How can 1 shitty judge 1 appointed person cancel travel ban?

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4191110/Donald-Trump-slams-decision-halt-immigration-order.html

never knew this guys name
he counteracts most popular president in 20 years
how? why is this allowed?
fuck lawyers n judges
insane

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=R2uZyTm_w0M
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taqiya
aljazeera.com/news/2017/02/court-rejects-trump-appeal-reinstate-travel-ban-170205091004259.html
ushistory.org/us/19e.asp
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_and_Sedition_Acts
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

...

I think you put the wrong link in - it's a Trump story, and Trump is the LEAST popular President in the past 20 years. What's the actual story you were talking about?

More generally, read the Constitution. Presidents - popular or not - do not have unlimited power. I'm pretty sure courts at various times have ruled against Reagan, Clinton, and Obama, for instance.

Tumblr makes you look like you'll be a total hottie once you actually reach the age of consent? Why are you shilling for a Yahoo property?

Trumps revenge comes monday, that judge better enjoy allthe lefty praise before Trump brings the hammer down

what?

what happens Monday? can I get a swift sprint across?

Seperation of Powers user

The executive does not have the power to change the constituion without the will of the legislature, and it is the judiciary who decied what is and isn't constituionally transformative.

This is why nothing will ever change under western democracy.

Are you sick of this shit? Do you want to end the left? Here's how:
There is a redpill NUKE sitting on YouTube right now.

Brendan Maclean - House of Air

Embed this in every children's forum and watch the left crumble.

>be tolerant
>gay rights
>art is important

DUDE SHITTING CUM ON ANOTHER MAN'S FACE IS AVAILABLE FOR CHILDREN TO WATCH PEOPLE.

Umm only the congress can fire the judge with 2/3
Good luck

Checks and balances bitch, be glad there's still that in place

Shit, I just realized that the reason your posting is so incoherent is because that's a recent selfie and you're really underageb&.

I recommend you leave this place and never return - it is not a good place, and the boys you will meet in middle school are not only better for you, but actually more mature than we are.

youtube.com/watch?v=R2uZyTm_w0M

he just claimed its unconstitutional (its not) he will get overturned and hopefully trump can send him on an early vacation for not upholding the constitution, as its supposedly his job. instead of making policy as the judge is attempting.

Honestly seems like a stall tactic to me

this is why the first thing new Polish government did is make a huge mess in constitution judicary system so judges chosen by previous leftist gov wouldn't be able to stall everything

Surely you have to prove that it's a constitutional issue though.

I've seen people discuss religious freedom, but since its a ban on countries, not religion, I fail to see how its a religious matter. There are plenty of majority muslim countries with even greater muslim populations that weren't mentioned in the ban.

How does it violate constitutional law?

>land of the free

Its 18+ though.

I'm still completely opposed to it and have no fucking clue how it's allowed on there but its not more, in fact less, difficult for children to stumble across than regular porn. Still, fucking get rid of it and kill all faggots though

We've just seen this exact scenario play out within the UK in regards to Brexit (although it was constitionally trasnformative in regards to UK law), and if the PM can trigger us leaving the EU without Parliaments vote.

It will likely go all the way to the Supreme Court and it will be up to them to decie if Trump can use executive power to enforce the ban, but until then, they can delay it.

>How does it violate constitutional law?

I honestly don't know. Pretty sure the constitution only applies to residents of the US. Not people seeking entry.

>most popular president
>lost popular vote
???

He cant, this will get overturned in a few days since it's a load of horseshit

Donald should teach these judge cucks a lesson. Sure you can cancel a travel ban but can you cancel a nuke launch? Check and mate muslim countries.

From what i understand several judges need to vote on this and the fact the obongos AG said it was legal then says she is not sure its legal but she let it go for obongo...

No, they can't

why do liberals care about immigrants so much? maybe these immigrants should overthrow their own corrupt leaders in their own countries instead of coming over here?

if you live in a shithole you shouldn't even be having kids. why the fuck are these retarded refugees popping out kids while living in a war zone?

if you have a kid while you're a war torn country and that kid dies, you're responsible for its death in my opinion. you brought it into existence in a war torn shithole.

i hate religious muslim cunts. They breed like rabbits while living in shit

>in a few days

It will be dragged out through your entire court hierarchy

MALANIA AND IVANKA ARE FUCKING HOT. HOW DO I BECOME RICH AND GET HOT BABES? I WISH I WAS AS COOL AS TRUMP

you shouldnt smoke

No it won't, this cuck makes decisions while crying and has no actual authority. He's losing his job Monday, cap this

>obongos AG said it was legal then says she is not sure its legal but she let it go for obongo...

That's also annoying. Activist judges are a real thing I guess.

I believe you are correct.

there is also plenty of precedent

Dangerhair is hot

because the corrupt liberals want to take full control and it's easier to control retards from another country than it is to control americans who have lots of guns

True. I just don't know shit about law.

