((((Global Warming))))
((((Global Warming))))
A hoax invented by the Chinese to stifle US manufacturing - Trump. How can anyone take this moron seriously?
CHYNAAAAAA
youre right, climate change that has been happening for thousands of years is somehow now caused by humans because al gore made a movie. that makes a lot more sense
Because it's true. Set aside your feelings for a moment and think about the ramifications of Gore's actions.
You fucking cucks never learn.
They're ripping us off Big League.
You can ignore a near total scientific consensus by screaming about Al Gore all you want, but the vast majority of climate scientists agree anthropogenic warming is occurring.
>near total scientific consensus
this is my favorite meme
that is entirely false you retarded faggot. everyone just repeats it without looking it up. that "97% scientific consensus" bs was based on a single completely flawed study. the truth is a large portion of scientists are completely skeptical about man made climate change
please at least do basic research before forming an opinion you complete and total retard
>((((Global Warming))))
Globalist attempt at global tax payed to the global banking cartels.
Which study was that and which scientific bodies are skeptical?
I'm genuinely interested.
No it wasn't.
But, even if it was, explain the other six concensus studies finding the same thing
>falling for the global warming Jew.
How about you literally use the internet faggot and do your own research instead of being a gibs me Dat
The climate hasn't changed this rapidly in millions of years.
'Coincidentally', our co2 levels have skyrocketed from 270ppm in the 1800s to over 400ppm two years ago. We havent seen levels over 380ppm in over 800 000 years
Not one person can site anything other than internet conspiracy and a small minority of scientists who refute anthropogenic warming.
Enjoy the Alex Jones /x/tier bullshit you call research.
>real man of genius
this is the study that began that "statistic"
iopscience.iop.org
there are a lot of issues with the original study on consensus that have since been extrapolated into other studies like the ones this faggot is shitting himself about.
i will happily link some articles explaining why but this is a great place to start:
climatechangedispatch.com
*uses parentheses while Trump suckles AIPAC*
Also, scientific consensus is different from regular consensus.
It's not about having similar opinions, it's about analyzing the hard data and agreeing on its scientific validity.
Not opinion, but fact.
As a follow-up, why should I believe a blog with zero scientific backing over, let's say, The American Meteorological Society?
Please explain.
You could read the information and decide for yourself. Appeals to authority are a terrible way to argue.
"Climate scientists" need to be shot.
>Not opinion, but fact.
im missing your point here. that is exactly what i am saying. 97% of scientists do not agree that it is "fact" it is much less than that. the 97% statistic is misleading at best and untrue at worst.
did you even look at that link?
it is a list of 97 scientific journal articles/studies/etc. from well established sources refuting the 97% statistic.
its not just some blog of some guys opinion
jesus my dude get it together
I just want you to consider your reasoning for a moment. Only using the AMA as an example.
On one hand you have a scientific organization presenting scientific data that has been peer-reviewed by the scientific community.
On the other is a heavily politically motivated blog.
Why should I, or anyone else, believe the blog?
(((climate scientists)))
>oh shit a link from the literal "politifact" of science!
>i guess im btfo now!
Climate change is a natural thing.
Liberals just wanna say humans are the cause, because they're egotistical and think humans are responsible for everything in the universe.
Pffft
>WattsUpWithThat
>The GWPF
>FriendsOfScience
All linked to indirect fossil fuel company funding, and constantly called out for fallicious arguments.
Plus, WUWT is referenced like 10 times in that link. Refutable my ass
>97% discredited
Read this article:
Do you not understand that the peer review process itself is politicized? You cannot find unpoliticized information about anything. You always have to read the source material.
It cites Brietbart and an asston of blog posts. Learn the difference between an article and a scholarly journal.
>Muh jews
>This website has a differing opinion from mine therefor its invalid even though ive given no fucking reason or evidence to why
Like you even have any evidence
>cherry picking 3 of the 97 sources you dont like
believe what you want my dude but you seem to be ignoring a lot of viable information that is right in front of you bc it doesnt go with your political beliefs.
good luck with that mindset hopefully you grow up soon
I just want you to admit that you will happily take the word of politically motivated bloggers over an entire accredited scientific organization because it fits your narrative.
Go ahead, say it.
lmao, using the graphs starting in 1979. why don't you go check the graphs in the 1990 IPCC report and you'll see that's a peak
You will literally believe anything you read online if it has the right spin. And then turn around and pat yourself on the back for your research. Holy fuck my dude.
Tol is referenced over 10 times and it says at the bottom of the fucking article YOU linked that Tol's discredited, WUWT gets referenced over 15 times, friendsofscience 4 times, gwpf twice, forbes listed once, read one of their 'debunking' articles, full of misinformation. Heartland institute, hard evidence of them getting financial donations from fossil fuel companies.
That's 33 out of 97 crossed off right there.
Breitbart got slammed too with one of their junk articles, 34.
I could go on, but the whole point of denialism is bloat the argument until the truth gets drowned out, and im not taking that bait.
Go on desmogblog and youll find all the direct evidence of everyone working for big oil money
>clean coal
>Trump
>So called President
Also, have fun Googling some of those names. Random bloggers. Lucia Lundgren appears to not exist.
The amount of cherry picking in this thread is absolutely disgusting.
The VAST majority of all well funded and/or independent science studies are in consensus that global climate change is happening and we are the cause.
If your gonna cite a source that says otherwise, at least make sure it's not funded by petroleum companies.
Fuck that lol.
Thanks for the extra ammo for my arsenal though ameribro.
Props to you for delving deeper
Trumpcucks would kill themselves if their cult leader ordered it
...