>"b-but but there was no Nano Thermite used in the 9/11 Hoa...I meant terrurist attack"
>literally videos exist from it
>"b-but thermite can't melt steel beams!!!"
>"b-but that was molten office stuff thats pouring out there goyim!!!"
youtube.com
when will the truth come out Sup Forums ?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
kendoc911.wordpress.com
nytimes.com
kendoc911.wordpress.com
twitter.com
>United Flight 175
>receives ACARS messages 20 minutes after the crash (IN THE VICINITY OF HARRISBURG AND PITTSBURGH, PA)
>The underlined date and time is when the message was received by the airplane.
>ACARS always sends its message from the closest 3 stations to the plane
>there is 12 different ACARS stations that are closer to NYC
>FLIGHT 175 WAS ACTUALLY STILL AIRBORNE 20 MINUTES AFTER IT CRASHED INTO THE SOUTH TOWER
>9/11 commission ignored the evidence
what is ACARS you may ask:
>Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) is a device used to send messages to and from an aircraft. Very similar to text messages and email we use today, Air Traffic Control, the airline itself, and other airplanes can communicate with each other via this "texting" system.
So, if UA175 was somewhere out in Pennsylvania when an aircraft was observed to strike the south tower,
and a standard 767 cannot perform at such excessive speeds as reported, then where did the airplane come from which was observed to strike the South Tower?
>and a standard 767 cannot perform at such excessive speeds as reported
>The government's calculations put the speed of the first plane at 494 mph, and the second at 586 mph.
>The MIT analysis determined the first plane was traveling 429 mph, and the second 537 mph
>check pic related
>its actually impossible that this plane could have reached that speed at that height (the air density is too high)
>it would have broken apart long before reaching that speed
>it actually is impossible to maneuver it at such a speed and still hit the target
>somehow a Goatfucker who barely could fly a Cessna pulls it off
Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure
also check this Video which explains it more in detail:
youtube.com
>meet Hani Hanjour
>so retarded and dumb that they told him to fuck off from flight school
>he couldn't even fly a cessna properly
>hijacks a plane with other goatfuckers
>does 400 knot 330 degree sprialing dive at 2500 fpm, only gaining 30 knots
>then 30 knots more descending from 2200 feet at full power
>with a very steady hand as to not overshoot or hit the lawn
>inside ground effect, at 460 knots impact speed he hits the pentagon in a very convenient place
>he did all this but was refused to rent a 172 cause he couldnt land it at 65 knots
Suuuuuuuuuuure
how did they apply the supernanothermite into the exact area of impact? I mena the collapse begins EXACTLY where the impact was. Great planning.
How did the supernanothermite and any supposed igniter survive the impact and subsequent fires?
>ignores also other high value targets in D.C
>like the white house
>or the capitol
>rather does a very complicated maneuver and steers into the pentagon
pic related
Hillary asked the Saudis to do 9/11 so she could take out building 7 where they were investigating bill's illegal pardons
then when seal team six figured out bin laden was a scapegoat, they shot down their chinook, killing 38 american soldiers.
why does Sup Forums care. trumps regime will false flag another terrorist attack to justify war with iran.
nice political science. you must be a real policy wonk to have such a sophisticated theory
Mossad had entrance into the whole WTC complex for god knows how long, they could have easily rigged the whole thing.
>it would have broken apart long before reaching that speed
no. Both of the planes involved with WTC did not exceed their maximum maneuvering speed.
YOU didnt answer the question.
How did the they set it up so that the collapse initiated EXACTLY at the impact zone...
...and how did the explosives survive the impact and subsequent fires?
Please explain.
according to the offical story they actually did.
>pic related one of the bright masterminds behind the operation who could steer a plane that wasn't build for such speeds into the WTC
>How did the they set it up so that the collapse initiated EXACTLY at the impact zone...
rigged the important parts of the building with thermite charges, then detonated them all after impact. explosions were reported underneath the impact zone
they KNEW EXACTLY where to place them.
