Why doesn't globalism work?

Why doesn't globalism work?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Israel
liveleak.com/view?i=cb0_1447249820
youtube.com/watch?v=bOMksnSaAJ4
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_poverty
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Cause the world is flat

Because there is no way to hold global power brokers accountable to the peoples over which they preside.

niggers

...

Globalism works. But it doesn't benefit us.

A +
Go hug your teacher

People in X make decisions for people in Y. Usually extremely out of touch decisions.

Also government is already shit. Not increase the complexity of problems 10x and see how it goes.

Just look at the UN. Imagine the UN in charge of everything. That's globalism.

The idea doesn't work because the world is massively unequal in culture, wealth, genetics, and everything else. We aren't interchangeable blank slates. Genetics drives around 50% of behavior and intelligence.

So. Would combining USA and Mexico be a good choice?

What about Europe with Africa?

Anyone with basic common sense can predict what happens. People are fucking tribal shit with variable genetics and shitty cultures.

globalism is extreme optimism with disregard for common sense.

Which is why we should all blanda upp

Globalism simply means one ideology is in effect for the entire globe. Globalism is a prefix

Globalism today really stands for Global Communism.

Yeah Israel is gonna be so enriched when EU and USA finally become fully libtarded and demand it open borders with mudslimes.

Bullshit. Communism failed. Globalism is good for business, everybody will benefit in the end.

It's already enriched: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Israel

Because it concentrates decison making to places like Brussles and Washington and so the people deciding whether you get to keep your job are hundreds of kilometres away and often dont even speak your language. Your objection is drowned out by every other interest in the world, and you wind up taking a haircut for the benifit of a noiser or more important voting bloc.

People in London really believed that because their financial sector was making money hand over fist it was worth selling out all the primary producers. They were so obsessed with controlling the discussion in Brussels that they didn't even bother making the arguement at home or try to redress the people who were being sacrificed for the bankers. And then they were surprised that all the fishermen decided not to be martyrs for the City of London.

Same in USA; Hillary and the Dems so want to belive that they can run a nation state by giving every assitance to people in NY, Cali and DC, while they keep the rest of the country in line through welfare and handouts. Unfortunately it turna out most people are happy for the whole country to be poorer (on paper) if it means they get to go to work and build cars.

FPBP

>Globalism today really stands for Global Communism
bullshit
it stands for global corporationalism

Because every single individual is a potential threat to every other individual. Because it is in our nature to compete.

Globalism doesn't work because like communism, people will always float to the top.

because everyones ego is constantly growing and psychedelics are illegal

I say this every time there is a globalist thread.

Imagine how hard it would be to overthrow your current country. Imagine what would happen if there was an all out war. There is a very valid chance that the resistance would be put out.

Now. Imagine how difficult it would be to overthrow ONE world government. It would be impossible you and your children will be cucked forever.

Because that keep poor countries poor.

>Why we fight
To expand on this answer, the ability to put down almost any opposition would be as near to Absolute Power as is possible - Power corrupts and we know what Absolute Power does

First and best post

This.

Globalism might create a net positive income increase, but most people will never see the benefits. It concentrates the wealth and power in the hands of those who can compete on a global scale, leaving out individuals.

The answer to this isn't communism/socialism, like the Bernie's would say. Its a modicum of protectionism. Smart business practices on the government level, while keeping the corporations who want to institute globalism out of government itself. Its understanding, that as long as someone is willing to pay their people a pittance, or dodge environmental standards, or undercut you in some other way that is illegal in your nation, they will ALWAYS out compete you. Free trade with nations with no standards will kill your low skill work.

The last piece is understanding that there will always be a class of people who need low or no skill work to survive. They are unsuitable for any other task or job. These people make up a large population, you can't ignore them and let them starve. You must provide them with a living somehow. Free trade with a nation that can undercut them is counter productive to this goal.

Exactly, the smartest get matched with the dumbest, so that everything gets equalized in the end. Since Israel is the master race IQ, we'll start by sending you to work on the abbos.

Because at the end of the day, our cultures and values are too fucking different.

There is nothing wrong with Globalism. There is everything wrong with LIBERAL Globalism. Greco-Roman Globalism worked. Ottoman Globalism worked. British Globalism worked. The moment the Social Justice Warriors and their Cabal got their hands on Globalism, it all fell apart fast.

Liberal Globalists can't control the people they import, nor can they get the people they import to actually labor productively. Furthermore, they give out free handouts to these populations which only drains their coffers, while these populations take on hostile attitudes toward their host nations by promoting radical ideologies such as Islamism. They literally contribute nothing to the system, but are only incorporated because the elites are incapable of realizing their failures in managing their pet populations.

You know how the Romans handled Globalism? Slavery. They imported millions of people in chains and LITERALLY crucified them if they got uppity. The slaves also produced unparalleled wealth for their Empire because the imported masses could be controlled into laboring productively.

The Ottomans, another Globalist construct. Got Christians to work for Muslims through a combination of slavery and the Millet system. They created a seperate set of rules for their 'migrants' that had to be obeyed, which enabled them to function successfully in their empire without much of a problem. Migrants were restricted in such ways as to keep the Sultan dominant in the system.

And the British Empire, another Globalist construct, worked out great by ensuring that subjects remained in their territories and paid tribute to the Crown. Although they eventually abolished slavery, they made sure that the British Empire made money wherever it ruled over it's subjects through a combination of guile and oppression.

