To fight the current cultural and political war, the """alt-right""" need be united under reasonable, realistic common goals, or at least non-conflicting objectives. Last time many snek agreed that we should do so by aiming at a NatCap gov., that respect private propriety as much as a gov. can allow while assuring national identity. We would like to hear more opinions, Sup Forumsacks from all political affiliations are welcome, even commie scums. State your political orientation in your post.
ex: >minarchist/AnCap We should maybe do x
Gabriel Walker
JOIN ANTICOM BROTHERS!
FIGHT THE MARXIST SCUM!
Tyler Powell
Moderate german
>deport kikes >ban lügenpresse >stop giving welfare to migrants and they'll have the options to leave or start the war >annex poland
>1000 years of peace
Kayden Hernandez
>my threads only attract shitposters
James Reyes
>not just using the official Sup Forums flag
wew
Logan Torres
>libertarian/minarchist
I have a lot of respect for our NatSoc friends but I'm not interested in being a part of their society. I'd rather a situation where we're trade partners and allies. As long as I'm not accidentally exporting degeneracy to their nation, and they aren't treading on me, I think there's a lot to be done between us.
Kayden Morales
I'd tolerate a Pinochet style dictatorship. Nothing wrong with totalitarianism if it exists in order to protect libertarian principles from commies.
Ayden Rodriguez
>I have a lot of respect for our NatSoc friends but I'm not interested in being a part of their society. Same here. I think we might be able to have an interesting migration agreement where people in NatSoc land and people in libertarian land can move between countries, see which one they want more, and settle down in one of them.
John Young
I think having small self sufficient regions could provide such an opportunity. People who voluntarily band together to live how they all see fit and welcome people who value their lifestyle and reject those they don't see as beneficial for their community.
Tyler Cruz
This canp work too, but what do you think about NatCap? Old american style. For me it merges the best of the two
Justin Rodriguez
It can work. I mean, the Constitution does grant the power to raise tariffs, and the individual states are granted far more economic power over their economies (or at least that's the way it was before FDR). That being said, I'm not a huge fan of tariffs, I think the FF's put that power in there because they were still somewhat in the mindset of mercantilism.
Hunter White
libertarians are a social cancer. You're liberals by in but another name. Do you think freedom of speech is a stable basin? Hell no, you either have to take the repressive tolerance approach of SJW's when a challenge comes or be an irrelevant accomplice to the wishes of others
Jaxon Gray
but if we separate NatSoc and AnCaps, they both have weaknesses that can make them degenerate/crumble, while NatCap is easier to maintain on the long run
Christian Wright
Alt right is for National Socialists, Fascists, White Nationalists and Monarchists only. Fuck libertarians
Oliver Williams
hello
Joseph Rogers
Gas all of you. Left and right, peasant poors have no reason to live in the day of automation.
Jack Baker
>inb4 dictatorship that's one of the ways libertarians respond to treaders, the other being recreational McNukes
Caleb Sanchez
The problem is that the NatSoc will literally attempt to 'help' the caps with oppressive government force
statists are kinda shit at not oppressing people different from themselves. You gotta quarantine them from eachother.
Spencers original use of the term literally referred to all right wing identitarians opposed to neoconservatism
Right wing libertarians are nearly all nationalists. Cry all you want but Civic Nationalists are Alt Right
Kayden Hernandez
>NatCap >give gov. a strong but narrow angle of power, enforce a basically free market (only partial protectionism must be in place, to encourage local businesses and cultivate the nationalist spirit >Hoppean social ostracization take care of the degenerates >we 1488 >we no step on snek
Wyatt Watson
You have a lot of faith
For every Pinochet and Peron theres still a Hitler
Cooper Foster
I don't have any more faith than fascists LARPers. AnCap is not possible with the current political mainstream mindset and the average IQ (thx jooz). I am seeking for a realistic middle-ground.
Julian Campbell
Quick question, how the fuck can Fascism and Libertarianism Co exist? Liberalism is literally super classical liberalism and Fascism is literally anti liberalism? Plz explain.
Angel Gomez
They don't, but many here are Fascist because they see it as the best way to heal and protect their national pride and heritage. I am proposing alternatives
Juan Edwards
Alternatives to what? Fascism? The relationship between Fascism and Liberalism?
Bentley Torres
Nm I get what you are saying now.
Jeremiah Young
alternative to fascism. Fascism is bad because it dies with it's ruler, implying that the leader is good (not likely). Also it treads on me too much for what it offers
Joshua Perez
I've heard it described like this. Fascism is a reaction to communism, and a temporary one at that. It is like the fever you get when you are sick, it is hot and painful, but it exists because it is getting rid of a harmful disease within you. Once the disease is gone then the body can resume normal functions again. Hence why fascist dictatorships tend to only last for a single leader, even in cases where they weren't defeated militarily.
William Bailey
They don't. Communism is the government giving shit for doing nothing Fascism is the government giving you shit for doing something Nat cap is the government giving you nothing except the basics, but strong protection from the outside