Friendly reminder that there are waaaaay more black and brown characters in the Bible than whites or yellows

Friendly reminder that there are waaaaay more black and brown characters in the Bible than whites or yellows

We are the Gods and Prophets... fuck your IQ meme

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Shroud_of_Turin#Prior_to_the_14th_century
youtube.com/watch?v=ROM5EpCQUlg
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>yellows
Were there any slants in the bible at all?

I'm fairly certain that there are exactly 0 black people in the bible.

Where to get bible with pictures?

Nubians may be mentioned in passing, but they are some of the more civilized blacks. NO SUB-SAHARANS are mentioned period. Also, at this time, the people of the Med basin were pretty much white. Arabization came later.

>black and brown characters

Noa=?

his sons

Japhet=white
Shem=yellow
Ham=black

look up the curse of Ham, that explains greatly why blacks lack so much compared to other 2 races

Queen of Sheba? Moses' wife? Nimrod? The Ethiopian eunuch?

WE

Can't believe I forgot this. Ham's son Mizraim were the Egyptians so the Egyptians descend from blacks, meaning ALL Egyptian characters can be said to be black

To this day Egypt is called "Masr" in Arabic. They know they are on black lands

Kekistani religion and Gods predate your Moses. Moses killed a man in Egypt then took loads of magic mushrooms and hallucinated then created religion that was blasphemus to the real Pepe god. and mankind has suffered ever since

>Ham's son Mizraim were the Egyptians so the Egyptians descend from blacks, meaning ALL Egyptian characters can be said to be black

Egypt was quite multiracial, but CHECK THIS OUT

NIMROD, pure descendant of ham really waz kang, but not of gyptians but of god cursed Bablyon

And?
Moses had goat horns and Jesus was pale white, had hair like a sheep and fire red eyes.
>We wuz humans n shit

nimrod = a mighty hunter before the Lord (gen 10 9)

grandson of Cush (=literally means black), and Cush is one of the sons of Ham

gods chosen people were white .. checkmate

Set in Africa and the Middle East,

>no guys, we wuz kaings!

No, they were Jews. Which is how you know that there is no god.

too bad none of these people existed

That's right. It's ironic, for all of Sup Forums's memes, the first post-Flood King was indeed a black man

Christianity is religion of all people. We have to welcome our black brothers to our homes.

And this is the problem.

>too bad none of these people existed

Nimrod hasnt existed?

>for all of Sup Forums's memes, the first post-Flood King was indeed a black man

shh! dont tell em that. Post-flood story and the Noahs are on Caucasion mountains fits perfectly into current races and geo.

Assuming you're African-American, you descend from West/Central Africa whose people are in the bible. You're trying to latch on to "black" or "brown" people who have nothing to do with you. Also, the Israelites would be people of the Levant who are lightish to brown. pic related

>the Egyptians so the Egyptians descend from blacks
Well no. The Egyptians were not negroids but they were and are brown. Note the contrast between Egyptians and black negroid from southern nubia in this pic.

Also, pic related are Upper Egyptians. These people are probably the closest approximations to the Ancients in my opinion. As you can see, not negroes.

God made white people to take care of these races we are essentially god's babysitters

Haha the muslim nigger is even doing the finger thing.

You can be white and a Jew

>Also, at this time, the people of the Med basin were pretty much white. Arabization came later.
Arabization was cultural, not (very much) genetic. The people there still look pretty much the same as they did. Spectrum from mostly white-ish to tanner brown.

Some of these people don't even look like the same race.
Why is there so much phenotype diversity in the MENA?

Haven't DNA tests shown that Muslims in the Levant have slightly more Arab DNA than Christians?

because evolution is awesome

Yes thats why I said (not very much). There has been some slight though not negligible mixture but not enough to affect phenotypes very much. Christian populations have little to no arab mixture at all so they're even closer to pre-arabization times.

Does that mean Jesus wasn't white?

Thor. Zeus. Nuada. Aphrodite. Medb. Artemis.