>and how did the explosives survive the impact and subsequent fires?
they just had to wait and blow the remaining charges up, some probably got destroyed, but they had probably placed enough to be sure it fucking pulls down when it happens
they had the material, they had access, they had the knowhow
study up on controlled demolitions. If you want answers the ones that get spoon fed won't stick with you.
also
>implying a plane hit the pentagon and not a modified cruise missile
>no footage ever released besides that one shitty cam
>everything else instantly confiscated by the Feds
>never released for unknown reason
Sorry been studying this for 15yrs...still the same old debunked bullshit...
My question is one they cannot answer - its a major flaw and they just wave it away. shocker.
>have knowledge where plane will hit
>have blueprints for the building
>place charges in convenient place weeks/months before the staged attack
that sure was hard to pull off
>the size of the plane doesn't match the pentagons damage
Maybe they just came down and by the time they sighted the building they realized they'd passed it on their right, so they circled around until they could get at it.
this dude had trouble flying a fucking cessna, you think he could have pulled this off?
also why not attack the WAY better targets like the capitol or white house?
>no lets rather hit the part of the pentagon where they investigate the missing 2,8 trillion dollars, that sure has a bigger effect than hitting the presidents home
>rigged the important parts of the building with thermite charges, then detonated them all after impact. explosions were reported underneath the impact zone
this doesnt answer the question. The collapse - as seen in the webmd you posted- begins EXACTLY in the impact zone. That is simply impossible for it to be initiated by CD in that context. No amount of speculation on your part changes that FACT.
explosions beneath the impact zones have been PROVEN to be from jet fuel travling down elevators shfts and blowing out the lobbies, Elevators severed and crashing down etc...These are FACTS and cannot be waved away with any shit-tier hand waving by conspira-tards.
not an argument...why do you ignore all the physical evidence of the plane and passengers found in the wreckage?
>Muslims a good boy they dindu nuffin
Fuck off, Ahmed.
>"that was just the elevators goyim!!!"
the OP webm proves you WRONG
>muslims are smart enough to pull off 9/11
no YOU Ahmed FUCK OFF!
>why not attack the WAY better targets like the capitol or white house
In order for the two planes to hit both of the WTC towers each team would have to have assigned targets, they didn't just choose from the air.
These guys were told to hit the Pentagon, so they went for that. 93 was also supposed to hit Washington so they could have had one of your other targets. We don't know how Saudis prioritize attacking their enemies, to you and me it seems like the landmark buildings are a more prime target because we've seen them destroyed as set pieces in apocalypse movies, but an Arab might be inclined to attack the military target instead.
Look into Operatiom Northwoods and youll find we had the ability to switch out aircraft mid-flight without alerting air traffic control that a second plane had even entered the picture. The floors and locations these remote controlled aircraft hit on 9/11 were precise, so as not to screw up the explosives planted in the floors below by Israeli "art students"(mossad). This is why the towers collapsed the way they did, at the speed they did.
thats fucking bullshit man
you hit the place with the most prestige to demoralize your enemys.
it makes no sense to attack the Pentagon
>no footage of the attack was ever released besides that one shitty 3fps video
why the feds keeping the other videos?
why weren't they released?
maybe because the video evidence shows what REALLY happened.
>proves
I dont think you know what that word means.
>yes goyim there was no thermite
are you blind, retarded or both?
oh for fucks sake...ONW was 50yrs ago and had no plans for "switching out aircraft mid-flight without alerting air traffic control"
Please stick to facts not fake and gay.
It was more of an uncontrolled demolition. I mean, they just blew those things fuck up without any of the usual safeguards to keep huge blocks of rubble from being ejected.
>had no plans for switching out aircraft
Wrong. In the documents of possible attacks, that is described as a possibility
>leftist conspiracy theories
how's it feel that after all that work all people think of 9/11 conspiracy theories are memes? your entire movement is a meme. nice meme!
gee...burning material in the rubble of collapsed burning building...how odd...guess that "proves" it was a controlled demo via thermite
hurrrdurrr.
