2020 potential democrats thread

Let's talk about the potential democratic candidates for 2020, Sup Forums.
>talk about who the potential candidates are
>who's the strongest?
>who's the weakest?
>expose weaknesses
>pic related

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=EF4Ll15ENgA
graphics.wsj.com/blue-feed-red-feed/#/president-trump
pnas.org/content/111/24/8788.full
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

You forgot the context that they'll be running against Pence in 2020.

lel

you're a faggot

>Hillary
Political suicide for Democrats, they can't run a failed candidate twice.
>Bernie
Will be 79 years old and his hardline leftist policies will drive moderate democrats to Trump
>Warren
Annoying shrill cunt, easily taken down with muh native american heritage
>Zuckerberg
Absolute fag, wouldn't last 2 minutes in a political debate
>Booker
Obama-lite, low energy, but still probably the best chance Democrats have in 2020.

Lol another dem who thinks Trump will actually get impeached. Keep wishing

I will honestly be fucking surprised if they don't run Michelle Obama.

I think she'd win in a landslide.

>MUH FIRST WOMAN
>MUH 2ND NIG
>MUH OBAMA
>MUH CHANGEEEE

If they actually wanted to win they'd pick pic related, but she's not really a Democrat.

You sure about Warren? Sure, she lied about being native american and it's funny, but aside from that her record's pretty clean. And who do you think will actually get the nomination?

Lol, what has she done aside from selling vegetables to black people outside of KFC?
Tulsi Gabbard? She's just Bernie Sanders but younger and more charismatic. Then again, I don't suppose the democrats are really opposed to that.

As for the ones not listed that I've seen others consider
>Kaine
Absolute dumbass that lost the debate with Pence
>Michelle
Other than muh dynasty, has nothing to offer, very apolitical, wouldn't last a second debating policy
>Gabbard
Best chance the democrats have at defeating Trump, she'll never get picked
>Biden
Old fuck, wouldn't get in

Doesn't have to make sense, it just has to be some sensationalized "yes we can" shit with the current infatuation of The West, which is "THE FIRST" in order to show how progressive we are.

>the first nigger woman president that absolutely slays, yasssssssssssss

Lol, I honestly feel sorry for Biden. He's another one of the classic dems like Jim Webb who got left behind by the progressive bastards.

They'll give Booker or some new guy the nomination, someone without any baggage. Warren is just unbearable to listen to, other than Berniebros I have no clue who would actually support her.

Webb was a solid guy, shame he couldn't get picked. Good record, too old for 2020.

> queen dunham 20-28

I'd love to see them try, that whore would drive Marx to the right.

>"They'll give Booker the nomination"
By that do you mean the actual people or is Tom Perez going to be the same corrupt shitheap as Debbie Wasserman Schultz
She'd accomplish the left-wing agenda of making men gay just with sheer ugly nakedness.

Corruption, remember the autistic screeching from Berniebros when he was nominated? That's why.

OH-OH

AYYYY AYYYY

OH-OH

AYYYY AYYYY

Reiterated that he'd go for 2024 run, in any case no sane person would vote for him.

*elected, not nominated excuse me

Warren was already in bed with the Hillary campaign apparatus, so she has the most likelyhood. Since Hillary's friends STILL controll the DNC, Bernie has no chance, also he'll be older than dirt in 2020. The others have no chance.

anything but Zuckerberg.
he lost connection to the real world and lives in an ivory tower. to him one guy meddling in several countries is better than democracy.
(((Zucker))) recently published a very globalist manifesto - apparently too globalist even for MSM. go figure.
besides, imagine all the fucking shilling on FB if he runs. "Oh let's tweak the wall algorithm A LITTLE bit". normies get their news from FB.

You guys are seriously underestimating Mark Zuckerberg.

> Owns the biggest, most ubiquitous social media network in existence
> has demonstrated he has no problem with censoring dissent and manipulating public opinion via this service
> an actual fucking genius
> Worth at least 10x what Trump is
> Massively popular with normies

He's the best shot the dems have.

Film industry insider here-- want to know the big, fat, juicy open-secret going around right now? Sup Forums's favorite actress Meryl Streep is prepping a run. Expect her to become more active politically, more speeches, more protests, rallies, fundraisers. If she keeps popping up on the news, then she's running. Guaranteed.

Chances are she'll announce exactly two years from now - 2019, at the Oscars. The timing is too perfect.

Still, watching CSpan and listening to that annoying whore talk is one of the most unbearable experiences anyone could have, I can't get how anyone would vote her in, she'll more likely than not just be a background candidate that no one will really take seriously, like a Santorum or an O'Malley.

I definitely hope the corruption stays. Internal unrest for the Dems is good for the rest of the country.