Christianity is the McDonald's of religion, don't get too uppity.

Egypt might have been multicultural, but it was ruled by melanated races. This helps prove the line of the Israelites are dark, because Moses was able to hide within the Pharoah's palace unscathed. The bible always makes sure to place attention when one is "ruddy" or red, as in the case of Esau and King David. The aforementioned, however, is not an Israelite, however.

former, not aforementioned**

redpill me on Indians, are they black people actually? what is their story?

>darker skin than any other Asians
>India doesnt even belong in Asia based on tectonic panels
>full of spices that we dont find in the rest of Asia
>frutile land as is Africa (unlike Asia)
>they behave more like blacks and far less likely to Asians

Poo in loo? Does anyone have any genetical study on Dravidian (not Indo-Aryans) people of India?

Bro Esau's wife... The entire reason for the evil jew is inbreeding with niggers.

depends on what "white" means. If by "white", you mean like a Western European, nord or whatever, then certainly not. He would have been within the range of phenotypes you see in the Levant and MENA today especially Christian and other populations that didn't arabize as much. Thats what he would have looked like; same with the original Israelites prior to dispersal.

on the off chance you're not a shill, Ethiopians are like honorary jews. that's the only black jew that exists.

in fact, their country is called beta israel. but they're not the "real" jews, just allies.

Most of the Nobel prizes for science in India was earned by the southerners.

I'm not shilling, I'm just seeking to expose the zionist babylonian for what he is, an identity thief. Clad in euro phenotypes

Gog and Magog

WE WUZ KANGZ

They have negroid features

>melanated races.
You can play with words if you want. Neither the Egyptians nor the Israelites were or had anything to do with negroes.

I dont see negroid features. I do see wavy hair there though.

As much as it pains your eurocentric mentality, the kingdom did not enter into miscegenation until under the later dynasties

miscegenation? look at my pic. These people (modern upper Egyptians) are the same as the Ancients. no mixture and as you can see, they're quite different from negroes.

also, see the contrast here:

I mean in your picture. All of the mummies are obviously white

>implying 2500 years of war did not have any effects
also check out white savior complex

oh you think the Ancient Egyptians were white? Looks like I'm arguing with both an afrocentric and a eurocentric here. pic related; asiatic, south nubian negroid, libyan, and Egyptian.

>>implying 2500 years of war did not have any effects

It actually didn't that much except for what I believe to be asiatic influence in Lower Egypt.

>Afrocentrists claim that Egyptian civilization was a "black" civilization, and this is not accurate [...] Most scholars believe that ancient Egyptians looked pretty much like today’s Egyptians - that is, they were brown, becoming darker as they approached the Sudan (Snowden 1970, 1992; Smedley 1993).[33]


>The evidence clearly shows that those Greco-Roman authors who refer to skin color and other physical traits distinguish sharply between Ethiopians (Nubians) and Egyptians, and rarely do they refer to the Egyptians, even though they were described as darker than themselves. No Greek doubted that the Egyptians were darker than the Greeks, but not as dark as black Africans.[37]


>I have encountered arguments that the ancient Egyptians were much 'blacker' than their modern counterparts, owing to the influx of Arabs at the time of the conquest, Caucasian slaves under the Mamlukes, or Turks and French soldiers during the Ottoman period. However, given the size of the Egyptian population against these comparatively minor waves of northern immigrants, as well as the fact that there was continuous immigration and occasional forced deportation of both northern and southern populations into Egypt throughout the pharaonic period, I doubt that the modern population is significantly darker or lighter, or more or less 'African' than their ancient counterparts.

>also check out white savior complex

im not white

That is a sun tan. Can you tell me why the mummies in the picture have blond and red hair?

why do you wish to deny people their heritage?

I find it increasingly frustrating to determine the appearance of Jesus because the Levant is so phenotypically diverse today.
I can't tell if it is the European looking people who are most native to the region or the other various people.
For example, where did Camille Chamoun's genes come from?

