Explain National Socialism to me guys...

Explain National Socialism to me guys. I just listened to George Lincoln Rockwell and I couldn't logically argue with anything he said in this.

youtube.com/watch?v=FaCHBmGWcBc

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=LwHAK_HJO0I
youtube.com/watch?v=PNoR8Tn4jpY
anarchistrevival.com/2017/02/01/american-decay-1-the-human-cancer/
washingtonpost.com/investigations/pentagon-buries-evidence-of-125-billion-in-bureaucratic-waste/2016/12/05/e0668c76-9af6-11e6-a0ed-ab0774c1eaa5_story.html
youtube.com/watch?v=x1tUFx_StSo&t=5269s
youtu.be/gQtNtg1XeDs
youtu.be/cgltok5yYeY
youtu.be/pKnFN8P21-0
youtu.be/YkenkfRTn4c
youtu.be/_r9Z-hTn1r4
youtu.be/bAmgGmxHOMY
aryanism.net/politics/economics/
ihr.org/other/economyhitler2011.html
pridecomethbeforeafall.wordpress.com/2014/02/10/hitlers-economic-miracle/
ub.edu/graap/EHR.pdf
nationalsocialistreeducation.wordpress.com/2015/05/23/wind-of-change-green-energy-in-the-third-reich/
youtu.be/oVIbuIGAu38
tomatobubble.com/id570.html
youtu.be/CF-rNvYs70Q
youtu.be/HAV1_bol2BM
hitler.org/writings/last_testament/
laraj.ca/AGwiki/index.php?n=Fascism.America
youtu.be/0Gnov1TdIA0
youtu.be/OJrAWBtqcq8
youtu.be/FaCHBmGWcBc
youtu.be/ztlRAdvMloI
youtu.be/e4KSF8e578k
youtu.be/kybN4dlBA5c
youtu.be/6Rg0RJKVvpU
youtu.be/YeIcQSnepig
youtube.com/watch?v=xMn4qiaSsew
twitter.com/sirmitchell
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

...

didn't he let a bunch of homosexuals into his ranks

The prime objective of national socialism is to create a unified nation that strives for excellence and wherein the people support one another unconditionally.


This is inherently incompatible with democracy.


Democracy is a system that, by design, splits a nation into artifical factions that are in perpetual conflict with each other. Red vs Blue. Green vs Yellow. Etc.


Worse, the system inevitably devolves into corruption by an evolutionary process of sorts: The most successful parties and politicians will always be those that are the best at lying and manipulating the public (so as to get their votes) while actually serving the interests of those that give them the most "donations" (so as to fuel the next campaign of lies and manipulations). Some idealists will emerge, no doubt, but they simply cannot compete with a charismatic professional liar that is backed by connections to mass media.


National socialism seeks to destroy this system and replace it with a single, unified governing body that serves the peoples best interests as a matter of ideology (or, if all else fails, because the people would otherwise remove it).


No more lies, no more smear campaigns, no more empty promises never meant to be kept, no more endless arguments that never lead to action.


It combines two seemingly conflicting notions - the stark and stoic Nationalism with the subservient and altruistic Socialism - so that they may balance each other. The harshness of nationalism is softened by an imperative to help those in need. The weakness of socialism to exploitation is tempered with iron resolve and burning pride.


One nation. One state. From the people, for the people.

honestly, gays aren't a problem by just existing. It's their degenerate culture and lack of making white babies that cause problems

Those who reveal too much tend to be silenced.

wasn't he killed for trying to get rid of the larping bullshit that we are still dealing with today?

Just read the Nazi Sozi its like 5th grade reading level

RIP Commander Rockwell.

You should probably know this guy was just acting

a question and a statement.

How do deserving people rise to power in said system?

I will never give up my elected republic form of government. Doesn't mean I would support an elected NatSoc party, but I will never surrender the only peaceful means I have of removing bad elements.

it's just odd that he cited the bible (as do most white supremacists) in arguing for segregation and white supremacy, but had no issue letting in gays

sauce on such a claim?

If you have to ask then you are not ready to know

I see your point, but I think we was a mix of a pragmatist and thinking "we can bolster our numbers by recruiting gays". I'm a white nationalist and have no problems with gays. Their brains are just wired differently for whatever reason. Again, the problem arises with the degenerate culture and lack of white baby making.

