Where were you when liberalism gasped its last, dying breath? Watching this shit...

Where were you when liberalism gasped its last, dying breath? Watching this shit, it's like erectile dysfunction personified, why are liberals around the entire world absolutely incapable of finding a strong, charismatic figurehead? Maybe if they had that, and didn't chase absolute garbage, flower power pipe dream fantasy tier policies more people would vote for them...

Other urls found in this thread:

nation.foxnews.com/poll/2017/02/21/how-would-rate-president-trumps-first-month-in-office/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

They're all moral relativists. They can't have conviction on any issue aside from moral objectivism is bad, m'kay.

Who are the nobodies on that stage? Where's Sanders? Where's Warren?

that man in the red jumpsuit. Is that the one who laughed at the trump supporter being beaten?

Sam Ronan is (our guy)?

No, forehead isn't sloped enough.

>Where's Sanders?

You mean the guy who literally nobody likes?

>Where's Warren?

Who, pocahontas?

The democrats are a party of losers and morons, why would they pick someone people actually know as their leader? These people are not trying to get elected again, they're just trying to start a civil war.

>literally nobody likes
The only reason he lost the primary is cause the DNC rigged it. That was a pretty huge part of the 2016 election, guess you missed it.

>they're just trying to start a civil war
Are you from an alternate timeline where the Democrats are capable of violence? Cause in my timeline they only ever whine. What happened in your timeline after the 2001 civil war?

They're getting ready for 2020, they have no reason to be head of the DNC.
Also what the fuck, you're messiah is an ancient, walking Jewish stereotype? His bullshit is exactly the kind of garbage policies I was talking about. It's what happens when you rely entirely on the youth and minorities.
Liberalism desperately needs a righteous anime superhero

Wait...they're debating to be head of the DNC? And it's on CNN? Wow, they are terrible at hiding the fact that they're the PR network of the Democratic party.

>The only reason he lost the primary is cause the DNC rigged it.

>the DNC rigged 3.7 million votes
Yeah, OK. They really needed to rig it, because we all know communism is super popular in the US.

Wow, you really are from a different timeline.
The rigging of the DNC primary was one of the biggest factors in the 2016 election in this timeline. Without that, we might never have gotten president Trump.

Is Trump still president in your timeline or did things turn out differently there?

they host debates and town halls from both parties
their next one is like two republican senators holding a town hall

nation.foxnews.com/poll/2017/02/21/how-would-rate-president-trumps-first-month-in-office/

We need votes in this poll asap!

please stop
Bernie Sanders is terrible
these retired hippies are not leaders

>Bernie Sanders is terrible

Many people think Trump is terrible too, but they voted for him anyways.

The entire election was decided by a handful of states. This year it was the rustbelt states that would decide the election. These states were going to vote for the candidate that advocated for protectionism and border security. Both Sanders and Trump have that.

Since these people tend to lean towards Democrat, there is a strong case to be made that if Sanders had won the primary, rustbelt voters would have chosen him over Trump. Only a few thousand votes would hand Sanders the White House.

I'm a voter who switched from Sanders to Trump, and I have many liberal friends who either voted for Trump or Jill Stein this past year, because Hillary was just the Bush policies in a pants-suit. I have one friend who voted for Hillary and he actually felt really guilty about it after he did.

Anyone who thinks that a guy who says "White people can't be poor" could've won the Rust Belt is legitimately fucking retarded. Congrats, man.

Oh look another thread with an American mixing up Liberalism with Leftism..

Only because your leftists label themselves as Liberals instead of Socialists doesn't make them Liberals.

They only leaned democrat because of unions. But when there is no work, they don't really care too much about unions. They would've voted republican regardless because Trump promises jobs and low taxes, Sanders instead supporter "clean energy" and higher taxes.

The people who lost their jobs to china don't care about welfare, they care about work.

>jehmu green
please elect a big bossy negress so even more white people are driven from your shitty party

>t. reddit
get out

>two republican senators
>mccain and graham

>Liberalism desperately needs a righteous anime superhero
Liberalism desperately needs a bullet in the head to put it out of its misery.

That statement was the nail in the coffin, what a fucking FAGGOT JEW LOSER, fuck off back your second vacation home Boynie

I'm not mixing up anything
global liberalism is dying thanks to the only advocates being limpdicks and the policies devolving into gibesmedats

Any politican who says "socialism is good" is unelectable in 90% of the country.