Paint made from local resources you skub tub.

>im not white
i meant the lady in the pic

also by the time of the oldest greek writings the dynasties had fallen

>Can you tell me why the mummies in the picture have blond and red hair?

3 possibilities:

1). Ramses and other Egyptians were found to have red hair. If you look at nearby North-African populations like berbers, they have always had incidences of blonde and red hair. Red/blonde Egyptians are likely from mixture from those nearby populations. Check pic related.

2). There is a cemetery from the Greco-Roman period in which many blondes were found. Likely slave populations.

3). Henna hair dyeing was also very common so there is that possibility.

That's not what the Jews think.

Caucasoid, Mongoloid or Negroid.
Pick one.

>also by the time of the oldest greek writings the dynasties had fallen
Here is dynastic art. As you can see, well within the phenotypic range of Egypt today.

Ancient Egyptians = Modern Egyptians (especially Upper). Its really that simple

and another

Friendly reminder that there are waaaaay more white characters in the forming of America than any other race

Whites are the citizenry mentioned in the constitution and declaration of independence... fuck your equality meme

Good thing it's just a sandnigger fairy tale losing its importance in the white part of the world.

The replacement sends His regards. Shadilay

>inb4 the actual reading and research of the bible shows blacks were involved
>esau and jacob
>inb4 this actually makes everyone double down on the rejection of Christianity beside roman paganist renditions

his genes are native. The "European-looking" ones are 100% native to the region. It would be perfectly feasible for Jesus to have looked like that. With no contemporary descriptions however, we can't know for sure.

>That is a sun tan.
also why would the Egyptian be the only one to get a tan where the other whiter-skinned ones didn't? Despite both their environments also being hot?

>also why would the Egyptian be the only one to get a tan where the other whiter-skinned ones didn't? Despite both their environments also being hot?
By staying inside? You don't get a tan from it being hot, you get it from being out in the sun.

okay great, we make the distinction between Egyptians and negroes. Because the egyptians were the ones enslaving the so-called lesser races, the tribes of Israel, which came out of bondage in Egypt.

Although the op is kinda of trolling the we wuz but it's true.. even Hitler said it

>inb4
covered it here and just as you predicted, it was denied here

too much mental gymnastics. We have far too much art of them that tells us otherwise. They were obviously dark brown people like upper egyptians today.

Yes, they were brown but not negroes. The best representatives of the Ancients are modern-day Upper Egyptians, North Sudanese. Not white and certainly not negroes.

I don't see why anons on Sup Forums want Egypt to have been white.
What makes Egypt so important for people to want to claim the Egyptians as their own race?

This question is thousands of years old

how much admixture makes you non-white? one drop, or something more?

we-wuzzing is a curse every group falls prey to. I can forgive negroes doing it since they have a not-unfounded inferiority complex. but I dont understand nords and whites doing it

Adam was made after the 7th day, the races were made on the 6th.
Modern, "white people" are the livimg descendants of adam through Seth. We are the Lords chosen, the lost sheep of Israel.
You wuznt Prophets, and you wuznt/iznt Gawds
There is ONE God, of whom I bear his likeness.
Deal
with
it

I look at whiteness as a very personal thing.
If I wouldn't mind seeing this person in my family tree, I consider them kin enough to be white.
I suffer from we wuzzing Jesus as a white man because Christianity is so significant in white culture.
I don't have any identity with Egypt and I don't think any white person does so I don't see the need for we wuzzing Egypt.

>Adam was made after the 7th day, the races were made on the 6th.

u on drugs m8m look here

Well just remember that Jesus said a prophet is welcome everywhere except his home. The Buddha was an ethnic Indian, but it was East Asia that fully internalized his teachings into their culture. Greco-Roman civilization was a mediterranean culture, yet it was later Western Europeans that would embody the best of their ideals far better than even they thought was possible.

