Egoism is the only true redpill

egoism is the only true redpill

Stirner just cracks me up

I like the idea of spooks but I can't really into anarchy.

...

>stirner
>left

>stirner
>anarchist

So you like the idea of people mugging you better than the idea of them not mugging you...
Brilliant senpai.

> stirner
> asking

>ywn btfo communists so hard that you're mostly remembered for a funny cartoon and massive rant targeted at you by Engels
JUST

I honestly eish that everyone who is an egoist or egocentric should get the most vicious ass-cancer mother nature can spawn.

So ruthless that you can see it from the other side of the street.

So merciless that your kids go around the house slapping your cancer with sticks saying: "That's what you get for being a self-centered retard, you fucking nothing."

Die in a pit of acid, all of you self-living, arogant fuckheads.

Successful people always have time and will to help others, while you strive for basic needs and fight for your life just to have a place to stay and enough to eat.

Also sage, stop giving stupid kids this idea

feeling spooked m8?

Ayn Rand is the Egoist. Im sure she triggers a lot of stircucks

Stirner had no agenda, all redpills are spooks. Chaos Magic is the path to ejaculation

ayn rand was spooked

The spook is a spook (is a spook)

Spook

I think I agree with your statement.

While I believe alot of the left is regressive, and destructive, I do see its growth as societies natural reaction to ever increasing wealth inequality.

The more society becomes unequal the more pressure there is going to be for a revolution. With the way technology is going and alot of other factors I think revolution is probably on its way. I just hope it's not going to be some horrible violent stalinist uprising. Hopefully the left sort there shit out and regain some morality and decency but I'm abit pessimistic about that.

...

TRIPS

>I do see its growth as societies natural reaction to ever increasing wealth inequality
Why would there even *BE* a reaction to some perceived inequality?
Economics isn't a fucking zero sum game Jesus Christ.

Wouldn't Stirner think that the left-right dichotomy is a spook?

lol, why does it matter how well off others are if you don't benefit?

>perceived inequality

Lel
Americans are stronger believer in the illusion of the American dream than Soviets ever were in Socialism

That's perceived inequality.
Saying something is perceived doesn't say anything *whatsoever* about whether what is perceived is true or false you poverty stricken illiterate dipshit~

Yep, exactly. Please die of something. Get stomped by a flock of emus. Just die.

why man, caring about yourself only just makes sense

>Why would there even *BE* a reaction to some perceived inequality?

Well I think it's fair to assume that there is a reaction going on. Perhaps not to some "perceived income inequality" figure, but basic jealousy and egoism are always going to be there. All human systems end up being hierarchical, because people are different. If it's a good system there isn't going to be much resentment between the people at the top and the people at the bottom, but there still will be some because of the aforementioned jealousy and egoism.

Regardless of total objective wealth, if there is a relative wealth difference I think people will get jealous. Normally I think this is fine and I think jealousy can motivate people positively as well as negatively. The problem is when this relative wealth difference becomes so extreme that people start getting violent and shit falls apart.

Clearly economics is not a zero sum game, but that still doesn't disprove the idea that extreme relative inequality, regardless of objective wealth, can be damaging to society.

Because society collapses without natural hierarchy. Some people are better than you, and civilization needs people who are better than you to function.

Right, let me draw it. You western people are so fucking shallow.

If you employ a person to find a way how to send the first human crew to Mars, it will take him forever. If you employ a lot of people, they will figure it out much faster.

Caring about yourself leaves people who can't care about themselves alone. Who is gonna take care of them? What if you get married and your wife loses a foot? You're just gonna leave her because she has to help herself?
No, spend your life selflessly helping others, the valuable ones will realize it and you'll form an unbreakable bond out of loyalty and trust.

It's easy being a selfish piece of shit, it's hard being a problem solver for others.

There is but it's unreasoned and absurd, which is my point.

If they can't be reasonable they should just off themselves to make the world a better place for lack of their absurd, hateful and envious carcasses rolling around inciting hatred and violence where none is due.

>stirner left

Get The Fuck Out Here, faggot.

>if an egoists wife loses a foot they wouldn't help her
>egoism means you aren't ever allowed to care about anyone else

what

>You western people are so fucking shallow.
>Norway flag
Go back to your shithole then

>If you employ a lot of people, they will figure it out much faster.
Not necessarily. This is the monkeys with the typewrites.

>What if you get married and your wife loses a foot? You're just gonna leave her because she has to help herself?
On sickness and in health, in good times and bad, until death do us part.

>It's easy being a selfish piece of shit, it's hard being a problem solver for others.
Stop thinking about yourself, give my poor shitskin self all you own.

I've had a fucking gut full of your shit you stupid Norwegian cunt so let ME spell it out for YOU. Your fucking moronic 'Mars Team' explanation makes zero fucking sense in relation to the topic at hand; egoism doesn't justify hiring one man over five in order to get a job done, that just slows down the entire process & fucks you over just as hard as the other cunt, hiring five makes your job far easier, however the workers feel is fucking irrelevant in this situation, only the efficiency of the job matters.

Secondly, the wife one's a bit more complex as it pertains to the idea of bonds, family, etc. where the ideas of egoism become a bit more loosely defined, you obviously put yourself first in the situation, that's the entire fucking idea of being an egoist, but it isn't to say that helping somebody is completely out of the question. This only really applies to those closest to you, who you feel a legitimate & important connection to, so if your wife loses a foot, assisting her to some degree is still somewhat justified within the ideals of egoism, as to some degree the family unit can be seen as an extension of the individual (though one's self is still ultimately individual), though this may not be the case for all.

Stirner would be considered an Individualist Anarchist.

Family bonds are a spook, m8. Haven't you seen that yet?

Sorry to ruin the meme, but family bonds legitimately aren't spooks; a spook is an idea made up by the human mind which doesn't exist outside of it. A family bond is a logical part of nature, where you protect those who carry your genes, it's not a made up idea.

Oh? Are you saying the human mind isn't a part of nature?
What, do you not believe in "science"?

...

Germans are the worst thing that god has ever created.

An egoist doesn't care about the working class, only his own self-interest.

Stirner is basically the heart of darkness.

Want to see it in action in real life? Look up "the belgian congo"
A place with no spooks. Just literal slaves.

so I will now exercise my might and dominate the oil industry, purchasing massive plots of land and employing people to work the fields.
While Stirner fanboys demonstrate how valuable and coherent their beliefs are when applied to a society. Let us examine how selfish and egotistical societies have flourished... oh wait.

I don't understand why the working class is a button.

>"I want your stuff"
>"I want my stuff too"
now what?

>signalling your altruism on Sup Forums
>doesn't understand the concept of social climbing
Get a fucking grip.

>An egoist doesn't care about the working class
Who says? My ego is fed on doing good for the working class.

Why don't Americans celebrate ego?

Yeah our unilateral one-world corporatist government sure is suckin' wind. Man I sure hope Kim doesn't wise up and take over the world with his nuclear bottle rockets.

They either come to an agreement to trade for goods/services or one of them takes it by force.

hirohito will make sure the samson option becomes available

You mean death of ego. The whole consumerism model is dependent on you having an ego, and so your self-esteem depending on social status and materials. If all your thoughts are strictly rational and not ego-driven they have no control over you.