ITT:Orthodox Jew answers all (((Sup Forums//)-related questions

ITT:Orthodox Jew answers all (((Sup Forums//)-related questions

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nasi_(Hebrew_title)
hirhome.com/israel/perfidy.pdf
truetorahjews.org/engdownload
truetorahjews.org/zionists-and-nazis-worked-together-sow-seeds-anti-semitism-germany
truetorahjews.org/lieberman
youtube.com/watch?v=0xXYojUGT-g
youtu.be/IMGbxfhVUSk
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amin_al-Husseini
twitter.com/AnonBabble

how many shekels do you have?

Which do you hold in higher regard, the Torah, or the Talmud?

The salient feature of the 20th century was the collective suicide of the White race. In 1900 we ruled the world. We ruled politically, militarily, culturally, economically, scientifically, and in every other way. No other race even came close. We ruled India and Africa directly, and China was for all practical purposes an economic colony of Europe and America. The Chinese Emperor remained on his throne only so long as he let White men have their way in China. Japan was the only non-White nation of any significance that even had pretensions of autonomy.

We had superior weapons, superior armed forces, superior communications, superior transportation, superior agriculture and industry, superior standards of health, superior organization, superiority in every facet of science and technology. We had the best universities — really, the only universities worthy of the name — the best engineers. We built things that other races couldn't even imagine. We explored, we conquered, we ruled.

More important than anything else was our moral superiority — and please don't misunderstand my use of that term. I don't mean that we were meek and inoffensive and turned the other cheek. I mean that we were proud and self-confident. We knew who we were, and we knew that we were far, far better than anyone else, and we weren't at all embarrassed by the fact that we were better. We recognized racial differences in the same way we recognized that the sun rises in the east, and we felt not the slightest need to apologize to anyone for that. Egalitarianism was a moral and mental disease that afflicted only a few of our people, despite the murderous outburst of egalitarian insanity that was the French Revolution a century earlier. Any sort of racial mixing was abhorrent to us. We looked on miscegenation with the same disgust and disapproval as on bestiality or necrophilia. We didn't tolerate it. And we didn't accept or trust Jews. That was our situation a century ago.

We did have some faults, however: some very serious faults. We were not vigilant. We were so confident in our superiority that we failed to heed the warnings of the few among us who were vigilant. We didn't pay attention when a few warned us, "Hey, we'd better do something about the race problem. We have nine million non-Whites in the United States, according to the 1900 census, and in the future they could become a real problem for us. Let's start getting rid of them now."

We thought, "Well, as long as they stay on their side of town and stay out of sight, how can they be a problem for us? Besides, they're useful for picking cotton and as cleaning women and cooks and gardeners."

And when a few warned us about the Jews we also didn't pay attention. A few warned us about the damage the Jews had done to us in the past, about their malevolence, about their growing wealth, but most of us didn't take the warnings seriously. We saw the Jews as obnoxious and unpleasant people, and we didn't let them into our private clubs and our better hotels, but we didn't consider them really dangerous. We didn't even become alarmed when they began buying up our newspapers and elbowing their way into other propaganda media.

And lack of vigilance wasn't our only fault. We were too ready to quarrel with one another. No other race was seen as a threat to ours, so we felt no need to suppress our internal rivalries and jealousies and hatreds and form a solid front against the non-White world. We let fester old rivalries between the English and the Germans and between the Germans and the French and between the English and the Boers in South Africa and between those of us who spoke Germanic languages and those of us who spoke Slavic or Romance languages. We didn't notice our faults, our weaknesses — but others did.

They are conjoined.

More than I have access to, thank G-d

The latter half of the 19th century saw not only the beginning of the acquisition of our mass media by the Jews, but also the nearly simultaneous hatching of two long-term, murderous conspiracies designed to exploit our weaknesses and turn them against us. These two conspiracies were Zionism and Marxism. Some Jews went with one, some with the other, but both were deadly for us.

The Marxists issued their Communist Manifesto as far back as the middle of the 19th century, but it was another 50 years before they were able to have much of an impact on the Gentile world. As for the Zionists, they also began propagandizing and organizing about the middle of the 19th century and only became noticeable at the beginning of the 20th century, when they began having international Zionist congresses and more or less openly laying their plans to foment wars and revolutions, of which they could take advantage to promote Jewish interests.

For example, at the Zionist Congress in 1897, in Basel, Switzerland, the Zionist leader Theodor Herzl told his fellow Jews that they were having trouble persuading the Turks, who at that time controlled Palestine, to turn the country over to them, but that the Jewish leaders had plans for getting around the Turks. And I should mention that Herzl's address to the 1897 Zionist Congress has been published in a number of places, and any diligent researcher can dig up a copy. Herzl said:

Stop rejecting Christ before you are thrown into the pits of hell.

"It may be that Turkey will refuse us or will be unable to understand us. This will not discourage us. We will seek other means to accomplish our end. The Orient question is now a question of the day. Sooner or later it will bring about a conflict among the nations. . . . The great European war must come. With my watch in hand do I await this terrible moment. After the great European war is ended the peace conference will assemble. We must be ready for that time."

