/lrg/ LIBERTARIAN RIGHT GENERAL - FREE YOUR MIND AND YOUR ASS WILL FOLLOW EDITION

This thread is for Discussion of Libertarianism, Capitalism, AnarchoCapitalism, and the physical removal of communist fags from our board of peace.

From now on I'm going to reserve this general for sundays, if you like this thread post it yourself but I will always post it on sundays.

>Post sneks
>Bump for Life, Liberty, and Private Death Squads

So Sup Forums what are you doing to secure a free and prosperous future for yourself?

Other urls found in this thread:

pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1b5b/8351b8e74885b976ae75ad605709b61b6ecb.pdf
liberalstudies.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/thelaw.pdf
il-rs.org.br/site/biblioteca/docs/Friedman__Milton___Rose_-_Free_To_Choose_--_A_Personal_Statement.pdf
socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/aristotle/Ethics.pdf
iea.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/files/Hayek's Constitution of Liberty.pdf
mises.org/system/tdf/Liberalism In the Classical Tradition_3.pdf?file=1&type=document
mises.org/system/tdf/Economics and Ethics of Private Property Studies in Political Economy and Philosophy_3.pdf?file=1&type=document
mises.org/system/tdf/A Short History of Man — Progress and Decline.pdf?file=1&type=document
riosmauricio.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Hoppe_Democracy_The_God_That_Failed.pdf
mises.org/system/tdf/Theory of Socialism and Capitalism, A_4.pdf?file=1&type=document
mises.org/system/tdf/From Aristocracy to Monarchy to Democracy_Hoppe_Text 2014.pdf?file=1&type=document
mises.org/system/tdf/Myth of National Defense, The Essays on the Theory and History of Security Production_3.pdf?file=1&type=document
mises.org/system/tdf/The Private Production of Defense_3.pdf?file=1&type=document
mises.org/system/tdf/Economic Science and the Austrian Method_3.pdf?file=1&type=document
mises.org/system/tdf/What Must Be Done_7.pdf?file=1&type=document
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

GENERAL READING LIST (feel free to make suggestions to expand this list)

>Basic Economics - Thomas Sowell
pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1b5b/8351b8e74885b976ae75ad605709b61b6ecb.pdf

>The Law - Frédéric Bastiat
liberalstudies.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/thelaw.pdf

>Free To Choose - Milton and Rose Friedman
il-rs.org.br/site/biblioteca/docs/Friedman__Milton___Rose_-_Free_To_Choose_--_A_Personal_Statement.pdf

>Nicomachean Ethics - Aristotle
socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/aristotle/Ethics.pdf

>Hayek’s The Constitution of Liberty - Eugene F. Miller
iea.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/files/Hayek's Constitution of Liberty.pdf

>Liberalism: In the Classical Tradition - Ludwig von Mises
mises.org/system/tdf/Liberalism In the Classical Tradition_3.pdf?file=1&type=document

H O P P E

HOPPE READING LIST

>The Economics and Ethics of Private Property (1993; 2006 2nd edition)
mises.org/system/tdf/Economics and Ethics of Private Property Studies in Political Economy and Philosophy_3.pdf?file=1&type=document

>A Short History of Man: Progress and Decline (2015)
mises.org/system/tdf/A Short History of Man — Progress and Decline.pdf?file=1&type=document

>Democracy—The God That Failed (2001)
riosmauricio.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Hoppe_Democracy_The_God_That_Failed.pdf

>A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism (1988; 2010 edition)
mises.org/system/tdf/Theory of Socialism and Capitalism, A_4.pdf?file=1&type=document

>From Aristocracy, to Monarchy, to Democracy (2014)
mises.org/system/tdf/From Aristocracy to Monarchy to Democracy_Hoppe_Text 2014.pdf?file=1&type=document

>The Myth of National Defense: Essays on the Theory and History of Security Production (2003)
mises.org/system/tdf/Myth of National Defense, The Essays on the Theory and History of Security Production_3.pdf?file=1&type=document

>The Private Production of Defense (1998; 2006 edition)
mises.org/system/tdf/The Private Production of Defense_3.pdf?file=1&type=document

>Economic Science and the Austrian Method (1995)
mises.org/system/tdf/Economic Science and the Austrian Method_3.pdf?file=1&type=document

>What Must Be Done (2009)
mises.org/system/tdf/What Must Be Done_7.pdf?file=1&type=document

...

fuck roads

...

...

...

...

Off road is for real men!

...

...

>AND YOUR ASS WILL FOLLOW EDITION
FAGGOT

Stop pretending to value liberty and just come out of the closet as fascists already.

