HUGE REDPILL: Conservative Views are a sign of Low IQ

dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2095549/Right-wingers-intelligent-left-wingers-says-controversial-study--conservative-politics-lead-people-racist.html

>Children with low intelligence grow up to be prejudiced
>Right-wing views make the less intelligent feel 'safe'

>Right-wingers tend to be less intelligent than left-wingers, and people with low childhood intelligence tend to grow up to have racist and anti-gay views, says a controversial new study.

>Conservative politics work almost as a 'gateway' into prejudice against others, say the Canadian academics.

>The paper analysed large UK studies which compared childhood intelligence with political views in adulthood across more than 15,000 people.

>The authors claim that people with low intelligence gravitate towards right-wing views because they make them feel safe.

Interesting. I know Sup Forums loves IQ studies, so this should tickle your fancy.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ODZ-RUufHgI
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Liberal bs.

Stupid people follow tradition, smart people buck it. But low tier smart people don't see a need for the stupid people to follow a tradition

sage
your mother is a stupid crack whore

I'm a lefty and ime moar itelij... inteligunt... IME MOAR CLEVURER than all ov u!!!

So science is fake when it opposes your worldview?

>left has all the niggers and shitskins at it's disposal
>somehow more intelligent than the right

okie doke

It's true, Globalism is the future
Conservatives live a dream about a time which has come and gone, it's time to start moving forward as a society and give up our countries for a one world government. A controlled world is a civilised world and a One World Government would be able to preserve resources much better than a world full of different governments and countries.

>(((science)))

Gelileo Galilei would roll in his grave.

>implying one shitty study is "science"
kek, these """studies""" are made by students with poor methods, then have their data cherrypicked, and are then sent to the media to be further misinterpreted before they become headlines. all this is is students wanting citations

it's the same with all shitty ""studies"" that reach the front page of the media, such as those that say eating x will cause you to die of cancer

What if you grew up with non-prejudiced views and cuck approved politics, but started reading Evola and lifting, inadvertently uncucking your entire psychology and existential outlook in the process?

Is that data pool too small on that?

>say the Canadian academics

Oh, never mind. This """""""""study""""""""" is fucking worthless.

this was a really great political thread and the insight i gained was massive,
i will restructure my character to be more in the liking of what you have deemed.
would you like a pudding?

Thanks for correcting the record.

youtube.com/watch?v=ODZ-RUufHgI

Being a nigger is an indicator of having a low IQ.

>tfw too intelligent to see the problem with flooding your country with millions upon millions of niggers

But this tested for literal racism, so of course only the idiots would answer affirmatively

Just look at the questiond
>are u an ebil nazi
>yub :DDDD

Me to.

The right wingers have no place in this country.

This country is for everyone.

I don't care. You can call me low IQ all you want if this suddenly validates IQ tests and informs the world that niggers are, on average, mentally retarded.

Psychological Study from OP. If you shorten that, what do you get?
(PSYOP)

>never paid taxes eatin' tendies!

Wouldn't be surprised if that woman has Alzheimer's.

Yeah meanwhile the rich is white leftists and jews.

Nice try creating low iq slaves.

probably true, but these things work like pic related.

The Nazis placed on trial at Nuremberg all tested with genius-level IQ's.

Science is facts, but none of this is facts compared to history.

It's a biased study based on feelings and social issues not actual smarts. Plenty of smart men in the past was racist or sexist or homophobic.
It also goes against reality.

There's a big difference between Herr Goebbles and the redneck with the MAGA sign in front of his trailer.

i know right? if only everyone could see through her tired eyes we could all be the same wearing the flag of humanity as we have been shown to be since the dawn of our reality.
when will the right learn?

Many people here are not "conservative" and are totally for socialism for WHITE PEOPLE in OUR COUNTRIES

National Socialism only true politic.

correlation does not equal causation

low iq are forced to be around niggers and spics
high iq can get into all white neighbourhoods, even high iq niggers go into all white neighbourhoods

No, science is fake when it omits data points to fix results. Like blacks and hispanics being really low IQ and are overwhelming left leaning.

My brain has failed to follow their narrative.

If he rolls a nat20, he might just come alive again.

you forgot: Left wing: extremely low intelligence. don't forget dindus and their gibs

what am I?
Pro gay marriage, pro weed legalization, pro choice, pretty much a leftist aside from being against islam, against mass immigration and pro freedom of speech

You know this post by OP.... you know it really... really made me.. you know think about this subject like totally opened my eyes to a whole new world of thought. My thought process has totally changed and I'm pretty sure the neurons in my brain are even talking to each other laughing and smiling at how stupid they were and how happy they are now!

>link intelligence to ideology
>lol conservatards btfo
>link intelligence to race
>WTF THATS RACIST YOU FUCKING SHITLORD

>What am I?

