about you.

>I don't care if she fucked 100 niggers in your wedding night.
>I love my sisters.

kys subhuman filth

You're on to something there user

>scarlet letter to wear forever.

Pretty difficult to enforce in modern circumstances.

Sounds like a good idea desu.

:D
>If sharia is so based why aren't you living in Saudi, goat fucker? Not enough gibs?

Why havent you moved to Greece if you love democracy so much.

Uh if my sisters did that I'd disown them

Nice false equivalency camel jockey, I live in the country my family have lived in for the past 400+ years because my people aren't perpetual fuck ups and savages.
>You had to leave your homeland because white people did everything better than them

There should be consequences if anyone cheats. If they have been together long enough. The emotional and psychological trauma they can inflict on the other person can ruin their life.

>no one show ever move
Whose the fucking degenerate

You could have moved to any muslim country in the world, yet you chose to move to a christian former british colony where you are a minority and the people resent you being there.
>Maybe because muslim countries are all shitholes? Maybe their all shitholes because they're full of muslims? Maybe sharia law isn't so based eh faggot kek

What about men who cheat?

Nigger, are you seriously pushing Shariah Law right now? You're seriously advocating decapitating people on the streets right now? How fucking retarded are you?

For as much as the left is being bashed about supporting Islam lately, religions, even Christianity, have been keeping women down for a long time. You pretty much at it coming.

These loony leftists are an equal, opposite reaction to your fucked up values/morality.

Dude, people will cheat. Get over it. Stop trying to control everyone else's life. Yes, being cheated on sucks, but there are plenty of awesome men and women out there that you can be happy with. You build this fucking boogeyman in your head and suddenly you think that we need to start beheading people because of a perceived out of control issue? You're fucking out of control.

Then you'll just end up dying too, That's how things worked in those times

Kill the cheating men as well, If they are stupid enough to get married they deserve it

Its having to sift through all the shitty people to find the good ones that is the problem.

People will lie for the sake of keeping their image clean.One of my ex's for example, I told her that Im monogamous and that I only date monogamous people when we first dated. She said told me she was, She cheated, I left her. I also found out through her friend that she is a serial cheater, that she "cant help herself"

Maybe consequences, but not death. "Til death do us part" is not actually agreeing to being executed for cheating, it's just an old phrase that people repeat without thinking about it. I think there should be some consequences for cheating, like not getting any of your soon to be ex-spouse's money/property. Then again, divorce needs to be reformed in the US. Alimony and child support are abused so that the poorer partner (generally the woman, but if it's the man, then the law doesn't work in his favor quite as well) can continue living her lifestyle without the husband and the husband is forced to pay for this. That is absolutely not how it should work. You should be able to leave a marriage without giving someone half your shit.

So many woman virtual signalling here.Kek.

None of these things are arguments, baiting reddit-spacing CREW leaf.

>What about men who cheat?
Men are not women.
>are you seriously? are you retarded?
This is not an argument.
>keeping women down for a long time
Sure. Not an argument as to why this should change.
>These loony leftists are an equal, opposite reaction to your fucked up values/morality.
You're just trying to appeal to moderation: just because something is at an extreme doesn't mean it's incorrect.

>Men are not women.
Everyone gets horny, that is a universal biological fact. You cannot morally hold another person to higher standards than you. Unless, of course, you claim that they are subservient to you, in which case, the rules 2 consenting adults set with each other is none of my business.

But you holding women to a higher standard than you while claiming they are inferior to you, is that not a conflict of beliefs. But hey, whatever floats your boat in your religion.

>Not an argument as to why this should change.
Provide an argument as to why this is the default position, as opposed to equality***. Why should women have different standards to men*****?

***** in the eyes of the law, in terms of human rights.

Once you explain that to me, maybe I can debate your position.

Listen man, you want Christian women to be subservient, I support that. You do you, I'm all for freedom of religion and freedom of beliefs.

But we're talking about being legally able to kill ALL women for that? Fuck off, this is exactly like Shariah law, and that's not an appeal to moderation, it literally is Shariah law and fuck that. Separate church from state.

>just because something is at an extreme doesn't mean it's incorrect.
Good point.

>You do you, I'm all for freedom of religion and freedom of beliefs.
then why aren't you tolerating shariah law?
are you islamophobic? :v)))

>just as bad
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0049294#abstract0

magazine.foxnews.com/love/women-more-likely-cheat-according-new-survery

>a whopping 25% of females say they'd cheat
I'm estimating another 10% at least who wont admit it


Good luck brothers

ISIS YES!
>how progressive

Because it would be a law, not a belief.

Separate state from church. I do not believe in Allah, so I should

1) not be subjected to his laws and
2) not be a victim of his followers.

I fully support Shariah Law as long as unwilling participants can leave it at will. I will admonish it and be disgusted by it, but if it's not imposed on me, then that's fine. Live and let live.

I prefer American law. 50 states with 50 different laws is genius. People can go to a state where guns are banned, isn't that beautiful? Let the snowflakes congregate and they will lose the elections every time, but still get to live by their own beliefs. Washington was truly a genius.

>They say men cheat more than women.

This is a throwback from decades ago, and it was true then. After the sexual revolution and feminism things have changed.