Yup. Immigrants almost always vote for more government power. Especially if they're not white.

I don't think you understand how appellate courts or speration of powers work user.

The Government has very limited power in the scope of law making.

In the UK executive power is limited to mostly states of emergency, foriegn affairs and war.

I beleive that Trumps order is within his executive power, but it would be very easy to argue that it isn't due the the vauge nature of executive powers, vauge enough that the Supreme Court will likely have its say.

>most popular president

So, is this what they mean by alternative facts? Because it looks like you're just stating the opposite of facts (aka falsehoods).

Read The Art of the Deal.

Let the refugees in on one condition. They have to be forcefully sterilized and they have to blaspheme their own god(to prove they aren't religious crazies)

when you import retards with the IQ of a 12 year old it's no surprise when they want big brother to do everything

It's well within his power. I know that much. It's in us code 1182. Which basically says the president can deny entry to basically anyone for any reason and any amount of time if he thinks they represent a threat to the US.

syrians refugees who shit on the quran get let in

are you on drugs?

It's so sad, user. The DNC is literally importing its voter base because Americans rejected communism in the 60s.

Pretty sure these activist judges get to do whatever the fuck they want until higher courts slap them in their commie mouths.

I don't even know how these fucking assholes can be judges honestly when they've got nothing but contempt for the law.

legal system are not overlords
I think USA citizens take way too muc shit from judges and lawyers and dont take limited governmetn seriously enough
activist judges should be disbenched

>The Art of the Deal
thanks user. i must know my leader better.

tru

>most popular president
>lost California

So basically Trump is the most popular president in everywhere else but among illegals in California.

>read the Constitution
Why don't you?
It's very clear that what he's doing is constitutional.
There is no reason for it to even be an issue.
There is nothing to determine in court.
Everyone already knows that.

this is him

There is no real power behind any of the threats to stop Trump. Obongo and the dems gave an awful lot of power to the presidency.

Only thing that can really stop him is division amongst republicans. Which will happen from cuckservatives.

>They have to be forcefully sterilized
OK.

>and they have to blaspheme their own god(to prove they aren't religious crazies)
>syrians refugees who shit on the quran get let in
Except that won't fix anything. Mudslimes can lie all they want.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taqiya

They can tell themselves they blasphemed in order to support islam.

By the way, kikes can do this too. Though it goes by another name. Mudslimes most likely copied/inherited the concept from the kikes.

This behavior was one of the main reasons why the early christians split.

That may be the case, but as I said, it is very easy to blur these lines.

If they can make it a racial issue, or an issue involving Absolute Human Rights, then it will generate enough doubt to involve the Supreme Court. National Security can only be used in international law to restrict Qualfied rights and not Absolute rights.

Say if someone makes it a case of "degrading punishment", not enough for people to say "YES IT IS DEGRADING PUNISHMENT", but say "hmmm... maybe..."

That is enough to delay the process.

Obviously the US Gov is at an advantage to the UK Gov here as you don't have to answer to the ECtHR, but you still have a democratic system in place that requires the Supreme Court to make binding rulings on matters of confusion in Law.

Again, he may well have the right, but all people need to do is cause some doubt for the Supreme Court to have its say.

lul

Ding ding ding we have a fucking winner

Legislature has already transferred the power to control immigration to the executive. There is an ongoing national security issue and the list of nations is the same one the Obama administration provided of our top national security threats.(the list is lacking desu)

It's political posturing bullshit and it really is causing a national security issue. The left themselves are causing a national security issue. Some of them need to be arrested for inciting riots.

These things get appealed to a circuit court, probably the 9th, and then eventually to the supreme court. Who then reverse the decision a majority of the time in the case of the 9th.

>Obongo and the dems gave an awful lot of power to the presidency.

I told my liberal friends that what Obama was doing to the executive branch was dangerous because of how much power he was cpnsolidatinf. They told me he was being brave because the republicans wouldn't cooperate with him. They're of course shitting their brains out now that a republican has that power.

It's fucking golden

no

I agree that it's likely going to be in court for a while. I just personally don't get the unconstitutional or illegal argument. But I guess what you're getting at is the existence of large amounts of people screaming those words can force a ruling.

I'll admit I know fuck all about the specifics of US law.

But in cases of Absolute Human Rights, restirctions can not be put in place under any circumstances.

I personally don't see this as a case of Absolute Human Rights restriction, but it will be very easy to muddy the issue enough to make enough people consider the possibility.

I'm talking from a British legal perspective obviously, but the US system is still based in English Common Law and international treaties.

And yet, The Law won. :^)

Immigration is not an absolute right.
There is nothing to determine.
That is not at all the way our nation was founded.