Capable of thinking for yourself instead of how the party you voted for tells you to think.

That despair.

Smart people only buck tradition when they deem it necessary, not because it's edgy or sexy. That's an important distinction.

>making this thread is purely racist
>blacks have lower I.Q.'s on average than white.
>you now just labeled blacks as racist
>that is in fact racist on your part
>since you are racist you must have low I.Q. acorting to your article
>there for since you have a low I.Q. I dont' think you even fully understand the article so it can't be believed.

try harder troll

You don't really have to have a specific "worldview" to know that the droves of blacks and Mexicans that vote democrat aren't the sharpest knives in the drawer.

Where are the real-world examples of this study? Why are so many business owners registered republicans?

This.

we are enlightened...
enlightenededededededededededededededed
HWNDU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

yeah, sure it is

No need to project cuck. I contribute to economy like good worker. Earn many shekels for bombs.

Nationalism is the future btw.

>A more closed mind means lower IQ
Huh, really makes you think...

>canadian academics

Fuck off toronto

>Conservative Views are a sign of Low IQ


Only if the only members of the group that are being talked to are nearly all or all white.

i be trollin' but that got me...
aw sheeeeeeeeit!

As an antithesis to your blacks and Mexicans argument, I would like to introduce you to the entire state of West Virginia and the walking tree stumps they call people.

has it ever occured to anyone, that them having a lower IQ, thus having to work more wagecuckery jobs normally. And working them aka "retail" seeing how awesomely abused WIC, and EBT/Food Stamps are abused. Thus growing up to hate the gibs me mentality of the left?

Those who talk of "racism" haven't really understood why people are "Racist"

They live in their little gated communities with little interaction with people outside their own demographic. They are just as uneducated world-wise.

The Left has literally stymied their own limbic system while the right's is still active.

How come Conservatives are the fat white rich men? If they were dumber, wouldn't they be the poor people?

...

intelligent people recognise danger. when one group is 6℅ of the offending population yet they commit 50℅ of the violent crime, recognising that's not "racism". it's intelligence in action. any claim to the contrary is a literal slap in the face to evolution and the idea that species grow and evolve with their surroundings. munts are fucking animals and they act like it. trying to say that acknowledging that is "racist" flies in the face of all their evolutionary convictions.

even is they were to say that munts "evolved" to be more violent doesn't dispose the idea that they are losing not for their violent tendencies but because of them.

in short, fuck munts, fuck liberals, fuck communism. their own precious "science" denies them.

>Canadian academics

All I needed to see.

What if you go from liberal to conservative?

Sure thing. So that means that EVERYONE is stupid? The "study" makes no sense.

You have not addressed the massive quantities of uneducated minorities that flock to the left.

Most Conservatives aren't fat, white, rich men. They're Cleetus and his kin along with every farmer between Cincinnati and Denver.

>munts
you might have a good point.
i have considered the japanese among the super elite.
perhaps even more so than the aryan.

Checked

There is this weird phenomenon I've noticed where you learn something, it seems good, then you get smarter and wiser and find out it's wrong. Only stupid people believe it. Then you get even smarter and wsier and realize the stupid people were right the whole time.

The human intuition is a lot more powerful than we give it credit for.

No, I'm saying that a large portion of the voter base for both major parties are stupid.

but hers is the only one libs would consider "art"

In this case, it's self preservation. Most liberals don't fully understand what that term means, or they do and just ignore it.

OP, get ready to swallow the redpill.

People's political views are based ENTIRELY on their self-interest. It has nothing to do with IQ.

Pol is everything but sjws.

You got dumber or were never smart in the first place.

"(((Social))) Sciences" are a joke famalam.

Like 80% of them can't be replicated, which is the whole point of science and understanding.

I'm a libertarian but wasn't much of the nazi high command above an IQ of 120? I'm pretty sure goebbels had a projected IQ of 150

I'd agree, but I'd also contend that party affiliation has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with IQ.

Emotion votes left, logic votes right. Professors vote left, businessmen vote right.

Damn right!
Can we accept now that blacks have lower IQ's too then?
Science is but a bunch of ideas, nothing is concrete.

reminder that libertarianism is the high iq autistic master race and you will all suffer under the tyrannous yoke of leave me alone and i will leave you alone.

This. I used to browse Sup Forums back in the day in like 2014. Then I grew up and became a Democrat.

The left telling the right they are "stupid" when they cant even work out what gender they are and think 60+ genders just miraculously popped up out of no where during the Obama administration.

The left has become a cult of weirdos.

Higher IQ = more years of school = more years of liberal brainwashing

Retarded study, does not control for rural vs urban influences on IQ (city influences both IQ and political beliefs)

Also does not control for race which is a way better predictor of both IQ and political "choice".

Thirdly this applies to the UK "right" and "left" and not the US whose right is far more fiscal than the left.