Remember, Herzl was talking about the Jews' plans 17 years before the outbreak of the First World War. But the Jews were ready when the time came. In 1916, with the war more or less stalemated, they approached Britain's political leaders and made a deal to bring the United States into the war on the side of Britain in return for a British promise to take Palestine away from Turkey and turn it over to the Jews after the war. The British side of the deal was made public in the so-called Balfour Declaration. And the Zionists kept their end of the bargain by working through Jews close to the Democratic President of the United States, Woodrow Wilson. Wilson had won the election to his second term in the White House in 1916 by promising America's voters that he would keep the United States out of the European war. But as soon as he took office in 1917 he began scheming to get the country into the war on the side of Britain, which, of course, he did two months later. That cost a couple of million additional Gentile lives, but it got Palestine for the Jews — and it also prolonged the war enough for the Jews in Russia to topple the czar and get their communist revolution off the ground.

When I said that some Jews took the Marxist route and some the Zionist route, I didn't mean that all Jews became active workers in one or the other of those movements. Most Jews remained full-time money-grubbers and provided propaganda and financial support for their conspiratorial brethren, continuing to buy up mass media and to dispense capital to the Zionists or the communists as needed. And they didn't wait for the First World War for that. The first big Gentile bloodletting of the last century in which they had a hand was the Boer War in South Africa, between the British and the Boers. This cruel and murderous war, in which Jewish capitalists were allied with British capitalists against South Africa's Dutch and German and French farmers — the Boers — laid the foundations for Jewish control of much of Africa's mineral wealth.

In 1904 the Jewish Wall Street speculator Jacob Schiff, planning ahead for a communist takeover of Russia, helped to finance the Japanese side in the Russian-Japanese war and used his influence to block loans to the Czar's government from America. This was the same Jacob Schiff who a little more than a decade later provided the Jewish-Bolshevik movement with an infusion of $25 million to finish the job in Russia: that's $25 million from capitalist Wall Street to finance the communist butchery of Gentile Russians. In 1917 $25 million was a lot of money; in any case it bought enough bombs and bullets and communist propaganda leaflets to get the job done.

Get a job, too many orthodox here. Or get a life.

Now, none of this Jewish activity was really secret. The lemmings didn't know about it, because it wasn't in the funny papers or the movies. But Jews weren't even trying to keep their sympathies or their activities secret, and observant Gentiles continued to issue warnings to anyone who would listen. But, as I said a moment ago, we weren't vigilant. White Americans didn't believe that they were in any danger. Things such as the deal to bring America into the First World War in return for the turning of Palestine over to the Jews were too subtle for the American mind.

After the war the mass murder of Ukrainians and Russians by Jewish-Bolshevik commissars might possibly have registered with White Americans, except that the average White American didn't think of Russians and Ukrainians as real people: they spoke a different language and dressed differently from us. And besides, by that time the Jews had gotten a pretty good grip on Hollywood and the broadcasting industry, and so the only side of the story that most Americans were allowed to see or hear was the Jewish side.

Europeans were more vigilant than Americans. For one thing Europeans had longer memories: they were more aware of the long history of Jewish scheming and predation than Americans were. For another thing, in Europe the danger was quite a bit closer. Communist parties in a number of European countries besides Russia had taken advantage of the chaos in the wake of the war to make grabs for power, and in a few countries — Hungary, for example — they succeeded temporarily. People noticed the ethnicity of the commissars and were horrified by their behavior toward the Gentile populations. Even in insular Britain no less a public figure than Winston Churchill spoke out clearly about the danger of Jewish communism. In a full-page feature article in the February 8, 1920, issue of London's Illustrated Sunday Herald, Churchill wrote:

How do you feel about the Israel-Palestine conflict? Would you consider yourself an Isolationist, Non-interventionist, or Interventionist.

"This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weisshaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky in Russia, Bela Kun in Hungary, Rosa Luxembourg in Germany, and Emma Goldman in the United States, this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality has been steadily growing. It played ... a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the nineteenth century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.

There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky or of Zinovieff ... or of Krassin or Radek — all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commission for Combating Counter-Revolution [the Cheka] has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing."

Based Mathias Rex.
How's your week been? Any more stories on violent niggers?

If they were really dedicated to peace in the middle east, all Jews would move from that country and come to America, *because its the only solution.*

Also all white Europeans and Jews in Europe and other like-minded peoples should move to America to help us make it great again

Its been good. And no.

Do you guys learn that the 3. Reich was pro-zionist and called Israel by it's name "Israel" while writing about how Palestinians are just Jordanians who should be sent back to Jordan once Jews have been settled in Israel?

>pic related: Example 1: book from 1936 on the subject of Israel and why the Brits should give it to Jews and help relocating the Jews of Germany and Austria there

Why does every orthodox and zionist american jew i talk to ignore this?

naw but thanks for the autism buxs

Jews absolutely will not admit the existence of the Haavara agreement, because it destroys the Holohoax entirely.

How much pedophilia is tolerated in the community?

But there are so many books in german language on it, some even written by jewish german zionists who while writing their books resided in Germany.

