Go ahead, please. I'll be waiting.
Give me ONE(1) piece of evidence that NY Times is "fake news"?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
en.wikipedia.org
nytimes.com
dailycaller.com
huffingtonpost.com
gawker.com
nytimes.com
foxnews.com
politico.com
twitter.com
They're kikes, kikes are always lying
RESPOND OP, RESPOND
>will only accept NYT as a source
We all know that Israel attacked the USA on 9/11 now the proof: youtu.be
+0,02 saged
wow I got told.
...
...
>almost 15 years ago
Great job.
Their editor is a self described "creole" who refuses to be called african american
Their opinion editor is a jew
Their publisher is a jew
The richest man in the world, Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim owns the majority of the company
Yeah I'm sure it doesnt have an agenda
they're headed up by a pedophile from the BBC
I'm getting a bit tired of the whole 'Everyone I don't agree with is actually a pedophile' thing.
You didn't specify a timeframe.
Dude just fuck you
Just watch the news and see for yourself. It's just a backstabbing and condescending trump show now
Well they can be a racist, misogynist, islamophobic, transphobic, xenophobic shitlord if you would prefer
Hang yourself toothpaste
OK, let me be more clear because you're obviously being obtuse. I want evidence that the Times has been creating fake news about Trump and/or his administration within the election cycle or during his term so far.
...
Fake? Nah. They can definitely be "sloppy news" though.
...
here is the article that image cites:
nytimes.com
I just read it and it seems like a fairly rudimentary but decent look into the right's use
(and misuse) of the globalism idea. Point me to a lie or inaccuracy within the article.
> New York Times publisher vows to 'rededicate' paper to reporting honestly
can't be bothered. you'll clearly apply liberal thinking in regards to your interpretation.
I can agree that they (and every other media source) can be sloppy. It's the fake news label I have a problem with.
gary webb FAGGOT
>died in 2004
>didn't work for The NY Times
JUST
just replace 'fake news' with 'politically motivated' and it actually becomes a much more incisive critique of the media in our country. These dullards don't know that though
btw, this board will never answer your questions because they don't actually care about politics
Imagine how many remain undetected
4th estate my ass
didn't they run an article where they interviewed trump's exgirlfriends and portrayed them as them hating him, when in actuality they were praising him?
i remember one of the interviewed women calling the NYT out for fake news
Dude, the Times has yet to return Walter Duranty's Pulitzer.
GTFOH.
thanks, this actually seems like a pretty good example.