Are slavs aliens?

Are slavs aliens?

Other urls found in this thread:

sr.m.wikipedia.org/sr/Cвapoг
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

...

Historically we are just another branch of aryans, who migrated through whole eurasia. We share same cultural and religious background with nords and indian vedists. Nords probably are less mongrelised. But still all europeans share that same roots of anicent pretty developed in spiritual terms civilisation of aryans.

We are descendants of gods.

>Cyka bylat rush B

What did they mean by this?

Unfortunately for us though all of our lore destroyed whereas the Norse managed to keep a fraction of theirs by appealing to Christianity through euhemerism (ie. Eddas, Gesta Danorum.)

Sad really, thanks Christians.

Indo-Europeans, not aryans.

Well technically you are right. Arya means noble. Its merely just a title.

Who is the Slavic equivalent of Indra? I know that Zeus is the Greek equivalent of Indra and Jupiter is the Roman equivalent of Indra. Furthermore, Indra, Zeus and Jupiter are each the king of their own pantheon of gods, they are each known for being womanisers and they each use a lightning bolt as a weapon. Interestingly though, in the Vedic literature of Ancient India, 'Indra' is not a single being but is instead the title given to the king of the gods and, as such, there have been many Indras in the past and there will be many Indras in the future. The current Indra is Purandara. Fascinating stuff.

he is right tho
slavs are aryan

Jasza, Perun, Piorun,

Yes, 'arya' means 'noble' in Sanskrit and is simply a title that was given to the people who adhered to the Vedic way of life.

WE

He's right though. The many similarities in words and gods point to a single common origin in remote antiquity.

Not aryans, aryan is used specifically for branch of IEs who settled in Iran. Slavs are Indo-Europeans though.

'Aryan' is a self-designation used by ancient Indo-Iranians who settled in both Northern India and Iran.

I said the same thing

ayyy lamao blyat

Fuck off terraniggers space is ours.

The Vedic writings of Ancient India (ESPECIALLY the Puranas) describe human lineages that go back over a BILLION years into the past and we have PHYSICAL archaeological evidence that CONFIRMS this. I'm interested in the cyclical conception of human history that pre-Abrahamic cultures had. The Ancient Greeks had a cyclical conception of human history that was similar to the cyclical conception of human history that the Hindus had (and STILL have). The Ancient Greeks had a Golden Age (equivalent to Satya Yuga in Hinduism), a Silver Age (equivalent to Treta Yuga in Hinduism), a Bronze Age (equivalent to Dwapara Yuga in Hinduism) and an Iron Age (equivalent to Kali Yuga in Hinduism). I call the model of human history that is currently dominant among historians 'the linear-progressive model of human history'. The linear-progressive model of human history basically says that the further back in human history you go, the more primitive that humans, their cultures and their technology becomes. The linear-progressive model of human history embraced by modern historians and modern anthropologists actually has its roots in Judaeo-Christian beliefs, ironically enough. Virtually EVERY pre-Abrahamic culture WORLDWIDE embraced a conception of human history that was CYCLICAL, with civilisations rising and falling one after the other over VAST periods of time and humans being EXTREMELY OLD.

No

Here is merely SOME evidence (though DEFINITELY not ALL of the evidence) suggesting not only a human presence on Earth BILLIONS of years ago, but also suggesting complex human civilisations on Earth BILLIONS of years ago:

* A human skull fragment from Hungary dated between 250,000 and 450,000 years ago
* A human footprint with accompanying paleoliths (stones deliberately chipped into a recognisable tool type), bone tools, hearths and shelters, discovered in France and dated 300,000 to 400,000 years
* Paleoliths in Spain, a partial human skeleton and paleoliths in France; two English skeletons, one with associated paleoliths, ALL at least 300,000 years old
* Skull fragments and paleoliths in Kenya and advanced paleoliths, of modern human manufacture, in the Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, dated between 400,000 and 700,000 years
* Neoliths (the most advanced stone tools and utensils) in China of a type that indicate full human capacity, dated to 600,000 years
* Hearths, charcoal, human femurs and broken animal bones, all denoting modern humanity, in Java, dated to 830,000 years
* An anatomically modern human skull discovered in Argentina and dated between 1 million and 1.5 million years years (eoliths -chipped pebbles, thought to be the earliest known tools- at Monte Hermoso, also in Argentina, are believed to be between 1 and 2.5 million years old).
* A human tooth from Java yielding a date between 1 and 1.9 million years years
* Incised bones, dated between 1.2 and 2.5 million years, have been found in Italy
* Discoveries of paleoliths, cut and charred bones at Xihoudu in China and eoliths from Diring Yurlakh in Siberia dated to 1.8 million years
* Eoliths in India, paleoliths in England, Belgium, Italy and Argentina, flint blades in Italy, hearths in Argentina, a carved shell, pierced teeth and even two human jaws all bearing a minimum date of 2 million years (end of part 1)