No one's won anything yet. Try to understand the situation before shitting on your keyboard.

that only applies if you're being persecuted and you have to lie about not being a muslim to escape imprisonment or death. This doesn't justify lying in order to kill infidel

He won in a landslide.

It is constitutional. Neither this judge or the judge in boston said it was unconstitutional.

what the actual fuck?
why even is this on yt

The left knows the president has the power to turn on and off the immigration tap. The judicial overreach won't work and the EO will not be removed.

Another useless thread denying the FACT that Trump has lost his mind in the last week.

>most popular

I see those alternate facts are working out nicely.

>Immigration is not an absolute right

I didn't say it was...

What I am saying is that if somone can create a plausible argument on how restriction of Immigration can violate an Absolute Human Right, then it will go to the Supreme Court.

I personally don't see it as a violation of Absolute Human Rights at all, but I am not a memeber of the US Judicary.

It's a retarded activist judge who's a known BLM supporter.

>Checks and balances bitch, be glad there's still that in place
One judge overstepping his bounds isn't checks and balances.

how about they not only have to shit on the quran but they have to draw a picture of muhammad as a dog with their own shit on the quran? is that blasphemous enough? if they have a wife, she can't wear a burka or a headscarf. They have to leave everything of their past muslim behind and assimilate. Learn fucking english.

incel cuck

Bull fucking shit.

Al Tabarani, in Al Awsat, said, “Lies are sins except when they are told for the welfare of a Muslim or for saving him from a disaster.”
>for the welfare of a Muslim OR for saving him from a disaster
>OR

It's all ridiculous.
People have become total retards.
The "educated" have lost their fucking minds and are now reduced to babbling babies.

past muslim life behind*

Other than learning fucking english, they can do anything else under taquiya as long as they consider it a way to further the reach of islam.

Good. Now take the nuclear codes back.

aljazeera.com/news/2017/02/court-rejects-trump-appeal-reinstate-travel-ban-170205091004259.html

every time another appeal process rejects this shit my dick grows a little harder in your subby asses

>he counteracts most popular president in 20 years
He actually has the lowest approval rating of any president at this point in office. And you know, lost the popular vote by 2+ million votes.
>how? why is this allowed?
Because the US has a legal system that the president can't override whenever he wants to.
>fuck lawyers n judges
Hopefully you won't ever need one.
>insane
Actually if you paid attention in civics this would be pretty unsurprising.

uhhh it's what maintains democracy, constitutionalism and keeps powers separated?

Oh, also, straight from the Hadith:
>[ Bukhari 3,49,857] Mohammed: “A man who brings peace to the people by making up good words or by saying nice things, though untrue, does not lie.”

Or
>[ Bukhari 5,59,369] Mohammed asked, “Who will kill Ka’b, the enemy of Allah and Mohammed?”
>Bin Maslama rose and responded, “O Mohammed! Would it please you if I killed him?”
>Mohammed answered, “Yes.”
>Bin Maslama then said, “Give me permission to deceive him with lies so that my plot will succeed.”
>Mohammed replied, “You may speak falsely to him.”

Or
>[ Bukhari 4, 52, 268] Mohammed said, “Jihad is deceit.”

The "power" has ALWAYS been in the presidents jurisdiction to suspend influx into the country
Step up your game to stump anti-trumpers.
ushistory.org/us/19e.asp
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_and_Sedition_Acts

cnn

Its really sad when foreigners know our legal system better than the Americans that post here.

Seriously what the fuck happened? Did you all just fall asleep in US history every single period?

wtf i hate borders now

I AM THE LAW!

>He actually has the lowest approval rating of any president at this point in office

This is the issue with Democary though, it promotes bland utilitarian policy.

If anyone actually comes along with a means to change anything, they will polarise the electorate and likely spend their entire time fighting against the seperations of power.

The reality becomes that we just form a grey blob of mass and slowly march towards cultureless degenerate destruction.

Only if the ban has been shown to have real intel behind it.
Trump announced this ban as a "way to figure out what is happening". He literally said he was going to shut it down until he found out.

That is not real intel. That is fear. Which, is not a legal reason to ban travel from 7 nations.

When Obama did the ban for Iran, it was because the FBI found actionable intel.

So you know of this law?

>(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. Whenever the Attorney General finds that a commercial airline has failed to comply with regulations of the Attorney General relating to requirements of airlines for the detection of fraudulent documents used by passengers traveling to the United States (including the training of personnel in such detection), the Attorney General may suspend the entry of some or all aliens transported to the United States by such airline.

>2+ million votes.
wasnt it 3 million a week ago
what happened ?

We have a similar system here, America and Australia both have shared political roots

wtf I hate trump shills now
>bland utilitarian policy.
Usually works better than fear based panic driving your laws.
>they will polarize the electorate
Yup just like when Obama came into office.
>culture-less degenerate destruction.
The US has always been culture-less, degenerate and destructive.

You should read more history man.