Alan Greenspan: Ron Paul Was Right About The Gold Standard

It's ogre, Sup Forums. Chief Jew banker of the Fed and central banking guru (((Greenspan))) explicitly admits Austrian economist and former congressman Ron Paul was right about everything.

>zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-20/alan-greenspan-ron-paul-was-right-about-gold-standard
>“Today, going back on to the gold standard would be perceived as an act of desperation. But if the gold standard were in place today, we would not have reached the situation in which we now find ourselves,” he said.“[T]here is a widespread view that the 19th Century gold standard didn’t work. I think that’s like wearing the wrong size shoes and saying the shoes are uncomfortable! It wasn’t the gold standard that failed; it was politics.”
>And the punchline: “We would never have reached this position of extreme indebtedness were we on the gold standard, because the gold standard is a way of ensuring that fiscal policy never gets out of line.”

Link of the interview of Greenspan/
>www.gold.org/download/file/5497/Gold_Investor_February_2017.pdf

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/Justin12393LEE/status/833762145473089537
constitution.org/mon/greenspan_gold.htm
youtube.com/watch?v=o_WBo4sfmi4
youtube.com/watch?v=9-JWBBHuX_c
myredditvideos.com/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Guess I forgot to mention niggers or cute anime girls in the OP to bring attention to the thread.
Shameless self bump using my Paul folder.

...

...

...

...

...

Where does he mention Ron Paul?

Still, this is a pretty big deal. Can't imagine even the biggest proponents of fiat believe their own horseshit.

One chance every month to Paulposting.

In one of the answers,
>When I was Chair of the Federal Reserve I used to testify before US Congressman Ron Paul, who was a very strong advocate of gold. We had some interesting discussions. I told him that US monetary policy tried to follow signals that a gold standard would have created. That is sound monetary policy even with a fiat currency. In that regard, I told him that even if we had gone back to the gold standard, policy would not have changed all that much.
Further on, he says that it was bullshit.

(((Greenspan))) admitting the gold standard was superior?

What kind of a timeline am in, anyways?

That's called backtracking.

I do that too, when I say some truth that I shouldn't.

I like Trump but I fear his dominance has overshadowed Paulposting a bit too much.

Best timeline.

We need to go on the loli/ rare pepe standard.

Irrelevant. Central banking won't stop.

>tfw grandpa paul has always been right

Perhaps Trump will be enough of an absolute madman to at least launch a public audit. He has already pissed off all the people he would piss off doing it.
I think a large section of the public is ripe for the number one red pill. It's just not a thrilling subject for normies so it's will need careful exposition but once you hit a critical mass I don't see the current status quo remaining for more than a few years.

The meme stealing it's been rutless.

But we will always know the truth.

The truth is there.

FIAT currency faggots
Blown
The
Fuck
Out

...

No shit, you can't obtain this kind of debt on the gold standard but it's a trade off for more growth

No political subject is thrilling for normies but if you time it right you can redpill broke people about the jews and (((central banks)))

Momentary gains.

What you have already lost you will never take it back.

Greenspan has been advocating the gold standard since the 1950s.

Perhaps but talking about the Wall will give more passion to most people, whether or not they are cucks.
Monetary policy is a comparatively technical, esoteric subject.

It's really not. Giving fake incentives backed by force to either spend or invest contrary to actual wants can sometimes make a balance sheet look better for a few years but we both know that's not really "more growth".

He had an interesting "pause" in his advocacy which corresponded exactly to his work at the federal reserve. You'll have a hard time saying that his actions at the Fed weren't the opposite of what a gold bug would have done.

Funny, because him and Friedman took us out of it during the Pinochet years.

I spent 10 hours making this OC

>ron paul was right again
no fucking shit the guys pretty much the most intelligent person i've heard of when it comes to anything government really.

This is the best news I've heard in a while. Ron Paul has a special place in my heart, not only because I think he's one of the greatest Americans to ever live, but because my grandfather loved him.

My grandpa was the man who brought my attention to Ron Paul, after stating he liked him in the 2008 election.

Ever since then, I've always known Ron Paul was right.

My grandpa died right after Obama's election in 2008. His funeral was held on the day Obama was inaugurated. That day was arguably the turning point of my life.

