HURR DURR CLIMATE CHANGE ISN'T REAL HURR DURR HOPE YOU LIKE COAL ASH DURR HURR MAGA FUCK THE ENVIRONMENT DURR

HURR DURR CLIMATE CHANGE ISN'T REAL HURR DURR HOPE YOU LIKE COAL ASH DURR HURR MAGA FUCK THE ENVIRONMENT DURR

Other urls found in this thread:

dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Climate change is jew hoax that numbskulls like you fell for cuz you love a false sense of moral superiority, kill your self nigger clean coal ftw

fuck drumpf and fuck white people

>HURR DURR WIND POWER WILL SAVE US HURR NUCLEAR POWER IS BAD FOR MUH ENVIRNMAMENT HURR

>jew hoax
>that no scientist has still managed to disprove
lmao try again fag

disprove of what?

HURR DURR I AM A FUCKING RETARDED CANADIAN HURR DURR

global warming
99% of scientists that investigate it end up agreeing with it

What motivation would someone who doesn't believe in climate change have to study climate science?

nice try shill. sage.

Counter sage, faggot.

HURR DURR CHINA DURR HURR

100% of scientists in the field of climate studies don't want to lose a job.

>HURR DURR IM A FAT FUCKING AMERIFAT HURRRRRRR MUH HURT ATTECK DURRR NEED MORE MONEY FOR DEM FAT ACEPTANCE PROGREMS HURR

smoke some more pot you socialist cum slut

The same reason these losers come on Fox News and start shitting up the world with their retarded arguments - to prove that it is fake and put the debate to rest
But nobody can disprove it, because the evidence is overwhelmingly supports global warming

>(((Scientists)))

>wow people predicted the US would emit more than it actually emitted because US started taking initiatives into reducing CO2 emissions, but China's CO2 emissions keep on increasing
>this disproves the global warming

HURR DURR I AM A RETARDED CANADIAN SAYING IRRELEVANT SHIT BECAUSE I AM RETARDED LUL CLIMATE CHANGE PRAISE KEK I WOULD SUCK A CORPORATIONS DICK YUM YUM COAL ASH THE EARTH JUST FLUCTUATES THERE'S NO WAY MANKIND IS DOING ANYTHING LUL KEK LIBRULS DEMOCRAPS XDXDXD HURR DURR

>counter sage
>on your own thread

Holy fuck shill get out

you can't just spout non-sense about Fox news every time there's evidence of your narrative being proven wrong.
Besides, Fox News is owned by the Saudis.
Only old dads watch Fox News. Get with the times you out-of-the-loop faggot.

Fuck proving that climate change is real.

Prove that we can fix it in the year 2017. If you can't, your words are meaningless.

FUCK CLUMPF AND FUCK YOU WHITEY REEEEEEEEEEEE

>millions of scientists are able to hide a global conspiracy because they don't want to lose their funding
>which they get before publishing studies, not after
Retard alert!

There are ways to help combat it but since it is against bourgeoisie interests it won't be done. Once again, the rich fuck us all.

>a bunch of students that use thermometers and CO2 measurers to collect data
>this obviously makes them Jews part of a global conspiracy
Go back to school, inbred retard

>there's evidence
no there isn't

Who do you think pays these scientists?
Who do you think funds the projects?
Who do you think you are?
Who do you think pays for all the socialist babby's crying and protesting in the streets?

I'll be posting a bunch of proof in this thread while arguing with the other retards like you

If there's nothing challenging, then what's the argument?
grow up you hippie faggot, you're being lied to.

>biased charts with no meaning qualify as proof
wew lad

>Who do you think pays these scientists?
>Who do you think funds the projects?
A lot of different people with different interests do
My local university funds scientific projects, does that make them part of a (((globalist conspiracy))) without any whistleblowers?

You are seriously delusional and disconnected from reality.

>Who do you think you are?
>Who do you think pays for all the socialist babby's crying and protesting in the streets?
How does this relate to global warming being fake?

No, you don't understand, climate science is not a field where they discuss the reality of global cooling/warming/climate change, it's a field where that's assumed. You basically can not write a peer-reviewed article "disproving" climate change. It's like writing a flat earth article basically, no one's even going to check off on it

Also it takes 8 years of hard work and money to get a PhD and begging for grants to get an opportunity to try and disprove climate change. No one's going to go through all that

We know for a fact climate change is fake. Government institutes are the only one with big enough resources to collect the necessary data and NASA has been caught fudging the numbers before.

>We know for a fact climate change is fake.

Jesus wept.

I wish more people knew this statistic of how it's a 99:1 ratio on the issue of climate change yet equal media air time seems to be given to the obviously wrong view

I think Sup Forums fell for the
>climate change isn't real
meme a little too hard

Your university is funded by the state.
You're a tool bag that's so far up his own ass he can't even see the light of day.
You're beyond helpless.

