Does Sup Forums agree that shaming is immoral?

Does Sup Forums agree that shaming is immoral?

This reminds me of that time my sister wanted to have practice sex to prepare for her date. She came home after school one day all flustered and said that her crush would only date her if they had sex after dinner. Mind you she was 16 and this dude was 19 (got held back a few years), while I myself was 11.

She told me to put on a suit,light up some candles on the dinner table and microwave a spaghetti TV dinner. I didn't have a suit so I put on my dad's which was hilariously oversized,even if I was pretty big for my age and did as she asked. I love my sister so I didn't question much but when she wanted to practice kissing after eating I got a little nervous so I backed out a little. We ended up doing that thing the dogs did in Lady & the Tramp which made it a little less awkward.

My sister had never had sex before, and obviously neither had I. She had no real formal sex education (bible belt) but had seen a porno flick after sneaking into the theater last year. I'm guessing that's where her knowledge came from because she had some pretty detailed requests, asking me to take off her bra and rub her breast,and in turn she would take off my pants and poke my weiner. We went to her bedroom and she gently tied me to the frame with her bra and took off her underwear. I didn't know what was going on and I didn't have any real sexual attraction to my sister but I got a slight chubby and she got on top of me and slid it in her vagina. She told me that she'd do all the work because I didn't know how and kinda started jumping up and down on my semi.This scared my penis a bit so it became flaccid and she was tired from all the movement so she kinda just laid on top of me with my penis in her for about thirty minutes before she told me to release. I thought she meant pee because I didn't know how to ejaculate yet so I peed inside her and then she cancelled her date because she thought sex was gross.But in all seriousness we can't let this guy get the nuclear codes

no, you nerd virgin fat fuck

Who the hell virgin shames women? Or is this just the female's way of turning "yeah sucks you aren't getting laid loser" into a male endorsement of promiscuous women?

>Who the hell virgin shames women?

Other women. They're just as dumb about it as boys are.

Just go pay a prostitute and get it over with, virgin OP.

>implying being a virgin is a choice
>implying virgin guys are virgin by choice OR that it's only wrong to shame female virgins

I wanna bust all their balloons, I wanna burn all of their cities to the ground

>Who the hell virgin shames women?

The most degenerated wretches that you can think about.

kek u know what's even MORE magical?


degeneracy

Men don't want sluts because they're more likely to be discontent with the relationship due to having a greater range of experience to compare it to.

Women don't want virgins because they're less likely to know what to do with a vagina or do all the little social things that their insanity requires for them to enjoy a relationship.

Both are literally bad, but women take virgin shaming a little further than men slut shame. Actually, women slut shame worse (because resentment) and as a virgin I can confirm men are actually really nice, supportive and always willing to offer advice to virgin men.

These things make dating shit, but not much more shit than how shit women naturally make things.

My 13 year old sister came home crying one day, said the girls at her school were bullying her for admitting she hadn't been fingered yet.

Fucking 13 years old. What the fuck is going on these days

Isn't shaming sluts a personal choice that should be respected though?

Maybe this person should respect my right to be called a dirty filthy whore slut for thinking of such naughty things while a try and maintain the glorious status and inherent morality that I myself as a puritanical crusader virgin.

Checkmate anti slut shaming shaming slut crusaders.

well did you?

I remember in college I was about to fuck this girl and she asked me "you aren't a virgin, are you?"

I told her I wasn't because her tone implied she wouldn't fuck me if I was.

I don't get why women are allowed to just do that. I didn't go "wait, how many cocks have you taken?" to her.

Worst part is if I'm a fucking virgin and you won't fuck me then how the fuck am I supposed to stop being a virgin? Like shit nigger.

I guess virgin shaming of men is just tied to that female thing where they want to fuck men based upon how many other women want to fuck that guy.

So virgin = undesirable by all or whatever.

Still, I lied and got her to fuck me because if you're gonna virgin shame then I'm gonna lie, heheh.

Guys on pol insist that women not be degenerates but men also have an equal responsibility to shun degeneracy. If you treat women like objects and encourage such behavior then you are taking part in propagating degeneracy. I don't care about shaming or other social bullshit like that, the world is tough, get used to it but you ought not be hypocritical.

