Should loli porn be banned?

Lets be honest here guys, it's child porn.

This degeneracy should not be allowed in any western countries.

All paedophiles should hang and we must cut off their supply of pleasure.

However that is merely my opinion, what about yours Sup Forums?

Other urls found in this thread:

phys.org/news/2010-11-legalizing-child-pornography-linked-sex.html
web.archive.org/web/20080725072444/http://www.xuk.biz/UKLR/Landslide/library/72/nolink.htm
web.archive.org/web/20080522200538/http://www.xuk.biz/UKLR/Landslide/library/05/dissertation.htm
scireview.de/sexualverbrechen.html
sexarchive.info/GESUND/ARCHIV/GUS/JAPAN.HTM
archive.is/T08T5
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

No.

yes
fucking milo fag

u wot

So long as niggers are banned too i'm all for it

With any form of media,ANY FORM, iif not a single real human was harmed it should be allowed to exist and watched.

>it's child porn.
If you honestly think that, then you have no idea what actual child pornography is.

Don't compare drawings to infants getting penetrated.

>This thing hurts my fee fees, please ban it
Really makes you go hmm...

Yes drawings are human beings now
Kys

>the cancer that is killing Sup Forums
yes

then at what point do the bans end? You ban Loli, (while I may not agree with it, it is a form of "art"), then what? We start banning all forms of art that are considered offensive to some? It's a slippery slope. I mean for fuck's sake, in Australia women who are flat chested/A cup or below aren't allowed to do porn because it symbolizes children. Or so they say.

That and if 2D loli will keep pedophiles from acting on and harming a 3D, it's a good deterrent.

>a child is the same thing as a picture of a child.

Pedo detected

Loli garbage should disappear. Real anime girls with curves are what we want.

I feel you.

It is not child porn, actually.

There is no child abuse because there are not children involved. There are only fictional characters.

Should Nabokov's novel be banned too then? Where is the line?

curvy lolis

You raise a good point. But I think that people being allowed to watch a drawn 4 year old be raped is disgusting and harmful.

remember the last time an artist drew a picture of something you're not supposed to draw a picture of

i'll give you a hint: it was in france and 12 people died

but who does it hurt?

Your focus is misplaced, ask why is there a such an obsession over the depiction of sexualized children. someone with a specific mind had to draw these and someone can always draw these. banning it will only cause it to bleed into graffiti which your kids will see.

The number of victimless crimes shouldn't be increased.

This policy shouldn't be implemented on its own. I have a theory to try and vastly reduce paedophilia.

What if the loli consents tho?

>if any single human was not harmed
It corrupts the mind. Never give people the wrong ideas.

that's the difference between me and you Jack. I don't give a single iota of a fuck what some other schmuck is pulling his pud to so long as A). No one is being harmed (unless both parties are consenting into the harming i.e. BDSM) and B). it doesn't negatively hinder or harm me or those close to me.

This would be an entirely different argument if they were attempting to normalize Loli porn via mainstream news or sites, but this is not the case. If the individual is harming no one, their degeneracy is of no concern of mine.

...

>lel you are Moslems if you want any laws or security or don't want people doing bad shit in general
Kys with this retarded meme.

...

I see. I don't have a libertarian side like that to me I'm afraid, except when it comes to economics.

>how to get a thread full of Loli: the post

It's just drawings. Appreciating a certain kind of art doesn't mean you condone the behavior depicted.

I find guro aesthetically intriguing.

There is not victim in loli porn. The chilling effect of making it illegal on regular anime porn is not worth making it illegal.

Also it is free speech. Drawing's no different than writing a story.

Also those fucking digits.

Not that user but I think they were referring to fear of expression. If you were going to crucified because the general public doesn't agree with your art or in the case of the sand niggers in France shooting up the Newspaper place because they didn't like the comic of their prophet, what kind of art would that inspire? What kind of artists?

