Serious question. Why wouldn't Trump protect the US from the countries that truly threaten...

Serious question. Why wouldn't Trump protect the US from the countries that truly threaten, and have previously threatened, their values? Or is this list fake?

Other urls found in this thread:

breitbart.com/big-government/2016/02/12/machete-wielding-man-attacks-israeli-christian-ohio-restaurant-several-wounded/
dailysignal.com/2016/12/02/ohio-state-attack-sheds-light-on-somali-communitys-struggle-with-terrorism/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Because they are our Petrodollar allies and even if he wanted to the deep state wouldn't allow it

Two words: oil, Israel

H9w is this true. We had troops die I'm those countries by citizens from those same countries

>conveniently ignores 2016

They have somewhat functioning governments.

The banned ones have no functioning government, an enemy state and/or are terrorist hotbeds. They're more of a threat than the others.

The seven have no government or governments that won't cooperate on a vetting procedure, so travel was suspended until one could be established unilaterally.

That said, some of those off the list are bigger threats.

Those banned countries (with the exception of Iran) are active war-zones. Obama launched hundreds of drone strikes at both military, militant and civilian targets. There are a lot of pissed-off people wanting payback.

Your chart is incomplete; there are at least 33 majority Muslim countries on the globe. Only 5 are under ban and will be "extreme vetted" in the future. So Trump is not really doing a "muslim ban" but an extremist one. The ban is only 3 months; Obama did a 6 month one and Carter actually expelled Iranian students.

>0

dont you think theyre due for an attack?

Its actually all non-rothschild/central bank countries that are banned.

Its based off of how many actually managed to get into the US to carry out attacks/kill people.

Not an all encompassing statistic of deaths caused by people from there.


The irony being that the official government position being is one that of the latter and not the former which would be have better been served by the former. So based on what is actually being argued by trump and his subordinates that is the statistics that come up when you check them. So that is what is being presented.

But it was Obango that made that list

Somalia isn't really 0
breitbart.com/big-government/2016/02/12/machete-wielding-man-attacks-israeli-christian-ohio-restaurant-several-wounded/

Also lots of somalians have attempted terrorism
dailysignal.com/2016/12/02/ohio-state-attack-sheds-light-on-somali-communitys-struggle-with-terrorism/

Didn't the iraq get one after the second gulf war?

I mean the Americans and their overlords were already there

>implying libya didn't get a rothschild bank when they were overthrown
>syria doesn't have a rothschild bank

y'all are trippin.

Do you monkeys really think this constant misrepresentation of what the ban was is helping your cause?

It's like you retards actually want to lose.

that's a stupid argument. the ban isn't to stop attacks that already happened. that's literally impossible. it's designed to stop future attacks.

You don't really believe that don't you?
You're getting play just like when Bush say Iraq have nuclear weapons

None in the Middle-East is a threat to you.

So why would you not ban countries that the most fatalities have came from? As a precaution? I'm just confused as to why not do a blanket block of primarily Muslim countries from entering the country like he was campaigning for instead of using Obama's hand-me-down list instead of making his own.

Because those countries cooperate in anally examining, at least in theory, everyone that is leaving those countries to come to the US.

That's the point behind the extreme vetting that happens here for those 7 countries that President Obama and Congress, and then President Trump, acted on. There was not any, or only minor, vetting of people leaving those targeted countries to come to the US.

His instinct of a blanket Muslim ban was a better idea.