Does Donald Trump have some sort of learning disability or reading impairment?

Does Donald Trump have some sort of learning disability or reading impairment?
It seems he didnt read the Executive Order he signed putting Steve Bannon on the National Security Council and removing the Military and Intelligence guys.
Why would he not read it?
There seems to be a pattern of him avoiding reading.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/HEJO8t_wCUQ
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

This should explain it

youtu.be/HEJO8t_wCUQ

>believing a NY TIMES article relying exclusively on anonymous sources

Think you need to re-think who the retarded here is.

Sage all concern threads.

S A G E
A
G
E

Those anonymous sources are in the White House, the journalists would know who they are

But I bet if Alex Jones had an anonymous source making all kinds of claims about lets say Vince Foster you'd lap it up

You do realize that the NY TIMES is owned by Carlos Slim, the Mexican billionaire?

>COINTLEPRO, an FBI program to disrupt the left that operated from the 1950s-1970s, developed a set of rules to disrupt Internet forums
>all of which essentially consist of "posting things I don't like"
I don't think so, Tim.

same bs they tried with bush jr and reagan,

>he is just being told what to do
>he is a puppet

no one believes you

A source very close to the president of zumbobwae told me that Trump did in fact read the EO.

Alex Jones is more credible than the JewYour Times.

What I hate about the fake news meme is that it hurts deluded Trump supporters who never mastered critical thinking.

Instead of wondering about the authenticity of information that either supports or rejects their positions, they cherry pick news items that buttress their world view in lieu of anything which they deem hostile.

Congratulations, you sad fucks, you have successfully played yourselves.

Its owned by The New York Times Company, sims has a 17% stake
And what's your point?

But that was true about Dubya and Raygun

And when Things Alex jones gets from anonymous sources proves true, it builds his reliability a bit so that the next time he says it you're more inclined to believe him.
The difference with The NY Times is they have been spamming articles with "anonymous campaign insiders" and shit which never turn out to be true

>hurr durr

>believing anything you read on an anonymous cartoon porn board
One is more retarded than the other. Can you guess which one?

what about the frog people?

thanks for ur opinion ctr

...

>trusting Texans more than Mexicans


It's really just common sense.

>Oh shit this guy makes a lot of sense, I've made a fool of my self...
>no that's not possible, I can't have made a mistake can I? All I did was what the double plus good media tells me
>its HIS fault! He is lying! He is manipulating me! How else could he make me doubt myself like this!

Not an opinion.

There are threads that trend regularly on this board about articles in fucking national TABLOIDS which gather crowds of outraged Trump supporters.

Meanwhile information delivered from internationally acclaimed journals are deemed bullshit.

The Republicans decades old fight to tear down and destroy our education system has finally born fruit. They've enthralled a mentally deficient base, easily convinced and distracted by tribal lies and non-sequiturs. Our democracy is only as smart as the average voter, and sadly that's criminally dumb.

Hahahahahahaha

FPBP
P
B
P

....
..........
>wikileaks

>my anonymous sources are better than yours!!

That's a problem on both sides to be honest.