Again I'm talking down the line. Defining Loli as art is tough for me to do and the crude drawings of a french newspaper isn't Picasso, but once again. Slippery slope. When you let the public even begin the allowance of defining what is considered "allowed" art, they'll take it to the next level. Ban political cartoons, ban anything offensive to anyone, etc. Give them an inch, they'll take a mile. They always do.

I think it's disgusting but it's not real people. It's idiotic that Bart or Lisa Simpson being naked would be considered child porn when they're older than most people that would ever view it.

So photos of papercuts would be banned?

>implying this wasn't a ruse to get a free supply of loli pics.

>doing bad shit
>people thinking or jerking off to fictional bad shit is doing bad shit
even if you think shit like loli hentai corrupts the mind, let them be judged for the crimes they actually commit
>inb4 so you wabt little girls to be raped before you catch the perverts
yes. people should be punished for actual crimes that they actually committed

>Should loli porn be banned?
From Sup Forums? Yes PLEASE!!!! This shit should carry an instaban with it.

i think its a drawing

if someone draws rape does it make it a rape?
if someone draws murder does it make it a murder?

when does it end if someone writes a novel about murder does that make them a murderer?

wait no Im retarded. I dont want anyone raped, but people should only be jailed after the fact

Shit is pedophilia just like how traps are homosexual. Fapping to loli makes you an actual pedophile. At least it lets low grade pedos "release" without having to take it out on actual children.

Keep it legal but just as a way to control the pedos. Otherwise it should absolutely be illegal.

you guys make me sick

You ban loli porn because fuck pedos and degenerates. You don't ban flat-chested girls from doing porn because it's their right as an 18 year old bimbo to fuck niggers on camera.

Not that hard. Banning sex with animals isn't a slippery slope to banning missionary.

>against firearms
>against knives
>against wibby-wabby-wonky-woodies
>against free speech
>against 2d lolis
>pro child brides
>pro child sex slaves

So progressive Britainistan! When can we purge this decrepit "country" off the face of the earth?

Do you even know where you are?

It says in the first amendment of my constitution that you are guaranteed freedom of speech. Putting lines on a piece of paper is your God-given right. People who claim higher moral standard over drawings are weird busybodies with something to hide.

It should definitely be banned from this board.

Technically yes.

I understand that but do you not think there comes a limit?

I'm arguing from more of a moral point of view here.

>traps are homosexual
It's not gay if they're feminine boys.

Yes.

t. Putin

Why don't we just lobotimize everyone to reduce the risk of degeneracy?

...

Is Tanya Sup Forums reincarnated?

I think we should just execute everyone but a few oligarchs to run the entire world. It'll be safer that way. But that's just one of my... leaf opinions.

Go be a feminist somewhere else. Loli is love, loli is life

No, she doesn't actually believe in any of it. She does it just to survive. Inside she is pure cynic.

But now you're talking semantics. Why would someone WANT to watch a super petite/flat chested girl take a dicking from some super hung guy? Why do you think porn where they emphasize the guy's dick in comparison to her hole (showing the bulge through her stomach) is popular?

Because the petite woman, regardless of actual age or maturity, looks like the body of a child. Maybe not some 8 year old no, but the attraction here is her super young appearance. If you're willing to ban loli "art" because "fuck pedos and degenerates", then the ban of flat chested women in porn should be even more relevant because they're the real life embodiment of that pedo desire. Their being on camera is in this line of thinking, just as offensive as 2D loli and should be banned.

>implying I'm anti firearms
>implying I'm anti knives
>implying I'm against free speech
>implying 2D lolis
>implying I'm pro child brides
>implying I'm pro sex slaves

It should be legal, as well as real child porn, since it lowers child molestation rates.

phys.org/news/2010-11-legalizing-child-pornography-linked-sex.html

>"There is no link between looking at child porn and sexual abuse of youngsters, a senior police officer told a conference today. Studies have found no correlation between those who download graphic images of youngsters via the internet and child molesters. Dr Stuart Kirby, Detective Chief Superintendent, told the Psychology Conference: "When you look at all the research that has been done nationally, the consensus is that there has not proven to be a link between the viewing of porn and the committing of hands-on offences. In a followup study that was found to be clearly the case."