I know that zionist jews believe Israel is the result of the "Holocaust" and they cling on to it, but that's BS. From what i can gather, also from the german archives, creating Israel was commonly supported.
In fact i can't find one shred of paper that doesn't call the land "Israel" by NS personalities

>pic related: Another book, same subject, written by a NSDAP politician from 1933

Should Australians move to the USA

Because learning Germany literally forked money hand over fist over to Jews to get them to fucking leave doesn't jive with the idea that nazis wanted to rape little Jewish abbies with pitchforks and masturbate them to death in electric chambers.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nasi_(Hebrew_title)

I understand that rethoric from leftist jews but rightwing jews should be smarter, especially if they whine about rising anti-semitism.
Ben Shapiro for example always applauds himself for supporting facts and logic.

But when it comes to Germany he literally picks emotions over facts.

read perfidy by Ben Hecht. You can read it free here:hirhome.com/israel/perfidy.pdf

Other red pills: truetorahjews.org/engdownload

truetorahjews.org/zionists-and-nazis-worked-together-sow-seeds-anti-semitism-germany

truetorahjews.org/lieberman

Zero:youtube.com/watch?v=0xXYojUGT-g

Those who dont accept this pesak has ostracized themselves from religious Jewry.

That's because the Haavara agreement was not about establishing a Jewish state, it was a discussion about sending Jews the Palestine and having them ruled by the Arabs there. Hitler spoke about the dangers of Jewish having their own state in which they'd conduct international Jewry at a much more successful rate.

Was that written or contributed by Hitler and the Reich leaders? Read my above comment in this post.

Idk if you're real or larping but on the assumption you're not I have a few questions

Do you think Muslims will forever be a threat to Jews?

Do you think Religious Jews and Christians can co-inhabit civilizations with Christians understanding full knowledge of the Jewish faith rather than the usual Jews are just Christians without Jesus misunderstanding?

What action needs to be undertaken to ensure Jewish continuation?

Religious doctrine disagreements aside, do you consider the Jewish faith against Christianity (as in one cannot thrive without the other resending) or do you believe both can be in a civilization without clashing?

What is the ideal endgame- I'm not talking about conspiracies but rather what do you consider the ideal world or political set up for the Jewish people?

Wrong.

Thanks for the links. I wish more rightwing jews would acknowledge that. Especially outspoken ones like Ben Shapiro

Here have a redpill from my families private estate. One of them was an ethnologist with the Ahnenerbe who went to Auschwitz, Dachau and Natzweiler and i inherited many interesting documents.
This one changes the narrative about Mengele quiet a bit, especially what "survivors" of him claim in their books about him. One example in this document is that while at Auschwitz he got infected with Malaria and later with Typhus while working on remedies for Typhus.

>pic related: the document

Save this 100% srs

youtu.be/IMGbxfhVUSk

Yes, in fact it's one of the books on the required reading list in the NSDAP-Parteibuch of 1938, 1939, 1940, 1941 and 1942

Also see this:

I'm more than happy to corrected on this. Could you point me to a writing where it shows, specifically in the Haavara agreement, where Hitler discussed establishing a Jewish state run by Jews? Or when he met with al-Husseini of Palestine? He specifically spoke to Hitler about opposing such ideas.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amin_al-Husseini

Also, Zionists in Israel at the time, such as Stern sent Hitler letters asking for him to send the Jews over to help establish a land and in return they'll help Hitler fight the British. He refused.

Can you point me to some texts where Hitler, post 1935-38, was for the establishment of a Jewish state? Thanks, I can't access your book.

Also proof (names etc. censored for obvious reasons):
>pic related

How do you explain away all the really fucked up stuff in the Talmud that justifies raping young gentile girls and other shit?

>can you find a source that says hitler liked jews after they outright betrayed him and declared war on germany?

You brought up the Haavara agreement and insinuated that it was for the establishment of a Jewish state, run by and ruled over by Jews. I asked for the evidence of this. I presented you with an argument where you flat-out just said "wrong" with no points. I'm happy to be corrected on this, so if you can please provide me with something.

Yeah this bothers me I had a guy in NY Heredi say if the woman is Gentile and single you can do whatever....seriously G-D is gonna fry those people who act on this stuff....he was married by the way no problem as long as the woman is free

No, just leave kek

You can find talk about the importance of establishment of israel post-1938 in the following two official books

>Das Organisationsbuch der NSDAP (1940)
>SS-Oberabschnitt West - Prüfungsfragen für SS-Führer (1941)

The SS one is the official ideology study book that goes through different world religions, countries and the "Judenfrage" explaining why the creation of Israel would be beneficial for everyone

>pic related 1/2

2/2

What is up with you thinking I am cattle?
Feels bad man.

Why post if you don't want to answer

Can you post some texts then. If the establishment of a Jewish state, specifically post 1935 (or 1938 as you state) was an accepted policy or goal of the 3rd Reich there surely should be some records of it online where Hitler, Goebbels or Hess talk or have written about it. If it comes from the top, specifically said by or written by them, then it's official.

TL;DR