Why do conservatives never actually have arguments and facts when debating?

Why do conservatives never actually have arguments and facts when debating?

For example, if Jews control the world, why wouldn't they have you antisemites exterminated?

If a small segment of Muslims perpetrate a crime and we ban them, should guns be banned because some gun owners unjustly murder someone?

If 1% of the population owns most of the world's wealth while people are dying from inefficient healthcare, what's wrong with making the wealthy pay more?

You never ever answer the questions. You just resort to personal attacks like Trump. You guys are the morons and the snowflakes.

...

...

...

...

>Why do conservatives never actually have arguments and facts when debating?
shit's passé, m8

...

...

...

>not understanding the efficacy of cognitive dissonance

Explain to me exactly why the white man should commit racial suicide, no liberal ever has a good answer for this.

...

Facts scare them.

Exceptional example of someone who ignores the material because they know they're too stupid to formulate an argument.

Pic related OP

1. They are slowly
2. We most likely won't get into a car crash yet most of still use a seatbelt just in case. Also Muslim violence is over represented
3.I agree fuck capitalism

Not an argument

Whats right with taking money from the wealthy? Its not my responsibility to look after you.

It's not a right but a duty,

Also because people aren't equal thus we should treat them at the same standard.

Shouldn't*

Work for wealth. This generations is far by the laziest. Expect everything to be given to you. The 1% happen to employ
99%

Nice strawmam. Maybe we would address your points if you actually had any that weren't ad homs. The reason we call you cuck and libtard is because 90% of you are simpletons, with zero reasoning skil, who aren't worth our time. Cuck

Why are people so entitled?

Might be because they don't agree with the premise that white man is committing racial suicide.

>if Jews control the world, why wouldn't they have you antisemites exterminated
>antifa a jew funded group goes around laybeling every they dont like a nazi and assaulting them
>gets jew owned networks to endorse punching a "nazi"
huh

>trump supporter
>Likes mccain and romney
>watches fox news
nice try

Why do liberals never actually have arguments and facts when debating?

For example, if whites control the world, why wouldn't they have you antiwhites exterminated?

If a small segment of Blacks in America perpetrate a crime and we jail them, should guns be removed from society because some gun owners unjustly murder someone?

If 1% of the population owns most of the world's wealth while people are dying from inefficient healthcare, what's wrong with making the wealthy pay more?
Tell that to the rich liberal hollywood stars like Zuckerberg and see if they like that, too. If so, go ahead and promote it.

You never ever answer the questions. You just resort to personal attacks like Feminists. You guys are the morons and the snowflakes.

Yep, OP's points are infuriatingly retarded.

Anti semites still pay taxes

Foreigners are not entitled to move to the united states you colossal retard

Throwing money at problems doesn't fix them, healthcare is a simple supply and demand problem. There aren't enough doctors for everyone to get the best care

>For example, if Jews control the world, why wouldn't they have you antisemites exterminated?
1) Outright exterminating antisemites is stupid because it instantly radicalizes all of them into fighting for real which could end up badly. Much better to slowly freeze them out of society by denying them a way to make money, friends, family, etc.
This is why jews are smarter than you, the typical goy.

>If a small segment of Muslims perpetrate a crime and we ban them, should guns be banned because some gun owners unjustly murder someone?
2)Guns owners have a whole do not share any beliefs in common that makes them dangerous, muslims all do by default.
>If 1% of the population owns most of the world's wealth while people are dying from inefficient healthcare, what's wrong with making the wealthy pay more?
3) Well once you figure out that the 1% are mostly jews and don't see us as fellow humans its not hard to see why this talk is meaningless. The only way you can make socialism work is via nationalism. My family for example is probably part of the 5% and they hate paying taxes since much of it will go to nonwhite leeches, and lefty bureacrats. You can try to increase taxes but the rich are smart and will get out of them, class warfare and communism don't work.

>mocks the JQ and bitches about the 1% in the same statement.

Comprising just 2% of the population Jews make up 43% of the 1%.

>if Jews control the world, why wouldn't they have you antisemites exterminated?
because to destroy western civilization they need to be the "victim", if they started killing anyone who doesn't like them people would start to fight back, also to finding out who is an antisemite where does he live, and kill each and any one of the individually would cost a lot of shekels,
>If a small segment of Muslims perpetrate a crime and we ban them, should guns be banned because some gun owners unjustly murder someone?
Muslims kill people because they are muslims, guns are just a tool and are not responsible for death, guns don't kill people, people kills people
>If 1% of the population owns most of the world's wealth while people are dying from inefficient healthcare, what's wrong with making the wealthy pay more?
wealthy people do already pay more and conservatives are fine with it, but they earned those money and there's always that

>For example, if Jews control the world, why wouldn't they have you antisemites exterminated?

Mass immigration.

1) Jews power isn't based on physical force, it's based on mass manipulation and mass financial control.
2) Gun owners haven't got a book telling them to replace and kill the population.
3) Nothing.

Didn't you just, pretty directly, represent exactly what OP said nitwits like you usually do instead of producing valid arguments....?

I think OP was representing how idiotic the GOP can be. I doubt a majority of Trump voters dislike McCain or Romney, and I'd bet money they watch Fox religiously.

>Why do conservatives never actually have arguments and facts when debating?

We do, you just never listen. You get "triggered" whenever we point something that inconviniences your worldview.

>For example, if Jews control the world, why wouldn't they have you antisemites exterminated?

Mass immigration from non-white countries into white ones both destroys white identity and the immigrants identity. Marxist Jews have advocated stuff like this via Critical Theory, something that originated from the Frankfurt School in Germany. Also, last time I checked if you killed someone, or even attempted physical genocide, you get shunned by even the most rational people. I can't believe you couldn't figure that out.

>If a small segment of Muslims perpetrate a crime and we ban them, should guns be banned because some gun owners unjustly murder someone?

Guns aren't people. The perpetrators of the crime are punished, whereas the perpetrators of the Islamic terrorism are punished.

>If 1% of the population owns most of the world's wealth while people are dying from inefficient healthcare, what's wrong with making the wealthy pay more?

Why should we treat other people differently? I would assume you like to advocate for minorities and "progress" but when it comes to the 1% this minority gets treated differently? This is just purely galling.

>You never ever answer the questions. You just resort to personal attacks like Trump. You guys are the morons and the snowflakes.

You can live in your own bubble if you want. If you've even looked around here, you can find infographics on pretty much anything. It's an absolute disgrace that you advocate us as name callers, then just name call us back, you hypocrite.