8 U.S.C. ยง 1182(f) "Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate." law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1182
Landon v. Plasencia, 459 US 21 - Supreme Court 1982 "This Court has long held that an alien seeking initial admission to the United States requests a privilege and has no constitutional rights regarding his application, for the power to admit or exclude aliens is a sovereign prerogative." scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5918376679014688763&hl=en&as_sdt=6&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
United States ex rel. Knauff v. Shaughnessy, 338 US 537 - Supreme Court 1950 "At the outset we wish to point out that an alien who seeks admission to this country may not do so under any claim of right. Admission of aliens to the United States is a privilege granted by the sovereign United States Government." ... "Thus the decision to admit or to exclude an alien may be lawfully placed with the President, who may in turn delegate the carrying out of this function to a responsible executive officer of the sovereign, such as the Attorney General." scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5235136558696880110&hl=en&as_sdt=6&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
I was a fat neckbeard but then I votes for Trump and now I look like this
Aaron Sanders
Yeah, how'd that work out for ya?
Angel Mitchell
>B-B-BUT THE UNIVERSITIES NEED MORE FOREIGN STUDENTS!!
t. 9th circus cucks
Liam Reyes
It has only just begun. Kek wills Trump will get his ban.
Easton Mitchell
OHHH SHITTTT HERE COMES THE BOOM TURBOLIBS
Adam Nelson
doesn't matter, those laws where written by white people, and those where racist court cases
this is a Brave New World, Trump must be stoped
Hudson Howard
Its clear, the law allows the ban. EVERYONE knows it.
But these activist judges will keep challenging everything based on BS, then get overturned, but never be disciplined or replaced.
It will be obstruct/delay/delay/get_reversed, then repeat on the next Executive order.
Leo Rogers
Those two cases don't play on this issue, because they deals with individual determinations, not classes of people like the EO bans
I still think it's constitutional and will likely be upheld, but if you're a fellow lawfag I suggest you kill yourself
Jonathan Cruz
So how tbe hell are these bans being held up by courts?
Kevin Lee
>Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof Case closed
Robert Scott
holy shit you people are seriously this dumb? that statement has literally nothing to do with the EO but even still, banning threats from entering the country in no way prohibits the free exercise of religion
Mason Martinez
NYAHAHAHAHAHA
Joseph Phillips
What part of No Constiutional Rights don't you understand? Scotus says immigrants seeking initial entry have N O Constitutional rights
Gavin Richardson
The Ninth Circus is used to giving blatantly unconstitutional rulings they know will be overturned by the Supreme Court for the purpose of delaying Republicans. They and the Left don't give a shit what the law says, they only care about their desired outcome.
Jaxson Morris
>trump bans travelers from countries of known terror issues who refuse to vet properly >other muslim countries allowed in >but drumpf can't ban US citizens from practicing religion!! In another related statement: >Congress shall make no laws regarding the number of people allowed to ride unicycles in a single room. If that doesn't make trumpkins understand then i dunno what will
Tyler Scott
Leftists will send as many cases as they can in front of the Ninth Circus knowing the Supreme Court will overrule every absurd decision they hand down. It's a distract and delay tactic.
Adrian Hill
The judges are passing rules based on judaism and gay cuckoldry not whether the order was constitutional.
Jonathan White
Life Liberty and the Pursuit of Jihad
Jordan Brooks
But will the Supreme Court as it is today, follow those rulings? As I understand it there are 4 originalists and 4 who follow the "living constitution" meme right? Won't they just vote based on that and it'll be 4-4?
Joshua Harris
Confirmed.
Brandon Carter
Seriously, we can't let him get the nuclear codes.
Hunter Carter
2 originalists, 1 who tries to follow the letter of the law, one moderate who doesn't want to upset the New York Times, and 4 dedicated "living Constitution" Leftists. I'd guess even the dedicated Leftists would be hesitant to deny the executive this obviously Constitutional authority considering it has been used by Carter and Obama as well.
It would require putting States' rights above power explicitly delegated to Congress in Article 1 Section 8, which requires contradicting a slew of previous rulings.
Austin Morgan
can somebody explain this to me? It can't mean what I think it means.
Jayden Hill
Gay cuckoldry confirmed.
Anthony Green
oy vey good goy. that complement costs you ten shekels. HAND IT OVER GOY
Nathaniel Mitchell
If this gets rescinded, I want Trumo to give the public the numbers of those judge so we can call them and personally ask them why they are putting the safety of non-Americans over their own citizens. I fucking hope he does because if this gets rescinded, I have fucking words to say.
Alexander Ortiz
It means the Ninth Circus represents about 20% of the US population due to changing demographics since it was created.
