Someone posted this on FB, well lads, is this accurate?

Someone posted this on FB, well lads, is this accurate?

Other urls found in this thread:

strawpoll.com/6152459
twitter.com/AnonBabble

was shit the first time YOU posted it is shit every other time YOU post it

TYT needs to go further to the left, Salon further down and whoever put huffpo higher than breitbart is huffing tons of paint.

No, it's fucked to the brim. Saged.

USA Today Neutral

I'm not even a burger and I know this is garbage.

...

Dubs, also fpbp

Fox News is very high quality. Definitely above CNN (which needs to be moved left).
Huff Post should be on the same level as infowars.
WSJ should be the middle

No buzz feed should be in bottom left

>Media Matters
>High Quality

the daily beast is not left

>Black Lives Matter
>news
>high quality

No but this poll is pretty accurate.


strawpoll.com/6152459

>RT
>Not Horrible

this is as terrible as pic related.

>infowars bottom right
>CNN just barely in the middle left

whoever made this is a blatant ctr shill

Alex jones hates the bush's and neocons as much or even more as he hates obongo

Faggot OP for even posting this outlandish image

Sage

Buzzfeed. HuffPo, TYT, and BLM are too high.

AP is too far to the right.

FOX is too low and too far to the right.

CNN is too high and too far to the right.

Fox news is cringey garbage. Infowars might be a meme site, but they're surprisingly spot on about many things that "high quality" always fails to predict

Someone posted this on FB, well lads, is this accurate?

It is, lel

BBC should be much further to the Left.

No. It's Sup Forums-tier retarded.

...

>The Daily Beast
>high quality
just kill yourself already
also sage

That pic is so accurate though.

Move everything down one tier with nothing in high quality, but put CNN a bit above the left-tabloids.

>Huffington Post is the same tier as a tinfoil hat water filter advertisement radio show

Yes.

not bad at all. BLM of course should be removed altogether. I assume that's a subtle troll ('High Quality')

That's probably because it is pol oc

This is unfair to Vox, which is quite high quality, well informed, and not as far left. The Wall Street Journal and New York Times should be higher quality. The Cato Institute is garbage because it's a think tank paid to lobby for certain interests. Fox news is worse than this suggests. The Guardian is more left than this suggests. There's also a serious absence of non-Western outlets (like Al Jazeera).

In short, this graphic isn't very helpful.

Flip the pyramid
Now connect the dots of ownership
90% of media controlled by 6 entities

Major news networks buy Chinese influence

get off Facebook you bundle of sticks

USA Today Neutral?

>Alex jones hates the bush's and neocons as much or even more as he hates obongo

The location of infowars on that chart is one of the very few items that's accurately placed. If anything, it isn't low enough or far right enough.

> pro-hint: hatred of bush & neocons does not make you "left leaning" or "credible"

Beyond shit-tier quality and extreme pants-shitting right wing.

Almost everything else was placed by a butt-mad ALT-RIGHT shitwit. Not even worth trying to deconstruct it.

Well ... looking at it more closely, I would suggest that it was probably produced by Moscow. That describes most of it better than any other quick, casual explanation.

>RCP
>WSJ
>right
>Fox more partisan than CNN
>either one borderline high quality
>BBC, PBS, WaPost, fucking SALON high quality

whoever made this should kill themselves

>CNN more to the left than The Atlantic.
Swap those two.

Fox news can probably hug the line between leaning and hyper, same for MSNBC.

Buzzfeed and Breitbart can belong in the shit tier, which needs to be added.

Fox's opinion pieces are cringeworthy garbage, but at least their actual news tends to be non-partisan and reasonably good quality.

This one is almost perfect, though I'd push BBC further to the left, and The Guardian even further than that. Also FT leans left on multiple issues, particularly Brexit.

Middle is missing nickelodeon.

posting a (somewhat) better one that some user made
inb4 assmad putin shills

No, calling the Cato institute highest quality is a joke. It's literally Koch brothers propaganda.

Smartest thing I've seen an Aussie ever post. Cato institute is literally Koch brothers propaganda.

>AP
>neutral

They're as left wing as you can get.

Infowars should be at the top and in the middle

>The Economist
>Neutral

Fucking Christ. I thought it would be neautral, so I subscribed a couple months ago. The liberal slant isn't even nuanced. The last issue was title "An Insurgent in the White House" and featured a stencil of Donald Trump throwing a moltov cocktail.

ProTip: It's owned by Jews

Should've known.

underrated

I could vouch for this one

fpbp and witnessed

the economist thinks 16 year olds should vote

OUT OUT OUT

the more i look the more blatant propaganda i see

saged