What is wrong with capitalism?

What is wrong with capitalism?

its too forgiving

the materialistic society rotting humanity instead of elevating it

no gold standard.

nothing

what's wrong is that girl doesn't have a black guy to satisfy her properly

>resist capitalism
>using a capitalist made phone

That's the point you fucking inbred

> muh womyn muh jobs
Losers hates it

Creates stuff that only the people who can afford will buy and makes the poor chimp out all the time

>The founding fathers used things the monarchist government made
>Fucking hypocrites

Nice job resisting capitalism while taking a selfie with ur iPhone

Makes people upset when someone has more than them.

Monopolies/Cartels, planned obsolescence, conditioned naivety, ostensible subjugation. Its not an objective enough system Its all about one man being on top.

The pure irony of that being on an iphone is too much to handle. Did she mean to do that?

It slowly ruins and degrades society by making nothing sacred, degenerating the people, and allowing greedy sociopaths to succeed most in life and horde money for themselves that could be used for the good of the people. The actual capitalists who are complicit in all of this are worse than subhuman and deserve to be lined up against the wall 10 years ago.

>falling for a meme a right winger made

This girl is a rightist.

Yes. She is a rightist

Crooked Robespierre supports property damage and murder! Sad!

Stupid peasants kill their landlords with weapons made under feudalism, how ironic!

Capitalism only works in practice. We just need to reform feudalism.

Nothing. But, Socialism is wrong with Capitalism. Not an an-cap, there isn't a perfect political system, and in Republics there are problems such as social programs like Public Schools which allow the government to brainwash the next generations as they please.

Its shoe0nhead

it will eventually develop into a globalist monopoly. At that point we will live in a false democracy, since the parties that will rise the most will be the ones financed by the big companies. Once in power, the politicians will change the laws that will benefit the big companies that are giving them power.
That's why we must comunicate to the world that freedom is the most important thing. With freedom we can take down companies. They will call it slander and try to abolish it. Look how we took down hilary clinton. We campaigned for free for Trump, spreading the spirit cooking shuit and the draftourdaughters thing. i guarentee you that we turned the tide of some swing states. Because we can't be controlled.

That's ShoeOnHead you fucking mongoloids and the picture is ironic. You would recognize that picture if you had lurked more than a fucking day before posting. Saging for retarded bait thread.

the c*pital

Capitalism says that the rich should rule. While aristocracies say that the best should rule. We have so many rich celebrities who only bring about negative effects on the nation while the best are suppressed because of capitalism's appeal to the lowest common denominator.

Meritocracy is the best system bar none
No BS, no handouts because you're le oppressed black woman, only those who bring something to the table get a reward. The way it should be.

Prove me wrong

yep but neither socialism nor capitalism are meritocratic

only nazbol is

Is there any book that examines this subject (feudalism applied to modern society)?

pet rocks and pornography

i think that feudalism can't be applied anymore because of guns.

>using hair dye made by capitalism
>using technology made by capitalism
>using clothes made by capitalism, instead of sewing her own clothes made out of cloth made by her
Nothing is wrong. The fact that the pic was made possible by capitalism, and allowing brainwashed commie femshit to post that pic, is proof that nothing is wrong with capitalism. Capitalism is a free market of everything, even ideas. In a commie society, and if that pic was anti-commie, she would've been gulaged or immediately shot.

But all of that will change soon.

merit is impossible to objectively assess, therefore capitalism and free choices are the next best thing

>using wigs
>eating plants from farms
>being protected by guards
These minutemen are hypocrites. They use everything monarchy built for them.

dont think so

but I hope you realize that defending capitalism, unless you're some trust fund kiddy, is cuckoldry

like a medieval peasant defending feudalism

this board needs to be purged of ancaps

is this shoe on head's parody of feminust¿

Take the Theocracy Red Pill of course diety free one such as Taoism of Jainism

or* Janism

>inherit property
>live off rent/profit, perform 0 labor
>hire someone to do administration
business owners are AT BEST glorified administrators, and I can respect someone who manages capital well cause they should definitely be spared and used to build nazbol utopia

most business owners are parasites though

>a lazy piece of shit can win millions through lottery while poor farmers work twice as hard and don't gain much in value.

My complaint about capitalism is that just because someone has more money doesn't mean they are better. A lot of people in Hollywood are shit. Aristocratic thinking believes man can be super to another regardless of income.

this guy is woke

most rich people are SUPER decadent

But what would be a rational alternative? I mean, capitalism is balls deep in human kind, and somehow works, but... i don't like either an extreme capitalist world.

> resist capitalism
> apple cell phone

there would be fairfone bitch

>A lot of people in Hollywood are shit.
According to you (and I agree). But normies voted with their dollars and rich celebrities are the result. If people didn't want to pay to see them perform, they wouldn't be rich.

refer to my name

regular commies are naive

I miss the GDR

I'm for over throwing the rich not for class warfare but to establish aristocracy of the people where true leadership is gained by skill. Regardless of income, leadership and the superiors will rise. It will be easier with equal opportunity. I don't seek equal results.

That pic can't be real

Please tell me it isn't

This implies everyone is equal though and everyone is the same. This is the problem with capitalism. It says all men are inequal yet say they are all in the same day. People aren't equal. Some people have the right to rule over others.

>It will be easier with equal opportunity. I don't seek equal results.
Exactly. Most lefties want to force equal results, which is dumb. Denying equal opportunity is dumb too.

depends what you mean by rational alternative. 90% of people would rather be left alone than know the truth. For them capitalism it's the best system even if they sat they don't like it. As it keeps them confy and don't want to be involved in politics. Basically voting the party that lies the best. I like capitalism, but what we have right now will eventually lead to false freedom, which contradicts capitalism and what the french revolutionaries wanted. Here in Spain we have limited free speech. If you say something one group doesn't like and it is outlawed, you will be fined. That kind of shit is not freedom.

