Why do you suppose pedophilia exists Sup Forums? How is it that in every age and every culture, it seems to find its way into existence within the population? Naturally this question can be applied to homos as well, but why pedophilia in particular?
Literally no reason for the thread to be pruned. Just good discussion. Also reminder that HE DOES IT FOR FREE
because old or young, women want that bbc. and they will get it, no matter what
Pedophilia used to be normalized. Children were forced to marry adults without any say on their end. They weren't viewed as children, women were viewed as a walking womb.
Today
>Some men like the innocence of children
>Some men like that it's illegal and forbidden
>Some men prefer illegal teens because of how untarnished their skin is and how smooth they still are
>Some men like having power over younger women because of how trusting they are
There's no easy way to understand or squash pedophilia. Especially in some countries where they see nothing wrong with it.
>every age and every culture
If you're talking about pubescent and post-pubescent, then yes I get that. That's just nature's signal telling everyone you can fuck if you want.
Pre-pubescent is another story and there's no fucking way that's acceptable in any society.
i dont want to fuck kids but i would want to reserve a kid from lets say 10 year old and marry her when she is 18. so that she is pure and virgin by the time i marry her.
Only place where it was normalized was royalty.
Here is some redpill that you might be interested in. The red pill is so harsh, it triggers Sup Forums.
Speaking of
>HE DOES IT FOR FREE
you sure dont you fucking shill
Because little girls are hot. Some men will deny it because thrre are modern societal rules against acknowledging the truth but it's still true.
No, they're not.
It can be argued that women who have passed the age of puberty are hot because they've developed features that allow them to conceive children but there is nothing attractive about innocent youth who don't even understand what sex is.
>who don't even understand what sex is.
Nobody understands anything until they're taught.
And her having or not having knowledge of certain things doesn't change that her body and behavior is attractive.
You can't justify being sexually attracted to un-developed children you sick fuck.
Women shouldn't understand sex until their body is ready to conceive. I hope you're on some kind of a watch list and stay away from playgrounds.
Because childlike traits are often also seen as beauty traits.
Its don't.
Bestiality is far more common across human cultures than paedophilia. Think about that. People are more likely to fuck a donkey than a little kid.
Paedophiles are aberrations. For many cultures, it's an aberration so profound that they literally lack the words to express it and the knowledge system to comprehend it.
Also kill yourself
Are you assume that we only evolve good traits?
Sex is for procreation. If a young girl has received her moonblood she is old enough to marry and breed.
This is undeniably true, most people look after more soft looking facial traits. And lolis indeed have cute faces, but then, there's a difference between cute and hot.
you are the sort guy i would beat up
redpills have more beef in them, that's just a rant with history dressing.
multifaceted question
I think there are several answers depending.
1) Emotional Predators/Cowards: Obviously there is a need to be psychologically dominant. Man-children are terrified of thinking adult women. They need to be in complete moral and emotional control. Kids allow them to feel "manly" and "in charge".
2) Mental Weakness: for most of human history, women were making babies when they were 10-14 (whenever the girl's first period was, was usually the age she was married off as able to make kids). Only as society got richer and more educated did the age of a woman's first child start to drift back to 16-18, then compulsory schooling shoved it back to 18+ eventually birth control and women going to college drove it back even later. In short men being attracted to girls Just entering their fertile age probably is genetic on some level for a large chunk of men. Of course humans are "intelligent" and often suppress genetic urges. So it's natural that some men would be "weaker" then the rest and give in to those old biological urges.
3) Mental Sickness/Genetic Errors: much like gays or animal fuckers, there are plenty of people who are just mentally fucking ill out there (or suffer from some sort of serious genetic issues, which have warped their minds).
4) Abuse Victim: A huge percentage of sexual child abuse perps were abused as children themselves. This is conditioning that forms when an eventual perp is growing up that this type of behavior is OK on some level mixed with a boatload of self loathing and blame. Women who are abused as children often abuse their own children who in turn abuse their children. And the circle continues until someone is arrested. Personally I think all known abuse victims should be put in a national registry just like sex offenders themselves and carefully observed. (something stupid like 80% of victims commit the same acts) I'm sure this is where most of the pedos actually come from.