>slut shaming
Why am I not allowed to choose who I want to be with based on their past choices?

Sluts will always be shamed. You see almost any woman can be a slut, but only a select few men can be players. Its easy to be a slut, getting laid as a guy is 10000x harder especially if you're not a legit 8/10 model tier guy.

What is something-something shaming? It means considering something inferior quality and a personal responsibility of a person. It is a good thing and an exact opposite of immoral: how society's morals are reinforced. Is it good to be a slut, a 40 years old virgin or a fatass? Definitely not. Is it a personal responsibility? definitely yes.

don´t worry she figured out you were a virgin probably

I'm not anymore though!

Haha

Shaming is what keeps society afloat by keeping the norms the norm, Not shaming degenerate behavior makes its normal and encourages more to do the same.

I feel like most Sup Forumsack males are NOT propagating whores or whoreish behavior though

There's three kind of Sup Forumsacks desu

The virgin/kid (yes underages still browse the chans), probably a NEET or still in school, maybe autistic or something, either too young or fucked up to get a girl atm

The regular joe, working class guy, probably pushes right wing opinions when he can, but contains his power level, probably dates like a normal guy, but avoids the avid street trash/single moms/ect, making him not date much or take a long time to find the "right" girl.

The extremist, the actual 2spooky4u nazis, probably a member of a pro fascist org, or some other hard right group, vocal as hell with his politics, probably married or in a serious relationship

no, the purpose of shaming is to let people know that if they don't get their shit together they will die alone and miserable
when we shame virgins and fatties, we're doing them a favor

I think the ideal course would be to fall in love and marry a girl after polite courtship; doesn't matter weather you loose virginity before or after marriage but you should be serious and be willing to marry the girl if you are willing to engage in intercourse. Men who seek multiple sexual partners and insist on a hedonistic lifestyle are a bane to society and should be treated as such. They spoil the lives of young impressionable women just for the sake of a few moments of fun and also harm their psyche in the process. Both men and women should be allowed to choose their mates freely but sexually deviant behavior should be highly discouraged.

Darkness a cute. A CUTE!!!

Kek, that's a good one

>be conservative
>shame virgins

its almost like you are a degenerate or something.

Slut shaming is justified as usually fucking a lot of different people winds up being a poor decision mentally, hygienically, and socially. This applies to dudes as well. Virgin shaming is applicable only when the person obsesses over sex and still hasn't gotten any. When you're trying to shame someone who doesn't really care, all you do is further blur the line. A man shouldn't want to be with a slut. It should at least be seen as a negative trait as she invariably has different values. If celibacy is to be seen as a positive within females, then you can't admonish males for it since then chads will mentally screw up women for the sake of their KDR. Realistically speaking, the sexual revolution has made it pretty impossible to find women who haven't had some form of stinky dinky in her and it's silly to think it matters that much. The major takeaway is sex is not that great and shouldn't be that important to a relationship. It plays a part for sure but it's only going to be 2% of the relationship and if virginity is a deal breaker then it shouldn't have worked out anyway. A slut would always be thinking of other relationships they could be in or have though so your presence would only be the one they stuck with or the one they'll toy around with until they're bored.

While Virginity is not a deal breaker, It is always preferable in both men and women. It is a mark of decency and a mark of caution. I understand that sometimes experiments fail and people don't commit even after intercourse but our culture almost treats it as a recreational activity. Sex is not a recreational activity, It is a means to an end the end is the creation of the next generation and this is crucially important for the survival of our species. It should not be taken lightly.

Topkek

fuck off cuck.
there's a reason sex and drugs are usually mentioned in relation to each other
still love both but im not stupid enought to realize they aren't good when abused.

cocaine was used to help relieve pain during surgery, now i use it when i run out of adderall.

only purpose for sex is to procreate. not for one man to fill enough condoms that if emptied , could drown a small village.

I can agree with that but it's difficult to still find people who hold traditional values in these times other than those who are highly religious. Not that there's anything inherently wrong with that but in my experience chicks who are way into God usually tend to feel like the bible is their strategy guide. Not really a huge issue it's just a value I wish was more common in all walks of life or at least respected in other communities.

