Would you be willing to pay $1 a month to post unlimited on this site. It will always be free to browse.
This would allow Sup Forums to be ad free becuase it would generate tons of revenue. It would also eliminate 90% of shill content becuase every time we ban a new VPN ID must register for $1 to post. We have discussed how this would bankrupt David Brock and other shill organizations very quickly and give you guys at /pol etc.. A shill free site to do all your crazy awesome user threads. David Brock would hand us his $40,000,000 fortune in new ip accounts.
What do you think /pol? Is this something you could agree to?
I'm OK with that. Maybe pay-per-post with bitcoin is also viable, like a few satoshis for every post.
Lincoln Hall
absolutely no restrictions to posting is what makes the unique brand of shite on this board possible
also stop larping you faggot
Lincoln Peterson
i would suggest upping the price to keep out the poor minorities
Benjamin Hall
Nice try George Soros
Elijah Thompson
you're a fucking goober
James Cruz
Gookmoot and Joot have a very lucrative deal with the FBI and Google already, don't pretend your paltry offer is going to be accepted.
Jonathan Price
I would be willing to block the Canadians from posting unless they pay for it, like the Chinese right now.
Kevin Martin
I think you're a jew and your place is in the oven
Michael Ramirez
Difficult to stay anonymous and charge, unless you accepted bitcoin, in which case yes, I think that's a good idea
Jason Campbell
yes, provided it is ANONYMOUS!
$1 a month is a link between my real ID and my posting ID. NOPE NOPE NOPE!!
So here's what you do: sell VPN services that INCREASE privacy.
Michael Cooper
No you'll kill the site by cutting off its voices. In a massively ironic way, diversity is its strength
Pay to post is a form of censorship
Jonathan Nelson
say more. this site is ANONYMOUS because only anonymous speech is free speech.
Elijah Wood
A Holocaust joke? Really? Well I suppose such juvenile behaviour is expected from fans of dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises, each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though "No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
Jason Cooper
>Anonymous board >Have to identify yourself to post
Yeah, great idea.
Adam Taylor
Sup Forums would lose 70 of it's current users. Considering at least half of all users live in their mom's basement who can't afford 1 dollar and the rest would just stop browsing and move to a different chan
Xavier Bailey
>investing in Sup Forums >not knowing that joot is a gigantic moneygrubber >being this new
Blake Nelson
I agree, but the problem is it would stop third world countries from posting. Oh wait that's awesome.
But monthly idk...12 a year to post >be American >get shot Jokes, eh not worth it
Charles Taylor
> holy fucking shit there is no escape
Wyatt Sanders
Doesn't work that way. Hiro will just tell you no silly baka gaijin.
Jordan Russell
Don't ever forget mootykins had to go to court over the Sarah Palin email leaks. Don't ever forget Sup Forums harbor. Don't ever forget the fappening. Don't ever forget you are the FBI and the Jews now. Don't ever forget you're here forever.
Robert Morris
LEMME make it clear we would only charge through Bitcoin. Your anonymity would be the same as if you didn't pay.
Honestly /pol would you really mind spending .0001 Bitcoin per month to post on Sup Forums? And bankrupt David Brock and his shill boi faggots in the process? And clean up your board from all the degenerate back cock threads Brock likes to fuvking post. Don't you want more happening and bigger hate threads?
Don't quote me if this actually happens. :) you will know who I am.
Samuel Watson
>you will know who I am Are you David Brock, by any chance?
Ryan Thompson
There is nothing anonymous about your IP address.
You're only anonymous to other users. I teased moot once in a thread and he went fucking ballistic and started shit talking Australia. This was before the flags.
Robert Young
Would be happy to pay if it meant less brain dead threads
Kevin Peterson
>you will know who I am.
Release the music on FLAC Martin you faggot.
Jace Powell
nice try brock
Asher Gutierrez
That's a British WW1 era uniform. Why are Americans so stupid?
Cameron Powell
oh sure we will pay to post go buy this site hurry
Michael Cook
That's a British WWI uniform you fucking cuck, read a history book.
Kayden Wright
Why won't Jap moot just take the wesearchr guy's money? He made an offer and Jap-moot just disappeared. wesearchr (and gotnews) guy wanted to use it to crowdsource newsworthy digging. Source: I think a December 2016 'Descending the Tower' episode.