((their)) goal is to bring in more muslim military aged men at all cost

liveleak.com/view?i=cb0_1447249820

But you are just explaining why Globalism doesn't work RIGHT NOW.

Imagine a society à la Starship troopers, where people moved away from attributing too much weight on national culture and shit and formed a global power to conquer space.

Unequality in culture, wealth and even genetics can be solved. It will be cruel, wars will be fought and billions of lives will have to be sacrificed, but the ideo of Globalism would still reign supreme in the big picture.

that is imagination. when you see what this imagined utopia of equality and social justice actually means in practice, you will be sickened, you will revolt.

but that new government that you faught for and advocated does not tolerate dissent the way this current government does. you will simply be lined up against a wall and shot.

happened in vietnam. happened in china. happened in the USSR, happened in venesuela, happened in bolivia, etc etc etc

Now let's talk about these NWO Globalists. What is their master plan to rule the world? Invite in a bunch of ungrateful Barbarians from the Third World and pay them free money to commit acts of crime and rape against the natives. And then censor anyone who complains about this wanton destruction in the first place. No. Better yet. Censor anyone and then go bankrupt trying to protect these Barbarians after they promptly stab you in the back for all the good you've given them.

This version of Globalism is an utter failure because the people managing it are as incompetent as they are in denial. Inevitably, this whole thing is going to come crashing down in a brutal fucking Yugoslav-style war after the Barbarians become too heavy to carry, and then we'll see massive destruction and plunder unseen since World war fucking II.

This is an absolute embarrassing time to be alive, and I am ashamed to call myself apart of the human species, where most of my peers are so incapable of being decent they are no better than aggressive children who take their rage on the people who provide for them. This entire era will be looked on with shame, and future elites will never repeat the mistakes that we have so ignorantly made in this time.

>dude you're just looking at the real world
>what you need to do, is imagine an impossible hypothetical
>wouldn't things be different, then?
You're lucky I'm phoneposting or I'd make a smuggie of you

Because it is communism

In Starship Troopers Globalism, they publicly whipped people for acting out of line. If we whipped Jamal and Achmed everytime they grooped Heidi, Cologne would be safe again.

The question and problem is would it actually help or benefit? Some populations have shown they are nothing but a burden on any system they enter, why then should I be led to believe it is a good idea to dilute the genetic potential of my population with theirs?

Now if we were talking of phasing out useless groups that drag everyone down then uniting under one umbrella it might be better. The problem still arises that currently the idea is to flood countries with refugees and wash out the native population to dumb it down and make it easier to control.

>dumb it down and make it easier to control.

Nobody can control Barbarians. That's the problem of this system. There is no control. It's just chaos and denial.

Because most of the globe rejects capitalism, because dictators want to directly control the economy.

Globalism does not work for people living in developed countries. Doing away with borders, there is a flow of resources towards the poorest countries, like when you connect a full bottle of water to an empty bottle. Trouble is: there are not enough resources to sustain the western world quality of life once the flow starts.

The real limiting resource is, of course, Energy.

It actually kinda does, there is a record low number of people on extreme poverty, the regular folk is more rich than ever and this is the most peaceful time ever, the thing is that we have access to so much information that it looks as if the world is going down the shitter.

Understandable but that's just it, the top believe they can they've been able to effectively subdue the white race, once the power house on the globe, through indoctrination and preying about the social aspect of humans.

To (((them))) they've done it before and will do it again once they get where they want. Doesn't mean it will actually work, but there is still an effort to continue this even if it leads to ruin.

>record low

what number is that? i want the number of people in poverty

youtube.com/watch?v=bOMksnSaAJ4

because the economics just don't add up

Human Nature.
Humans are Apes. Apes will always be tribal.

Took me a billion hours to make this

Genesis 10:32 These are the families of the sons of Noah, after their generations, in their nations: and by these were the nations divided in the earth after the flood.

Nations are the appointed order.

Genesis 11, the story of the Towel of Babel.

1. And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.

2. And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there.

3. And they said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them thoroughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for mortar.

4. And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.

5. And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men built.

6. And the LORD said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do.

7. Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech.

8. So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city.

9. Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because the LORD did there confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the LORD scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth.

It doesn't work because it isn't supposed to. Plain and simple. Same reason degeneracy doesn't work. I am a White descendant of Japeth. Europe and North America belong to me and mine. Anything else will cause confusion.

I never said we have to adapt marxist or SJW morals as the goal of globalism.

Technically a united faschist earth is still globalised. Of course there will be people who will not be happy with the implemented morals and government decisions, but that is inevitable in politics. We practically all already fight for our own versions of globalism that fits our most liked world view by default.

Only focusing on the what IS and ignoring the what COULD BE is simply narrow minded. This thread discusses the posibility of globalism and not exclusively its current form.

People will always suffer, at least this way they do for a reason.

These populations will obviously not have place in a world order. I'm not saying that I know the ethical and moraly perfect way to achieve it, I'm simply saying that populations that do not fit will be exterminated or supressed one way or another.

your pic is pretty accurate

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_poverty
Here you go buddy

Thats beautiful

that goes on the fridge
kek

the human race began in poverty.

poverty is the default state. what you need to ask is "how is wealth created"?

youtube.com/watch?v=bOMksnSaAJ4

For the record, I like globalisation not "globalism". And I believe that freedom of trade and lower taxes makes the perfect environment for creating wealth goods and services

Very simple: no race division rules, also a lie that there is equality when rich people obviously aren't equal to everybody.