web.archive.org/web/20080725072444/http://www.xuk.biz/UKLR/Landslide/library/72/nolink.htm
web.archive.org/web/20080522200538/http://www.xuk.biz/UKLR/Landslide/library/05/dissertation.htm

>"Such an effect has been proposed in relation to Denmark during the few years when child porn was openly and legally available: in that period sex offences against children were significantly lower than either before or after. A similar phenomenon occurred during a period of liberalisation in West Germany, where from 1972 to 1980 the total number of sex crimes known to the police decreased by 11%. If child porn led to sexual assaults, then there would have been a huge increase in assaults as a result of the allegedly much greater availability of child porn on the Internet."

scireview.de/sexualverbrechen.html

>In 1999, Diamond and Uchiyama observed that "there are no specific child porn laws in Japan and porn depicting minors are readily available and widely consumed. Most significantly, despite the wide increase in availability of pornography to children, not only was there a decrease in sex crimes with juveniles as victims but the number of juvenile offenders also decreased significantly".

sexarchive.info/GESUND/ARCHIV/GUS/JAPAN.HTM

>What happens when Child Pornography is decriminalized?

>Results from the Czech Republic showed that rape and other sex crimes have not increased following the legalization and wide availability of pornography.

>When the ban on Most significantly, the incidence of child sex abuse has fallen considerably since 1989, when child pornography became readily accessible – a phenomenon also seen in Denmark and Japan.

>They also found that the number of cases of indecent exposure and other, less serious, sex crimes fell dramatically in the wake of pornography becoming more readily available.

>The researchers say: ‘As with adult pornography appearing to substitute for sexual aggression everywhere it has been investigated, we believe the availability of child porn does similarly.’

archive.is/T08T5

Why do Erie and Laos have nearly the same flag?

Sup Forums

how do we justify which illegal things we are allowed to show in art (or other 'art') and which not?
pretty sure murder is one of the most horrific things a human can do, but still it's shown fucking everywhere in the most diverse and creative forms.

Delaware looks like Brazil.

What should I do with my rustle collection?

>but shouldn't we limit free speech?
>it would be the moral thing to do
You're retarded.

t. pedo

it's promoting bad behavior. creating an idea. sure, some says it's an outlet, but masturbation and restriction, I,e just a drawing and not physical, can only have such an appeal for so long. when you really desire something, almost unobtainable you become depressed and even desperate to actually acquire said desire. this leads to it being a gateway drug of sorts. and simply saying "it's just a drawings" it's not just a drawing, it's an idea that's fucked up. it's an idea that harms real people. and all you can think of when you see these children is rape, or sex, or whatever. it would than translate to real kids. whenever you see them on the streets. you think of your manga, and than maybe you finnaly had enough and decide to kidnap one. I could go on and on, point is, it should be illegal. anything that promotes bad, immoral, or destructive behavior should be illegal. if you find children attractive, you should be put down. you wont get better, and drawings aren't going to help.

Sup Forums approves of lolis

>post it

And is that pic real? I'm assuming photoshop but these days, you just don't know anymore.

Not necessarily because paedophilia is the attraction to children who's reproductive organs have not yet fully developed.

Whereas a petite woman is exactly that. A woman.

>"You're retarded"
>Is a pedophile loli lover

really fires up the neurons

>check flag
>still Britainistan

If it walks, talks, and REEEEES like an Ahmed. They are lines that originated on paper or in some drawing software, with no one being hurt except maybe a carpal tunnel ridden artist/animator.

Take your virtue signaling, holier-than-thou ass right the fuck out.

Do you think that people who watch violent movies or play violent video games should be jailed? Should the book "American Psycho" be banned? I'm not attacking you I want to understand your position better.

This is not with other measures that could be implemented that would actually compliment the ban.

>b-but muh statist brainwashing says that's wrong
Stop trying to justify thought crime.
>it's promoting bad behavior
Sex with children is not bad.