>man is made of dirt
>he must protect his dirt for future generations
>government should be for the people and to protect thier dirt
>people serve givernment to protect dirt and build on it

youtube.com/watch?v=LwHAK_HJO0I

He understood how the Negro is and was and always will be a tool for the Jew in Europe & America.. He believed in and did, curing homosexuals. RIP Commander Rockwell 88

You mean like the neo-pagan shit that Hitler despised?
>It is typical of such persons that they rant about ancient Teutonic heroes of the dim and distant ages, stone axes, battle spears and shields, whereas in reality they themselves are the woefullest poltroons imaginable. For those very same people who brandish Teutonic tin swords that have been fashioned carefully according to ancient models and wear padded bear-skins, with the horns of oxen mounted over their bearded faces, proclaim that all contemporary conflicts must be decided by the weapons of the mind alone. And thus they skedaddle when the first communist cudgel appears. Posterity will have little occasion to write a new epic on these heroic gladiators.
t. Adolf Fucking Hitler

for every intellectual white nationalist, there are 10,000 drunk idiots
why do you even come here, man

because it's the only site that we can openly talk about white nationalism and shit that I "trust"

plus the bants are pretty comfy

>they simply cannot compete

WHITE BOIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Buy a copy of Mein Kampf

no, a post a while back I read said he was killed by a former supporter because he was trying to get rid of the german nazi aesthetic like the swastika and roman salutes. Obviously because he realized that he would never be able to get mainstream support by larping as Hitler 2.0

what version? From what I've read I can't just walk into a Barnes and Noble and buy one without it being edited and corrupted by (((them))) even tho the blacked out version they carry is pretty nice looking

just throwing out there: Jewish ACLU lawyers have fought against that kind of censorship for a long time

GLR was probably the most based political figure the US ever saw in the 20th century
>mfw he donated to malcolm x
youtube.com/watch?v=PNoR8Tn4jpY

>fought against that kind of censorship
what do you mean?

Meh, i have the new ford translation

Czech it out

>he donated to malcolm x
Holy shit... I have to learn so much more history. I feel so uneducated and behind on stuff.

bump

even if you just cite the Skokie case - where Jewish lawyers defended the National Soclist Party's constitutional right to march in a Jewish suburb of Chicago, only for them to back out after finally winning the court case - ACLU members have a serious issue with censoring freedom of speech

anarchistrevival.com/2017/02/01/american-decay-1-the-human-cancer/

He received a standing ovation at the nation of islam, he donated a few dollars to those guys, it was mutual respect, muslims fought in the Waffen SS anyway

His speeches and books are phenomenal and definitely worth looking at, he BTFOs libshits everywhere he goes.

Its both desu.
We should kind of be making children but lots of straight people only have 1 or 2 kids as it is which is really not great for growth.

hmmm. Fug it, I'll just go pick up copy when I finish the book I'm currently reading. If it seems off I'll find a better version

...We need a new GLR and we need him now

it's because of taxes man. My sister has 2 kids and has said multiple times she would have more if there was money for it. Her and her husband both work too so it's not that. In fact this fall was the first time they weren't able to pay their debt off to zero after the decade they've been together.

...

republicans are not going to extend those tax breaks next time around, man

we are all waiting for the next avatar, the next führer, literally..

Doesn't Trump want to completely redo taxes? From what I've heard it's going to be great for poor/middle class citizens

we're far enough in debt, paul ryan would never allow another trillion dollar deficit to happen under his watch
that's why I'm worried, as well, about us going to war with ISIS....shit's too expensive

I'm sure he's got a plan. He wouldn't just cut taxes and increase the deficit without a plan to cut spending. I can't wait to see where he cuts the fat

washingtonpost.com/investigations/pentagon-buries-evidence-of-125-billion-in-bureaucratic-waste/2016/12/05/e0668c76-9af6-11e6-a0ed-ab0774c1eaa5_story.html
mentioned it in a previous thread
not gonna happen, instead defense spending will just go up

Indeed, I wish the words of Rockwell were more well known.

I'm being redpilled on a whole other level right now listening to more of his speeches

youtube.com/watch?v=x1tUFx_StSo&t=5269s

Somewhere in this entire speech, he touches on queers and how he doesn't tolerate them. While your at it, listen to the whole speech. Everything in there makes complete sense and, I don't think, can be refuted.

that's actually next up on my list

Those woefullest poltroons extol the 50,000 crusaders it took to massacre the Seljuk muzzies that genocided Christians.

The most brutal muslims retreated before the "christcucks" and watched them slaughter those in Jerusalem and the kikes therein.

Good. He honestly touches on just about everything there is to know about National Socialism and how it would best work in America. If you didn't know already, ideologies like NatSoc tend to be specific to the country it was born in which is why his version of it would work best in America.

I think if any of his speeches were taught about in High School history classes or College history courses, many people would actually see that Rockwell's NatSoc would be perfect for America. Granted, those people would already have to be questioning certain things. His speeches just seem to finalize people's convictions because of how logical they are.