KYS
wrong. In the documents of possible attacks they mentioned hijacking - not radar evading stealth technology...in 1962
muslims are smart enough to seize the middle east and make the US shit their pants, what point are you trying to make here
You are fucking dumb as fuck m8
Oh and you're blatantly and eternally incorrect, i hope you are a shill
the people who did it didn't care about all the american lives that were lost that day.
check the evidence nigger
>Nano-thermite explosives shown above were gathered from the WTC debris shortly after the towers fell on 9/11. Brigham Young University Physics Professor, Dr. Steven Jones, discovered the explosives and joined an international team of nine scientists for further analysis. Through extensive laboratory testing, the scientists concluded that the samples were Nano-thermitic explosives.
Explain how pockets of molten steel were found weeks after at ground zero, still burning.
>US
>shitting their pants because of muslims
on which planet do you live muhamed?
It's the most important military building in America, it makes perfect sense to go for it.
If you aim for the Capitol building you might just knock the dome in and kill nobody, U93 might have been aimed at the White House. If Hanjour went for the WH and the other team hit it as well the overall damage would be minimized. Having each team reach their respective target greatly increases the scope of the operation, see WTC.
No, they did. You don't get to just ignore facts.
>He's never had a Chipotle burrito wrapped in tinfoil that stays 100 degrees for the whole day
oh Sup Forums
>You don't get to just ignore facts.
thats HILARIOUS coming from a "troofer"
thanks for the chuckle!
>you might just knock the dome in and kill nobody
yea suuuure
>rather aim for the part that is under renovation (so minimum losses and only the fags standing between rumsfeld and his lost 2.8 trillions die)
>super hard to hit even for a professional pilot
>this tar still managed it somehow
>banning muslims from entering from countries that the US is perpetually shitting their pants because of
which planet do you live on faggot? Muslims have killed more Americans in recent history than anybody.
Believing the official story is on par with believing the earth is flat. Both are fairytales that ignore physics. Explain how WTC 7 achieved freefall.
>nobody reading about the ACARS message that somehow was received by a plane that evaporated in the south tower half an hour before it could get that message
The whole middle of the Capitol building is cavernous. If you were going to hit this building where would you strike it?
>rather aim for the part that is under renovation
How would a Haji know the Pentagon is under renovation? That wouldn't be common knowledge to anyone who didn't work in the building.
why would a haji randomly fly into THAT part of the building?
why take a hard approach to the target?
the pentagon is a fucking bunker anyway, why not strike something that leaves more damage?
capitol would have literally collapsed from a plane hit
protip: it wasn't a plane hitting the pentagon
>
Where is the definitive proof it was "steel" and not molten metal of some other sort? No offense to firefighters but they are not metallurgist
US government btfo.
I think the plebs will go french revolution on people like Podesta, the Bush's and Clintons within the next decade.
Clean Break Document
Rebuilding America's Defenses
Urban Moving Systems
Pearl Harbor Style Attack
Richard Perle
kendoc911.wordpress.com
Shills explain this or gtfo.
How can you watch the fucking spire of the wtc turn to dust before your eyes and still argue in favor of the criminals?
...
>Muslims have killed more Americans in recent history than anybody.
Bullshit- other Americans have killed more Americans than anybody...
...
If that was thermite, those machines would have been fucked.
explain these please
...
...
...
...
Have you not seen cities from a plane? It can be difficult to recognize landmarks because they look like little toys compared to the angles they're most frequently photographed from.
My thinking is that he came in and didn't see the Pentagon until he was passing it, so he circled around and happened to hit it on that side.
Posting cropped photos obscured in smoke with convenient indicators to tell you what you should be seeing is not helping your argument, neither is calling the Pentagon a "bunker" while asking why the plane didn't leave a distinct hole in it.
...
...
Yes, I've actually been in that hole since they cleaned it.
Are you implying only thermite would leave those kinds of gaps?
