Sup Forums is he right?

Sup Forums is he right?

No. It is almost always because of land or money.

You don't have to defend your beliefs, if you don't have any ThinkingNegro.jpg

Conquest. It's always conquest.

Yes, because one side believed they should own the other's land or money.

Huh, this really forced me to ponder.

Really makes you think

Is he suggesting that ideological subversion is the optimal path to world peace then?

Fucking retard.

No people just killed everyone that agreed with them.
Are you seriously so stupid you need to ask this question?
Where two opposing ideas cannot find common ground there is no other option than war.

Wow that's fucking deep. In international relations there's a term called mirror image, where both opponents see the same negative qualities in the other. This is how the country has become

WOAH THIS IS MINDBLOWING SUFF FROM BLACK SCIENCE MAN

BRB POSTING THIS ON R/SCIENCE

Why believe in abstractions when you can believe in abstractions called rationality?

>conflict starts when people hold opposing viewpoints
Wow how deep and profound, really made me think

>No. It is almost always because of land or money.

And pussy

And memes

He is a scientist, pointing obvious things is part of the job.

Instead of ideological subversion we should strive for a world where people with opposing viewpoints can peacefully coexist.

Because I'd rather live in a world filled with conflict than a world with thought police.

Indefensible vague af
>All of history is because people are different

HAZELNUTS STATUS: INITIATED

...

...

Disagreeing with people is violence. That's what the left believes.

Football deactivates the almonds.

If you stretch this to mean conflict over ownership of property than it is mostly true. All conflict arises from two irreconcilable viewpoints.

...

This.
Neil the Grass Tyson is just a bandwagoner who doesn't know what he's talking about and just goes with the anti-theist flow.

He used to be a chad after all. What do you expect?

Sadly true.

No, he's wrong.
Almost all wars are about dominance, not belief.
Belief is just a justification.

...

>I believe that land is mine
>I believe I should have that money

He is almost always right.

I can't believe I used to like this asshole

Why do ant colonies fight when they come into contact? Resources and genetic inheritance. The winning faction will be able to pass on their genetic heritage and will be able to prosper due to capturing vital resources.

For a black scientist he does not seem to know shit about tribal warfare.

kek. shower thoughts - degrasse tyson edition.

>those other people are the enemy, and we both agree that we're both enemies
:^)

Thats not a belief. You are objectively better off if you control other peoples land and money. Belief is for the pleb soldiers that do not get compensated for risking their lives.

> water is wet
> the sky is blue
What's his point?

>hasn't discovered anything at all
>literally nothing
>has not added to science at all
>his only "contribution" is "PLUTO AIN'T A PLANET FOR NOT BEING BIG LIKE MY NIGGA JUPITER"
>He is a scientist


He is science's poser cousin just like Bill Nye is.

If your vague and reductionist enough, you can be right about everything by stating the obvious while sounding smart.

this. it's all about power.

>Chad

looks like a Keyshawn to me, fuccboi

That's college education right there.

nigger

scientist

pick one.

this guy gets it. race war is nature.

Yeah, the victory or death mentality is common to all moral people.

Moralists can only understand the world in terms of conflict.

> Condoleezza Rice whitewashed
kek

Damn. . .

>Thats not a belief
Belief in something is independent from the truthfulness of that thing. It should be trivial to construct some hypothetical where owning more land leaves you worse off - ie; even though you now have objectively more land, you haven't the manpower to govern it all effectively, ending in a revolt and your usurpation.

more philosophically, people can only act based on what they believe, because absolute truth is fundamentally not knowable

Wow, really made me think.

We
Are
Right

Trying and failing to sound intelligent is for dumb people. Your arugment is bad.

Wow, such a deep philosophical thinker.

I'm terribly impressed by this contribution to history.

>nigger intellectual.

WE

Really activated the neurons, never thiught of it that way before

I hate when people word basic phrases trying to sound so much more intelligent than everyone else. No fucking shit conflict is caused by differing opinions about anything. What's more important here is the timing in which he posted this message. Is he advocating an armed conflict in the united states?

I'm the baby, gotta' love me.

Shit...

Someone post this on /his/ to trigger useless history majors

I agree.

Thesis + Antithesis = Synthesis -> Thesis...

Marxists are stupid for thinking history is the story of class struggles. It's the story of the struggles of ideas.

Let's go more basic

How does he keep doing it?

so, does he be sayin' we wuz kangz?

shieeet, dassa smart muhfugga

Almost all hot water came about because it was boiled at high temperatures

Ehh
mehh
not really
the forefront and what the small people fought for yes
except these people were either instigators, cannon fodder, or victims
The people who actually managed wars fought for control of something
trade, land, money, resources, etc.

almost all armed conflict in the history of the world came about because people had arms

...

Beliefs don't mean shit without money to back them

Fpbp
War is always a lobby pulling some strings

Opposing views are smoke and mirrors for normies who become cannon fodder

...

Shutup you egotistical no-fun asshole.

The right believes it's absolutely on the right side of history.
The left also believes it's right about everything.

But

Learn, that not all conflicts are based on good versus evil, rational against irrational, mind against soul. Most conflict afflicting you are based on ignorance. Being an ignorant means you cannot discern between good and evil, rational and irrational, mind and soul. All your wars have one and the same mother: ignorance.

Yes, but that's an almost nonsensical statement. Why would there be grievance if both sides believed exactly the same thing and were in complete agreement?

Jesus Christ the stupidity of this nigger.

ALL WARS EVER FOUGHT (excluding africa) WERE OVER RESOURCES YOU FUCKING NIGGER