>We therefore conclude that the States have alleged harms to their proprietary interests traceable to the Executive Order. The necessary connection can be drawn in at most two logical steps: (1) the Executive Order prevents nationals of seven countries from entering Washington and Minnesota; (2) as a result, some of these people will not enter state universities, some will not join those universities as faculty, some will be prevented from performing research, and some will not be permitted to return if they leave. And we have no difficulty concluding that the States’ injuries would be redressed if they could obtain the relief they ask for: a declaration that the Executive Order violates the Constitution and an injunction barring its enforcement. The Government does not argue otherwise.
BECAUSE A FEW SHITSKINS CAN'T GO TO SCHOOL IN MINNESOTA AND WASHINGTON!
they are treating foreigners as though their wants and needs are just as important if not greater than citizens, which they aren't
Asher Brown
>t. pink skin failures
Nolan Ortiz
Globalists did this.
Noah Hill
He is
Jonathan Gray
At what point do we listen to Thomas Jefferson and cause an armed revolution?
Lucas Jones
That's not the argument. The University is claiming it will be harmed by the loss of faculty and students. The university has rights, the foreigners don't.
Sebastian Butler
Redpill me on why the 9th circuit gets to pick
James Young
>In a unanimous decision, the panel of three judges from the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined to block a lower-court ruling that suspended the ban and allowed previously barred travelers to enter the U.S. An appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court is possible.
fucking traitors need to fucking hang, this isn't checks and balances, this is blatant disinformation appealing to moral superiority justifying blocking the constitutional power the president has exercised
Evan Scott
wtf reasoning is that >people can't travel to a university for 3 months oh nooo that sucks
Zachary Anderson
Not necessary. If you read the full thing you see that these cunts admit to precedent for Trump having the power to deal with inadmissable aliens and foreign policy as he wishes, but the stay doesn't require grounds of unconstitutionality to be made, just "damages". Once it is taken and proven perfectly legal, the merits of the stay are overwritten.
Julian Roberts
Everything the gov does will harm at least one person without exception. Someone being harmed isn't a legitimate defense.
Jack Lewis
the university isn't suing, the state of washington is. The person who is suing has to show that they are being actually harmed by a certain action. The state of washington is claiming that it is being irreparably damaged by the EO because people from somalia won't be able to go to its universities
Hudson Mitchell
LOL wow pretty mad there
Connor Hughes
Only "damages" need to be proven for a stay to be made until the constitutionality of Trump's order is affirmed. See
Matthew Sanders
>Jeff Sessions is racist because he decided a case based on the law and not his personal feelings >judges are supposed to activists, and it is a victory when they rule directly against Constitutional provisions to support their own ideology These people need to be shot in the street.
Thomas Perry
The state is suing on behalf of the people and university.
At what point do people stop misquoting jefferson?
William Morris
That's some backwards ass logic
Aaron Wright
What part of "get cucked" do you not understand
Gavin Ortiz
Corporations would be harmed if we stopped taking H1B visas, but it's not a Constitutional issue.
This has absolutely nothing to do with the free exercise of religion for American citizens.
Jackson Lewis
How is it a misquote?
Adam Perry
t. triggered drumpfie broflake
Dylan Nelson
>San Francisco-based What a shock.
Hunter Price
Huehuehuehue I'm looking forward to the fallout from overhauling H1B
Hunter Thompson
He was against armed rebellion, not for. Read the letter in its entirety
Tyler Carter
It's the most overturned of all the Federal appeals courts
Nolan Jones
> this isn't checks and balances Its literally the very definition of checks and balances. >Someone being harmed isn't a legitimate defense. You are right it is a legitimate CLAIM. Dumbass. You don't even know which side is the defendant. I wish stupid fucks like you would stop posting.
Jaxon Moore
The state of Washington has an interest in the companies that pay it taxes and the schools that it finances.
Benjamin Cox
Which is why this stay can only apply until it is proven in the Supreme Court that Trump's order is perfectly consitutional.
It's a game for these cunt partisan judges to score a "win" for leftists in the mean time.
