So I have an esaay to write but I don't understand completely what this means. #2 makes no freaking sense...

So I have an esaay to write but I don't understand completely what this means. #2 makes no freaking sense. Can someone clarify #2?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_Duer_Miller
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

you should punch your fucking teacher in the fucking face for giving you such a stupid assignment

It means a man doesn't want to discuss something when he can assert his dominance and not have his authority questioned. Might makes right.

It implies that "manly" men can only settle disagreements through violence.

Which is, of course, patently false. While a well rounded man should be capable of fighting, violence is not how you settle every problem in life.

Violence is the first resort of niggers. Your teacher is awful, and sounds like they are projecting about their own brain problems.

Call them on it.

It means you need to slap your professor across the face with a glove and shout, "You, [sir/madam], have insulted my honor. I demand satisfaction!"

it's just a rewording of the old arguments against women's sufferage and both the person who wrote it and the professor who thought it was a good discussion topic are peabrained morons

Sorry OP, your screwed. Go out with a bang!

Type up the female version

Hell I'll do it, just give me a minute

but women's suffrage WAS a mistake

What the fuck kind of assignment is this?

No wonder American students are such shit writers.

Please tell me what the premise of this class and assignment is. This seems absolutely ridiculous.

For the love of god, tell me your teacher is aware that this is rubbish.

Here you go OP

For the love of God, Kek and Moloch, gas your fucking "teacher"

of course it was

So this essay is for AP Language (Juniors) and my teacher is some ex World champion wrestler, Jim Lucas (James Lucas). He was a rich ass fucker and owns 5 cars and shit ton of suits, Rolexes, and the usual rich crap.

OP I wrote an outline for you

Please use it

tell the stupid bitch running the class to go make her own society if she hates the one men created so much and see how well she copes, or better yet, tell her to go live in the society women already created, there are lots of them out there, you just have to look real hard

/rant /wrists

Reported for being underaged. This board is for adults, faggot.

Yeah, I will do so user and thanks.

I think you should actually do the assignment the way he wants, argue why men should be able to vote, but then also use the outline provided as an additional point.

The ridiculousness of the counter, with the only thing switched being males and females and their niches, proves and invalidates the original statement.

Best of luck user

>>But the topic is for adults. Guess someone is butthurt with this anti-feminist thread.

>men are too emotional

Goddamn you're dumb. You just did what amounts to translating English to Israeli to English again.

>Israeli

I'm high, I meant Hebrew.

your underage is showing

That was the point.

It's to invalidate the original argument.

If that paragraph is taken seriously, there is no reason why the one I wrote shouldn't be either.

That's some heavy duty delusion right there. Your best bet is to take this up with school officials. Teaching this nonsense should absolutely not be allowed in any school.

The question should be why socialists don't want men to vote. The real reason- because men can settle differences without a grudge and prefer capitalism to socialism.

wtf, is this satire class?

And this

Alice Duer Miller?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_Duer_Miller

Also, the writing prose on there is atrocious.

Who the fuck says 'manly man' who isnt under the age of 10?

>wtf, is this satire class?
Liberal college composition 101

>Because man's place is in the army

I agree with this.

>Men lose their charm if they leave their natural sphere, defending their country

I also agree with this.

There's probably quite a lot very nice prose today that will sound like total shit in 100 years.

I agree with those points, but I don't think they support the notion that men shouldn't vote. If anything, it strengthens that argument. The very act of voting IS defending ones own country.

You retard that's satire. The real essay is why we should stop niggers and white trash from voting.

>Should men have the right to vote

Undeniably. We die for the country therefore we should run the country.

If women want to go form their own combat oriented military branch and keep the fuck out if ours than they should be allowed to vote too. But as it is now, they should fuck off because back to the kitchen and have no say in our politics

>Men are too emotional to vote.

How about you write an essay about how women are favored heavily in divorce courts, and have no requirements toward proving that the child support goes to the development of the child?
Or how women are statistically the "more educated" gender, and yet have infinitely more scholarships and acceptance bias than men?
Or maybe how women are actually more likely to be the abuser in domestic violence?
But really give some mention to the fact that women can accuse a man of rape with no proof whatsoever, destroy their career, public relations, educational future, and even familes, but not face a single consequence if there is absolutely no evidence that the man did a damn thing.

Your teacher wants you to get butthurt so she can say "Now you know how women feel!" and act like she taught you something about the world.
Always be a step ahead. It's really not hard considering the allergy most feminists have called "critical thinking."

That's my conclusion there. Thanks for summarizing my points

The answer, of course, is that when men are deprived of a means by which to settle any question otherwise than by fighting about it, they'll settle the question by fighting about it, which is why there's a vote instead of a king in the first place.

Point out the assignment is retarded because most men couldn't vote in 1915 either.

Simply write your essay based on the fact that men are better to pursuits such as science, mathematics and industrial pursuits while women are more suitable for the bickering, beurocratic world of politics