>implying free speech is somehow entirely moral.

again. Semantics. So are you saying you'd be totally down to bring an early fully developed 14 year old to pound town in your fuck truck? Because if so, you're a pedo according to most country's age of consent. (18 in US, dunno how it is in UK)

Keep in mind I don't consider any of this to be OK. I'm only fighting for no censorship AT ALL of art. Even if the art in this scenario is fucking Loli as much as it pains me to admit.

Everything always starts with good intentions. Then we just get a more and more sanitized, "no thoughts other than what we approve allowed" society.

>Britistani
>I hate pedos
>Unless they're mudslimes then it's religious freedom

>it's promoting bad behavior

Look at most of the shit on prime time television, modern video games, or at the movies and tell me that they do not also go under your umbrella of "promoting bad behavior".

Leave idiotic statements like that at the end to fool those who may have actually read whatever drivel you put before it into taking you seriously.

I don't care about violence. if people want to kill, im not entirely against that, as long as it's justified. you can't ever justify sex with kids. you simply cannot. but murder....look at the snowtown murders in Australia. two dudes who killed pedophiles and some gays. I find that to be justified because they where cleansing. like I said at the end of my post, people don't get better. at least without extreme measures, so pedophiles, rapists, people who have sex with animals, they should all be killed because they don't offer ANYTHING of value and for the most part, will not change their ways. I did enjoy American psycho, but none of his murders where justified, BUT he wasn't having sex with kids and there where repercussions for what he did. this loli stuff, there are no morals at the end, there are no lessons to be learned. it's completely different.

Did keem respond to this?

I hate people who argue that loli should be illegal. I hate them more than I hate muslims or jews or SJWs. If I could I would gas to death every person who unironically believes that loli should be illegal.

>implying being moral = being correct

What a bunch of freedom hating faggots you limeys are.

It's 16 in the UK

And no I would totally not be okay with it. I don't understand the point you're trying to make to me.

The thing is, if you're attracted to someone who's 14 but looks 18, then you're not a paedophile and it's a totally different situation

Lol what a surprise from a jap fag. Your whole culture promotes banging children. Equal with the sand niggers. Liking loli makes you a pedo period

m8 i can assure you I hate sandniggers more than I do pedos

>if people want to kill, im not entirely against that, as long as it's justified

What about killing those imposing themselves on my freedoms under penalty of death? Your "argument" is completely subjective and based solely on feelings. I know its hot in your cuckshed but I think it's getting to your head mate.

I don't know, I don't follow drama like that. I think Shad said "well, it wasn't porn so I don't know why people got upset". I think he should've drew them fucking. Fuck the haters.
Well, I guess I shouldn't have expected a brit to understand why restricting speech and art is bad.
>Liking loli makes you a pedo
Yes, and there's nothing wrong with pedophilia.

But user, none of these images are underage. Each of them is over 18.

Your country only banned ACTUAL child porn in 2014 so that doesn't surprise me.

>What about killing those imposing themselves on my freedoms under penalty of death?
I don't understand. If it's a justified killing, than yes. it's alright. the weak, the stupid, the mental. those are all justified killings. and, nothing in this thread is based on anything other than feelings. there is no one true right forever final answer to any of these human constructed problmes. it's about what makes you feel, and some natural laws.

>murder is good
>loving sexual relationship is bad
You're an insane person.

There is no justification for possession being illegal.

>Well, I guess I shouldn't have expected a brit to understand why restricting speech and art is bad.

Imagine as dumb as a burger and not knowing that freedom is a multifaceted concept.

considering pedophilia is an actual disturb i find it way safer to have pedophiles controlling their urges by masturbating to material created without harming any real kids than allowing them to go unchecked.

>Should loli porn be banned?

It already is

I never said anything to do with the possession.

>the weak, the stupid, the mental. those are all justified killings

I was going to take you seriously but you just had to go full retard.

you shouldn't try to exacerbate pedophilia tendencies. you shouldn't compromise with sick mental fucks. this is the problem. you say drawings arn't bad, but you're just giving in to what they want, instead of discouraging them from giving in to their sick mental disorder.