Not one white man. #DNCsoblack

Bernie had a movement of burn outs who normally wouldn't vote. The Dem party hates him and most democratic voters don't like him. He isn't even a democrat he's an independent. He also hasn't done ANYTHING until his 2016 run. He just sits in the senate drooling into his applesauce.

Being head of the DNC is an administrative position, more about fundwhoring and coordinating party campaigns than providing any sort of leadership.

>He thinks people vote based on policy

Ted Cruz and Hilary Clinton believed the same thing.

>Ted Cruz and Hillary Clinton believed the same thing

What did he mean by this?

They might find a strong leader once they reform and find a cause that appeals to a wider range of people

That will take some time though, and it's not guaranteed that they'll ever do it

"Im not trump" "trump is a racist" "pepe and alt right" is a policy apparently.

I don't think you guys were looking to closely at Sanders. He generally had two types of supporters:

1) leftists that want all the things leftists usually want
2) Reagan democrats who were attracted to his talk of bad trade deals, better border security, TPP and NAFTA being harmful, etc...

>Bernie wants to change the Democratic platform and start a movement.
>Cucks himself out of Democratic nomination.
>Doesn't bother leading DNC.

ALL TALK NO ACTION.

More like consequentialists.
Republicans are like kantians thinking that we can never have gray areas.

Licking Hillary Clinton's boots, obviously.

The old fraud should be swinging from a sour apple tree.

>Reagan Democrats

This is a meme demographic

correct, but I see a global trend toward fascist liberalism, or fishism, where we care about the environment and basic human rights, but if someone pisses you off you can kill them.

>the socialism-liberalism confusion

>He generally had two types of supporters:

You forgot his largest demographic: socialist college and/or high-school kids.

Lol they all look like beta fucks.
>8 years

Because there is a war on the left between the corporate shills and the actual progressives that want to save what's left of this shithole

>Where were you when liberalism gasped its last, dying breath?
Right here on Sup Forums.

>You forgot his largest demographic: socialist college and/or high-school kids.

But what is the demographic that matters? It's not the millions of socialists in the California. The rustbelt states had the greatest number of type 2 Sanders supporters, people who are listening to Sander's talk about bad trade deals, no jobs, and harmful immigration. They are the ones that decide the election.

Read a book. Libertarians are true liberals, lefties are socialists. We call them liberals in this country but it's actually retarded and we should quit

Kek, Bernie people took over my county's party apparatus during the primaries then all moved back to the state's main city. End result is all county comissioners are now Republican despite going Clinton by 18% over Trump.

The best way to do this is primary Manchin and Heitkamp in favor of ultra-progressives who vocally hate oil and coal.

> sips tea

cut it with the pedantry

liberalism means defending a moderate welfare state, keeping growth of the military industrial complex in check, asserting strong control with regulatory bodies and over schools

it's just when it comes out of jemima's mouth along with islam is great it's REALLY hard to get behind

your robinhood tax and facebook meme tier ideas of what social democracy should be can kiss my ass

>One kid dies
>BAN ALL GUNS
>One tranny can't shit where he wants
>BAN ALL GENDERS

>mfw they elect Ellison and the lose jewish support

They already have better jobs. The head of the DNC just does some minor fundraising and PR shit unless they go full retard like DWS.

>IF U DONT TALK LIEK LE TROMP THEN UR BENIS DOSNT WERK XDDD

>Why are liberals around the entire world absolutely incapable of finding a strong, charismatic figurehead?

Since when were most right wing leaders any of those things?

>Since when were most right wing leaders any of those things?

I think politics just attracts assholes in the first place, liberal or conservative or whatever. You almost always have to whore yourself out to succeed, they tend to want power for power's sake, not to actually accomplish anything, and you live under a microscope where every act or comment is misrepresented by the media and your opponents.

Very few seem to enjoy it. Reagan and Nigel come to mind, and maybe Trump will be a survivor. Most of the rest get beaten down eventually.

keep straw manning maybe someone will upvote you

they aren't
except their ideolgy corrupts very easily and is an easy pill to swallow, which means they don't need big stronk guy to sell it to chumps