Do you prefer backing up dictatures in muslim countries or democratic rebels ?

Do you prefer backing up dictatures in muslim countries or democratic rebels ?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ll2Z3-F-Y_c
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>democratic rebels

>Democratic
>Rebels
Pick 1
Either you accept the election or you don't

dictaures don't sound nearly as bad as dictators.

Dictators. At least they have the stones to tell the muslims to Shut The Fuck Up We're Trying To Make A Country Here.
It's been shown over and over that there's only two types of governments in the middle east: theocracies and dictatorships/secular authoritarians. Theocracies are far more unstable of the two.

why would i even care what happens inside muslim countries? Why should anyone meddle into their affair? There is this thing called independence of state, sovereignty, every state has the right to determine their own fate. If they succumb to dictator? Fucking their problems.

those are some beefy planes

or their own bleesing because sometimes a dictator can actually do shit and pull country out of the ass.

what about turkey and tunisia ?

>Why should anyone meddle into their affair?
because it ends up with millions of refugees in the west trying to impose sharia law ?

I prefer basing my thinking on facts rather than fantasizing about ideals. Former Ambassador Robert Ford himself admitted in a British radio interview that his sole criterion for "moderate" rebels was that they did not want to murder Assad's family right away. There are no "democratic rebels" in Syria. Assad was liberalizing and thus looked weak to the CIA-Soros-Saudi axis, who sent in mercenaries who are not in any way democratic and Salafists who are not in any way democratic. If these people ever had a legitimate case they have scotched it in their obsession with raping children, murdering the innocent and destroying culture. Glory and life and victory to ASSAD!

Turkey is now or will be soon a dictatorship, Tunisians burned themselves alive theirs was so shit.

bomb them both.

Pictured is a rare photo of the peaceful family man and 'democratic' rebel, holding the severed head of a kurdish woman who refused the right to vote

:-)

>democratic rebels

>democratic rebels
nigger please

...

refugees are not a problem if you don't open the door.

Isn't that Dubai?
>tfw we'll see Dubai burn instead of dry up/blow away

we dont, germany did

don't blame us for your nigger problem

>not backing anti-muslim communists
this is why the middle east is the way it is

we could have let the communists destroy islam, but noooo instead we backed the muslim community against communist revolution.

you brought nazism in europe now you bring islam
you people carry on destroying europe since the fall of the roman empire
fucking bosh

youtube.com/watch?v=ll2Z3-F-Y_c

>democratic rebels

I'd like to ask Libyans how much they are enjoying democracy.

Support the dictators.

>destroying europe since the fall of the roman empire
you are welcome

Should hav had a downward curving road so it looks like a sad face

>nationalistic secular dictators that maintain at least a little bit of stability
or
>radical islamic rebels that want to destabilize the entire region

Hmm...

Dictators at least keep the countries stable, are mostly secular, crackdown on extremist (and their own people) and so on. Democracies fail, they don't want democracy, they are unstable like shit and have coups every 10 minutes, can't do law enforcement so extremism rises and so on. Dictators are the preferred trade-off they can at least transition to a normal country latter rather than chimping out for 20 years until a new dictator arises and sets the square back to zero.

dictators, yeah

pet islamists never work, and the CIA needs to stop fucking trying that shit already. it fucks everything up

Less people die in those countries under dictators. It has been a disaster whenever fools have tried to democratize them.

Fpbp

democracy to Islam as foreign as capitalism is to communism.

mix the two and you are going to fuck up.

the lone exception would be China, but it's probably has to do with them being Asian.

Nobody genuinelly gives a shit about Syria.

Have you heard from Aleppo?

Is France, Canada, Britain sending humanitarian aid there, now that they are no longer denyed access to the city?

No!

In fact, now that there's finally peace in Aleppo, ya'll don't give two shits about it. Its gone, GONE from your news.

kek

kek

I love this bullshit. A very liberal idea is that every dictatorship is inherently terrible and abusive and any democracy is good. In Middle East military dictators are pro-western and quite progressive by this region's standards, whereas democracy means Sharia.
I prefer backing secular governments over Sharia.

When you back rebels to overthrow a country because they seem democratic but they turn out to be almost the same as their previous leaders so you you back rebels to overthrow a country because they seem democratic but they turn out to be almost the same as their previous leaders so you you back rebels to overthrow a country because they seem democratic but they turn out to be almost the same as their previous leaders so you you back rebels to overthrow a country because they seem democratic but they turn out to be almost the same as their previous leaders so you you back rebels to overthrow a country because they seem democratic but they turn out to be almost the same as their previous leaders so you you back rebels to overthrow a country because they seem democratic but they turn out to be almost the same as their previous leaders so you you back rebels to overthrow a country because they seem democratic but they turn out to be almost the same as their previous leaders so you you back rebels to overthrow a country because they seem democratic but they turn out to be almost the same as their previous leaders so you you back rebels to overthrow a country because they seem democratic but they turn out to be almost the same as their previous leaders so you

Why is it that frenchfags can't into English or interpunction? You shouldn't put a space between your last word and the question mark.

Dictators.
Saddam was a monster who ruled a peaceful secular nation with religious freedom. Apparently in that part of the world an iron fist is the only way to prevent local factions of sectarian violence that kill each other and surrounding civilians forever. Repeat with Gaddafi, Assad, etc.

Dictatorships, yes, but it depends on the dictatorship. For (((some reason))), the U.S. only destroys the GOOD dictatorships, lately.

You're asking somebody from a country Comic Sans is used almost everywhere. We can't into typographics, Aquafresh-san, sorry for that.

I was just asking myself, what is the reasoning or the intended inference for writing the word "Parley" in this shaky, messy hand (on the backdrop)?

I wouldn't be surprised if it is jus a messy word, nothing more.
Even wouldn't be surprised if it was "parler" in the beginning, but "r" was too shitty and everyone thought it's "y"

>lately

>implying Hitler and Mussolini weren't destroyed by the US

yo is pic related bombing my boy Burj Khalifa? That's not very nice

...

The thing to remember about arabs and Islam as a whole is that it's a medieval set of rules of medieval people living in medieval conditions. It's better to keep the dictators, because those "democratic rebels" are just going to end up instituting another dictatorship with more hardline rules. Another terrible side effect is the tendency of the risen-up B country to destroy the A country, and then everything's back to square one, leaving you with a endless cycle of brutality and deadlock.

The idea of supporting dicators obviously clashes with the west's liberal values and it's love of republic and democracy, but since that part of the world has not evolved to the point where republics or democracies are sustainable, the best bet is to keep the dictator until that eventuality.