Do people on this board genuinely believe that women should not be allowed to vote?

Do people on this board genuinely believe that women should not be allowed to vote?

Other urls found in this thread:

img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1475/99/1475998906389.png
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

we're all closeted Salafis here m8

I believe non-whites shouldn't be allowed to vote

Only the gays unironically believe this.

Everybody should have the right to vote. In fact, I think they should lower the minimum voting age to 16.

Sure they can vote, if they are land owners.

Yes. They have proven they wont vote in their own nations interest. Their own races interest. Their own families interest. Their own interest. They are simple social animals trying to gain status. Just as bad as niggers.

Neither men nor women should be allowed to vote if they cannot reason, own land/business, have family (adopted or otherwise).

Sex itself is irrelevant.

Women & non land owning males shouldn't be able to vote.

Cunts should not be allowed in government at all. They are property, not people.

I've literally only seen that opinion expressed once here, and the context was obviously satire. Go away.

I don't want to know why they do that. Just how does doing that not get super infected... or ripped... or just flat out decay... Same shit with those gauge earrings. I don't get that either.

HELLO /REDDIT/

Sup Forums doesn't really understand the purpose of democracy

it's why they're also opposed to compulsory voting laws

can you name one agenda that females voted correctly on en mass that men did not? ... IN the HISTORY of suffrage. the problem isn't that they cant choose right its that all shit aside they're submissive and they hop on the "minority" train hard.

Eh. I go back and forth.

2016 proved women aren't capable of intelligent choices and will gleefully vote with their vaginas.

What the fuck

I genuinely believe that people on this board should not be allowed to vote.

100% should not be allowed to

I don't know if they all shouldn't vote, but I've definitely met some that I KNOW shouldn't vote..

checked

This board is nothing but retards and 12 year olds. Don't take any of it too seriously.

That Kek guys is for the LOLs though.

I don't think women should be able to vote.

1. It harms the family unit. When men had the vote it was one vote per family. Now politicians pander to women and divide men and women on issues.

2. Women don't think logically, but emotionally. This isn't to inply they're inferior, but absolutely different. Women shouldn't make decisions that determine nations.

3. Women have never and won't ever bare full responsibility for their actions.

Women shouldn't hold public office or be allowed in the military either

I think having one legislative chamber where voting is restricted to one per household would be beneficial. And in a traditional society, that vote would be cast by the patriarch of the family. So yes.

sure, why not?

women should be allowed to vote if they served in the military and were accepted under the same standards and guidelines as all men. Otherwise, women cannot be trusted to make decisions that benefit the collective over the individual.

Honestly? It depends on the woman.
I'm personally leaning towards a Starship Troopers form of government. If you're not willing to serve your community in some fashion then you are not fit to exercise authority over it.

absolutely

why should they be allowed to vote? their brains didnt evolve to lead civilization. why would you instantly give them 50% of the power to determine everything? makes no sense.

img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1475/99/1475998906389.png

As long as they have no tattoos, they may vote.

Good opportunity to post this.

Only people who have "skin in the game," so to speak, should vote.

Meaning only those who own property, work jobs paying enough for wages to be taxed, and military personnel.

the majority of women base their decisions on emotion and not logic

so no, they shouldn't be allowed to vote.

>believe
hard facts and common sense

no, only irrationals

but white women voted for trump

This guy just posted full pic so skip my link

Wow, look at that horrible racist future AfD wants.

This.

Trump would have swept 49 states.

the right to vote should come from the ability to pay taxes and own property
therefore if you do not want women to vote, you should take them out of the workplace

Try to find a female Bernie supporter that knows either his or Trump's tax policies.

Then you'll understand.

Pretty much everyone believes this, now tits or GTFO.

Oh no you don't think I should be allowed to participate in the kike-controlled brainwashing competition? What a shame.

>people on this board genuinely believe that women should not be allowed
ftfy

yes

everyone knows giving women the right to vote was a mistake. even women.

link to the original post? google not revealing much

1 vote per parcel of owned land. Who ever pays the taxes, gets the vote.

You realize white men voting is what got us to this point right?

I don't know. It's just in one of my maymay folders. It's an interesting read.

I don't agree with 100% of what is said, but the guy makes a pretty solid argument. (i.e family based politics vs. individual politics).

Yup, they nope should nart.

G G G G G G GOT EM

Yes.

Criteria for voting:

1. Be male
2. Not on welfare
3. Married, with children
4. Own property
5. Own a gun

Then you can vote. This would literally fix democratic systems over night.

And what's wrong with
>this point

yes, unless they own property.

Yes, women shouldn't be able to vote. Nor should non-whites or white males who do not own property.

I mean, to most women society probably just feels like a big game, if they fail they can just fall back to getting married and let the husband handle things, so it's not surprising they don't take it too seriously.

I don't believe in democracy

OP, look at your pick, and you tell me.

This point = everyone getting a vote. Women didn't vote for the 19th. White men did. Niggers didn't vote for liberation and voting rights, white men and women did.

its not that I believe women shouldnt be allowed to vote but that I believe if they weren't it would be much better for society because women vote for socialism and thus significantly harm the economy but much more importantly technological and scientific progress

>Pretty much everyone believes this
Evidently not seeing as women can vote. Though I wonder how many people outside of this board do hold the view.