Fourthly, intellectuals tend to like communist and other similar ideologies due to the power it lends to the intellectual class and the idea that society can be systematized from the top down.

Fifth, there is no discrimination within right wing tradition, it breaks the correlation vs causation situation quite a few times.

Sixth, liberals literally run schools all the way through till the upper levels of university. Longer you are in school = higher your end IQ (2-4 IQ point gain per year of schooling). More than likely the liberal "shift" can be explained by the effect of schooling on liberal/conservative values.

seventh, there is this implication that safety. That is literal physical safety, or safety via the preservation of values/ national resources, is akin to "safe spaces" or emotional need for safety. It is fairly obvious that conservative beliefs create a feeling of safety. They require a commitment to the preservation of traditional values which have been tested and true.

eighth, it assumes that racism is not natural but more by implication. everyone is racist, just some admit it more than others. Also, there was no Implicit association test done, and therefore any measures of racist are "face value" whereby persons, especially liberals would be less inclined to answer honestly.

Very jewish study, reminds me of how marx said "religion is the opiate of the masses".

Very intelligent people are capable of holding repugnant beliefs. You can't just differ to the 'authority' of another person's intelligence to tell you what to believe.

>tfw too intelligent to ever come to a conclusion on what is in my own interest ie postjudiced.

SPBP

If that was true, then the most basic assumption / presumption would be that lower IQ individuals would be more prevalent on the conservative side and that you could map the IQ rainbow across sexes and races directly to the political spectrum.

But the demographics of the parties actually show the opposite.

Most white males and Asian males are conservatives.
There are more white female conservatives than liberal ones.
And of the non-white and non-East Asians, the majority of these vote for and are targeted by the liberal/democratic parties.

>Fifth, there is no discrimination within right wing tradition, it breaks the correlation vs causation situation quite a few times.

What do you mean? The further right you go the more movements tend to factionalize (like how migrants and homosexuals tend to swing left simply because the conservative right of the countries they inhibit denies them).

This fits right in line with all the other stuff we know about race, genetics, and IQ. White people are less clannish in general than, for example, black people, and have a higher IQ. But when we look at somewhat more clannish (and therefore more conservative) subgroups of whites, it stands to reason that their IQ would be lower than the average white.

These studies have already been done before multiple times.

TLDR: in general, the more liberal and atheist you are, the smarter you are.

...

>tfw too intelligent to be for smaller government and more self-reliance

That's true, this only reinforces genetic IQ across race. Retarded nonwhites are almost incapable of seeing beyond ethnocentrism, this is why whites must fight tooth and nail to argue through logic our reasoning to become ethnocentric while shitskins simply just *do* it.

Exactly. Or instincts developed for a reason. If a specific cultural trait (say, distaste for adulterers) is found in pretty much every civilization throughout history, it seems pretty likely it's necessary is they want to survive at all.
Some liberal "intellectual" who references Harry potter sitting in an armchair can't discredit ages of selective pressure, even if the products of that selection don't have the slightest clue why they behave the way they do.

>Dailymail
Ok, whatever makes you happy.

I think the more intelligent you are the less intuitive and more rational you become and so you become less clannish. Leftism in general is a sliding scale of universality, and this is why in a different study I've read showed that rightists can easily imitate leftists whilst leftists cannot because they have a poor conception of loyalty.

>muh proofread *our *if they want

fake science from pseudoscientific leftist circlejerk that is Social Psychology

Bait thread

the study is from 1970 you retard.
not sure if you knew or not but
conservative values as well as liberal values have changed over the decades.

>yfw when political affliation has correlation with IQ but race/geographical location doesn't somehow

>Niggers
>Spics
>Mudshits
>High I.Q.

This isn't necessarily true. As I've gone more through education (in college now for a few years) I've become more conservative and most of the A+ students are right-leaning. You can't really attach a common IQ to a side of the political spectrum.

Liberals are the most racist. They live in 90+% white/rich communities, never around poor blacks, hispanics or arabs.

Funny how they say one thing and always do the opposite. Zero integrity, the greatest strength of the psychopath.

I mean that there are many different kinds of right wing traditions. Also, libertarian beliefs are right wing fiscally but very low authoritarian and so are seen as more centrist. Even though they are far right (it really depends on the nation and social order though).

Right and left on a whole is a very shitty way to break down politics.

I would venture that most libertarians have an above average IQ due to knowing and or studying economics. Especially if they are chicago school right wing libertarians.

I believe that this is why nationalism and limiting immigration may seem so repugnant to some leftists. You'll often see them say things like "Why exactly should I be proud or be like someone else because they are from the same country as me?" (which I suppose has some merit). Leftists are "above" identitarianism on a sub-universal scale. They see nothing wrong with migrants or the cheapening of their own culture.

Liberals are scared of other races and being called a racist is something they fear.