Joseph Brown
"We hae discussed how this would bankrupt David Brock and other shill organizations" ...
Either there is no we or you're a larper.
Who will filter out content? How do you know who's being ironic and who's not? Are you straight away going to ban any dissenting opinion (I wouldn't mind pro-hilltards being banned but what if they do have some genuine points once in a while)?
If you'll ban only a VPN, then Brock would just stop using them. You realize for an army of 1000 people, and one ban every week, it's still $4K which is nothing for him.
Levi Barnes
No
Carter Wright
>citizen bane nice.
John Torres
OP this guy's ID says "gold doctor jews", what more sign do you need to buy a chan board
Kevin Lee
Paying to post would kill Sup Forums and cause a mass exodus to the chan that is full
Gabriel Lewis
>implying there's no such thing as proxy pools you don't know shit OP
Dominic Fisher
How about this- create a public private key pair and post your public key here and sign your messages next time, okay?
Cooper Baker
Get your ass back to Something Awful or neogaf, you neophyte to the internet. Paid forums are cancer cells.
Nathan Kelly
>Is this something you could agree to? No
Samuel Peterson
You larper you haven't answered my question from earlier- how are you planning to "bankrupt" david brock?
Are you fucking retarded? Obviously not Martin Shkreli
Brody Moore
Exactly. People are wrong to think they are anonymous unless behind a good-quality VPN which I doubt more than 5% here are.
And those 5% will probably find a way to be anonymous even with an id.
Lincoln Mitchell
>paying to anonymously express your opinion only to be deleted in a half hour
Horrible idea
Xavier Harris
Sup Forums can you honestly answer please? I'm hoping someone better than this larper is monitoring this post and taking steps to keep the board free and at the same time remove Brock's army
already do pass, so anthing in 20 buck range per year is pretty reasonable. You might remove some retards but not shills, those fuckers will still hop your paywall like mexicans. Get some non-faggot mods
Connor Gutierrez
Posting is free for everyone, but Canadians and Australians have to pay $5 per post and $100 for creating a thread.
Julian Richardson
ads..?
John Rodriguez
>a=b >a+b = b => a=0 >b=a=0 >2b=b >2*0=0 >0=0
good bait tho
Jace Scott
you are wrong on many levels. your second line ruins the fallacy of the pic
Zachary Harris
if a+b=b then a must be 0 and since a=b b must also be 0
I don'[t udnerstand your question
Andrew Jackson
wait... I take that back. You used an axiom. I bow masta
Jace Garcia
lol that tier list is so bad. for whom the bell tolls and invisible man are shit books. lotr is a masterpiece compared to that trash
Brody Reyes
No, he used clever whichcraft. it is the additive identity axiom. b + 0 = b, therefore a + b = b => a = 0
Justin Peterson
ALso there's another mistake >a=b >(a+b)(a-b)=b(a-b) >a=b => a-b=0
and you can't divide by 0 anyway
Angel Diaz
I'd be fine with it, as long as there's an anonymous way to pay that isn't bitcoin.
Gabriel Morris
Ok buy Sup Forums, implement your shit idea and watch everyone move on to a different chan
Gavin Perry
Yes as long as we got rid of the shill mods who ban people who dig too deeply into (((their))) goings on
Nathan Bailey
no sane user would.
good reason we tolerate this site because its still free.
if this happens then back to IRC
Dominic Gray
I'd literally do it if I could just put twelve dollar bills in an envelope, enclosed w/a piece of paper with my user email addy on it. You get the bux, email me a link, and that's the only connection. I get a year.
Or something like that.
Dylan Baker
That was what I was getting at, but you out-smerted me
Christian Sullivan
Okay, Elon, if you include a quick tutorial on bitcoin I'd be okay with it.
Blake Thomas
I can see where this is going.
Logan Ortiz
>dividing zero by zero Everyone over 14 should be able to disprove this
Kevin Perry
You just want us all to buy bitcoin.
Parker Brown
The second people have to pay to post is the second this site dies forever
Julian Cooper
Gas the Commies!
Ian Kelly
I'm not paying you so I can post.
Brayden Rivera
Itake back everything I said previously your commie maths wiol not work on me