Sup Forums UNITED: 2dn edition

To fight the current cultural and political war, the """alt-right""" need be united under reasonable, realistic common goals, or at least non-conflicting objectives. Last time many snek agreed that we should do so by aiming at a NatCap gov., that respect private propriety as much as a gov. can allow while assuring national identity. We would like to hear more opinions, Sup Forumsacks from all political affiliations are welcome, even commie scums. State your political orientation in your post.

ex:
>minarchist/AnCap
We should maybe do x

JOIN ANTICOM BROTHERS!

FIGHT THE MARXIST SCUM!

Moderate german

>deport kikes
>ban lügenpresse
>stop giving welfare to migrants and they'll have the options to leave or start the war
>annex poland

>1000 years of peace

>my threads only attract shitposters

>not just using the official Sup Forums flag

wew

>libertarian/minarchist

I have a lot of respect for our NatSoc friends but I'm not interested in being a part of their society. I'd rather a situation where we're trade partners and allies. As long as I'm not accidentally exporting degeneracy to their nation, and they aren't treading on me, I think there's a lot to be done between us.

I'd tolerate a Pinochet style dictatorship. Nothing wrong with totalitarianism if it exists in order to protect libertarian principles from commies.

>I have a lot of respect for our NatSoc friends but I'm not interested in being a part of their society.
Same here. I think we might be able to have an interesting migration agreement where people in NatSoc land and people in libertarian land can move between countries, see which one they want more, and settle down in one of them.

I think having small self sufficient regions could provide such an opportunity. People who voluntarily band together to live how they all see fit and welcome people who value their lifestyle and reject those they don't see as beneficial for their community.

This canp work too, but what do you think about NatCap? Old american style. For me it merges the best of the two

It can work. I mean, the Constitution does grant the power to raise tariffs, and the individual states are granted far more economic power over their economies (or at least that's the way it was before FDR). That being said, I'm not a huge fan of tariffs, I think the FF's put that power in there because they were still somewhat in the mindset of mercantilism.

libertarians are a social cancer. You're liberals by in but another name. Do you think freedom of speech is a stable basin? Hell no, you either have to take the repressive tolerance approach of SJW's when a challenge comes or be an irrelevant accomplice to the wishes of others

but if we separate NatSoc and AnCaps, they both have weaknesses that can make them degenerate/crumble, while NatCap is easier to maintain on the long run

Alt right is for National Socialists, Fascists, White Nationalists and Monarchists only. Fuck libertarians

hello

Gas all of you. Left and right, peasant poors have no reason to live in the day of automation.

>inb4 dictatorship
that's one of the ways libertarians respond to treaders, the other being recreational McNukes

The problem is that the NatSoc will literally attempt to 'help' the caps with oppressive government force

statists are kinda shit at not oppressing people different from themselves. You gotta quarantine them from eachother.

Spencers original use of the term literally referred to all right wing identitarians opposed to neoconservatism

Right wing libertarians are nearly all nationalists. Cry all you want but Civic Nationalists are Alt Right

>NatCap
>give gov. a strong but narrow angle of power, enforce a basically free market (only partial protectionism must be in place, to encourage local businesses and cultivate the nationalist spirit
>Hoppean social ostracization take care of the degenerates
>we 1488
>we no step on snek

You have a lot of faith

For every Pinochet and Peron theres still a Hitler

I don't have any more faith than fascists LARPers. AnCap is not possible with the current political mainstream mindset and the average IQ (thx jooz). I am seeking for a realistic middle-ground.

Quick question, how the fuck can Fascism and Libertarianism Co exist? Liberalism is literally super classical liberalism and Fascism is literally anti liberalism? Plz explain.

They don't, but many here are Fascist because they see it as the best way to heal and protect their national pride and heritage. I am proposing alternatives

Alternatives to what?
Fascism?
The relationship between Fascism and Liberalism?

Nm I get what you are saying now.

alternative to fascism. Fascism is bad because it dies with it's ruler, implying that the leader is good (not likely). Also it treads on me too much for what it offers

I've heard it described like this. Fascism is a reaction to communism, and a temporary one at that. It is like the fever you get when you are sick, it is hot and painful, but it exists because it is getting rid of a harmful disease within you. Once the disease is gone then the body can resume normal functions again. Hence why fascist dictatorships tend to only last for a single leader, even in cases where they weren't defeated militarily.

They don't.
Communism is the government giving shit for doing nothing
Fascism is the government giving you shit for doing something
Nat cap is the government giving you nothing except the basics, but strong protection from the outside