Name One thing you agree with communists on

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Pp1wVPeg59Q
youtube.com/watch?v=EC6C-cAc240
youtube.com/watch?v=ZjuweNjJwrk
youtube.com/watch?v=iPVKSiTmU8s
youtube.com/watch?v=N294FMDok98
twitter.com/AnonBabble

OP is a faggot

Fascism is terrible. Maybe not as terrible as communism, but still pretty bad.

Also the people should have the right to bear arms.

Stop subsidizing corporations

Killing other communists

Ukranians should be murdered

That violence is the best solution to your problems.

It's good for downsizing the population. My people had seen the efficiency of such depopulation masterwork.

Capitalism is fantastic at BTFOing commies.

Capitalism provides the most freedom.

Capitalism is better at being efficient.

I actually agree with a fair amount of communist *economic* doctrine. They're cultural policies are fucking hilariously backward tho.

AK is best rifle

Rinse and repeat. In the name of Anticom: Fuck you, Commie scum.

Commies are gay but that is true tho

AK-47 is meh, AK-74 is decent.

Capitalism is shit.

...

What system should we have instead?

What portions of communist economics?

> Name one thing you agree with the communists on

I agree with them on many things. I used to be a gommunist, until I actually went out into the world and got a job and realised how lazy and parasitic the vast majority of people are, and how egregiously counterproductive it would be to ask me to subsidize them.

I guess the thing I still like most about the system is how degenerates really did get sent to the gulag

My dick is huge, and I guess I like starving people for a different reason.

Nice picture.

Basically putting people before the market, which communism tries to do, and fails. The problem with communism is they go full centrally planned, which will obviously always fail. The ideal is a mixed market centrally directed economy.

That people deserve equal treatment under the law. Whether you're pure Aryan or the niggest of nogs, the law shouldn't see that.

Sort of like China's economy?

You might be the first person I've met to realize that egalitarianism is literally a Marxist concept.

It existed long before Marxism tho.

but thats what communists do

but communists wouldn't make that assumption, so you should try again.

Not necessarily, they have state capitalism which is doing wonders for the economy, but their country is a fucking shithole. The ideal for me is something of a crypto-welfare state where something like jobs (infrastructure building or something similar) could be provided by the government for the unemployed.

...

Where? Humans weren't "equal" until 1965.

0/10, fuckface

i guess the idea of that they try to make everyone equal and that in theory a communist utopia should be that everyone is equal that no one is above anyone and that end goal is there should be no starvation, currency and that there should be no distinction between rich or poor problem is that communism just falls flat on its face so :/

I see. I guess that makes sense.

>egalitarianism is literally a Marxist concept
>"We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."

It's shit.

Egalitarian-oriented societies are inherently inefficient, because they put the most retarded and weak in charge (or at least keeps appealing to them).

Society needs to be governed by a Darwinist hierarchy.

The Philosophy of egalitarianism was before Marx and it has mostly replaced Marxism in the form of identity politics.

The question was "name one thing you agree with communists on", so I was agreeing with you on this.

Didn't all those countries have awful oligarchies and weren't really ruled by the people at all?

Did literally any classical liberal thinkers believe that blacks were equal to whites?

you said two things. i never said i was arguing with you

did you just post a pic that doesn't explain shit about inflation? did that just happen?

Jefferson did, although he continued to own slaves anyways. The rest didn't even think of blacks as people, really.

Oh, okay then.

We did have John Brown, though.

no. i don't think john locke ever said anything that lead anyone to believe he wasn't just talking about white land owners. did thomas hobbes?

oh by the way it's the 21st century now

Use your brain box, why didn't they mention blacks or black societies

post-scarcity resource based economy and/or green technocracy. transition to it from democratic socialism that invests in alternative energy and educating every human being on the planet because education people are less likely to have children or have as many children

Industrialization of the land and nationalization of natural resources.

I like that under communism, you would starve and die.

CEOs, corporations, and capitalists that control the means of production are also central planners.

every economy has some form of "central planning"... that's not much of an assertion.

banks are the enemy

>why didn't they mention blacks or black societies
Why would he, is he supposed to bring up every single individual society and then say they're equal? Why do that when he already told us that all men are equal?

Question. What will happen to capitalism when robots take all the jobs?

because they were being murdered and colonized, which would put a damper on their whole premise about "liberty" and "freedoms"

Fuck corporations. The nation must always come before the (((economy))).

It collapses.

I'm not sure you understand what "centrally planned" means.

It's a very common term used in economics used to describe communist markets.

What replaces it?

They didn't consider them men, this was in the founding document of your country.

nomadic hunter-gatherer tribes literally lived and migrated the planet for thousands of years, dumbass

we fix robots, then robots fix themselves, then they become sentient and will kill us all.