I'm interested, but honestly, I can't get fully on board if he starts talking about getting rid of our elected republic. The ability to peacefully remove those in power is a value I hold very dear. Not to mention, for us, government service and political positions were meant to be an honor and a privilege, we just need to get back to that

Oh no, further into that speech he talks about he loves free speech and how he thinks that a Representative Republic is the best from of governance for America specifically. Another reason for why his specific take on NatSoc would be even better for America. He talks about how he's been in two wars and that he absolutely hates war and wishes to avoid it at all costs.

did you ever see the documentary Blood in the Face
youtu.be/gQtNtg1XeDs
his followers were pretty embarrassing and insane lol

>His speeches just seem to finalize people's convictions because of how logical they are.

as a race realist and relatively redpilled on jews, I can confirm this. Already a white nationalist, by he's slowly turning me into a natsoc. It's freaking me out honestly. A year ago I was still a solid AnCap, and I still am on an idealistic level. I'm having a political identity crisis right now

>read that as "drink Coca Cola in buttholes"

nice, I may become a Rockwellian NatSoc by the end of the night then. How the fuck did this happen to me? lol

Ancap is literally modern day neoliberalism and degeneracy on steroids

(((companies))) need regulation

Bampen with more info
卐 - 25 Demands of National Socialism:
youtu.be/cgltok5yYeY
>Rodney Martin - The Economic Plan of the NSDAP
youtu.be/pKnFN8P21-0
>German Economic Miracle of the 1930's
youtu.be/YkenkfRTn4c
>Hitler's Economic Reform:
youtu.be/_r9Z-hTn1r4
>Social and Cultural Policies of NS Germany
youtu.be/bAmgGmxHOMY
>NatSoc Economics
aryanism.net/politics/economics/
>How Hitler tackled unemployment and revived Germany’s economy
ihr.org/other/economyhitler2011.html
>Hitler's Economic Miracle
pridecomethbeforeafall.wordpress.com/2014/02/10/hitlers-economic-miracle/
>Against the Mainstream: Nazi privatization in 1930's Germany (Germa Bel)
ub.edu/graap/EHR.pdf
>Green Energy in the Third Reich
nationalsocialistreeducation.wordpress.com/2015/05/23/wind-of-change-green-energy-in-the-third-reich/
>Hitler's Warning about the Zionist Control Structure
youtu.be/oVIbuIGAu38
>Adolf Hitler: Man of Peace?
tomatobubble.com/id570.html
>Hitler: We Want Nothing But Peace
youtu.be/CF-rNvYs70Q
>Hitler's Appeal for Peace in 1939
youtu.be/HAV1_bol2BM
>Last Will and Testament of Adolf Hitler
hitler.org/writings/last_testament/

卐 - AMERICAN NATSOC
laraj.ca/AGwiki/index.php?n=Fascism.America
>George Lincoln Rockwell
youtu.be/0Gnov1TdIA0
youtu.be/OJrAWBtqcq8
youtu.be/FaCHBmGWcBc
youtu.be/ztlRAdvMloI
>Dr. William Pierce
youtu.be/e4KSF8e578k
youtu.be/kybN4dlBA5c
youtu.be/6Rg0RJKVvpU
youtu.be/YeIcQSnepig

>he's still butthurt from the last thread
>not even showing the full quote because of how assblasted he is

Your own quote implied exactly what Hitler wanted from germany:

Stop talking about religion, start talking about the jew. Hitler had no problem with neo-pagans anymore than he had problems with Christians, it was when they started to fight amongst themselves that he had problems.

Neopagan vs Christian shit is D & C, fuck off back to Israel, Schlomo.

He's what pushed me over the precipice too. I was already fascist on some level, but I had never really gotten on board with it. After I listened to a couple of speeches, it really set me off.

It's the eternal redpill, my man. It never stops, I don't think.

This. It is an argument of ideologies, and not religion. Really, regardless of how I feel about pagans as a Christian, they actually have something to believe in that drives them unlike atheists, agnostics, et cetera.

Crusaders killed more of their own they they killed muzzies. Sorry, but had it not been for the sacking of Constantinople the Ottomans would've never taken it nor the Balkans.

Be thanful that the Finns sacked Baghdad

does NatSoc have to be fascist? I only ask this because even actual fascist have said it requires dictatorship and restrictions on free speech and the press

This, I have no problems with Christians reforming their religion as long as they don;t interfere with other whites.

Race > religion, we can focus on religion after we deal with the JQ, and in a more civilized manner.

Hmm, not necessarily, according to Rockwell. He argues that it is more so a "philosophical" ideology rather than an economic one like Fascism itself. He touches on that too in his speech that I linked earlier.

It's about applying nature to humanity. Have a supreme love for ones own race and people and strive for a better being within your race. As it's pretty much impossible to do that between different races/mixing them. Yet respecting the others for what they are. Except if another people/race aims to hurt you or disrupt your racial progress. Nationalism for a stong self-being within your race as a collective and socialism for the strengh of the individual within its group. It's about wanting to help the weak in your peers and project the strong. It's about discipline, loyalty to your race wich also means yourself as it is the centre of your existence. It's a philosophical view of the world rather than a ideology. It is the natural way.

