Who are we? "The Vanguard of Liberty supports Patriotism and Americanism. We are a Hand extended to our communities, to our forgotten poor, our mistreated vets. A Hand lowered to those in need. A Hand raised to protect our communities, our country, ready to stand together and fight those who seek to undermine our great country. A Hand striking those who only wish us harm, only wishing to exploit us, both internally and externally. The American people are being betrayed. The very same protesters who say they are defending American liberties destroy American businesses, bankrupt American families, and assault everyday Americans for their political beliefs. This is not Americanism. This is not activism. This is authoritarianism. We will not stand idly by as these terrorists violate and alienate our rights. The frontiersmen who built the foundation of this country supported and provided for each other, protecting their communities from outside threats. We, modern Americans, must do the same. We must band together, and fight back. The Constitution provides for a well-regulated militia, for the protection of the American people and their rights. We shall be that militia."
Goals: To stand against radical left wing groups and rioters. To help our communities through works and fundraisers, and defend them should they be threatened. To peacefully counter-protest the opposition, and any law or politician against American conservatism and patriotism. To defend just laws and work against unjust ones. To never strike first, but always take a stand. To promote Pro-American Patriotism.
What do we do? Repair communities ravaged by violent protest, organize peaceful protest to oppose fascism, socialism, and communism, and promote good will towards each other.
Other social media: Twitter - www twitter com/VanOfLib?lang=pl Instagram - www instagram com/vanoflibofficial/ Facebook - www facebook com/VanguardOfLiberty/
How can you join the movement? All information on our current, and future, structure is located on the discord server.
What are we not? We do not oppose free speech. Though we wish to oppose socialism, communism, and fascism we respect other's right to believe in these ideologies. However, we will not tolerate trolling or spam. We are not a violent group. We will respond to violence and far left ideologies only with peace and respect. We will not invite violence.
This is a grass roots movement with supporting chapters around the world. Community outreach is our main goal, protecting them from leftest agitators and restoring pride in national traditions and culture. Find your local chapter and get organized. Human contact not your thing? Produce multimedia, share ideas or work with social media platforms.
Easton Watson
Feel free to ask any questions about the group.
John Taylor
...
Brandon Miller
Bump
Austin Sanchez
bump
Zachary Wilson
Bump
Logan Hernandez
So what about a basic gestalt on these two?
David Reed
bump
Kevin Torres
Bounie Zander's goy
Caleb Murphy
bump
Noah Evans
What's the difference between you and the minutemen
Jackson Wood
Minutemen are dead and we aren't LARPing
Jackson Foster
How do you sort out infiltrators from legitimate members? How can the leadership be trusted?
Brayden Bailey
We don't spew out our secrets
Isaac Bennett
There's a vetting process. All important info is not given out all the time. As a recruit it's on a need to know basis.
Hudson Hughes
Still sounds like a honeypot since we have no clue who the fuck the leadership is or if they can be trusted
Brandon Ortiz
'leadership' is mostly here to coordinate, not command.
Dominic Turner
>vangay of niggerty >not Sons of Liberty >not Sons of the Patriots >not The Minute Men >not something creative like The United Snake why so bland?
Owen Howard
I see your point. If you feel so inclined to use a VPN or perhaps a burner account. Afterall it's your choice wether you want to join.
Hudson Martin
Military Intelligence is already aware of "The Vanguard of Liberty." Please, I bed you. Say something stupid, advocate violence or make terrorist threats.
We're watching you
Jeremiah Hall
>We are not a violent group. We will respond to violence and far left ideologies only with peace and respect. thats dumb
Adam Edwards
Since when did this come back?
Gabriel Nguyen
It's more along the lines of self defense. What do you want? A Antifa tier degenerate group?
Henry Gomez
FUCK ANTIFA JOIN YOUR LOCAL VoL
Josiah Johnson
fuck off faggots agreed just make sure you train those god damn DYELs so I don't see skinnyfats all over the news being the face of the movement
Lucas Rodriguez
As somebody that's currently writing a self defense guide for the group. I'll make sure all that go out will be physically fit. Not just some neck bearded fat ass.
