Does /pol really believe that a group of wealthy families control the world...

Does /pol really believe that a group of wealthy families control the world? Is this only due to the fact that the world is random and we wish to assign it patterns?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/B4wU9ZnAKAw
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>Does /pol really believe that a group of wealthy families control the world?

Are you saying that money doesn't rule the world, and wealthy families don't become super corrupted because of this?

Have you MET people?

Profit and growth is the goal, money is just the mean I think.

They crave evolving power and becoming god like.

i have friends who unironically believe 13 families rule the world

What is god like?

These ppl can buy anything, it gets to a point where they need something greater to make their lives more interesting. Like creating a subculture and symbols to marinate their fantasies to a higher level

Influence/control

That's exactly what history tells us. You still think the Federal Reserve is a government agency, and not a private corporation?

youtu.be/B4wU9ZnAKAw

>You still think the Federal Reserve is a government agency, and not a private corporation?
Zeitgeist fags need to die.

Its actually very trackable, but it takes a lot of research that most people aren't willing to do.
Most people would rather blame a vague collective group "da joos!" "duh white man!" "duh 1%" etc.

The thing is, the true nature of the illuminists is not with any particular group. They can be jews, they can be white, they can be Chinese. It doesn't really fucking matter as long as you conform to their core values with their same view of the "perfect future" (basically everything leftists believe today. State atheism, free love, abortion, all hedonistic degeneracy encouraged because we are all soulless automatons, and most of all the destruction of Christianity etc etc.)

Are they are all "rich" the answer would usually be yes, because of the nature of their founding and also the nature of man.
Money = power, so of course they only really focus on corrupting the wealthy or people who wish to become wealthy. Think a young aspiring politician like Hillary Clinton and how easy she would have been to convince to become rich and powerful. But it extends far beyond this, they would also want to recruit musicians, artists, actors. Anyone who could influence and ultimately control the public mindset.

But back to the root, you can track them through their origins and by the fruit of their work. We know that it started with secret societies such as the freemasons, but at a certain point even Masonic lodges became infiltrated by those with a new purpose in mind. They felt the masons weren't utilizing their true potential to usurp power from the Jesuit. They used Lodge meetings to recruit and even had some disputes with other Masons over it. But it didn't matter, they had set the groundwork for a new movement of secretly operating elite, this time one bent on vast upheaval of society through political manipulation.

I want to believe, but there seems to be no proof other than paranoid internet videos

Doesn't explain the thousands years old sacred geometry, the symbolism and the numerology found everywhere.

just to clarify; their existence is very trackable. Maybe even SOME of their members/rituals, but there is always a lot more than we know. We dont know all of them, or all of what they do.
>pretty sure they make a yearly visit to Bohemian grove for one of their rituals, but nobody knows which one it is.

I don't think (((they))) are a small group at this point. I think they have great reach, a global one in fact.

There is a reason why so many international celebrities(especially females) end up horribly jaded, drug addicts etc, and its not just because "they had too much money" its because they are likely involved with the kind of rituals that include drug fueled orgies as a normal proceeding. Just staying true to their core "enlightened" hedonistic outlook, which they are naturally very ritualistic about.

The ironic part to me, is how Sup Forums is triggering their ritualistic nature with PEPE. Because the blight of frogs is a REAL Christian symbol. Its actually unsettling them that their opposition chose this image. Because despite their proud "atheism" they are actually very fond of their ritual proceedings/imagery. And through it all they view themselves as staunchly anti-christian.

ARCHaeology and history is full of fakery. The Ankh for example, looks a lot like a Lewis (a tool used to move large stone blocks). Lots of fake ruins and artifacts, like Dinosaur 'skeletons' made out of plaster.

Its actually common sense.

Rich people have money. Money gives influence. Some people have more of both than they know what to do with, and have friends who are the same. It isn't a conspiracy, but they do conspire. Make sense?

Jesuits control the people who control the people

well another thing some of their earliest members were very intrigued by was incest, group sex/orgies and sodomy. They generally held the belief that marriage was an unnatural institution of Christianity and even if they got married for public eye that didn't prevent them from "sharing" in private. (what we would call cuckolding today)
>Which might be why Hillary didn't real care about Bill being a sexual predator and Bill doesn't really care that Chelsea isn't his real daughter.
But I don't want to point too many fingers, the Clintons are just such an easy example to pick on if you know anything about them and in relevance to the foundation of "enlightenment" (aka illuminism)

Now go on a porn website and look at how many incestual fantasies, gangbangs, cuckolding, and anal scenes there are. You could say its purely coincidence, but you could say that about a lot of things. And if it was all a coincidence then why is the (((media))) pushing cuckolding as "the intelligent fetish" and waging war on the concept of traditional marriage through every channel they can?


Knowing their nature, porn is a tool they would both consume themselves as well as use to corrupt the public into accepting the "new" world.

Jesuits lost their power when Europe lost its crowns.
The Pope/cardinal made a deal with the devil to stay where he is, and is likely part of (((them)))

What people don't realize is why the gears of revolution were invented and what their goal was. Even when we know the revolutionaries were often much more savage/unfair than the Monarchies they fought against.

Its because they realized right away that to remove Christianity's hold on society you would have to remove the kings that defend it. Either by actually killing them or by putting in a new system that renders them irrelevant.

The first to fall was obviously France, which was a huge blow in itself since France was one of the most loyal Christian nations. Moreso than England and Germany.

The Federal Reserve is as federal as the Federal Express.

But I wouldn't expect a kraut to know that.

It's desensitizing yourself to everything in order to go beyond the normal limits of a human and reach a "god like" state of mind. In other words, it means to have 'no limits'.

Rule is for GOD only. Humanity just holds office. And those who do, did a shitty job so far.

elaborate, please