It looks like his own audience is turning against him. He took a question way to personally and flew off the handle at some poor cuck.
Has Memereux Gone to Far?
Other urls found in this thread:
cdn.media.freedomainradio.com
twitter.com
The guy was being arrogant, easy to fall for the idea that you are the only right person as a young punk. The kid needed to be taught that argument needs no kindness as it is a deliberation involving facts. Arguments are void of personal attacks and anecdotal/emtional "evidence" if someone does that to you, you have no obligation to be respectful.
>memereux
my sides, god
>"lol i got my opponent angry with my shit non arguments guess I win lil.'
no
His anger is rising, he will be full nazi soon
I am a donator and I watch everything he posts.
Basically, he gives more ears to what Sup Forums thinks than his actual audience. Why? He knows his audience is smart and loyal while Sup Forums only watches the pleb-tier YouTube content.
Who's this racist fuck?
they call me the donator
another one by Shariablue CTR shills. holy fuck , can you shitbags fuck off
i watched the entire video. molymeme was right to bitchslap that fag back down to earth.
>do you think you're more effective than me?
>y-yes... n-no....
>WE ALREADY HAVE A PROBLEM
>YOU LIAR YOUR ENTIRE ARGUMENT IS INVALID NOW
The caller is obviously just nervous or his question was poorly written, who wants to talk to such a faggot that starts attacking his callers 1 minute into the show?
people are so easy to offend even on the right
ill watch the video 10:1 it's fucking nothing just like the 1$ shit was nothing
he acts like an autistic cunt in this video. are you honestly this cuckolded by a bald faggot with mommy issues?
it is fucking nothing. the people complaining are pussies
Stef is fucking losing it
his whole bullshit ancap/libertarian utopia future has crashed and burned in front of his eyes
will you ctr shill fags stop making these fucking threads, it's pathetic.
He was always insane
But at least in the past he could hold on to his dumb visions of ancapistan
>muh ancap boogeyman
Gas yourself, I donate to stef and yes, sometimes I question his content.
He killed it when He fell for the Trump meme
>check flag
>Mexican
you have to go back
we all know what you think
But he is an ancap (was? I don't know how you cna be an ancap and support government action like defense)
he never claimed to be ancap. he was a ayn rand lmao dude who got redpilled by the refugee crisis
>I think if you're nicer to people you can make your point more effectively
>YOU THINK YOU'RE BETTER THAN ME??!??!?!?!?!
Stefan proving the caller right in less than 20 seconds
>he never claimed to be ancap.
Yes he did
He was an ancap up until like 2015
cdn.media.freedomainradio.com
In 2008 he self published his own "book" pushing his ideal ancap future
To be honest, no, he doesn't need to be nice.
Being nice got us to wife's son territory in the first place.
This is the shittiest Sup Forums Molyneaux meme yet.
I'm not even that big a fan, I think his ancap identity is retarded, fucking grow some Reddit for fucks sake, it's like you like the blacked porn unironically.
t. easily offended numale
he was confrontational at all
Except Stefan attacked the guy based on his authority and expertise, and not the argument itself. It is not impossible for someone without expertise on a field to contribute to said filed. In a similar way interns can be useful to a company and bring in fresh ideas and first year PhD's could be conducting research and obtain results that might be useful to experts - particularly in applied research.
So, here's an analogy.
>Hey, prof. I think this this 300-line program is excellent, but this MIIIIIIIIIIILD correction of these 3 lines could have been done more efficiently.
>HOW FUCKING DARE YOU ATTACK MY EXPERTISE? ARE YOU SAYING YOU'RE BETTER THAN ME? ARE YOU SAYING YOU'RE A BIGGER EXPERT THAN ME? I'LL HAVE YOU KNOW I HAVE OVER 30 YEARS EXPERIENCE AND OVER 300 CONFIRMED PAPERS!!
So Stefan could have just said "I see why you think that, but this is why that argument is wrong." Instead he went on a series of personal attacks and vile ranting against the PERSON (Ad hominem = not an argument).
If the kid's question was that irrelevant, he should not have chosen him for the show.
The other guy violated the NAP tbqh famalam, he deserved to be fired at with autistic missiles.
>you have to go back
Back to America to gangrape your women?
Haven't watched the video, but it's a good point relevant to all fields. The world and ideas are in a constant state of change and the biggest opponents to this are people already established in their fields who become arrogant and protective of their ideas and actively resist change even if it is for the better.
>Bald Guy
>Implying that even a nigger with hair isn't superior to him.
Just watch the first 5 mins and it will be clear.
>Stefan is confrontational.
>The kid has some difficulty articulating his position and backpedals a bit.
>Stefan is confrontational about the backpedaling.
>The kid says he's nervous and a bit intimidated being on air.
>"WELL, HOW CAN WE HAVE A CONVERSATION IF YOU'RE INTIMIDATED BY YOURSELF? GO SORT YOUR ISSUES OUT AND THEN WE CAN TALK!"
I don't know, maybe allowing at least 15 seconds to break the ice and not jumping straight on Ad Hominems?
He should either have argued the point or pick a different person for the show as his point is irrelevant. I suspect some Anons are right that he only picks easy targets to rip apart.
Molyneux is a huge phaggot
It's funny watching all you people sympathizing with the autist who spilled his spaghetti all over.
The call was a waste of time, there are real issues to worry about.