I do not get why the right dismisses human induced climate change

I am against illegal immigration, against gibmees, for building walls to keep illegals out, for restricting access of Muslims to the West for security reasons, for lowering taxes and cutting spending, for deregulation, for nuking ISIS etc.

But there is one thing I am consistently at odds with the right wing - accepting and combating human induced climate change. I think we should phase out oil, gas and coal and replace it with nuclear (fission and fusion), hydro, solar, wind, geothermal, biomass, tidal etc. so we get better air quality, limit climate change effects and fuck over the Saudis.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_cap_climate
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>I do not get why the right dismisses human induced climate change
Because the left is for it.

I'm right there with you user, I haven't seen the right won't even acknowledge human induced climate change. They argue as if the matter is decided but never seem to provide any evidence.

...

...

...

...

...

And this is why leftists support it.

>At a news conference last week in Brussels, Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.'s Framework Convention on Climate Change, admitted that the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism.

>"This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution," she said.

>Referring to a new international treaty environmentalists hope will be adopted at the Paris climate change conference later this year, she added: "This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history."

Agreed

>b-but this invalidates science

Monkeys in charge of logic lmao

That being said, I support nuclear.

Climate change is natural. CO2 is not toxic.

"Man Made Climate Change" is a diversion from focusing on real environmental problems. We can do CO2 reduction when the other serious problems are solved.

IF "man made climate change" is real we need to adopt to rising waters and more wind. That's easy. Adapting to breathing, drinking and eating (FUKUSHIMA) radiation and toxins is not easy.

Forget about CO2. Get into real environmental protection. Start by cleaning the plastic out of the oceans.

Do deniers actually believe our waste output has no effect on the ecosystem?

All of you can just fuck right off with your carbon taxing bullshit period.

Because global warming means the death of the Earth.

1. Christians are afraid to face hard realities to begin with

2. They believe Jesus is coming back, so it either isnt real or doesnt matter

Although they are right when they argue that the Left demagogues the issue in order to push other Leftist policies.

But its stil happening.

>literally cooking up numbers because the experiments disagree with you
That is the very definition of invalid science.

Sup Forums will defend this

You just know she sucked a dick that day

...

Because ignoring it makes life easier for large companies to produce and what not. Implementing cleaner resources would be ideal, but it seems most republicans in office are too old to really give a shit about the long term affects/benefits.

>proving the negative
Evidently, global warmers have issues with basic logic. I blame re-education programs that swept through US and western Europe in mid 1980s, mentally scarring entire generations for life. You and OP are basically rape victims.

>1 post by this id
>click bait pic
>irrelevant subject
report. sage. move one.

right wingers are sheep who listen to their leaders saying global warming isn't happening to protect Big Oil

climate change is not the same as pollution

well i think humans have had an impact but i can see why many wont listen. its simple really most of these scientists will say global warming and that to deal with it all nations must band together in a nice big globalist agreement and cut down. now the rising economies e.g china and India will not listen as their success depends on them getting their hands, air and streets dirty. the right in the USA wont listen as it (the environmental agreement) would create laws they cannot alter and the other big economies dont care so if the US cares they are losing business. EU will say it cares and destroy some of the factories in the west and move them to the eastern EU or subsidize the companies if they move abroad away from the cameras. bongo bongo land and the 3rd world cant care as they have nothing better to use to run their so called countries.

TLDR right wing put the economy first and they wont agree to a globalist agreement bound by law.

Climate change could be real. There's as much evidence for it as there is against it. The real issue is that the whole movement isn't about the environment at all. It is, at best, a thinly veiled attempt to develop second-world countries; at worst, it's to set the stage for all countries being equal, allowing for an easier transition into a one world government under socialism. The anti-nationalism, anti-masculinity, anti-white, multiculturalism, and race-mixing/LGBT acceptance rhetoric is part of it, too. Those things on their own may not be bad, they might even be good, but put together they're a formula for instilling one giant socialist regime. It's all about brainwazhing minorities into thinking we're all the same and the one thing standing in our way from "not feeling like a minority" is the white capitalist masculine boogeyman. A.K.A. the only people who can stop their "utopia" from happening.

"Human Induced" climate change is fake news. Look up Lord Monckton on yourube. Humans are beneficial to the environment, and any changes we are experiencing, are part of a natural cycle.

Also, any governmental regulation on pollution is meaningless when China outputs more than the rest of the world combined.

if its real we need to kill the third world which wont happen so its pointless to even argue about and your proposed solutions of crippling western economies are fucking obnoxious and insane

Show me any empirical evidence that it's happening to any significant degree. I do NOT mean:
>stating CO2 is a greenhouse gas (this is accepted by everyone)
>evidence that CO2 causes warming (this is also accepted by everyone)
Every prediction ever made by the extremists have all been proven wrong, Why do you still blindly believe? Sounds like a religion, not science.

Except there is no proof that global warming is man made. Or that very much global warming is even happening, if it is happening at all. We literally cannot tell whether the earth is cooling or warming or merely fluctuating within a range normal for such a gigantic system of dynamic interactions between the oceans, atmosphere, land masses, earth's inner molten core, the Sun, cosmic radiation. The absurd claim being defended, poorly, by climate alarmists is that the avg. temp of 2 trillion cubic km of air and water can be accurately measured to within thousandths of a degree, and that the avg temp has increased by .7C over 136 years. Which looks like my graph. Pic related is what the whole sky is falling debacle is based on. Let that sink in.

I'm the opposite. Don't believe in climate change my only problem with the right is how it doesn't like muslim immigrants

Don't try to argue with manmade climate change truthers, they're unbearable and just say
>m-muh science
without feeling the need to provide any.

really makes my bongles jongle

...

>Because the left is for it.
/thread
The left may be overly-zealous about it but the right is overly-zealous against it. I'm optimistic that when the effects are very much undeniable we will be able to work against it.

WEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>why does the right dismiss human caused climate change
Because we didnt cause it.

>this proves literally nothing we dont already know

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_cap_climate
The Earth has spent a majority of its existence without an ice cap. Climate change is real while "man made" climate change is not. No model exists that has adequately predicted temperature variations and no one mentions that we are currently in an ice age, by virtue of the fact that we have ice caps. You're 's faggot.