>not understanding how geo-politics is connected
wew lad

>you're being lied to
holy fuck you are retarded
It's simple 8th grade physics and chemistry

>CO2 blocks infrared light
>infrared light is the only way Earth can release heat
>we've nearly doubled the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere over a century
>and that increase is only further accelerating
>even a small disbalance in the heat Earth releases can tip our climate away from the extremely stable conditions that have let humans evolve and create civilization

Fun fact: civilization started around the same time the climate entered the current stable conditions

Jesus was a Jew, you fucking nigger.

It's not a meme, you dip.
Your life is a meme.

>biased
I know you're retarded and unable to make simple logical connections, but that chart shows how the Arctic is melting faster than the IPCC models predicted, which directly relates to global warming

>smug socialist spouts non-sense in attempt to gain respect from someone he thinks is retarded
lad, are you fucking high?
Go outside and meet some people or something.
GLOBAL WARMING WAS STARTED BY THE CHINESE TO LIMIT AMERICAN FACTORY PRODUCTION.
Your life is a lie, you crazy cretin.

>thinking attacking people via ad hominem is logical
lad, you're a fucking joke. get over it.

>armchair paranoid Sup Forumstard trying to teach me how geo-politics work
If you ever actually held a high or even respectable position, you'd understand how it works, and you wouldn't have said the retarded shit you just said

It's funny how the entire world regardless of geo-politics agrees that global warming is happening

>can't actually counter the chart
>ad-hominem!!!!
So far you haven't made a single valid argument against global warming
You're just a retard who can't even think for himself

Climate change isn't an issue, we are about 2 to 3 decades away from full scale nuclear fusion plants. Our current resources are better used to accelerate that process and to give as much prosperity as possible.

It's the people that want to invest billions into solar plants and wind mills that are anti-science. Politicians only want this because they have stocks in those companies and get kick-backs. Solar and wind energy are already obsolete apart from specific situations but sure keep letting politicians steal billions from you just so you can feel better about yourself.

teaching you would be an exercise in futility you pompous pseud.
I bang your mom on occasion, it's not highly respectable, but it gets me off.
Your faux science isn't welcome here.

>anyone I disagree with is a socialist!!!
fuck off retard, I hate socialists and communists, but sadly you're being as retarded as them

>GLOBAL WARMING WAS STARTED BY THE CHINESE TO LIMIT AMERICAN FACTORY PRODUCTION.
Funny how the Chinese are currently the biggest investors in green energy and are currently spending the most money on slowing down global warming
Why would the Chinese agree to sign the Paris agreement if they invented global warming and signing that agreement would hurt them the most?
And you're also not just retarded, but factually wrong: global warming was first theorized in 1896, before the Chinese revolution (during a completely different regime and during a completely different political landscape)

>can't actually counter the arguments
>resorts to ad hominems
(((Exxon))) shill pls go

Because all you're doing is attacking me personally like your state education has taught you to do, instead of doing credible work.
You're a cog, being manipulated. Sad!

You're an arrogant fool.
Stay in Latshitvia you new-age communist nigger.

>more ad-hominems and still no actual counter-arguments to global warming
It's sad how far up your ass you are

Global warming is real, it's happening, and no amount of attacking me will disprove it.

This. I hate global warming because I guarantee the burden will be on us Europeans to take in all the niggers who will get BTFO by the sea levels. However,I don't want my tax money going into Jew plans and meme solutions like wind power when it could be going into literally the white mans method of power generation:the fusion reactor. And if white people go extinct thanks to Jew plans,I don't give a fuck what happens to this god forsaken planet. Also fuck the eastern European faggot in this thread,he probably sucks refugee dick.

>my local university...
Oh, another one of these episodes.

You must be 18 or older to post on Sup Forums
Please go back to school and attack your fellow 10 year olds with your absolutely hilarious and creative insults

>more ad-hominems
>no counter arguments
looks like I win against yet another flat Earther retard

Listen bro,I have to hand it to the other guy. U have not used facts n shiiet against any of his graphs.

HURR DURR CLIMATE CHANGE IS REAL HUR DURR MY 97% HURR DURR MUH FLORIDA WILL BE UNDER THE OCEAN IN 2000 HURR MUH POLAR ICE CAPS WILL ALL MELT IN 2005 DURR

even if there is global warming why the corporation that creat it and the 3% that profit from it should not pay for it ?


globalwarming guilt is like white guilt .... Insane

What's wrong with a university funding a study?
That's what they're supposed to do.