Good God, do I miss him. If only he were alive right now to see how right he was about Ron Paul.

It's because of Austrian Autism
Once you master it you can predict anything

Fuck I miss these memes. Good times.

F

Greenspan didn't put the US back to the gold standard for a simple reason. In order to do so seamlessly, US monetary policy would need to fulfill certain criteria. If it did so, it would already have the benefits of the gold standard, and implementing the standard would serve no purpose except to limit future flexibility. It was deemed better to manage monetary policy outright rather than work to remove a tool.

the libertarians have always been here.

>twitter.com/Justin12393LEE/status/833762145473089537
Done and vote, bump

>controlled fiscal policy
>as distinct from economic entropy

you cannot make money from nothing form that, gormless goy

I think user is talking about chile

Yeah, I remember that lame excuse.

Like the fact that they were advocationg for the dollarization of economies every where else, and the influence of the petro-dollar didn't have a role on it.

Sure, I just wanted to add some context about the US. Greenspan made a decision not to push the US back to it early in his policy career.

Thanks bro. I miss him a lot. I wish he didn't have to die knowing Obama was about to become president. At least without knowing that Trump was going to be President after.

>Ron Paul was right
No shit. When was he ever wrong?

"Tool" is a kind euphemism for monetary policy. It's basically price control on by far the most important prices in the world. And handed over to bankers. And not subject to political takeover at all.

Oy vey indeed.

minus the absurdity that youre putting evaluations on a resource that can be manufactured by jews to the point of deflation

oh goyim

>you will never follow under Ron Paul's standard in last stand of Christendom and the West

>resource that can be manufactured
Gold can't be manufactured. You can painfully mine some of it in quantities infinitesimal compared to the money creation of the last QE.

gold is a terrible idea because it ties currency to speculation and trade. very volatile, difficult to make mp based upon. we just need stricter rules on fiat so we can't print 20 trillion in debt

Really im surprised this isnt common knowledge. Money turned to paper. You wonder why the market can be manipulated so much. Gold and silver coins should have never changed to paper.

You can speculate on and trade fiat currencies.
Trading actual commodities instead of fiat (not necessarily gold here) destroys the political "technocratic" takeover of the entire financial system.

greenspan is a goldbug from way back

notice he never pushed it when he could have

gold standard is a scam

Sup Forums's attention span is too short to care about Ron Paul.

Gold is a meme.
If you don't understand why, you don't understand econ.
The problem is the private control of money creation, not fiat.

and in case anyone is wondering why I think he's an old goldbug,
constitution.org/mon/greenspan_gold.htm

if this doesn't make goldbugs wake up to the bullshit they're being sidetracked with, I don't know what will

>If you don't understand why, you don't understand econ.
At least that eliminates Greenspan now.
>The problem is the private control of money creation, not fiat.
Yeah, I'm sure government would do a much better job as it always does. Oh wait, a leaf.

youtube.com/watch?v=o_WBo4sfmi4

Guess what year Switzerland got rid of the gold standard.

This is really, really sad.

After 20 trillion of debt and unlimited quantitative easing the experts reveal they don't know what to do now.

>you can't just peg all value to a shiny rock!
Well look what the alternative got us.

>Yeah, I'm sure government would do a much better job as it always does.
Question: do you have any idea how a gold standard ever worked?

I think the large majority of them know. They don't know how to get out of this mess, but every time they made a decision, they had a rather clear goal in mind.

The gold standard being recognized in courts has little to do with giving monetary policy powers to the government.

Janet Yellen's term is up next year and Trump gets to appoint her replacement

Let's hope he's holding back Ron or Rand for that

>volutary socialism
what in the actual fuck is he talking about people are greedy pigs who horde their wealth

He has been talking about Rand to Audit

You didn't read the whole thing did you?

Sauce?
I'd see him do it but it went under my radar.