Read your bible, its all in there. Dont let the Catholic stupid your brains

also, I think its very plausible for the real Jesus to look something like the Passion movie's version. I know the actor was white but they gave him a fake nose and tan. It looks very plausible. Likewise with my pic related which is one of the earliest icons. Thats the Jesus in my headcanon.

Jesus did not have long hair. That's a Roman Pedophile Church meme from their sodomite artists.

cesare borgia

white people have the biggest ego

>cesare borgia
Borgia was born in 1475. The icon I posted is from the 6th century and its the earliest surviving one. Its from the Byzantine Empire (eastern Roman). What do white people (western europeans) have to do with it?

...

iconoclastic

Mary was from Syria, plenty of fair-skinned caucasians in that area, especially before the 6th century when arabs started invading everywhere outside of their starting areas.

so all """jesus""" did was chimp out at bankers and they executed him for that. sounds like a black guy.

Are you talking about the Mel Gibson movie?
The actor in that movie portraying Christ was half Irish and half vaguely European.
Your pic related has always been very intimidating for me to look at.
I can't help but think Eastern idols are unpleasant to look at.
I'm very fond of the shroud of Turin portrayal, though I'm not sure how it fits in racially.
>jesus did not have long hair
Well what you think is long might not have been considered long to the people of the time and area.
I think it's more reasonable to think that Cesare Borgia wanted to look like Jesus rather than want Jesus to look like him.

>mary was from syria
Literally what?
That's fascinating if true. Do you have a source for that?
>plenty of fair-skinned caucasians in that area
Strange that you can tell the difference between a Syrian refugee and a native in Germany.

I want the Shroud to be real but what would it have been doing all this time in between the time of his death and centuries later in Medieval Europe?

>The actor in that movie portraying Christ was half Irish and half vaguely European.
Yeah he is but they semitized him very well. Fake nose and tan so he looks pretty levantish.

>I'm very fond of the shroud of Turin portrayal, though I'm not sure how it fits in racially.
the recreation in your pic and the one in mine now fit the bill.

Those times and these times arent the same, friend.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Shroud_of_Turin#Prior_to_the_14th_century

Supposedly it would be traveling between churches as a holy relic as Islam spread into the region.

As for the movie, I guess I don't know what a semite is really supposed to look like.
At best they look like hook nosed Europeans and at worst they look like Arabs.
Is that right?

How can we be sure?
I know that in theory the Arabs moved in from deeper in the peninsula and mixed with the Levantines, but I find it hard to believe that there were ever enough Arabs to have a significant impact on the appearance of the region as a whole.
See, and 90% of the time I consider this a white man, but that other 10% of the time I wonder if I really see a white man or if I just want Him to be a white man.

>At best they look like hook nosed Europeans and at worst they look like Arabs.
Europeans are a constant reference point for you haha. Yes, a tanner, hooked nose and dark haired European.

>See, and 90% of the time I consider this a white man, but that other 10% of the time I wonder if I really see a white man or if I just want Him to be a white man.

I'll give it to you straight. Jesus would have fit right in a group of Christian Lebanese or Syrians. He was a Levantine Jew who spoke Aramaic. White people (germanics) were not yet relevant on the world stage besides as a nuisance to the Romans at this time.

You are projecting a bit honestly, but you arent the only one. Every culture has claimed Jesus as their own and imagined him as such. It just speaks to the universal appeal of Christianity.

speaking of Aramaic. Here is a beautiful rendition of the Lord's Prayer in that language he would have spoken:

>youtube.com/watch?v=ROM5EpCQUlg

I mean, nazareth is very close to the modern borders of syria. Borders were much less distinct then compared to now. She was a jewish woman, she was a galilean. There is no reason to believe the vile jewish "archeologist" renditions, which are based in nonsense. Caucasoid peoples still exist in the generally syrian area that are native to the area. There is no need to get caught up in a racialism over this, but there is no reason to deny apparition derived renditions of how Jesus/Mary looked just because they have relatively fair skin and modern middle-easterners are very arabic.