To add to the argument I made in that post, many independent scientists also ended up confirming their hypothesis that global warming is happening and is man-made

If you believe that all scientists in the world are corrupt and are doing a good job at hiding the conspiracy, you really need to spend more time in the real world instead of your shitty HABBNING threads on Sup Forums.

I only use facts to retort assumptions based on other facts. There are no facts ITT, so there is nothing to retort.

Here are some graphs with facts in case your retardation caused you to miss them:

and pic related

>funding coming from public universities
>public funds for research
>research used to (((prove))) and support their various policies
>policies, often secret, that are dripping in corruption
Hm. Ya, nothing to worry about here goyim.

user, that isn't even data, simply the graphical representation of data. That is far from a fact.

Surely the graph u just posted BTFOs you.

I guess Svante Arrhenius who first theorized global warming in 1896 was just a corrupt shill for the communist Chinese regime in attempt to limit American factory production

The man-made definition is what is in question.

How do you define man-made, who ultimately profited from that global warming and who will profit from it now.

Always the same.

Mate, global warming is real, but mass migration is the more direct threat atm.
Act like a retard all you will, but that reality won't change.

Global warming will mean more niggers using it as an excuse to polite our motherlands. If the white race is to survive 2 things are needed: fusion technology,and fascism.

I mean if you want to go back to living in conditions when humans didn't even exist and couldn't even survive in, then sure
But right now we entered a period of climate stability, which also coincides with the beginning of civilization. Our CO2 emissions have managed to kick our climate out of this equilibrium, and if we keep going, we'll end up destroying the food chain and killing a lot of the living things that exist now

Fun fact: 50% of all ocean plankton have died out in the past few decades due to ocean acidification and global warming

So what's ur solution?

For the 12th time, posting biased graphs with zero relational material is irrelevant.

Wow, that sure changes everything

You still haven't debunked any of the data it is representing, nor have you provided any valid counter argument against global warming

Coal is clean and zero risk of meltdown

And do you even have any idea about how scientific research works?
You're not forced to come to a certain conclusion, because if you were, then your paper would end up widely criticized and some scientists would've already come out and spoken against all the corruption. There are thousands of scientists researching the climate, why haven't they come out and spoken against the corruption of every single government in the world?

Your argument is exactly the type of shit a flat Earther would say

I'm not against both of those at all.
We need to seperate us from africa and the middle east in general, making their oil gold useless while ensuring a bright future for the white races.
Sandniggers should'nt have any power over us with something we can do better, and cleaner.

Exactly. I hope we pioneer this advanced technology and then conquer the rest of the world with it. In the interests of earth,we may have to cull the non-white population down to levels appropriate for a brighter,whiter future.

Man made as in humans take the fossil fuels that were deposited underground over millions of years and release it into the atmosphere in a century, dramatically increasing the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere. And this is just the west. Now imagine what happens when the billions of people living in India or China finally live in first world conditions.

I'm in this thread to attack the retard who think global warming isn't real.

The solution is probably solar (it's already nearly cheaper than coal) and nuclear

Surely fossil fuels will run out soon and then we won't get to live out our mad max fantasy's.

>biased
How are the graphs biased?

>zero relational material
holy fuck you are seriously retarded
>temperature is rising
>CO2 is rising
>Arctic ice is melting
>All scientists agree
>IPCC models correctly predict or even underestimate the effects of global warming
>somehow none of this is related to global warming

>coal is clean
what

He is probably a leaf on a proxy.

This exactly.
Everything that ever came from the middle east and africa are complete shit.
But the worst part is, some (((people))) apparantly like to continue giving these monkeys power over something they can earn money on.

Watch molymeme on this.

Goddamn kikes piss me off. Global warming is one of those things where the Jew is on both sides if the argument

this. Global Warming is a jew plot to get idiots to spend even more money trying to "save" the earth from something they cant even understand.

Also, climate scientists are the most corrupt scientists out there.

dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html

Solar is becoming a lot cheaper and two months ago there was a breakthrough nuclear fusion reactor test that worked way better than expected (even though it was still inefficient), so there's no reason to be pessimistic

As long as there's money to be made.
In the end, the power of their shekels will be nothing.

99.983% of scientists firmly believe that global warming is a jew hoax after examining the facts. you know this is true because i posted a percentage value on the internet.

kys you retard.

>dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html
Please never link dailymail
They are a trash website and make up fake news for views

>On February 5th, Rose ran a story alleging scandalous behavior by NOAA scientists in a 2015 paper. The story was based on an interview with retired NOAA scientist John Bates, who was not involved in the study. However, in follow-up interviews with real science journalists, Bates clarified that he was in no way disputing the quality or accuracy of the data, even going as far as to make this damning comment:
>I knew people would misuse this. But you can’t control other people.