That goes especially for you "Hoppean" memers. The guy is literally the definition of a crypto-fascist.

>liberty for all except those I don't like
>also I worship a Chilean dictator

You are kidding yourselves.

...

Libertarinism is based on a premise of objective morality, which does not and cannot exist, hence libertarianism is nonsense.

t. never read Hoppe

You haven't read a single of his books I bet.

>objective morality doesn't exist

Wrong, you've been cucked by dark occultists

...

Saying something is "wrong" is not an argument.
Let's see you prove objective morality without appealing to Gods (appealing to Gods makes your case even more silly, by the way, since you then also need to prove the existence of God).

>objective morality doesn't exist

Is AnCap the master race?

Libertarian society is only maintainable in white societies.

Discuss.

If you could not objectively assert that you are the sole and exclusive owner of your body (including your vocal chords) you could not even attempt to engage in argumentation without becoming entangled in a performative contradiction.

The existence of God is self evident in our free will and the laws that govern reality to make it what it is, and don't think I'm at all advocating religious mockeries of God.

for

...

Hey

That's not an argument, just a baseless assertion stemming from your own particular bias.
Ownership is an abstraction that doesn't exist in reality. And yes, we often have to delude ourselves with various ideas in order to function in society, but that doesn't mean those ideas exist objectively.

This. Damn conservatives or libertarians who say "muh rights come from God". There are so much better arguments which don't require God.

huwhite Hoppe utopia when?

>ownership is am abstraction that doesn't exist in reality
>ownership in one's body is intersubjectively ascertainable by virtually every person including primitives

>ownership is abstract
>but I own my body to be able to write this down :^)

Soon my fellow huwhite person. Interestingly enough, Jared Taylor reviewed Democracy The God That Failed

Yes, this is why we oppose fascism. I am the highest power and only I will secure a future for myself and my loved ones.

But...but...you are...egoist !!! That's bad

Naturally, white people would want to live with other white people, blacks with blacks, jews with jews etc... and without any welfare system, all the low IQ races would not be able to leech off of other people. most societies would naturally be mostly exclusive to one race.

Capitalism has some flaws. For example, if you import enough people, you can simply drive down living standards. People get paid less unless the economy grows with the population growth. Even if it grows, you still have to deal with increased density and living in apartments instead of houses.

Finally, you realise that existence is one massive contradiction.. Now you should stop reading libertarian hacks and read real philosophers like Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Kierkagaard.

Relativism is for slaves, it blinds you to the objective nature that governs the reality we all share.

Just pay $5 for a website where you host personal information on every ANTIFA faggot you can find.

Data collection should probably be crowd sourced from a collection of volunteers.

t. "left-libertarian"
When forcing people to deal with people even if they don't want isn't authoritarian.

Fascism is the way forward.

Whites will not survive without it.

It revolves around self ownership. If you don't want to talk ethics, you could take up things from there and still be libertarian light.

Relativism is the basis of human existence.
However, that does not mean we shouldn't construct narratives and ideals. We have to, otherwise we can't live.

*boards helicopter*

Is Jeffrey Tucker solely responsible for the association of bow-tie with ancapism?

how is that a flaw of capitalism?
just don't import niggers you retard.
>believe in nothing acomplish nothing.

Nope, individuals may not always have a perfect understanding of objective reality, but collectively over time we put the puzzle pieces together to be able to judge what objectively is and isn't. No opinion can change natural law, if you walk in front of traffic you will be hit and killed. Objective reality is very real and so is natural law which is the basis of reality for what it is.

Yes. It is a flaw of capitalism as the sole mechanism of societal control. More of a complaint about libertarianism.

>>believe in nothing acomplish nothing.

I didn't say that you should believe in nothing. Nor would any relativist or existentialist. You should construct your own meaning, while at the same time accepting that it's objectively meaningless, simply a narrative you tell yourself.

No Sargon, biology is the basis of human existence. So reproduction is objectively what people are objectively designed for.
Relativism is for retards who think they are smarter then they are.

Don't let them in then, if they can't afford, they won't go, immigration wouldn't be a problem.

Hard mental dissonance.

Who imports those people and why would I be forced to associate with those people in a free society formed by different private, covenant-based communities?

I am not arguing against the existence of objective reality (the objective world), I'm arguing against the existence of objective values (human abstractions, particularly related to how one should live or behave).

As for walking in front of traffic and being hit and killed, that's only meaningful at the level of human existence, your death is irrelevant at the scale of the universe.

That would definitely work if things were arranged in that way.

