Where do you still have left views? >climate change

Where do you still have left views? >climate change

Funding abortion for nonwhites.

this

This and definitely OP's. Nothing else that I can think of.

>healthcare
>climate change
>gene patents (ban them)
>separation of religion and state, especially Islam
>mincome
>legalize all drugs (but they should pay higher premiums if they test positive)

i support higher taxes on rich people if you can make sure they actually affect rich people rather than the middle class

none because im not a faggot

Most of my views are leftist in nature. Ideally, a system providing its citizens with basic income, healthcare, subsidized education, etc... would all be great

But I'm also not delusional enough to realize that it would never work. The system would just get bogged down by corruption and agendas. So libertarianism it is

also this and state funding of cuck porn targeted to poor shitskins as part of foreign aid.

it really should tell you something that no one on pol has been able to info graphic their way to proof climate change is bullshit

I mean we got more proof that the irish rule the world than we do of global warming being bullshit

>Gays should be allowed to live.

>Climate change but if it does not happen in my lifetime then whoopedy fuck.

>Renewable energy should be a primary focus.

Healthcare, I don't like it as it is but don't see a better alternative yet

Probably none now.

why are swiss so smart?

>Left Views

None, because I'm not a fucking communist.

I believe in climate change, but that doesn't mean the government shouldn't be disbanded and its property auction off to the proudest patriot.

You muricans cant have left views because hurr durr muh communism.

fiki piki taku paku

>not using greentext correctly
>unironically believes in muh global warming
Back to
Being non-Christian is also Leftist.

>Climate change.
The data shows the earth is getting warmer, no doubt in my mind. Now, how much do humans play a role in that? Maybe some, maybe not so much. On a grand scale, we've been putting emissions which stay trapped in the atmosphere for less than 200 years or so. At least in quantities big enough to fuck the global climate. The earth is billions of years old, how can a hundred years or so of some extra CO2 really ruin the planet for good? I'm just not sold on that.

Additionally, the point libs fail to address is that the US and many other western countries have cut down a lot on carbon emissions over the past few decades. The real problems we have now are developing countries like china, india, much of africa, etc. The west could cut emissions by 100% and those other places would still put out way more gasses than we ever did since their populations are now 100x what the west's were during the time they spent industrializing. So how do we address this fact? Do we march over to china and india and africa and demand they stop industrializing? Are liberals okay with a bunch of white men telling another country that? That we're denying them the ability to industrialize just like we did 200 years ago?

molymeme has alot good stuff about "climate change"

I'm not trying to turn this into a CC thread, but China is investing heavily in renewables. It's not because they care about the environment, its because we have about 50 years give or take of fossil fuels left.

Public healthcare and education