Forgot to add that he claims that because Fascism itself doesn't specifically touch on race and how they are different and should remain separate from one another. He does argue for authoritarianism though to have a strong leader to bring countries to greatness and cites some of the founding fathers as examples.

National socialism is basically a chauvinistic communism that is legitimized only by war. National socialistic country is organized as an army and is prepared ultimately for a one, big war, just like III Reich. Once the war is lost, national socialism loses all legitimacy

If anybody dares to oppose what I've just written, then you're a moron from the democratic mob

samefag
watching this again, the conspiracy theories are fucking amazing

I'm of the camp that good and strong leaders don't breed followers, but other leaders, thus there's a lack of a NEED for authoritarianism

I had a thought earlier today that seems appropriate here:

The masses only ever overturn their rulers by force. This is the case even in democracy, where even if you start out with noble statesmen you eventually breed a nepotistic, self-interested ruling class that requires purging. The king and the dictator are faced with the threat that if they don't keep some minimum level of order and security, they will be overthrown because the people will simply be unable to bear it and one revolutionary movement or another will gain strength. The process is actually stifled by the (illusion of) choices presented by democracy, but it still does eventually happen.

As for ascending to power, through the military and the civil service. Having a separate political class was a mistake.

I'll have to disagree because most people aren't born to be great leaders. There's such a few that actually are which is why there IS a need for it.

They breed both. The followers follow, and the lesser leaders serve under the strongest leader.

This too

True, not everyone is meant to lead, but those genes could theoretically get bread out of existence in a society that encourages and rewards strong leaders in communities

Basically, my distastes for authoritarianism comes from the founding fathers fear of centralized power and central planning. That shit is was too commie for me

Yes, perhaps.

Well, a lot of the founding fathers were federalists, as you may know; in a way, those federalists founders were authoritarian on some level believing that a strong government is needed to retain order if it ever becomes chaotic.

Regression to the mean, dude. Even in aristocratic societies some people born to the nobility are shitty rulers.
In a fascist society you're looking at eugenics, so that may not happen as often, but eugenics could be tuned to create leader-quality people in every social class.

true, but from what I've read it was more to protect from outside threats and to hold together the states so they didn't just completely break away into their own independent nation because they knew separate states would never stand against a nation like France or Britain

another good RARE ROCKWELL SPEECH COMIN THROUGH

youtube.com/watch?v=xMn4qiaSsew

Yes, and I think Rockwell is talking about that form of authoritarianism in his speech that I linked earlier. Once you get to watch it in its entirety, you can judge for yourself.

wanna see something funny?

twitter.com/sirmitchell

straight eugenics seems unethical to me. It's like abortions, it's still life and they have rights to life, at least in the US. Now instead of just straight killing them I say we give intensives to those broken people to not have children

I agree, those are some reservations that I have about it myself. I really do like the idea of it, but I still can't morally put myself into it

welcome to Sup Forums

I don't believe in killing people who are already alive, absolutely. Sterilize them, for sure, but not kill them. But Gattaca-style sequencing or matching, and aborting fetuses with crippling congenital diseases, are different from that.

If you're against the latter, consider whether it's worse to allow someone with the downs, and their family, to suffer through forty years of life or to just prevent it from the get-go. Abortion is unpalatable but it's not always wrong.

That's hard for me to get behind because I have a cousin that has downs. He really is a good kid, but I understand to have a good society that it can't happen. It's just hard, I think.

yeah... no shit, eh?

No, I share your reservations. It's not a nice thing to think about, but it's the sort of call that has to be made.

but who is the state to deny the family's choice? If they are self-sufficient who are we to tell them no?

I think it's a matter that's beyond the individual family to further the gene pool of the nation.

as much as I detest democracy, maybe this is something that the nation needs to vote on? Or we just put it up to electing representatives that will fight for the belief we believe in congress similar to what we have now?

Leftism but for vaping neckbeards. They go on and on about innate superiority while also crying for big daddy government to take care of them blissfully unaware of the irony.

literally nothing I've read about NatSoc has been about taking care of people the way leftism/communism does

Well, in a Rockwellian NatSoc society, that's what our representatives would do, I think.

You're wrong and seem generally uninformed about what National Socialism actually is.

Ok, that I can get behind.

btw, started listening to that speech (Commies VS Natzis)

The funny thing about socialism is that in advocates for the government to seize the means of production because competition is bad and hurts people's feefees. If you want big daddy government to take care of everything for you by all means go ahead but at least admit you're a low test pussy.

Awesome man. Everything will slowly begin to make sense now.