(start of part 2) Curiously enough, several of the very earliest artifact discoveries display a truly extraordinary level of sophistication. In Idaho, for example, a 2-million-year-old clay figurine was unearthed in 1912. But even this discovery does not mark an outer limit. Bones, vertebrae and even complete skeletons have been found in Italy, Argentina and Kenya. Their minimum datings range from 3 million to 4 million years. A human skull, a partial human skeleton and a collection of neoliths discovered in California have been dated in excess of 5 million years. A human skeleton discovered at Midi in France, paleoliths found in Portugal, Burma and Argentina, a carved bone and flint flakes from Turkey all have a minimum age of 5 million years.
How far back can human history be pushed with discoveries like these? The answer seems to be a great deal further than orthodox science currently allows. As if the foregoing discoveries were not enough, we need to take account of:
* Paleoliths from France dated between 7 and 9 million years
* An eolith from India with a minimum dating of 9 million years
* Incised bones from France, Argentina and Kenya no less than 12 million years old
* More paleolith discoveries from France, dated at least 20 million years ago
* Neoliths from California in excess of 23 million years
* Three different kinds of paleoliths from Belgium with a minimum dating of 26 million years
* An anatomically modern human skeleton, neoliths and carved stones found at the Table Mountain, California and dated at least 33 million years ago
But even 33 million years is not the upper limit. A human skeleton found in Switzerland is estimated to be between 38 and 45 million years old. France has yielded up eoliths, paleoliths, cut wood and a chalk ball, the minimum ages of which range from 45 to 50 million years.
There's still more.

(start of part 3) In 1960, H. L. Armstrong announced in Nature magazine the discovery of fossil human footprints near the Paluxy River, in Texas. Dinosaur footprints were found in the same strata. In 1983, the Moscow News reported the discovery of a fossilised human footprint next to the fossil footprint of a three-toed dinosaur in the Turkamen Republic. Dinosaurs have been extinct for approximately 65 million years.
In 1983, Professor W. G. Burroughs of Kentucky reported the discovery of three pairs of fossil tracks dated to 300 million years ago. They showed left and right footprints. Each print had five toes and a distinct arch. The toes were spread apart like those of a human used to walking barefoot. The foot curved back like a human foot to what appeared to be a human heel. There was a pair of prints in the series that showed a left and right foot. The distance between them is just what you'd expect in modern human footprints.
In December 1862, The Geologist carried news of a human skeleton found 27.5 m (90 ft) below the surface in a coal seam in Illinois. The seam was dated between 286 and 320 million years. It's true that a few eoliths, skull fragments and fossil footprints, however old, provide no real backing for the idea of advanced prehistoric human civilisations.
But some other discoveries do.
In 1968, an American fossil collector named William J. Meister found a fossilised human shoe print near Antelope Spring, Utah. There were trilobite fossils in the same stone, which means it was at least 245 million years old. Close examination showed that the sole of this shoe differed little, if at all, from those of shoes manufactured today.
In 1897, a carved stone showing multiple faces of an old man was found at a depth of 40 m (130 ft) in a coal mine in Iowa. The coal there was of similar age.

(start of part 4) A piece of coal yielded up an encased iron cup in 1912. Frank J. Kenwood, who made the discovery, was so intrigued he traced the origin of the coal and discovered it came from the Wilburton Mine in Oklahoma. The coal there is about 312 million years old.
In 1844, Scottish physicist Sir David Brewster reported the discovery of a metal nail embedded in a sandstone block from a quarry in the north of England. The head was completely encased, ruling out the possibility that it had been driven in at some recent date. The block from which it came is approximately 360 million years old.
On 22 June 1844, The Times reported that a length of gold thread had been found by workmen embedded in stone close to the River Tweed. This stone too was around 360 million years old.
Astonishing though these dates may appear to anyone familiar with the orthodox theory of human origins, they pale in comparison with the dates of two further discoveries.
According to Scientific American, dated 5 June 1852, blasting activities at Meeting House Hill, in Dorchester, Massachusetts, unearthed a metallic, bell-shaped vessel extensively decorated with silver inlays of flowers and vines. The workmanship was described as 'exquisite'. The vessel was blown out of a bed of Roxbury conglomerate dated somewhat earlier than 600 million years.
In 1993, Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson reported the discovery 'over the past several decades' of hundreds of metallic spheres in a pyrophyllite mine in South Africa. The spheres are grooved and give the appearance of having been manufactured. If so, the strata in which they were found suggest they were manufactured 2.8 BILLION years ago.