/thread

best way to put it imo

if I'm with a lady and I find myself in a position to fuck a more attractive lady, for sure I'll jump on that boat.

Even if you feel like you will never, ever cheat on your GF out of principle; don't ever tell her that.

Someone else Curt Doolittle? Nice.

fuck your sister whores

Correct, that's why Trump won. It was a complete rejection of that shit.

>You cannot morally hold another person to higher standards than you.
I do not masturbate, and I did not engage in premarital sexual activity or dating. I expect all men and women to do the same. My statement that "men are not women" was not meant to somehow justify men cheating (to which I am very much opposed): rather, my intent was to make clear that those things are entirely unrelated. Saying "men cheat too!" in response to the statement "women cheat" is like saying "apples are tasty" in response to "oranges are tasty": it's just not meaningful. However, it happens to be the case that my arbitrary and unrelated standards for male and female sexual behavior happen to correlate.

>Once you explain that to me, maybe I can debate your position.
This is not practical within the constraints of a Sup Forums post, as it effectively requires justification of my moral framework from the axioms. I can continue in another post if necessary but I will look like an autist.

Marriage is still a good idea so long as violating marriage vows in enforced socially. I was adopted and raised by old folks. When giving moral lecture ,my "mom" would talk about how she would never imagine cheating or slutting it up when she was young. She owes it to her faith and purity but also mentions, no one would ever want anything to do with the women that did.

Their family, church, community, and even personal friends would ostracize them and essentially women who broke the "rules" had to move away.

People need to just quit fucking whining.

>WAAAAAHHH MUH HEART DUN GOT BROKEDED

Get the fuck over it. I'm for changing family court practices so they don't fuck over men but if you marry a dumb whore and then she fucks you over you're probably a little bitch. Everyone acts like they never could have seen it coming but most of the time there are plenty of clear signs long before you get married. Actual sociopaths who can convincingly pretend to be something they're not are few and far between. Women might be a problem but men being little bitches surely is too. Get the fuck out of your feelings and use your brain.

Then you are a clannish retard. If your sister signs a contract that will end with her death on breaking, then you should just back off, like a civilized man, but instead you will nigger it up.

checked
I agree with the advice, though I disagree with your position. Hopefully you find someone who will not cheat and become faithful. Only sadness lies down the other road, friend.

I'm pretty sure on average they cheat close to the same with maybe a 1 or 2% higher rate for men, but it's a handful of high status men sleeping with cheating women.

My sister is a bipolar leftie communist cunt and I hope someone kills her in an "honour killing"

It will be the only honourable thing she was ever involved in

Okay, plenty of people masturbate. You're in the minority. You should totally be able to find like-minded people and live by rules that all your like-minded friends agree on. More power to you, I respect that.

But as per your image, if you want to form your idea, you can expect it's members to follow it and judge them on that, and even outsiders, too.

But it will never be applied to all. Because people have a right to say no to you.

Just like I can't force you to masturbate, you can't force me not to. So you can think I'm immoral by your standards, calling me that with contempt serves nothing to expand your idea and accomplishes the same thing as the left is currently doing: self-destruction. But that's fine.

Again, it's all fine as long as you don't impose it on others. You can't seriously expect people to be on board with public executions for adultery for members of your beliefs, let alone all members of your society, and not be (rightfully so) called retarded. It's an absurd idea.

They are unhappy about being unable to marry in their 14-16 and feminists promise they will get their happiness back, if they would be able to cheat.

Same way they promised, that if government would ban young woman from marrying in her 14-16, she will get educated and this would double the GDP.

Get over it. Is that your only argument? Why are african christian nations such shitholes? By the way I am white you piece of shit.

In all seriousness, men and women are different. It's not as bad for a man to get some on the side imo. Most great men in history have.

A man also cheats. But in animal kingdom its hard to find another example of cheating spicies

Is it Vegetable Steven on picture in mask?

>in animal kingdom its hard to find another example of cheating spicies
Hwat? Almost no animal species are monogamous in the first place.

>get over it
Nice retort haha
>Africas christian too, why are those countries so shit
Because they're full of niggers.
>I'm white
Of course you are kekekek

what kind of savage beheads an adulterer?

you are supposed to stone them to death.

>Because they're full of niggers.
You would know nigger.

Also now you answered your own question regarding shitholes.

I thought exactly like that for most of my life (not saying this to diminish your argument, just attempting to apply context), but I had a personal ephiphany relating to the nature of bias and belief. Armchair philosophers like to talk all the time about morality, making "unbiased" judgements (e.g., everyone is entitled to their own moral foundation) from some omniscient detached perspective. My claim is that this "unbiased" position is not feasibly attainable: if a person truly believes something, that kernel of belief cannot be excised from the person so as to allow arbitrage. True belief is core to humanity, to personhood. Your statement that "we should all be able to believe what we like" reflects your own bias, and just like me you attempt to impose it on others, because it is a true belief, it is part of what makes you "you". I just don't make any qualms about imposing my beliefs upon others: in fact, this is the exact point of ethics: to define correct behavior.

You sure told me kek
Holy shit mate this is almost sad

Fuck i''d honor kill my sis if she fucked that many niggers,
the fuck is wrong with you faggt?

Hello my Persian friend

What is the general conscious with Donald Trump in Iran right now?