The worst part is that it is the people that vote for freedom restrictions because they don't see the grand scheme of things and are not willing to learn politics or economics because they want to be confy.

Capital is dead labor, which, vampire-like, lives only by sucking living labor, and lives the more, the more labor it sucks.

This is why Strasser was right. He wasn't a Marxist. He sought to make everyone start the same so the true superiors can rise while the inferiors have basic rights. People are inequal no matter what. Capitalism seeks to put all men on the same standard even though men cannot be kept on the same standard. Strasserism gives all men a equal shot and recognizes not everyone can be on the top.

>The production of too many useful things results in too many useless people.

It's too fair.

...

>There is a specter haunting Capitalism, the specter of Socialism.

Thanks for aswering.

ayy, Strasser was definitely right

Markets have existed since the first yield of surplus of resources was made, back when we were developing out of tribal systems. To say there is a problem with markets is to say there is a problem with the nature of reality as it necessitates such a system for human societies to function beyond the scale of small tribal groups. Markets are just the conceptual term for successful voluntary human interactions for material resources.

Market systems are truth if you look at economics in the material perspective (as opposed to socialism or communism, which are false). However material truth is inadequate to explaining the totality of humankind and their interactions on a societal scale. The material truth of markets needs to be reigned in by higher truths.

This comes to the problem between those who see the markets as "(free) markets" or as "Capitalism" with a big C. The former see the breadth of human history as operated under those markets forces, while the later see "Capitalism" as the system started around the 1700's-1800' and continues to today. What was the difference between the markets before and after the 1700/1800's? The gradual dissolving of European Monarchies and Aristocracies and a movement towards Democratic states. The problem isn't markets, but the system its operating under (Democracy) is not adequate in control the market under higher truths.

it has no solution to automation.

>Wherever there is great property, there is great inequality... for one very rich man, there must be at least five hundred poor.

>No society can surely be flourishing and happy, of which the far greater part of the members are poor and miserable.

Kill yourself you filthy commie

A majority of the money ends up in the pockets of a minority.

That said:

Capitalism provides equal opportunity to all to achieve said minority status.

Socialism forces all out of achieving said minority status.

Communism provides zero opportunity to achieve said minority status.

Take your pick.

competition makes the prices drop dummy

>The real tragedy of the poor is the poverty of their aspirations.

>What can be added to the happiness of a man who is in health, out of debt, and has a clear conscience?

Capitalism is the worst economic system on earth, except for all of the other ones.

>Virtue is more to be feared than vice, because its excesses are not subject to the regulation of conscience.

Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone.

Depends which kind of capitalism. Market mechanisms are irreplaceable in some aspects but corporate central planning is terrible.

One of the biggest issues with markets is advertising. Advertisement was made to undermine markets so that you could sale the shittiest product possible for the highest price.

You can have markets without private ownership of means of production. Look up mutalism. Not the biggest fan of it, but it beats capitalism.

Yup.

enjoy the refugees, cuck
im not a commie

>this same porn-posting politically illiterate amerifat that posts in every thread every day

>communism would work without niggers
fucking niggers.

>defeatism
maximum cuckoldry

"hey lets not take Spain back from the moors cause they already won"
I'm glad we aren't like you.

Advertising promotes competition and is a vital market function.

now you're getting somewhere

dugin and strasser are names you need to look up

t. Hoppe

Well what are you then?

Lenin will redpill you.

After a while too much wealth gets pooled at the top and it turns into Downton Abbey.

It's the best system but it has to hit the reset button occasionally.

>too much wealth

Wat?

no it wouldn't you fucking autist stop blaming literally everything on black people holy fuck sort yourself out yes black people aren't as good as white people and are detrimental to western civilisation on average but hey guess what western civilisation goes hand in hand with white people guess what communism is it's non-western and fundamentally aims to destroy the western traits and traditions that were bred into white people for two thousand years communism doesn't work, can't work, will never work and will every time fucking kill you

>this same politically illiterate ancap bong that gets BTFO in every thread every day
>not porn

You cucks are just as bad as commies.

>people are so dumb that they slave themselves to impulses when they see any advertisement about anything this is why they should elect leaders to rule over everyone

i rarely post

Nothing. The majority of people are just lazy though and don't want to be judged on their own merits.

Too high of a percentage of the wealth is hoarded at the top.

>inb4 muh rising tide lifts boats

at least you put the name of the women in the filename. I salute you for that.

Nothing.

...

We already have feudalism.

Banks = Kings
Corporations = Lords
Politicians = Vassals
Military/Police = Knights
The people = Serfs

the "distribution" of wealth is more equal in capitalist societies than socialist or communist ones
wealth literally cannot just pool at the top and sit there without government interference unless the top 0.01% are literally superhuman demi-gods who are more productive than the rest of humanity combined

>You cucks are just as bad as commies.
Explain

Wealth isn't a fixed sum

>Writing that shit on an iphone

How these people make it through life with zero self awareness I'll never know.

If you have a strong moral culture it works
Combined with nihilism you get >see present

I wasn't going to because part of the reason I do this is because people ask for sauce causing the thread to bump but my OCD kicks in and I have to keep my computer organized. I'm about to switch it up, I only have two girls right now I need to get more. I'm probably going to get some Marsha May next, people seem to react to her.

>itt we strawman capitalism and blame it for anti-capitalistic policies
bravo
every time

But feudalism is rigid. A peasant rarely could become a knight. Feudalism is more attached to blood.

you mean combined with a hundred years of jewish subversion, white guilt and champagne socialists proclaiming their value judgments as gospel?