Redpill me on the moon landing

Redpill me on the moon landing

Is it true that the photos were supposedly taken with a normie tier camera without any special protection and also taken without viewfinders and stuff or anything that would help make sure you got the right exposure

Other urls found in this thread:

out.reddit.com/t3_31pwq8?url=https://youtu.be/sGXTF6bs1IU&token=AQAAcuCoWBmxHSEh5g0KmG3XG1_OHihln_yFQyON8fQ6rq6fsClK&app_name=mweb2x
bibliotecapleyades.net/luna/luna_apollomissions10.htm
bibliotecapleyades.net/luna/luna_apollomis>>
archive.is/NEY5j
youtu.be/hMBCfuKs9i8
youtube.com/watch?v=dE-vOscpiNc
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Laser_Ranging_experiment
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slow-scan_television#Early_usage_in_space_exploration
youtube.com/watch?v=arIc1NlHvV0
mileswmathis.com/musk.pdf
google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjEhJfw8JrSAhVG5yYKHQVuAYgQFggaMAA&url=https://petapixel.com/2016/07/18/check-legendary-nasa-f0-7-lens-frakencamera-kubrick-used/&usg=AFQjCNELKC1ZaY7YGGYJJaiHUlLkpi6PCg&bvm=bv.147448319,d.eWE
google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjEhJfw8JrSAhVG5yYKHQVuAYgQFgggMAE&url=https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/1km4et/til_stanley_kubrick_used_lenses_commissioned_by/&usg=AFQjCNHt1srE3KNfSFyM8CP9WKF3otJlyA&bvm=bv.147448319,d.eWE
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

its fake cuz cheese is not grey its yellow

Kubrick shot what you saw around the same time he made 2001. His confession is in "the shining"

the thing about the moon landing that gives it away is that they needed a rocket to get to the moon but then there's no rocket to get back

This

...

We probably couldn't do it again in less than 5 years.

We landed on the moon end of story

You have no understanding of the physics behind the lunar lander which did have thrusters as well, also the less lift required due to weaker gravity on the moon.

They did have a rocket to get back, it's called the Service Module. But they needed to bring it with them to the Moon, which meant they needed an EVEN BIGGER rocket to start with.

>America
>home of modern special effects
>makes the best motion pictures
>claims to have landed on the moon
Yeah nothing suspicious about that at all

So who's going to go first to the moon? Take your picks:

1. China
2. Russia
3. Poland
4. Nigeria
5. Israel
6. India

Jeez my sides were annihilated.

They didn't have the technology in the 60s to fake it. out.reddit.com/t3_31pwq8?url=https://youtu.be/sGXTF6bs1IU&token=AQAAcuCoWBmxHSEh5g0KmG3XG1_OHihln_yFQyON8fQ6rq6fsClK&app_name=mweb2x

Kubrick could have faked it no problem. Man was an absolute master

bibliotecapleyades.net/luna/luna_apollomissions10.htm

>modern special effects
>1969

>bibliotecapleyades.net/luna/luna_apollomis>>

archive.is/NEY5j

Seriously though where are the stars in the sky and why is the flag blowing in the wind

I get it "0 gravity" but if they thrusted the flag into the ground it would be pointed up. That is poised perfectly horizontally and rippling

You didn't watch the video. 2001 looks like absolute shit compared to the moon landing. Also, explain the mirrors we placed on the moon and how we can bounce back laser beams. Also, how come the Russians didn't cry bullshit when we did it, they had the capacity to hear our transmissions.

Myth busters tested this one. Also the camera was not set for enough exposure to view the stars.

youtu.be/hMBCfuKs9i8

Link to myth busters disproving the flag theory.

Are you all so retarded that you can't see the flag has a horizontal pole at the top to keep it in place, it's not "blowing".

Interestingly Kubrick used NASA lenses to film Barry Lyndon (before the shining) which were developed specifically for the moon landing.

wait, so no one has been on the moon since? or at least attempted

The astronauts had some knowledge/training of photography.

youtube.com/watch?v=dE-vOscpiNc

If they were real, then you'd see white streaks all over the image from the radioactive particles from the sun constantly hitting the lens.

You don't need a rocket to leave the moon.
There's no gravity there.

USSR and China have landed rovers. USSR had plans to land a cosmonaut, but dropped them after the US beat them to the punch.

Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17 are the only men to land on the surface.

The USSR also sent many probes to Venus.

Based pajeets went

China's smart enough not to waste money going to the moon. Not until there's Helium mining there.

The moon has approximately 1/6th Earth gravity. You definitely need a rocket, but not a very big one.
There's also no atmospheric drag to worry about, which further reduces the delta-v needed to get off the surface.

Also, just because they had thin sheet metal and mylar foil on the exterior of the lander does not mean the pressure vessel was made of tin foil.

Red pill you? We landed on the moon. America. Fuck yeah!

We also left mirrors on there for science. Red pill 5 decades of lunar laser tag.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Laser_Ranging_experiment

How about this: The US landed on the moon but what people saw in TV was faked.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slow-scan_television#Early_usage_in_space_exploration

I wonder how cold it gets on the moon with no atmosphere

It's a fake
Source: Miles Mathis equations of the unified field, which tell us the moon would be so overwhelmed with charge no landing would be possible

It should become officially the 51st state. The moon has more productive people than Puerto Rico.

Elon Musk.

If he won't run out of government money, maybe
youtube.com/watch?v=arIc1NlHvV0

mileswmathis.com/musk.pdf

>Is it true that the photos were supposedly taken
Yes. And the hundreds of people involved in faking it never came forward. Even the USSR, who could have won the 'space race' if they called the US out on the fake landings decided to keep the secret too.

...

>(((USSR)))
Keep shilling, Rockefeller lackey

Good going, guys. You literally ruined multiple innocent people's lives and businesses, all while making everyone from Neil Armstrong to Buzz Aldrin look like complete schizos.

Well played, gentlemen, well played indeed.

>Interestingly Kubrick used NASA lenses to film Barry Lyndon

google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjEhJfw8JrSAhVG5yYKHQVuAYgQFggaMAA&url=https://petapixel.com/2016/07/18/check-legendary-nasa-f0-7-lens-frakencamera-kubrick-used/&usg=AFQjCNELKC1ZaY7YGGYJJaiHUlLkpi6PCg&bvm=bv.147448319,d.eWE

google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjEhJfw8JrSAhVG5yYKHQVuAYgQFgggMAE&url=https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/1km4et/til_stanley_kubrick_used_lenses_commissioned_by/&usg=AFQjCNHt1srE3KNfSFyM8CP9WKF3otJlyA&bvm=bv.147448319,d.eWE

damn that is mighty interesting

>hundreds involved in faking it never came forward

not an argument

This is one of the most retarded conspiracy theories.

Like most conspiracy theories, it is the result of a disinformation operation perpetrated by an intelligence agency.

Primary source documents directly from KGB archives exposed this as one of the "active measures" from the infamous KGB Service A.

Most of you dumbass niggers don't actually fucking read anything so you wouldn't know this even though it's been common knowledge for decades among people who have done even minimal research on history of the Cold War.

Some other famous conspiracy theories spread by intelligence agencies are alien visitations (spread by CIA to cover up black projects) and the 'CIA created AIDS to oppress the black man' conspiracy theory (spread by KGB to undermine US influence in third world countries).

There are countless others, many of which some of you probably believe.

>Also, explain the mirrors we placed on the moon and how we can bounce back laser beams.
Are you aware this laser reflection experiment could also be done in the early 60's using the natural reflectivity of the lunar surface? And that unmanned Russian probes also placed mirrors on the moon?