>i cannot refute his argument

>HURRDUURHURRDURR FAGGOT SAGE HURRDURRR

this is literally every climate alarmist ever

Basically, the guy in the dailymail article who was the "whistleblower" even claimed that his words were taken out of context and that he never denied the accuracy of the research

Please stop spreading fake news and verify whether what you post is true before posting it

I'm tired of arguing with overly smug retards like you

I posted a bunch of infographics in this thread, all having similar numbers, and in every single infographic, the source is cited

ho you mean big corporation keeping the monopole of what created advenced civilisation ( modern transport) for profit and kept us all from advancing further only for personal gain.

man made as in the same one who try to take profit from the warming right now ?

This is such bulshit, the big oil compagny wouldn hide anything that could prevent us to be so dependent of oil.

Why does it always have to be the same who pay the bills you tell me

ohh look a pretty chart spanning the entirety of 40 years. meanwhile temperatures have been rising and plummeting because of completely co2-unrelated causes for millions of years.

yes deary, your animated chart is very pretty, why don't you go color a book with some crayons now.

Nice strawman
Sadly it isn't even true, because you are delusional

>*Thinking that politicians making people pay a tax effects the environment when their own scientists have hacked emails proving they fake the numbers for the data*

>ohh look a pretty chart spanning the entirety of 40 years
The point was to debunk the arguments that would have been made by retarded flat Earthers like you before the arguments were even posted

>temperatures have been rising and plummeting because of completely co2-unrelated causes for millions of years
[unsourced claims]
It's a fact that CO2 causes warming, proved by both empirical data and by physics

>yes deary, your animated chart is very pretty, why don't you go color a book with some crayons now.
why don't you go back to 3rd grade and

>their own scientists have hacked emails proving they fake the numbers for the data
You mean those emails that were taken out of context and used by the retards watching Fox News as proof that there is a global conspiracy involving millions of scientists?

Here's some examples of the emails:

>"A quote came out of the emails, these leaked emails, that said "let's use Mike's trick to hide the decline". That's the words, "let's use Mike's trick to hide the decline". Mike is Michael Mann, said "hey, trick just means mathematical trick. That's all." My response is I'm not worried about the word trick. I'm worried about the decline."
>This claim is patently false and shows ignorance of the science discussed. The decline actually refers to a decline in tree growth at certain high-latitude locations since 1960.
>Tree-ring growth has been found to match well with temperature. Hence, tree-rings are used to plot temperature going back hundreds of years. However, tree-rings in some high-latitude locations diverge from modern instrumental temperature records after 1960. This is known as the "divergence problem". Consequently, tree-ring data in these high-latitude locations are not considered reliable after 1960 and should not be used to represent temperature in recent decades.

It's funny how retards with a limited grasp on this science try to pretend to understand what it means. If you really don't know anything about using tree-ring data, please do not pretend to be knowledgable about this topic

Another email:

>So to summarise, Trenberth's email says this: "The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't."
Again, if you have no understanding of what is being talked about, please don't pretend to be smarter than actual experts in the field.

>If you read the full email, you learn that Trenberth is actually informing fellow climate scientists about a paper he'd recently published, An imperative for climate change planning: tracking Earth's global energy (Trenberth 2009). The paper discusses the planet's energy budget - how much net energy is flowing into our climate and where it's going. It also discusses the systems we have in place to track energy flow in and out of our climate system.
>Next, Trenberth wonders with this ever increasing heat, why doesn't surface temperature continuously rise? The standard answer is "natural variability". But such a general answer doesn't explain the actual physical processes involved. If the planet is accumulating heat, the energy must go somewhere.
>So like an obsessive accountant, Trenberth pores over the energy budget, tallying up the joules accumulating in various parts of the climate. A global energy imbalance of 0.9 W/m2 means the planet is accumulating 145 x 1020 joules per year. The following list gives the amount of energy going into various parts of the climate over the 2004 to 2008 period:
>These various contributions total between 45 to 115 x 1020 joules per year. This falls well short of the total 145 x 1020 joules per year (although the error bars do overlap). Trenberth expresses frustration that observation systems are inadequate to track the flow of energy. It's not that global warming has stopped. We know global warming has continued because satellites find an energy imbalance. It's that our observation systems need to be more accurate in tracking the energy flows through our climate and closing the energy budget.

What's weird about you useful idiots is that conservationism is supposed to be an inherently conservative ideal; you're supposed to be preserving the integrity of your rural/agrarian outback and preventing exploitation by the urban industrialist/carpetbagger.
Yet there you go, looking for the quick buck, giving zero shits about the ramifications of once again seeking the immediate profit over the long-term costs.
And that's how I know you and your ilk are Boomers. Your entire generation lived by this utterly fucking moronic philosophy.