I don't agree or disagree. I do think the event was staged, but with more of a focus on building 7
>why would people that didn't like the US military strike the building that's a symbol of the US military? Conspiracy!
and hitting the capitol wouldn't actually do anything, the rotunda is just a big empty dome. regardless, the fourth plane was heading for DC, so that might have been the plan anyway
>WTC-7
>It suffered relatively minor damage and fires caused by exploding debris from WTC-1 (North Tower), which was over 300-feet (over one football field) away.
>WTC-7 was built to withstand major fires and hurricane winds of 160 mph and was known as a "super fortress" with redundant reinforcement.
>Larry Silverstein said, ''We built in enough redundancy to allow entire portions of floors to be removed without affecting the building's structural integrity".
>nytimes.com
>It's tenants included the Secret Service, IRS, and several financial institutions, including the Securities and Exchange Commission
>Evidence was destroyed in numerous ongoing case investigations by the SEC, including the Enron files, which implicated Bush and members of his administration
What else could burn weeks(i actually think it was a couple of months, if I'm not mistaken) after the attack? The thermite kept reacting, because there was no other source of energy for the heat to come from. These pools of molten metal were found trapped deep under the rubble without an oxygen supply to keep them going.
That list of facts won't disprove our narrative unless we decide it does Goyim.
its didint "turn to dust" - it collapsed- fell down- leaving dust and smoke in its wake...
Judy BTFO
...
Friend, did you know the CIA recently released dumps saying Clinton was being investigated in building 7 for his controversial pardons?
Why would they release that info now? Surely some revelation is at hand
...
...
The fact that TWO towers collapse exactly the same way in a 90° angle
Another building collapsed which wasnt hit at all, but was even more stable, because of its shape
Very strange
Investigations after, were manipulated right?
Did you watch the videos? Again, you're ignoring facts. You still haven't explained WTC 7 freefall. You can't do it without sounding like a retard with no understanding of physics, can you? That's because you're an intellectual coward who can't entertain any idea that hasn't been authorized to be true by big daddy government. Gtfo
This never gets brought up on Sup Forums but you fucking niggers need to realize THERE WERE NO PLANES. it's the greatest psyop of our time. Its all a sham, it was only explosives. They edited the plane in on the news footage. And they even fucked it up. Seriously just look it up for yourself.
how do you know there wasnt an oxygen supply? Rubble pile was 8 stories deep with lots of gaps and more oxygen flowing in as clean up exposed ares...just not a logical premise on your part.
...
thanks for the backup Frenchbro
...
There were planes. Nobody listen to the leaf. Hes here to poison the well.
Anybody ever analyse this to measure the length of the object?
The debate always centers on the width... but the length would be a dead give away and easily measured.
nice pic Hans, i steal it
They most likely weren't REAL planes but remote controlled ones.
check this
How can a Plane get a signal when it evaporated in the southtower?
thats a shoop you fucking retard.
>Very strange
Very strange?
Obvious!
you got any more RARE 9/11 pics?
>>"b-but thermite can't melt steel beams!!!"
filename kek
Let me understand your logical premise: pockets of molten metal stayed molten months after the towers fell with an very, very limited oxygen supply.
No, that doesn't make logical sense. Funny how you only argue my weak points, or just flat out block out reality.
every fucking stupid story they tell us has another layer of complete impossible bullshit
the rabbit hole does not end.
>thinking the whole world is going to cover this up
HAHAHA
you guys are so retarded
If there is a god I hope he comes to your in your sleep and whispers softly into your ear.
He'll say..
>wrong board, faggot
Physicist here. What are you even on about, all you need is insulation you don't need continued oxidation.
Go fuck yourself, brainlet.
>very, very limited oxygen supply.
this is pure unadulterated, unsubstantiated speculation. Obviously there WAS oxygen in the debris pile.
So..you admit your point are weak- thanks for playing.
(notice that you didnt answer the question)
i know it you faggot, i even know the one who did it.