Eli Price
will you be funding by paid membership like the oathkeepers or donations
Ayden Parker
I have no information on that subject. However I'm sure someone from higher up is in the thread. But personally I'm doing this for free.
Julian Cook
How are you in any way different from: >Minutemen >anticom >anti antifa >literally every other pointless group >minus anticom, they're ok
Owen Richardson
Do we need to have a defining factor? We are for the protection of western civilization and it's values from subversive elements that seek to undermine it's existence and it's people.
Joshua Green
So why not all join together to make one large group? Other than all of you getting a special pedestal to spout bullshit atop, how do you benefit from having multiple worthless groups with similar goals?
Samuel Butler
We focus on aiding communities as well. Protecting innocent people during riots and mitigating damages.
Luke Bailey
how will you get legal protection when the inevitable attack from the left occurs over something they will obviously provoke
Adrian Jackson
So how would a larger group be less effective? You all want the same thing. Being special doesn't mean shit if you're useless. I'm all for the cause, not the people within it.
Christian Clark
>single leadership >one legal fuckup and it all crumbles
Lucas Lewis
>implying These groups aren't mutually exclusive. You can join them all and change where you focus on any time.
hopefully with a recording. Several of us are planning on having body cams or the like. Of course, nothing can be guaranteed.
Anthony Foster
Doesn't even need a leader,antifa doesn't have one and they're doing a much better job than us. Well, all 15,000 different groups that constitute "us".
Christopher Kelly
Merging is difficult, and if done we can be fucked by a single mole or legal repercussion
Thomas Taylor
Being completely ineffective and spread out with no underlying loyalty? >Sign me up!
Ryan Barnes
But surely it's better than having no impact? The idea behind the groups is perfect, but it's impossible to achieve anything without definitive support.
Matthew Gonzalez
Bump This is long overdue.
Lucas Cook
If we simply gain supporters and willing participants more-so than we already have we can have a large impact.
Nicholas Bennett
But we lose 10% of possible supporters to smaller, ineffective groups that have no impact.
Brandon James
bumpity bump
Grayson Thompson
you need trust, organization, equipment and effective leaders first to run a large group
you need a soros
David Morales
What is needed is these grass root groups. They need to identify avenues on local levels to raise their concerns, and then use them.
Dylan Kelly
>Being completely ineffective and spread out with no underlying loyalty? >>Sign me up! Coming together and doing things comes first. Loyalty then follows. As far as being effective, I think that will just come with the experience.
>Doesn't even need a leader,antifa doesn't have one and they're doing a much better job than us. Well, all 15,000 different groups that constitute "us". They have ring leaders, and you know that. Many don't get their face shown, but that doesn't mean they aren't there. "better job than us" isn't exactly clear. They're on the offense. Does one attack mean we failed? Ten? a hundred?
bingo
Robert Diaz
You should be posting redpill info or links on posters all over local cities for starters
Justin Edwards
An excellent argument. Now, I want you to tell me how having these ring leaders run one group or perhaps sectors of one group wouldn't increase our power?
Tyler Lewis
Funding wouldn't be a bad idea, you just need willing and likeminded donors, and a figurehead who has the means to make the case to them.
This is all a good start, but if I can make a few suggestions:
>use word of mouth. Recruit actively, and build chapter espirit d'corps. >make free source posters and info to disseminate. Don't just post it in places where you know they'd be torn down. >media releases: social media is good, but articles that can be easily posted to social media is better. >perhaps radio? Videos? Having a voice or a face behind the movement builds trust. You just need someone charismatic to pull it off >get savvy with your hierarchy. Romanticized notions of some sort of egalitarian anonymous round table is ineffective. Make offices, make friends with skills, then fill them. >as gravitas gets better: find donors and elect a treasurer. Use it for PR, and then perhaps you can start paying people to build a grassroot. It's a passion project now, but never plan for it to be forever.
Feel free to add, anons
Juan Rogers
We already have posters. I'm posting some around my town this weekend
Christopher Morales
I agree, perhaps soros isn't the best example but nevertheless, I agree here.
Henry King
So do anticom and the minutemen. Whilst I admire your tenacity and initiative, surely competing groups with different branding just creates confusion and turns away potential followers?