It's gonna be Zuckerberg

Fuck that I have a running bet on Kanye vs Trump

She has nothing going other than "Muh humyn rights", these hollywood actor types are shallow elitist fucks that no one outside of Cali or New England would ever vote for.
Zuckerberg is just a technocrat fag that got lucky with Facebook, lots of people hate him already, just an elitist fuck that won't connect with your average union worker.

This. Zuck is the real danger right now.

He's a technocrat fag who got lucky with the biggest, most ubiquitous social media platform in existence.

One that he can use to effect greater than anything the MSM could dream of to manipulate public opinion.

DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ 2020 LET'S GO BITCHES.

SAY IT WITH ME

I wouldn't be too surprised if he wins the deb debates but he's get cucked in any debates where people watched him. He such a little Phag.

why are you so worked up. It's just a joke trumpcucks

lol zuckerberg

youtube.com/watch?v=EF4Ll15ENgA

Cory wheres my cheque, pfizer Booker?
yeah hes off to a brilliant start
face it, if this is still the list next year, enjoy your 8 years of trump

>other than Berniebros I have no clue who would actually support her.

Your basic bitch would

I saw a chunk of his speech. He's good enough.
Besides, it's not the speech itself that forms normies' opinions, it's the news reporting.
Which they get from FB wall.

Seriously, keep Zuckerberg away from WH.

The whole "walling off and trying to steal Hawaiians land" would immediately destroy him.

Check it.

He's too young. He'll barely be eligible to run in 2020.

Hitlery/Cuckerberg 2020
"At this point what difference does it make?"

I'm sick of "oh he controls FB so he controls the normies" shit in this thread. Does anyone think that Zuckerberg altering the site wouldn't alert some people? Facebook's already had some of the younger normies move to mainly app sites, you don't think that a full switch to propoganda wouldn't alert people? It's widely known that Zuckerberg owns Facebook, so any alterations would be obvious, it's not like some Soros "I own everything and you don't know about it" type of deal.

He will be eligible though.

>implying they won't shill the Anti-Trump in the form of Jeff Bezos

He's a lot more wealthy and owns companies normies use. He is also relatively young. I'd keep an eye on him.

Agreed. Probably the only name I'd be seriously afraid of is Tulsi Gabbard, someone I forgot about when making the list. Also maybe Zuckerberg because he (((controls the media))).

Cuckersperg is going to attempt a seizure of the DNC candidacy in 2020, or maybe later like 2024-28

That's what that dumbass manifesto was about

Don't underestimate him

Too many Bernie supporters and leftists in the Dem party will remember her for being quiet during the 2016 primary.

The secret is basically out for Warren, she's an establishment shill who spouts fierce rhetoric but doesn't really do anything. She might be a good lawyer, but is a lousy politician.

Not in the eyes of voters who will see his vanity for what it is. He got lucky on stealing someone else's idea. You think Trump isn't going to drill that and make him look like a rich beta nincompoop?

Warren lost the Berners when she failed to endorse Bernie as a candidate.
Most progressives are jumping ship now that Perez is the new head of the DNC.
Look forward to Trump 2020 with half of the voting base of the Dems splitting between the Greens and Libertarians. The Dems will soon be joining the Whigs and Tories as an antiquated party.

I don't doubt it.

>barfs

this

managing a site that basically manages itself

only real issue on kikebook is censorship becoming more rampant which will be very offputting to all but the hardest SJW's

tried to steal Hawaiians land and walled himself off from them

if he ran he would just cuck himself into a loss bernie sanders style by apologizing all the fucking time and would be seen as a weak hypocrite

say what you will about Trump but he is Alpha as fuck

I think Zuckerberg would run for a Governor position or for the Senate first if he was going to attempt a run at the White House so you'd be looking at 2024/2028 before the Executive run

It'd also give him the time to put enough space between him and Facebook for him not to be considered manipulating the site
>but of course he'd still hold huge sway silently

Yes, the Nixon/Reagan reelection gains would be optimal, just gotta hope they have an absolute retard in there like Ellison or something.

4 candidates in 2020

screen cap this

Trump vs

Green
Libertarian
Dem

Tbh this seems to be their only option right now

I'd like to see a Zuckerberg vs Trump debate, would be interesting to watch

CHAFEE 2020 FTW!!!

long shite because insomnia.

Granted, it reeks of crazythink.
However I know (roughly) how FB wall works: an extremely complex algorithm picks who, how early/late, and how often, sees particular news piece. There are literally countless knobs that can be slightly adjusted, and they are adjusted at all times. There is no real way to check the effects. There is no way to stop adjusting them, either. No court can realistically tell FB to suspend meddling for a year or more, however long the campaign takes.