Adam Sanders
they would also be harmed by a tax increase? Can they hold that up until they make sure taxes are constitutional?
thats about how dumb this situation is
Owen Carter
you drumpf supporters are brainwashed and full of hatred
seek help
Dominic Jones
trump is going to btfo of the judiciary
Kevin Myers
I fucking hope trump cuts all these somali refugees fucking welfare. see how long they wanna stay after that
Owen Evans
How can you have a rebellion without it being armed?
Jeremiah Wilson
It's not retarded. It's completely logically and fits in with the requirements needed for the TRO.
What's most interesting about the opinion is that they completely sidestep the issue of whether it violates 1st amendment rights, but this is mostly because they claim it violates the 5th, and that it's easy for Trump to get around that if he rewrites the order.
Samuel Perry
Minnesota here
FUCK OFF WE'RE FULL
and burn the Twin Cities to the ground and add all the hipsters, SJWs, shitskins and faggots there to the fire
Luke Sullivan
9th circuit = 9th circus
Well known for being completely full of shit.
Ryan Cox
>I have no argument so I'll just yell cuck more and more. You are pathetic.
Cameron Carter
traitorous judges have just betrayed the safety of the american people
now is exactly the right time to get mad
Anthony Cook
The state of Texas should claim that letting in sand niggers causes irreparable damages, and sue the fuck out of Washington state.
Jeremiah Gomez
Read the letter, he was against rebellion in general Calling "rebels" ignorant fucks
Thomas Foster
Unbelievable, isn't it?
But forcing your own citizens to spend thousands on crappy health insurance that many of whom will never use isn't harming them.
Seriously, this is the reason Trump won. Americans are sick and tired of our government putting foreign interests before our own.
Dylan Jackson
It's not checks and balances you cocksucking faggot. This decision explicitly goes against the FUCKING CONSTITUTION. The same one these so called """"""judges"""'" are supposed to uphold. This decision is literally treasonous.
Jack Gray
Unfortunately, Obama actually did a good job in stacking the courts with Marxists activists judges during his 8-years. It will take a while for them to be rooted out from all three branches of government. This decision is not a big surprise by the 9th.
Liam Morgan
fuck you nigger die
David Moore
Then what did he want us to do? Write sternly written letters to our oppressors?
Robert Jackson
>betrayed the safety of the american people skeeter is skeered
Mason James
You know nothing about the Constitution you fucking loser.
Jayden Brown
They left out
>some of these people will not blow up a shopping mall
Luis Richardson
Yeah, and? Where in the constitution are state government's universities entitled to foreign students?
Adrian Walker
I just love that the states' grounds for claiming a Muslim ban aren't the actual contents of the EO, but the fact that Trump claimed during the campaign he wanted to do a muslim ban. Childish logic.
Joseph Gutierrez
The liberal lawyers shopped the case to the most liberal district.
Dominic Roberts
>Its literally the very definition of checks and balances >activist judges basing rulings on feelings instead of the constitution >wasting everybody's time and money by forcing a higher court to rule that a government branch's constitutional authority is constitutional
Luis Wilson
...
Christian Clark
natural conservatives! future white Americans!
Oliver Scott
>if immigration is good for the economy you literally cannot stop it
We late stage capitalism now. Communist revolution soon.
Mason Allen
The Sixth is reversed more than the Ninth as a matter of decisions-affirmed to decisions-reversed. The Ninth is reversed more often in terms of sheer numbers because it's the largest circuit and sends more appeals to SCOTUS than other circuits.
(The Federal Circuit gets smacked down less frequently, but all its smackdowns are more brutal.)
boy i sure do love having our women raped for not wearing burkas sho is good for the economy
Jeremiah Murphy
Pure fucking nonsense
Caleb Baker
Shouldn't have suspended those visas then.
Thomas Lee
Get cucked faggot
William Powell
small hurdle. 80%+ of 9th circuit decisions get overruled. it's a political statement that won't hold up in a higher court.