Well central planning isn't the only type of socialist economy. You should check out decentralized planning

Nothing you faggot shill, sage

>they will kill us all

not if they want someone to repair them after solar EMPs, they won't

>Darwin
>promoting hierarchies

but that isn't correct. You are talking about social Darwinism, which was not endorsed ever by Darwin himself.

Read this book Mutual Aid: A Factor In Evolution

That's a long way away, but once they take ALL the jobs then capitalism peacefully transitions to a post-scarcity economy.

We're talking about John Locke right now, not the Founding Fathers.

Healthcare should be single payer and government run.

and yet, there are monopolies in capitalist markets

...

Yeah you're right, I live in a lite-socialist country. And by decentralized economy do you mean ancom and syndicalism?

The imagery is pretty nice. The symbols are strong, relatable and easy to understand.

To be fair, those monopolies either have to exist on the basis of customer satisfaction and efficiency, and thus are good, or exist because of government interference in the economy.

Yeah, and if you've ever opened an economics book you'd know they're horribly inefficient and often disastrous for the economy. I think that a truly free market would require government intervention.

they're retards, like all civil rights movements the parisitic robots will kill they're host and fuck themselves. just like dindus.

Sort of. Allende also had this weird system where computers calculate needs and tell factories what to make digitally. He got overthrown though.

Nice meme ya got there, where'd ya get it?

I'm talking in reference to the ideology as a whole, not specific thinkers. I'm sure there were some humanists in the crew, but the prevailing thought was that blacks were not equal.

That modern life is corrupt and rotten.

Only thing I agree with communists on is that a million dead communists is only a statistic.

Interesting, it almost seems like the next step in capitalism. 100% efficiency in relation to supply and demand. Seems a bit unrealistic though, right?

The power should belong to the strong, and the smart

Working for a living sucks

It worked... Kinda. Pinochet killed Allende so we never got to see if it would work out in the long run.

The meme factory.

The ideology as a whole holds that all men are created equal. What qualified as men may have been subject to the prejudices of the culture at the time, but that doesn't change the actual values of the ideology.

Certainly didn't work out in the short run.

For a serious answer, Marx's first chapter of the Communist Manifesto is redpilled.

He wrote that globalized capitalism had caused the downfall of chivalrous and religious fervor, had reduced the family to a mere money relationship, had made people slothful and greedy, and had alienated both workers and capitalists from the idyllic feudal sense of "belonging".

Seriously read the first chapter. He has a lot of sympathy for what he calls the "Reactionists" (read: Sup Forums). His diagnosis of the degeneracy liberal capitalism causes is on point. It's too bad his cure is absolute dogshite.

Luckily the fash pill is the actual solution to Marx's description of capitalism

From each according to his ability to each according to his need.

What I'm saying though is that this belief was a foundational part of the ideology. They believed specifically that all *white* *men* were equal, they never preached egalitarianism as a blanket for all.

And this is the point I was trying to make initially, Marxism was the only doctrine that ever preached blanket egalitarianism. Modern egalitarianism was never an aspect of classical liberalism.

REPORTING IN COMRADE! Point out the traitor to the proletariat that will be the first to the gulag! We have nothing to lose but our chains and nothing to gain but the world!

We all hate muslims

we must have bread but we must also have roses!

9/11 was an inside job

Also Marxists ruined Marx.

Actual quote: "What is certain is that I am not a Marxist." t. marx talking about autists ruining his philosophy like

Israel is a racist apartheid state who has illegal Jewish ONLY settlements
in the west bank where the border walls are wrapping around them inside
Palestinian land in an obvious land grab.
youtube.com/watch?v=Pp1wVPeg59Q

This is why terrorism happens and why the rest of the west gets blowback from it.

Israel builds these settlements on top of Palestinian villages that they have bulldozed by the military.
youtube.com/watch?v=EC6C-cAc240

If you support Israel you are not a leftist. End of Story.

This young activist was run over on purpose by an Israeli military
bulldozer while trying to stop them from destroying a village
to make room for Jewish only settlements
youtube.com/watch?v=ZjuweNjJwrk


This is Bernie Sanders exploding on a liberal girl for
daring to question the apartheid state of Israel

youtube.com/watch?v=iPVKSiTmU8s

How does Bernie Sanders with dual Israeli/US citizenship support a wall for Isreal but not the US?


AIPAC has the US congress by the balls

youtube.com/watch?v=N294FMDok98

Alternately kill the idiots then the cost for educating the rest would go way down and you'd get a better product.

>still clinging to the "not true Marxism" meme

He was actual talking about the Paris commune. Basically some random workers seized all the state property in Paris then held some elections and let capitalists run then they all got killed. Marx got triggered because they let capitalist run and also the revolution wasn't world wide.

DIE NC REBEL SCUM

FOR THE TERRAN REPUBLIC!!!

Let's not forget the Bible, though. Jesus was exceptionally egalitarian.