My political psychology professor's attempt at teaching the political compass

People are writing this shit down and eating it up.

Bernie was the definition of a populist: Not establishment, and only took small donations. Wtf?

>(((true))) Communists

>political psychology

That just sounds awful.

>Bernie Sanders
>Libertarian

Nigger, what?

You mean communist

Most of it is correct, the only thing that's off is the placement of Bernie and the Green party.

>Not establishment

The guy is a career politician with 40 years under his belt, when will people let this meme die?

Her reasoning was that Bernie's objectives transcend materialism therefore he's libertarian in his objectives on things like the environment.

>communists
>libertarian

explain yourself

>Bernie's objectives transcend materialism therefore he's libertarian in his objectives on things like the environment

I think your professor is trying to cast a spell on you, that's not English. Tell the dean your professor is a witch.

>I want to take every dollar you earn and give it to niggers
>libertarian

Update: I posted the political chart quiz on our class's Facebook page. Results are already rolling in!

ask him why communists were totalitarian in history but this chart can't accurately predict where they'd sit in that state

Because apparently true communist goals move beyond things like states and borders and the ultimate goal of communism is open borders and true freedom. I'm serious.

get the helicopter ready

>political psychology

good grief

I love being in STEM, and not seeing meme tier shit like this.

Post this next.

I have a strong suspicion that they are confusing communes and communism

yeah, but by his definition there's no place for "untrue communists". They're not conservatives, they're NOT populists either. That chart is a load of shit

>There are facts to back this up - STEM professors

>This is what i think therefore it's true - non-STEM professors

How the fuck Is communism Noth authoritarian? The entire premise behind it is that everyone must comply for it to work

He's not wrong, that's the end goal of "communism", but it's not viable or realistic and ALWAYS devolves into authoritarian regimes.

>bernie
>anywhere near center
LMAO

Why'd he flip the y axis?

Psychology
Always put the thing you want in the +ve/ +ve corner if you want to dupe cavemen

+1

>his objectives transcend materialism

How does massively increasing taxation to steal people's material earnings not a material objective? He wants to redistribute wealth, aka take material objects from some and give them to others. This is fucking material. Your prof has like 80 iq holy shit.

Damn that's good.

That chart gave me the cancers. Your political psych teacher should get their degree taken back and fired.

And writing it down wrong too

>political psychology
you might as well be in clown college op
why the fuck did you take this course?

They have dude weed lmao labeled communist and communist labeled populist

> Nazism/Neo-Nazism
> Conservative
LOL

You have the direction of rotation reversed and also strong and weak men reversed

It's perfectly valid because the political compass is retarded, because the current left right paradigm is retarded and relative.

If a proper one were to be adopted, like authoritarian/libertarian x free market/regulation it would make far more sense

The problem with that is that virtually every monstrous government that has ever existed would be on the left, so naturally leftists dislike such a characteristic.

The left liked to imagine every evil thing as right wing, which is why you don't see communism treated like nazism, it was just "implemented badly"

Think of it like this, you can have a leftist socialist economy, and a leftist authoritarian progressive executive focused government, and mere "right wing" rhetoric against classes of people would make the entirety of the government right wing. It's absurd.

Basically the scapegoat the given government chooses dictates whether it's left or right wing, and sometimes not even that is true.

Thankfully Sup Forums is intelligent enough to see this as yet another attempt by leftists to manipulate language....lol

I'm flabbergasted at what "(((true))) Communists" is even supposed to mean.

I do know that since the Coincidence Detector is going off it's not anything good.

>conservative and liberal arent relative terms anymore, another leftist corrosion

>transcend materialism
The only political ideologies that can come close to think line of thinking are what she would label as right wing rules based societies

Any platform that involves increasing taxation necessarily is material

noice

...

>political ideology/policies etc...
>able to be displayed on an xy-axis
pick one

Why is both the top "libertarian" and the top right quadrant also "libertarian"?

Yes, obviously Bernie and Green are in the wrong spot.

I just re-took the test.

Those questions are dumb anyway, "Do you believe people should follow the law?"

cuck

Nationalism is not inherently authoritarian, populism is not necessarily right wing, and communists are authoritarian. She got the echo part right though.

>populism is not necessarily right wing
*left wing. Although either way is correct.

She's hot, but needs to lose weight in her stomach.

Is this exaggerated, or is this what you guys actually do?

I think your professor is retarded yo

Why do you have that dumb shit saved on your PC, Muhammad?

By that logic the union of egoists is authoritarian

she's a hambeast. here's my test results.