>You realize white men voting is what got us to this point right?


Well women bearing children is what brought you into the world, but it doesn't mean we should give up on the practice.

This also. There's always a desperate faggy cuck waiting to worship some whore instead of casting her into the gutter where she belongs.

No-one should be allowed to vote based on simply existing. People should be allowed to vote based on merit.

Well women sure as fuck aren't going to fix the vaginal jewry problem, so what's your fucking point? Oh right. you don't have one.

You're just going through the motions of cuckery.

They mistakenly thought women and niggers could be on the same level as white men. Now there's history books to show how disastrous it was so no one will make the same mistake again.

...

Source on image?

Why can't they just be slaves?

this sort of "skin in the game thinking" tends to work less and less well the more people are involved in the process and the more power is wielded by those elected. I accept it works on small scales, for, say, unions, or corporations. I completely accept that the office bearers or directors of such organisations should be elected only by those who work for them or whose pecuniary interests are affected by their policies and management skills in a direct way. Of course.

But when you start talking about this on large scales, especially on national scales where all peoples interests are affected in bigger and smaller ways, the objective of voting becomes less of giving power to the people (because the larger the voting pool, the more diluted any one person's unique set of preferences are in influencing the outcome of the vote), and more of fettering the power of the elected class. By forcing them to account for the interests of all people, it's impossible to consolidate excesses of power in any particular area while expecting to be returned to office by the voters. It should be the aim of everybody sympathetic to the ideals of democracy to expand the franchise to as many people as possible, not to shrink it.
He makes a gish gallop of shit arguments that sound like they were drafted over the course of a single evening by an ambitious sophmore undergrad. I want to see if somebody in the thread in question took the time and effort to rebuke him on every individual point.

people on wellfare
should not be allowed to vote... and single mothers are the largest group

I believe only heterosexual, landowning, protestant white men should be allowed to vote.

eh. Maybe? What if the guys who already own property decide they want to control everything and make it extremely hard to own property? Like 100k to own just an acre kind of hard? And with the Married with children part. Do you lose your right to vote if your family dies in a tragic accident or your wife leaves you for some back stabbing piece of shit? What if you or your wife can't have children? Does that mean you have to adopt just to vote? What happens if you adopt a non-white just to be able to vote? Shit just isn't that simple.

Women fucking ruin nations when they get the ability to vote.

Of course.

/thread

>A bunch of logical fallacies hidden behind a sad attempt at eloquence

Wow. REally made me think.

Women are so smart.

>f you're not willing to serve your community in some fashion then you are not fit to exercise authority over it.
YOU FUCKING NAILED IT. But how do we measure someone's contribution? Impossible. NEXT!

I think what it boils down to is men and women have different roles, and both are trying to mold the government into a body that represents their role.

We can't have both. And trying to blend them together is not doing any fucking good at all. I have no idea how to fix it, though. Stopping women and gimmidat-addicts from voting is one way. But, for long term peace, it's not the best.

Women make me uncomfortable when I leave my Mom's basement. Therefore they must be repressed from any equal rights.

Digits and KEK wills it!

...

something along the lines of "I dont need feminism because of my brothers cock"

Yes, but not for the reasons you're thinking.

The problem with "the woman vote" is that it encourages families to vote separately; and not in their own best interests. Corrupt politicians playing identity politics try hard to get "the woman vote" and pander to them at the cost of what is REALLY best for the family as a whole.

It's not that women shouldn't be allowed to vote; but that there should be one vote per "head of household", so that husbands and wives aren't voting against each other. There shouldn't really be any reason for politics to divide a household; identity politics makes it so by politicians seeking niche interests that drive wedges between "identity groups" of people.

Roasties BTFO

Seriously though, we can't let Hillary get the nuclear codes.

Women are allowed to vote after having at least two children with the man they marry.

Men are allowed to vote while they own land and pay income tax.

I know.... a better system is fully qualified. You get points for certain things - education level, results of psychology test (to screen to collectivist tendencies, etc), home owner, biz owner, etc.
then you get minuses, so genetic test, welfare recipient, etc.
The end results are tallied and the final is how many votes you get, so some men get 1000 votes and others 0. Its the only way to save and protect you, little fag.

Only white men should be allowed to vote.

To be clear the title is "I Don't Need Feminism Because I Love My Big Brother's Dick". Just giving the cover might not have cleared it up.

Define Serve

if you can, you have an idea, if you cannot, it's shit

this so much

wtf i hate universal suffrage now

If it were that simple, then women could be the primary voters instead of men and the same goal would be accomplished.

Let's be honest here. Family values is just 1 piece of that pie. There's a dozen damn good reasons to revoke women's suffrage.

Women are basically communist.

Look where we are compared to where we were before women got the vote

Did you not watch the hundreds of thousands of woman march in washington for rights they already have? Does that not tell you anything?

Expect childbirth in hospitals to become a luxury and the price of land to skyrocket

>By forcing them to account for the interests of all people, it's impossible to consolidate excesses of power in any particular area while expecting to be returned to office by the voters.
term limits already achieves this without any action on behalf of "the people"

Before suffrage
>Women cheat on their husbands and bitch about being oppressed.
Post suffrage
>Women cheat on their husbands and bitch about being oppressed.