The algorithm already bubbles people heavily - there are numerous experiments on the internet that show how different news stream an 'conservative' gets from a 'lefty'. It's public secret. Check out (may be broken in Firefox)
graphics.wsj.com/blue-feed-red-feed/#/president-trump

Moreover, for years now Facebook has their own team of scientists who publish papers on meddling with people's minds. It's not nefarious, they just do research, everything's kosher. pnas.org/content/111/24/8788.full

Now ask yourself: FB has means (the tools and the know-how), FB has reasons (prop up Zuckerberg) and FB can get away with it. Will they?

There is no real way of preventing them from going ahead and meddling, because it's not an YES/NO, ON/OFF switch, it's degree, it's grade, it's as subtle as they want, and they NEED to meddle all the time, because the internet is evolving all the time too, and people are trying very hard to game FB's algorithm.

We have memes. They have means of meme production, dissemination and suppression.

Be affraid. Be very affraid.

You mean concerning the debates right? Third party candidates haven't been taken seriously since the Perot saga.

Thicc

>this thread

You're all wrong.

Nope, the full election.

Dems will fracture which will push people towards 3rd parties. You saw the birth pangs of this during the 2016 election cycle.

Wouldn't be a bit surprised if the Socialist don't try to get a legitimate party together before 2020.

seems legit.

i wouldn't be surprised to see Trump open up the debates if things are going very well for him and the dems get eternally btfo during the 2018 midterms.

I'd love to see Zuckerberg try to run just to see him fall flat on his face.

Sure, Trump is in the White House so anything is possible, but you still have to have some kind of natural constituency in order to win. Zuckerberg has none outside of Silicon Valley nerds. Even most young, hip tech writers regard him with either suspicion or outright derision.

I honestly think he'd have better luck running as an independent, since his economic policies are more in line with moderate Republicans. He couldn't win the Dem or Republican primary, but he could just squeak by in the general if the major party candidates are unpopular enough.

I'm just not buying it. There is no way that people wouldn't notice shilling from FB with Zuckerberg as a candidate, it's like the Inquirer propping up Charles Foster Kane. It's a widely known fact that Zuckerberg is Facebook, would the average voter really not see that Facebook would be biased for Zuckerberg?

I could see that. It would be the death blow and salt in the wound if he helped grow and legitimize the 2 major fringe parties.

>Everyone in OP's pic

Holy fuck, I hope not. Every prominent possible candidate is terrible.

Democrats need a male two-term governor from a swing or red state (not that I expect them to carry their home state) who won't be too old in 2020. The only guy who has all of those is Steve Bullock. Brian Schweitzer would also be good, but he may have missed his chance in 2016.

>post yfw Ivanka runs as a democrat and Don Jr. as a Republican while Trump retires to enjoy the last few years of his life

I mean yeah, it'll boost people over to third parties to some degree, but not enough to undermine the entire political system, especially not concerning the Republicans who, save for a few neocons, aren't feuding that much.

I protested the DNC in Philly and ended up jumping ship due to that shitstorm. A lot of people were holding out that Ellison and other Berners were going to get a powerful stake in the party but since that didn't happen I suppose there will be a DemExit 2: Electric Boogaloo

For the leftists or environmentalists the Green Party already has a place on a lot of ballots and the infrastructure/mail list to organize people.

I'm hoping that's the case. It would allow for the republicans to triangulate a bit but when you think about Trump originally thinking of running for president as a Reform party member in 2000 I have to wonder if part of his end game is to generate so much chaos energy it causes a shift in the playing field of American politics.

I'd vote for a qt like that

It's sooooooo obvious it's going to be Michelle. Perez at DNC was Barack's pick. You can tell how the media is treating the Obamas that they're plotting to set up Michelle. The whole "she'll never enter politics" is obvious bullshit to set up the (((SURPRISE))) when she announces.

bump.

Would further paint the Dems as being even more out of touch with the working class they supposedly represent.

However due to them being mostly DC idiots I could almost see them developing a strategy of "Well the Republicans are running a billionaire so..."

Michelle Obama, and she will win and you know why

Cuomo or Hickenlooper will be the nominee. A POC woman will be vp, which will cause a shit ton of accusations of sexism and racism for not letting her be at the top of the ticket.

Alex Jones sort of talks about this, how Google/Facebook can tinker with hive mind and predictive outcomes. I don't see the point in Zuckerberg running for office. He seems far more obsessed with becoming richest man in the world than 4 years of prez.