Noah Morales
The state argued the EO was religious discrimination/a muslim ban, not because of the contents of the order itself which clearly isn't, but because Trump said he wanted to do a "muslim ban" previously. They thought that logic made sense.
Isaiah Hernandez
Universities, as an abstract concept, do not have rights. Only people have rights. In the area of immigration, the federal government's power to regulate immigration supercedes any subjective claim to the local detrimental effects on institutions done by withholding the entry of foreign nationals into US jurisdiction.
Blake Foster
...
Oliver Ross
>State Rights are Sovereign!
on Trump.
>I hate States Rights!
Stay Classy
>>>/lgbt.
Nolan Garcia
>Its literally the very definition of checks and balances. yeah it's "checks and balances" when morally superior judges obstruct constitutional orders from the president. that's definitely what i imagine the checks and balances system being used for, obstructionism against legal orders. fuck you, all of these judges are not representing the law like they should be
>it is a legitimate CLAIM. what do you think happens when the president signs an EO out of nowhere that restricts immigration from certain countries that almost immediately gets overturned because some kids can't come back to go to school? do you think it does more good than bad? are those kids worth the risks? keep drinking that good tap water mouthbreather
Henry Robinson
...
Zachary Harris
I clearly know more than you faggot. His order is 100% fucking legal.
Charles Gomez
Time to reduce all visas from those countries down to one each permanently.
David Collins
>its unlawful to block immigration from anywhere ever for any amount of time because some immigrants may become faculty at a university
what fucking planet do these people live on
Sebastian Campbell
>activist judges That's literally what all judges do under a common law system.
Isaiah Harris
Bush was too stupid to do what Obama did sadly.
Cooper Turner
Except it's a split court and all the judges are activists.
Zachary Stewart
Funny thing is, little bitches like you would start crying tyranny if the congress impeached judges from the 9th.
>On no, you can't do that, that's tyranny
Okay can the president criticize them on twitter
>Oh no you can't do that
Great, so we have a guy in black robe that can issue a nation-wide edict and we can't criticize or impeach. Didn't know this was Somalia.
Luke Long
It's going to the supreme court regardless.
Jason Hill
Aren't there any lawyers here on /pol that can craft up a legitimate petition demanding the disbarment of these dishonest judges? I'm sure most people on here would sign it.
Christian Ward
...
Brandon Garcia
>every single thing Trump does will now be held up by infiltrated leftist judges without any legal basis
come on just dissolve the republic, at this point the communists have destroyed the integrity of basically every part of he government
we are a few decades at most from the total breakdown of the US government as a functional body
you could argue we are essentially already there
Bentley Kelly
Swedish beta male, how was your 5 prayers today?
Ayden King
Problem is its almost impossible for one to get impeached. The system is rigged specifically so they can't get impeached/
Angel Cox
>stupid No user naive. Appointing Roberts was a naive move hoping to appeal to a more moderate approach and Obama shit all over that.
Noah Campbell
That's not true at all.
Tyler Taylor
The problem is that it isn't the legality of the order being ruled on, it's the grounds for a stay on its effects until the legality is affirmed.
Andrew Smith
>federal government tells states they have to let gays get married >Trump tells retards to fuck off protecting illegal criminals >MY WHOLE STATE IS A SANCTUARY WE DON'T ANSWER TO THE GOVERNMENT
Nathan Russell
Good. We need to rid the world of capitalism. America would be a great place to start. 2017 is the new 1917.
Nicholas Long
During this "small hurdle" how many shitskins will pour into the country?
Samuel Hall
...
Xavier Ross
Not for long I can tell you by experience, we've had them since early 90's and employment rate runs around 20% maybe.
John Sanders
You're retarded. Painfully so. Take your own advice and stop posting.
Alexander Cooper
>RETARDED LOGIC lol, you think they have to have logic? courts/judges are just opinions. you just gotta make sure you have your guys there and not their guys.
Carson Baker
>>activist judges >That's literally what all judges do under a common law system.
you are LITERALLY a mouth breather, literally
Hunter Myers
Hence why California should be allowed to secede at this point. They're basically a Nu-Norway or Nu-Sweden at this point.