>You can't justify being sexually attracted to un-developed children you sick fuck.
What's wrong with it? There's nothing to justify, it is the default position.
>Women shouldn't understand sex until their body is ready to conceive
That's how you get girls being sluts. If you don't teach your daughter about sex some boy will.
>stay away from playgrounds.
I like going to the local playground to look at all the cute girls.
Sure you would Mr Internet Tough Guy.
Sick creepy fuck. You are what's wrong with America and the world.
Why is Sup Forums so into talking about genetics without ever really reading about it.
Speculation doesn't belong here, you can't use genetics as a catch all deus ex machina to flesh out your argument.
society is the new addition to reality. what we call pedophillia is just our natural state.
nobody questions why raccoons start fucking at age two.
I watched a documentary about some science being done to understand the difference between pedophile brains and normal brains, and one of the things with some evidence is that there is something wrong with the "wiring", where the part of the brain responsible for sex drive and the part responsible for parental feelings are crosswired. So when other people feel things like wanting to protect a child, the pedophile sees them sexually because of this brain default.
Do you think that genetic intermingling could have an impact on this abnormality? Are there consistent populations or racial/ethnic pairings where this occurs more often?
Why does every culture share the other mental illnesses?
Pedophilia is just a mental illness. I suppose it must pop up in every culture, just like dementia or schizophrenia.
I don't know, it was not covered by the studies I saw them talking about.
So you can plug her with all your well earned STD's as soon as you unwrap her you Neanderthal fuck. Go back to 20,017 BC.
Guess what, every facet of behaviour is reflected in neurological architecture somewhere. Does that mean it's genetic, or even unchangeable?
For the vast majority of this degenerate minority, it's a cultural phenomenon. Small dick + low self esteem + culture of coddling and worshipping children + too much porn = paedo. Mystery solved.
I doubt it, paedophiles have always existed, even in societies without those things you just mentioned when only the first two might apply.
Sup Forums can't even spot literal junk science anymore
>crosswired
jesus
There is nothing hot about the predation and abuse of children you sick bastard. Stop watching Disney. Cut off your gross D and send yourself to prison.
see
and then fuck off
Humans are attracted to youth. Not kids, youth. Look up the concept of neoteny in humans. An example would be cartoon characters which exaggerate features and achieve a cute result. Another is puppies versus adult dogs. Certain features are proportionately larger than in the adult. It's one of the reasons most humans are helpless but to find babies cute. It's genetic, and helps keep the species alive. But it can also turn into a degenerate obsession.
The guy they were talking about it to was a scientist at the University of Cambridge. Also that was my own phrasing, I can't remember what they called it.
>Why do you suppose pedophilia exists Sup Forums?
Because the anglo exists
It is perfectly normal to find children attractive. It only becomes degenerate when it becomes sexual. We're supposed to find children attractive because they are the future- but not sexually.
In short, non-sexual aesthetic has been lost thanks to the sexual revolution.
> Why do you suppose pedophilia exists Sup Forums?
> What is biology
There is literally nothing wrong with being attracted to women perceived as young so long as they exhibit physical traits of womanhood or fertility. In terms of pre-pubescent or infant pedophilia it just exists because it's pretty much a glitch in our biological program which doesn't make sense in reproductive terms and hence it's rare but so is something like Cystic Fibrosis for the same reason.
that's just arranged marriage
Is there a Cystic Fibrosis for wanting to fuck donkey cunts?
People are just horny, pathetic and degenerate, and some are more so than others. Observe the obvious, kthxbai
In any other context would you accept someone telling you something was true, only because a college professor said it?
Reminder that anyone saying pedophilia is biology is trying to normalize pedophilia. Note how language is used and ideas are treated.
>kthxbai
> I could have actually read his post and looked into the nuance of maturity and obvious phenotypic differences which determine maturation but fuck that he wants to promote fucking infants and kids
>getting this defensive
>not a pedo
>throwing out meaningless jargon
What did you think your post meant when you typed that up?
>nuance of maturity and obvious phenotypic differences which determine maturation
What did you think that meant? You're slurring a few ideas together, probably in an attempt to talk over my/the thread's head.