Well, Maybe it's to do with the different cultures but in my experience there are still plenty of people who wait till they find the right partner.

In India, this is more often the case than not but these people tend to go for arranged marriages which is also a deeply flawed concept in my opinion.

Liberal and leftist views have a complete stranglehold on education and the media so the USA is filled with a large variety of degenerates who use most of their brainpower justifying their selfish actions. If it's not stopped here the rest of the West will fall.

No, shaming is completely moral and a necessity.

A slut shamed for being a whore is good. She has made poor life decisions and should not be considered with any sense of honor. She is a loose cunt opening her legs for any man. Why should anyone respect her?

A virgin by choice is respectable. If a man, for moral reasons or personal decisions, has not had sex, be it chastity for a future marriage or conviction to a religious belief, he is a man with honor. Not all virgins are virgins for lack of game. Many are virgins for lack of wanting to be with a loose whore.

A whore must always be shamed. A man who willingly keeps his chastity is a man with honor walking a difficult road.

It depends on what you are shaming people for. It's okay to shame people for being losers who never do anything with their lives especially if they bitchwhinemoan Elliot Rodgers about it - it's not okay just for virginity.

It's okay to shame people for being irresponsible, for dicking around without a cock coat or doing the cock carousal without suiting up - but sleeping around isn't a sin as long as you are considerate to your own health and other people's health, physical and emotional. I would say in this time of AIDS that does mean you should space out your partners or don't make fucking strangers a habit, too risky.

Who shames the shame shamers?

The shamed.

It is but their only defense.

...like do you know you can catch herpes even if you use a condom? Cause herpe sores can be on the groin.

So it's irresponsible to to switch between strangers too fast, ESPECIALLY if you are doing clubbing for dicks/cunts at the same time at actually DATING, you are exposing someone you have date to greater risks then they'll assume.

...and definitely don't mix alcohol and drugs with sex, or place one in a situation where that is likely to happen (clubbing, crazy frat parties), those are the situation where unsafe sex happens.

Like, EW, Tommy Sotomayor has a baby mama, his second known daughter, he didn't remember the conception, he was that drunk.

Are you me?

Women don't want manwhores because they're more likely to be discontent with the relationship due to having a greater range of experience to compare it to.

Makes sense.Although I might say that Rodgers went psycho because he was a narcissist who was not capable of abstract thinking and had convinced himself that he was inferior because he wasn't getting any. He could not comprehend the idea that he could change his environment and find a healthy relationship in the future. Losing virginity has become a kind of right of passage for teens and this created an unhealthy pressure. Hollywood and advertisements constancy encourage this as well. The fetishiszation of sexual deviation is a fundamental problem in the modern world.

>The regular joe, working class guy, probably pushes right wing opinions when he can, but contains his power level, probably dates like a normal guy, but avoids the avid street trash/single moms/ect, making him not date much or take a long time to find the "right" girl.

This is me.

I get laid, but not as much as I'd like to, and when I do, it's from girls I meet on a night out. However, I'm still sifting through shit to find a decent girl, because, let's face it, it's nearly impossible to find a girl worth committing to in California. I'd love to raise a healthy family, but that doesn't seem to be anytime soon. Doesn't mean I don't have a chance with moulding a young girl into a good wife.

>NatSoc, but don't march around goose-stepping and putting up swastikas.

I don't think this type of thing should be a legal matter, and I won't be a jerk to someone because of their sexual history. But that doesn't mean I approve, and I would be VERY skeptical of a woman with an extensive history.
I don't think it's wrong to have sex with partners, but I frown on casual sex these days. I've had penetrative sex with 9 women - 4 of them girlfriends - and I don't think it was such a good idea in retrospect. I realized I was distracting myself from meaningful relationships when I had sex with girls I wasn't dating, and that I wasn't helping them towards fulfillment either.

I agree. We need to hold ourselves to the same standards.

unless it's fat shaming

I blame Game of Thrones

>mah nigga

Same story.

>a girl worth committing to in California
I'm female and in California (though probably ugly). What do you consider a girl worth committing to?