>tfw no nigger anime girl gf

I think it's like, public healthcare, whoever wants it will have to pay extra taxes for it but at the same time will be allowed its' services, on the other whoever doesn't want it won't pay extra taxes but won't be allowed its' services

>Died and went to heaven.
>Same day Obama became president
Feels good man

Problem is his motivation for the audit. I remember he said that his reason for it was because he thought Yellen kept interest rates low to get business going and make Obama look good (unsurprisingly, she proposed to raise them recently)

Ron Paul was too good for us. He could have been one of the great leaders in history, but we were too stupid and we deserve the retarded meme candidate we have.

WTF? Does Trump not know that keeping Jews in the Federal Reserve Chairman position is a time-honored tradition for the US for many decades now? How will this go over with our greatest ally Israel?

we'll probably adopt a "diamond standard" and replace with a "gold standard" when he have fusion reactors running.

Diamonds can be synthesized but not printed as fast as paper. Creating diamonds also requires more energy.

If my idea gets adopted call me the Man in the Sphere.

Sphere Diamond Standard.

Diamond wafers, diamond crystals of a certain size.

>basing your currency on worthless rocks that are more common in Africa than bugs are on earth

retard

The diamond standard can work like bitcoin.

The more energy and resources your produce, the more you can "waste or use" making diamond gems of a certain size.

Why do we need a standard? Why can't we just have a law that keeps the money supply constant?

In the end, the audit happening is the main thing. Trump comes from a background on the side of the business borrowers. I don't think he'd go full Ron Paul on their asses except if he decides to go full frontal war against the deep state. By the mere audit is enough to red pill tens of millions of people about the fed.
Imagine the MSM having to cover the actions of Bernanke. I can already see the failing New York Times headlines.

Greenspan has always been a hardline libertarian. And monetarist economists like friedman etc are almost always open to private banking and in some degree even gold standard.

gold is also useless.

reject diamonds can be used like gold flecks... to make saw blades or jewelry.

Oh naive one, you sound a lot like Nixon.

...

...

>gold is useless

Gold is an extremely valuable conductor used in circuit boards and electronics. Reply to me when you aren't a rural or suburban retard anymore.

I thought we don't have gold anymore?

thats a horrible idea because velocity of money is not constant, whch would cause fluctuations in price levels. the 2nd reason is that there are many defenitions of money supply, and keeping anything but the narrowest idea of money constant is impossible because of fractional reserve banking.

The diamond.

The scarcity similar to gold but reproducable like paper money or metal coins.

If we had fusion reactors and could be gold out of hydrogen then gold could be used like fiat money.

yes but that is not the reason gold is priced at 37million per ton.

thanks for posting OP

Saying diamonds are useless is like saying gold is useless.

Diamonds had industrial applications, like gold. You didn't get that...

Please stop shitting up this thread with your lack of basic understanding of science or economics, thanks.

Do you think Greenspan had a big ole hard-on for Ron Paul while he was speaking to him during this inquisition? youtube.com/watch?v=9-JWBBHuX_c

Oh I guess I see sort of. If you back every dollar with a certain amount of gold it becomes impossible for banks to legally create more money if there isn't more gold, either that or some money has to be destroyed.

gold is used very little in modern electronics

I never said they were useless, I said they were worthless because they're almost as common as iron in Africa - literally no real monetary value and an infinite natural supply. China could collapse a diamond standard in 5 years tops with their new empire on the dark continent.

It's useful.
t. working in photonics

With the gold standard we may meme India to superpoower by 2020.

Cheers.

There was a time that the Spanish were extracting so much silver, they devalued it to the point that the marker for the stuff crashed.

If we had fusion reactors, we could hypothetically make so much gold that it becomes as worthless as paper. A gold coin would only have the value printed on it and not the value of its composition.

Paulposting will always be quintessentially Sup Forums

1. silver is far more common than gold
2. we don't have useful fusion reactors and likely won't for a long time
3. creating gold from smaller atoms would waste so much energy that it couldn't ever plausibly be profitable.

If we had a perpetual electric generator, we could make free energy for everyone!

yeah, gold standard without central banking or some government involvement would most probably much more volatile than the current system.
doubt it. They are from much different schools of economic thought. Greenspan thinks gold is a useful tool to balance fiat currency while ron paul is more ideological proponent for gold who will always say that gold is the answer.

Somehow that devaluated market recovered themself once the britains got in control of the silver market.

Mysteryous.