Climate Change BTFO Forever

>dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html

how will climate change libtards ever recover?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Gh-DNNIUjKU
onenation.com.au/policies/agenda21
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>Left, blowing up the graph show is disappears in 1961 artfully hidden behind the other colours. Right, the reason? Because this is what it shows after 1961, a dramatic decline in global temperatures

Scam artists.

Not at all surprising.

>Mr Karl (papers author) had a longstanding relationship with President Obama’s chief science adviser, John Holdren, giving him a hotline to the White House.

B-T-F-O
T
F
O

Seriously though, this is absolutely fucking enormous news.

It was always bs. They predicted we would be dead now in 1979.

The religious left won't jump ship no matter who comes forward.

Trump must be a time traveler. He must be.

I think you should go to your nearest walmart.Go to their men's restroom (assuming your gender). Look promptly at the Urinal. See that round mint floating there in what looks like residue piss? Go ahead and grab that and place it directly under your tongue. Its the latest progressive trend and everyone is doing it! The real high doesn't kick in until you go look in the mirror. Go ahead take a nice long look. After you have fulfilled your homosexual desires fucking bash your god damn head into the sink repeatedly until the mint under your tongue begins to taste like a black-cock foreskin.

Bump

it's pointless to argue about it. just do nothing. so far all their predictions are failing horribly.

Of course not, but who the fuck cares, this is the biggest L of the year for them no question. This story has it all, it's like a fucking right-wing fantasy. OP is not kidding, climate change BTFO forever.

Go post on /sci/ see how those idiot react

It really is - this story has it all and it basically a huge blow to the climate change argument. People have to realize that the biggest factor undermining their story was the "pause," ie the fact that data for the past 15 years or so suggested they were totally wrong. So they cooked up a new paper saying "nope, turns out PAUSE was fake!" Then this story comes out showing just absolute corruption in the process, connections to Obama, cover ups and denials by NOAA, and most importantly, a total refutation of the "new" data, meaning the PAUSE is real (duh we already knew that).

As far as I'm concerned this is the final nail in the climate change argument until the real temperature data comes in for the next 10 years. There is NO justification for any action to prevent what is apparently something that does not exist in the first place. For a rational person this is GREAT FUCKING NEWS because we're not all gonna die or whatever but the left won't ever get to enjoy that relief and ensuing calm and optimism about the future because they're too emotionally retarded to change anything that goes on in their head.

Oy vey!

Busted again

WOops!

All this shit is played up so they can make large agreements like the Paris accords which actually in effect does what TPP does, its just an excuse to further the movement to a world government, and new nested forms of taxation.

kek

The argument needs to shift from "climate change" BS to just clean air/water. They are just using climate change as a boogie man since most people readily know their air/water is clean, except when their are fuck ups like flint where the govt stupidly changed their water source and didnt monitor it properly.

>As far as I'm concerned this is the final nail in the climate change argument until the real temperature data comes in for the next 10 years.


Thats why they hate satellite data with passion and usually try to bury the raw data as quickly as possible. You have real data from the satellites and its shows hardly any warming for the past 40 years.

But when its processed, homogenized, etc. it suddenly fits their models.

Oy vey just lucky! We still need carbon tax goyim

As Alex Jones explained on the JRE podcast the other night, the goal is to tax the lifecycle elements - carbon is the trojan horse. Once they can do that it's possible to create justifications for taxing (controlling use and access) to air, water, whatever. Diabolical, but BTFO eternally so it'll be something we end up laughing about over beers in twenty years.

If you keep massaging the data enough you can make anything happen

winters have been pretty mild 3 out of the last 4 years around where I live.

If the climate is changing, I'm not complaining.

Well yeah, just about anything can be justified if they establish a existential threat like climate change.

of course climate fanatics have an agenda

I emailed this to Limbaugh.
Snerdly better read that shit.

haha where is that from? Guardian? Independent?

But what do (((they))) have to gain from lying about Climate Change?

I've known this for several years really but this article should be read so you can see. Any person reading this article that fails to immediately say "fuck it' in regards to climate change hysteria is a hopeless lost cause (20% of population or so).

Independent IIRC

man this is so bad
0/10

Already been shown in great detail how we arrived at all the current lies about surface temperatures.
youtube.com/watch?v=Gh-DNNIUjKU

>One report featured flawed information
Wew climate change is completely discredited, r-right guys?

Fucking hell polacks are retarded.

Confirmed.

Hi shareblue

>daily mail
Come the fuck on.

No matter how many scandals or evidence to the contrary, the religious will always defend even the most ludicrous conclusion.

Amen brother

If they just understood that mother nature will destroy anything man made; it wouldn't make since that man could completely change mother nature in the long run.

We do, however, need to focus on alternative meta-energies that can not be bought or sold. It would change the entire human race forever.

You got us, Kiwi. I mean, just the most significant report that tried to answer the big flaw that was undermining the entire climate change narrative and was instrumental in getting Paris Treaty signed. Nevermind the exposed fraud, close connection to Obama or total refutation of the conclusions.

So the amerikikes were right?

I'm sure (((you))) would prefer salon or slate, eh rabbi?

>>>
/sci/ thread made.

I....I guess so.

onenation.com.au/policies/agenda21
Global tyranny

Most real scientists laugh at the whole field of climatology. The rest haven't looked to deep at it. It's a field for people that can't cut it in the established sciences. It's actually the study of what needs to be said to get governments to hand you money.

NOAA "revised" recorded measurements in one key study by skewing temperature readings by 1.5 degrees. The result of the study was thet the earths temperature had risen by 1.5 degrees.
Now that Climate change is not an officially protected sacred cow, an outside review should be able to sort out the truth.

big old bump for this shit right here my white brothers

This picture of Bill Gates at the (((world climate change conference))). RRRREEEEEEEE! Who elected this cunt to have any say on anything. RRREEEEEE.

>Possibly The Finest Newspaper In The World
>come the fuck on
no u

Bump to make sure people laughing at pizzagate goyette's lobster porn and Kek's announcement re: Trudeau don't miss this total fucking BTFO.