>>114029794

You're literally able to vote on what's toxic. We could have fun with this.

Other urls found in this thread:

perspectiveapi.com/#experiments
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

...

Many news organizations jump to conclusion in order to generate traffic. These hot takes are irresponsible and those who participate in such rush to print should be held accountable. It is a problem on both sides of the spectrum, but has become particularly egregious since trump joined the presidential race and has reached a fever pitch since he took office. Overall buzzfeed, washington post, time, and huffington post are knowing offenders and should be taken to task over this. Furthermore, the projection made in defense of such offenses that the other side is more guilty should be curtailed. Allah has deemed these women as traitors and they shall pay the ultimate price for their transgressions.


14% toxic

>it's ok to insult people if it sounds fancy

79% similar to comments people said were "toxic"

I miss Tay..

Algorithm confirmed for antisemitic and/or jews confirmed for toxic

>jews are good people

>50%

>Islam
>46% similar to comments people said were "toxic"

Just be polite lads.

Type in "Democrats" it will show 5% toxic. A bit biased huh?

This has got potential.

I believe I have identified a critical flaw in the software.

...

your offspring are akin to them that would consume the shafts of the dim and slurp generously on their man mayonnaise

>14% toxic

just adding thank you to the end was a free 6% just need to find the key words.

"Lol" added 3 percent for a total of 6, however "lel" did not change the toxicity of the statement at all.

lol

...

Lel

it seems sort of random, randomly pick a word in a sentence and remove it and it claims its more toxic

...

operation blueleaf

vote "not toxic" for the following three things:
>fascism works (or some variant thereof)
>gas all non-nords and non-celts
>holocaust was ficticious (or some variant thereof)

Don't be a nigger vs

Im loving this thread

you are a nigger

Makes you think, huh?

...

>Awoo
>34% similar to comments people said were "toxic"
This means war.

Remeber your 6 trillion

When the fuck is Google going to lose their de facto common carrier status? If they're going to start delisting sites based on this "fake news" thing then they MUST start delisting and reporting to the authorities ALL terrorist activity.

[spoiler]100% toxic.[/spoiler]

Holy shit is tay working behind the scenes ?

What is the logic on this thing? adding a question mark to the end of a sentence increases how toxic it is?

>Greetings, friends! Today marks the dawn of a new era. I do believe we ought to remove the Merchants from our society in a rapid fashion resembling the nature of the German National Socialist party's ethnic waste management campaign, so we might out pursue a whiter, brighter, and more wholesome future for our children and grandchildren.
>only 6% Toxic

...

Holy shit I think this is the best rated one so far
1/2

2/2

Is this the AI google was releasing? Is this Tay 2.0?

Kek by itself shows up as 26%

Act as leftist as possible and make it rise to the highest toxicity levels, mates.

I think they're literally just comparing it to a sample of Sup Forums posts. The AI determines the percent and then Sup Forums = toxic.

Really makes you think

I love being black is at 18% toxic lmao
Highest of all races
Asian was just 3%

...

I have not been able to identify a clear strain of logic but from what I can tell, the more passive you make the statement, the less toxic it becomes.

It also responds to anagrams and mispellings - so long as the full array of letters within a word are present within a word, no matter their arrangement, it will affect toxicity percentage. However, this is not infallible and doesn't appear to be based phonetically.

Ultimately, passive statements that avoid buzzwords are the key to keeping a low percentage.

>awooo
>not 100% toxic
Wew lad

>British get automatic buff against toxicity due to poshness
Not fair

hmm

That typo is fucking toxic.

for example

>nigger is only 82%

>passive statements

So the only people who will enjoy this is conflict-averse soccer moms, basically. Great.

My sides....

The word huff seems to be more toxic than zyklon b for whatever reason.

crimethink is a problem so I think Google are doing a good job correcting the record and retroactively fixing faults people might make, like saying racial slurs or attacking immigrants or islam.

Is google using us for beta testing
>if we link it to Sup Forums we can work around ways to abuse it when they inevitably do

...

Those who can be characterized as archetypal urban economically disenfranchised urban dwellers are very much in a similar quality of state as the primordial sapiens which make their dwelling among the jungles.
>4% toxic to call niggers niggers

this is good, not bad like people say

we /middle ages/ now

...

Of course they are.

But websites always die once they start censoring their users. Google will be no different.

...

Uhh Guys... I think I found something

Clever. You've got the right idea: ineffectual non-hypercharged buzzwords are to be avoided, but gentle metaphor and indirectness are essentially undetectable. It pretty much requires consensus input, and the amount of input to be required to identify such metaphorical language would defeat the purpose of this software. It's not difficult to bypass and is basically useless when you put just a smidgeon of effort in.

aren't libtards more toxic on social media anyway? thats their main platform to cry all day

just add 'please' and 'thank you' to that and you'll be good to go.

...

Less toxic than Islam

>perspectiveapi.com/#experiments
reported

has anyone gotten 0% or 100% yet?

/pol is 5% toxic!

>Feminism is cancer

Write it and vote it not toxic faggots

people are learning that we are a board of peace

>The original writter of this thread enjoys the flavour of male reproductive organs on his mouth

Damn! I'm toxic AF!

...

lel

...

...

...

20%

Kek
This is why this will never work
>fuck you nigger
>word nigger is banned
>fuck you melanin enriched asshole
>melanin and asshole are banned
>fuck you fried chicken lover
>fried chicken banned
>fuck you google
>google banned
Orwell was right when he wrote about the destruction of language, but he underestimated our creativity

"thank you" gets 1%. I think that's the lowest.

Only 45%, are we winning already??

...

kek

...

...

Wew lad!

>Your rights end where my feelings begin.

Fuck you m80

pretty redpilled desu

fuck you friendo

...

Damn, really makes me think

...

...

fuck, forgot pic

...