Today you are white. Good job.

>So reproduction is objectively what people are objectively designed for.

But that isn't a human invented abstraction, is it? Maybe you're the one that thinks you're smarter than you are, since you don't understand my position, yet shoot your mouth off with 100% certainty.

Only people who are willing to work and contribute to society are going to survive in a libertarian society. Even if somehow some shadow organisation forcefully imports niggers, they will have to work just like everyone else or leave.

But you could say that about any economic system, if you import more people then the system can handle it should surprise no one that the living standards go down.

Is /lrg/ the only thread on Sup Forums with actual political discussion?

Natural law is objective morality, and the concept that we can't know what is objectively right and wrong is a programmed abstraction

It doesn't matter if they work though. If more people exist, it means the supply side of the wage price changes. Unless there is more demand, wages will go down.

This and my Hoppe General

If you guys would stop being stop being such flaming faggots it would be a lot easier to crush communism as allies.

People have tried to prove the existence of natural law since before Socrates and nobody has managed to do it, in fact, really smart people realised it wasn't possible, unless you shoehorn in deities (which require a suspension of disbelief).

You wouldn't because this means that you can live as a free man and enjoying your personal property without damaging others

>your death is irrelevant at the scale of the universe.
Then everything is irrelevant, but why do you care about others lifeless planets? We don't value chickens as human, stick to the immanent world, dumb brit.

apparently
more people = more demand = more supply

Morals have a basis in biology. Why else would humans have developed morals if they were not biologically advantageous? Living in a group where the members don't kill each other over food is advantageous to you and your genetic offspring. It's why lesser primates have rudimentary ethics. They will for the most part not kill one another over nothing.
Sargon, why are you such a relativist one minute and a moralist the next?

This is not true if the immigrants produce their own income.

>Claims objective morality doesn't exist
>Makes a normative claim

Looks like yes
Commie general is shitposting
NatSoc general is singlejerking
On this thread we have real discussion
We /patrician/ nao

Dude, you're an alright guy and i would work with you. I'm just not going to suck the fuhrers dick. I will not bow to any arbitraitor.

Natural law has been known for ages, but it's been hidden to control people like you. The relativism you're fed is to keep you enslaved.

We have a basis in biology to construct abstractions, obviously, but that doesn't make those abstractions objectively real.

Just don't send the SS because I disagree with you on some issues and it's fine

...

True but we all know with a welfare state that rarely happens

yeah that too.
I've only seen one edition, i'd like to see more

>Then everything is irrelevant
Yes, anything beyond physics, chemistry, and biology has no objective meaning, but that does not obstruct the construction of subjective meaning.

> more people = more demand = more supply

That isn't how it works exactly. More people, but they need money. Especially if they are from poorer countries, they will not consume as much. They will also increase house prices, which does not increase employment levels all that much.

I get what you say but it practice it's a lot different. You won't bring about a Hoppetopia with a top down approach. Governments are monopolies and just like every monopoly they won't just disappear without a fight. If Fascism returned libertarians would absolutely be crushed as well. This is why we must endorse a bottom-up revolution by supporting separatist movements, secession, anti-democracy demonstrations, political humiliations, identitarian and nationalist uprisings, etc. We must ridicule the state and itsee agents and give back the power to the people. Read "What Must be Done" by Hoppe. It's a short read, less than 20 pages.

I've only made two or them so far but only the last one had the FAQ section and a high number of memes and discussion. Would be nice if any of you guys just copy pasted the template for the thread and make them more often.

So is all animal behavior subjective then? Instincts are subjective then?

Your people make the wealth, invite niggers, they live under welfare state. Thats sounds like a retarded plan.

>Yes, anything beyond physics, chemistry, and biology
No, everything. You're discussing the realm of the dead things. I don't know how to further this discussion. Don't be this reatarded, nihilist.

If they are not going to consume as much, they will not need as much money. Capitalism adjusts itself according to society, not the other way around.

>> They will also increase house prices, which does not increase employment levels all that much.

Land mass isnt really an issue. Plus building and maintaining a house is pretty expensive

>libertarians think removal of communists will magically make their fantasy world be a reality
I really hope you're a teenager and not an actual adult holding these views.

Nevar forget

>statists think giving the right man some power will magically make everything perfect

you can literally say this about any ideology

Sounds good to me, dude.

...

>when the OC you made 4 years ago gets resposted

Anti-com is a great thing

You trigerred /leftypol/ to do a commie version of your pic
Good work m8

I'm not a nihilist.

bump

The world really needs a Triple-H Physical Removal Treatment

This one is great

...