Landon Mitchell
This is even a bigger Win Bros! Have faith in our Emperor !
You see we are establishing the legality with the SCOTUS. Easily done by Sessions. Sessions will request immediate SCOTUS action. By next week even the liberals will be forced to agree.
We can then Ban all of Islam and Mexicans. If the Cartel is not a Clear and Present danger what is. Fuck. Don't ask Comey. The circle jerk law applicator would take 20 years to decide, which we would use to our advantage.
Its over left. We reversed you social gobbledygook and took back the country for righteousness.
Jesus is Lord!
Kayden Wood
"Rather than present evidence to explain the need for the executive order, the government has taken the position that we must not review its decision at all. We disagree, as explained above." - The panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
lel
Nolan Cooper
He had to make sure his first with the Supremes was a slam dunk win. Liberals are pretty fucking dumb
Liam Cruz
What the fuck? The court thinks the President needs to demonstrate need? How the fuck do they arrive at this shit? Their sole fucking function is to determine legality.
These courts are dens of treason.
Lucas Fisher
Do you even read? It says "Preventing Muslim Immigration". He's on the record calling it a Muslim ban. That is called targeting a religion. Now try not to choke on your baby food Mongo.
The bill of rights doesn't grant any rights. It takes away rights from the government. One of those is making laws concerning religion. A ban on muslims is a law concerning a religion. Ban is unconstitutional. You following Goofus?
David Perez
"of any aliens(people), or of any class of aliens(people)" No way you're a lawfag
Dominic Wood
>UHHHH ANY SORT OF IMMIGRATION CONTROL IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL HURRRRR
wtf i hate borders and laws and shit now!
Ian Cox
#
>EVERYONE knows it
ah but if it were true. alas, the baby boomers and their demon spawn grandcuckolds, the millennials, are so beyond cucked and fully fucked by the uniform brainectomy of their respective cohort, not EVERYONE knows what is plainly read and understood.
but Gen High T Trump, Gen (se)X, Gen Z(yklon) and the remnant of the Greatest Generation got this locked down. We turn to HOLY FATHER, HOLY GHOST, and Jesus the Christ to set this straight.
Ayden Davis
>Rather than present evidence to explain the need for the executive order The President doesn't have to justify an EO on inadmissible aliens. Nothing in the law compels it.
Moreover, federal courts have zero authority to review this particular EO beyond the questions 1. Is its legality provided for in existing statutes passed by Congress? and 2. Does it violate the Constitutional rights of a legal resident of the United States?
Alexander Price
Pic related.
It's not over yet.
Eli Jones
Screen cap this:
Trump is a zionist plant whose mission is to forment anti muslim hysteria to proportions so great that it creates the ripest conditions possible for the interests of Great Israel
Parker Powell
>Those two cases don't play on this issue >Those two cases on this issue >Those two cases >two cases read you dumb piece of shit
Nicholas Lee
Ahahahahahahaha
Jackson Howard
Note the countries in the way of Zionist ambitions.
Iraq: Already Fallen Syria: In progress of falling
Screencap this, Trump will push the wars.
Jaxson Phillips
>Landon v. Plasencia, 459 US 21 - Supreme Court 1982 "This Court has long held that an alien seeking initial admission to the United States requests a privilege and has no constitutional rights regarding his application, for the power to admit or exclude aliens is a sovereign prerogative."
are you?
Dylan Hall
kill yourself tonibler mehmeti, your entire cult deserves to be eternally eradicated
Isaiah Perez
>freedom of speech >protecting incitements of violence wew lad
Jeremiah Clark
t. Abdul the Kidney Merchant
Ayden Davis
...
Jackson Lewis
>privilege, not a right I hate that this doesn't go without saying.
Mason Phillips
Secondly that was from a statement in
DECEMBER 2015
Can you show me where in the EO the word MUSLIM is??
Faggot.
Josiah Harris
Jerusalem is and always has been, and always will be Israel's capital, even if the EU and America don't agree.
Kevin Campbell
Amerifat the Zionist pet...
All i ask is that when the day comes when you are sent over there to spill your blood for some rabbi and his olive trees, take a shot of liqour for me.
Liam Jenkins
if jews installed dictators in your country and financed sectarian terrorism and false flags all the time, many of your people would not "behave" in a traumatized situation like that.
Brayden Wood
That would be haram and reduce the quality of my organs though. Why would you want that?
Jaxon Edwards
...
Caleb Evans
someone is tweeting this to miller killer and friends right? Every news station should be talking about this
Gabriel Cruz
I love my country and refuse to see it fall to the Muslim hoardes. WE WILL GET OUR BAN. IN THIS LIFE OR THE NEXT.
is it basically illegal to prevent travel from any country now?