(start of part 5) What are we to make of these perplexing discoveries? They cannot simply be dismissed. If even ONE of these discoveries is TRUE (and I believe that MANY if not ALL of these discoveries are TRUE), then it changes EVERYTHING that modern mainstream anthropologists THOUGHT they knew about the human species. (end)

Humans are BILLIONS of years old and are NOT NATIVE to Earth.

>Inb4 time travel

I don't think it's time travel (even though I believe that time travel is possible).

so you believe extraterrestial origin of humanity, especially slavs, but time travel is somehow out of the question?

Noble or HIGH or a mountain. Slavs crossed Himalayas and gave Indians the Vedas.
If you look closely at the languages you will see:
weda - wiedza - wit - witch - wiedzma

They all mean knowledge.

If you compare slavic runes (Glagolitic script) with vedas script it is almost the same thing.

>Slavs crossed Himalayas and gave Indians the Veda
go somewhere and tell people stuff
very slavlike
if only there were some historical reference to heavy drinking, I would take it as granted

I never said 'especially Slavs' nor did I say that time travel is out of the question. I even said that I believe that time travel is possible.

niggers and asians are native to earth.

No, Asians (AKA mongoloid people) originate from the Orion constellation whereas caucasoid people originate from the Pleiades constellation. Niggers are native to Earth, however.

See his id?

>hi iq
->
>high iq

Kek speaks through him. You'd better listen.

>No, Asians (AKA mongoloid people) originate from the Orion constellation whereas caucasoid people originate from the Pleiades constellation
stop with petrol huffing

Svarog, creator of gods and universe. Commonly associated with hammers,anvils and flames. Said to be blacksmith

Perun is lightning god, son of Svarog. Sometimes he is also god of warriors,sometimes that is Triglav, but he is not the ruling god.

glagolitic is not slavic runes, glagolitic was created in 9th century as an alphabet for slavic language heavily inspired by traditional greek alphabet.

but he is

test

check'd

sr.m.wikipedia.org/sr/Cвapoг
Jebemu zivot...

>Sup Forums faggots don't know that Jesus actually lived in Kosovo and spoke Serbian
>also instead of turning water into wine he made Rakia out of it and it was sick

Actually he was pole and he was called Lech

T. Jovan Deretic

IND-RA.... hmm interesting, since hindus afaik were actually called Indus, now today Hindu means a follow of Hinduism but back then p. much all people were hindus by religion, so the title indus was also a nationality it seems, and RA.... we all know who that is.


>We share same cultural and religious background with nords.... vedists

Cringe, here he have a russian with an identity crisis, who's part slavic, part scandinavian and part finno ugric, yeah to those of you who don't know some Russians go full retard and say and actually bring up nazi quotes saying that Russians are actually nordic! See, the russian here is very confused, he doesn't yet realize who the Aryans actually were like and how they looked, Russia is a shithole of pseudo intellectualism and psuedo history (or at least I think so since some russians and russian websites are cringe inducing and disconnected from reality), and he probably read upon some stupid site about muh aryans and scandinavians so he thinks "Nords probably are less mongrelised," and >We share same cultural and religious background with nords.... vedists.

Yeah but none of those are a billion years old so you don't have evidence for billions of years old humans.

The Klerksdorp spheres are about 2.8 billion years old.

Perhaps. Perhaps Slavs are just simply divine.
We'll never know

My neighbor Yaroslav has a superhuman skill of working, driving and coming back home in one piece while drunk. Yes they are aliens.

Life (including sapient life) exists ABSOLUTELY EVERYWHERE in the universe. Humans and the general humanoid form (i.e. a head, two arms and two legs) are common throughout the universe. Humans are billions of years old and are not native to Earth. In each galaxy (including the Milky Way galaxy), the closer a star system is to the centre of that galaxy, the more spiritually advanced (and often also more technologically advanced), complex and sophisticated the civilisation or civilisations in that star system tends to be. Conversely, the further a star system is to the centre of that galaxy, the more primitive and nigger-tier the civilisation or civilisations in that star system tends to be. This is because of the electromagnetic radiation emanating from the centre of each galaxy, which has an expansive effect on consciousness the closer one is to it and has a contractive effect on consciousness the further one is from it. So it should come as no surprise that our civilisation, which is about 28,000 light-years away from the centre of our galaxy, is primitive and nigger-tier (including even Western Civilisation) in comparison to other civilisations that exist further afield in our galaxy.