Unless of course he could use position as prez to force his way into China (?) I don't see the motivation.

on Sup Forums you have shills who post shit and there's nothing subtle about it. no shill can make your good post disappear.
not so on FB.
FB does the picking and choosing of who sees what.
already one don't see everything that your friends post, but only selection. people know that, people learned to accept that and live with that. they take the divinations of fucking FB algo at face value. all FB has to do is nudge that selection ever so slightly.

if it's not 2020, no biggie, Zuckerberg can run 2024+. he's got plenty of time, and people will forget any loss he could incur.

I wonder what would happen if Zuckerberg got behind #DemExit and started propping up Justice Democrats. Right now Justice Democrats aren't exactly sponsor-friendly with their toxic 'progressivism', and without monies politics can't be done, amirite? but Zuckerberg could singlehandedly sponsor a party. or two, for a good measure.

>Steve Bullock

Wow, Sup Forums isn't completely retarded. Didn't expect to see this here.

Barry already said last november that she'll never run

W E B B

E

B

B

How will Michelle debate policy? MUH HOPE will only go so far. It's not like Hillary who's been in law and politics for a while, she's just been in a house for a while and raised some kids. Also the only political thing she's done is fuck up the lunch system which'll probably enrage some Gen Zers to vote against her. She's just not a political person. Hardline progressives will shill for her for "MUH BLACK WOMYN", but don't forget that white women voted for Trump at a higher rate than Clinton despite gender similarities.

I don't think there would be a Libertarian candidate with any shot. Gary Johnson is such a beta.
Oh golly gee willikers, do you think it might be so?

I don't see Google pulling such stunt successfully. Search isn't all that big those days; social media is where news is. People are already closed in their information bubbles, with little intersections and little awareness of that. search results don't change much; people simply hit search to find one confirmation of some "fact" and are happy with it.

MAYBE stuff like Snapchat will change it for Gen Z, but not for Millenials and older.

btw, this is why Sup Forums is so great: here even a blind nigger will stumble upon a redpill eventually.

The media will play up Obamas getting their revenge on Trump's racism birther shit + women's card. The (((narrative))) is soooooooo obvious.

Political operative here. Was involved with 2016 campaign(s). Here's who I know is almost definitely running:

>Booker (most effort is for him to be VP pick)
>Martin O'Malley
>Murphy (Wall St pick)
>Gillibrand (Wall Street's backup)
>Hillary wants to be a VP pick if her health is able to be hidden. She isn't likely to be well enough to be out of a wheel chair in the near future. Expect an NYC Mayoral run and to want to crown the nominee - probably Murphy
>Hickenlooper
>Castro brothers - but probably just as VP picks (dig into this fact - they never spoke Spanish until they were teenagers. Much more other dirt on them, involving people who were suicided and lots of shady money
>Tulsi Gabbard is the most likely candidate to really threaten GOP. I'm hearing she may get bought off with an ambassadorship and a future Senate run if the Dems continue to threaten her career for not waiting in line. Hope that she waits til 2024.

More info:
> Zuck will probably not run. Actually, no fucking way he does. But he will start a PAC and would like to run for office when he is much older
>Bloomberg MAY run 3rd party to help Trump if Trump will try to push certain pro-Wall Street and anti-gun laws
>A couple of brilliant Republicans are going to get Lindsay Lohan to run for president and totally destroy the Demo primary from within. Arm your Twitter accounts to start pushing Blowhan for 2020.

>democrats
>existing in 2020

I don't see the Green Party becoming any bigger of a force in 2020, mainly because of the number of Democrats who blame Stein for spoiling HRC's loss. Even those who might otherwise agree with Green Party platform are being told that she's a Russian double agent because of that one picture of her at an RT gala.
In 2004, the Green Party received a much smaller share of the vote than in 2000, because the shilling against Nader started immediately. Expect the same in 2020.

>85% name recognition
>progressive cuckold
>ugly enough to be considered "unpriveleged."
I wouldn't be too surprised if he ran. Probably won't get too far though.

Mark Cuban is probably their best bet

But I doubt a white candidate can win on the left at this point

You realize it isn't 1992 anymore? Webb would have an easier time getting on the ticket for the GOP in 2020 than he would Democratic Party.

I can see him shill for a candidate and manipulate perception, but the thing is that he himself wouldn't work as a candidate. It doesn't matter how subtle he shills on FB, it still would be seen as a massive conflict of interest by a ton of people.

I could see that. Before he leaves office, giving the other parties more exposure and legitimacy just to end the 2 party strangle hold and force these asshats to work together.

It'd hinge on whether the Democrats could get their rainbow coalition to turn out for him. My bet is no, although hatred of Trump might help.

Something sketchy going on with Hillary and Obamas. Michelle as POTUS, Hillary as Gov of NY or mayor of NYC?

i would
vote for her i mean

2020

whites vs. everyone else

I'd rather have a piece of shit like the candidates I mentioned than someone who might actually be electable like Tulsi Gabbard.