Ayden Young
Trump should be a dick and order that all aliens must be personally approve by him
Kevin Wood
>9th circuit has the highest rate of overturned decisions in entire country >kike activist 9th circuit judge tries to stop trump >gets case taken all the way to SCOTUS with gorsuch about to get confirmed >dems get BTFO'd permanently on immigration
We need to go full nuclear and get Cruz on the supreme court. The left would not know the meaning of pain until a Christian conservative gets in there, plus Ginskike is already one foot at the court and one foot on hell's doorstep.
It's time to go nuclear, boys, we need to patriotic Americans in there.
Elijah Hill
you turned black after voting for trump?
I just grew a 3rd penis. It's fucking huge though.
James Bennett
...
Tyler Sanders
9th circuit is liberal. >he institutes a small ban that only lasts 90 days >libs flip their shit and make a court case of it >it goes all the way to the supreme court >Gorsuch gets placed in >court decides in trumps favor saying he has absolute power and control over immigration >he then goes on to make a full Muslim ban and any court that tries to stop him will be in contempt of the supreme court ruling They really should have left it alone and let the 90 days pass.
Jason Foster
This would be amazing and very realistic. Please make it so, Kek.
Carson Thomas
Travel bans are legal. This one isnt because you cannot say you will take in a immigrant/refugee then say "naww go back Mohammad" once you already setup with immigration. Thats entrapment, and possibly leaves the individual without a country.
James Brooks
I think this is a very important point that demands further attention.
I don't believe it for a second, but EVEN IF the liberals are right and Trump is a flailing incompetent, surely the conservative think tanks and establishment republicans have literally dozens of anti-immigration lawyers who know the arguments and statutes like the back of their hand and have been chomping at the bit to argue this exact case all through the last 8 (or 50) years?
So therefore why would the administration send in a clueless n00b? It's surely HARDER for them to find a clueless n00b in Washington than it is to find a grizzeled veteran.
This can therefore only be proceeding as he has forseen. Trump's handing the libs the rope to hang themselves with. He wants this ban to be blocked. Either he's just trying to expedite its arrival at the Supreme Court so he can actually bring his A-game there, OR he *wants* it to fail even in the Supreme Court so the next time there's a Happening he can turn the wrath of the masses on the liberal judiciary and bring in much harsher measures when they're cowed and shamed by events on the ground.
6 FUCKING DIMENSIONAL INTERPLANETARY MAHJONG
Leo Ward
THIS.
Worst case he loses the supreme court but by that time he's instituted the changes the ban was about anyway.
Some people slip in during maybe, but probably with all this fuss they will be heavily vetted now.
Libs claim victory, Trump gets what he wants.
It is eeiry how everything they do to stop him end us helping him.
Luis Green
In other words these liberal judges are breaking the law.
Bentley Sullivan
>Thats entrapment, and possibly leaves the individual without a country. And this would be relevant if entrapping or de-country-fying foreigners in a foreign country violated their Constitutional protections. But they have no Constitutional protections, so, logically, this is a moot point.
Kevin Powell
>judges rule in direct opposition to existing US code
I thought a judge's job was to enforce the existing law code not to decide he doesn't like a certain part and try to unilaterally change it.
Gabriel Anderson
can someone explain to me 8 US Code 1182 (f). Because it just references aliens. But trumps ban also includes valid visa holders and people with green cards doesn't it? Are they still classified as aliens or do green card holders have a diff status?
Easton Sullivan
He was testing the media and the dems. This ban is very similar to one Obama had in place. He now knows their reaction. The media and liberals will literally freak out no matter what he does so it doesn't matter how far he goes in his EO
Eli Wood
yes we know, its cut and dry in law
how can we fix liberal activists who parade as so called 'judges'? how do we purge them from the system?
why do only conservatives in the judicial branch follow the law and take their duties seriously and impartially?
Jace Jackson
Do all your cheerleaders have flat chests?
Jackson Stewart
Liberals live in a fantasy land and therefore believe real laws don't apply if they hurt someone's feelings
Connor Davis
>islam is illegal
o dog
Julian Garcia
Its crazy that you even have to justify this >"I have the RIGHT to crash on your couch! You can't throw me out of your own property!"
Isaiah Bell
Except you cant make a person stateless.
David Adams
I also believe there is a law on the book banning immigration from those who practice polygamy. It was intended for the Mormons however long ago but last time I checked it hasn't been repealed
Elijah Thomas
Cheerleaders wear sports bras to keep their titties from flopping around while they perform.
Jaxon Morgan
Not bringing them here didn't make them stateless
Christopher Watson
>i didn't know that the quran said to kill all infidels and submit to a semi-theocratic feudal government i swear