Stop saying liberals are the real racists

Stop saying liberals are the real racists.

dailystormer.com/the-idiocy-of-liberals-are-the-real-racists/

>dailystormer.com
best moderate republican website

then tell them to stop being the real racists

>dailystormer

Liberals apply lower standards to groups like blacks, latinos, muslims because deep down they genuinely believe that those groups can't live up to white standards. THAT is the essence of their racism.

>dailystormer

Why do I have to agree with fucking leaves when disliking the Dailystormer...Feels bad, man.

Would make white children

The real racist is me.

They literally can't though. Do you believe they can?

young varg a cute!

They're not wrong...

>By acknowledging that and then dismissing it, you avoid this nonsensical “NO U” gibberish altogether, and put it back on them to explain why brown people behave in such undesirable ways. Their “it’s because of oppression” line is just a filler argument that they know they won’t ever really have to use in a serious debate, because cuckservatives will just get caught up on trying to explain how they are not racists, and never get to what a racist actually even is, or why people take objection to the collective behavior of non-whites.
>We need winning arguments.
>“Liberals are the real racists” is not a winning argument.

>you didn't bring a condom, did you user?
>that's silly, how are we supposed to secure a future for white children if we don't have any?

Simmer down there buddy

Funny, I actually already read this article earlier today.
Which is weird because I've been on the daily stormer maybe three times in my entire life.
I find it amusing that Aglin or whoever wrote the article talks about only wanting "winning arguments" when his specific brand of identitarianism/ racialism is tiny and shows no signs of growing.

Honestly, the only valid response to being called a racist is to point out that racist is a bullshit manufactured term with constantly changing definitions and it's not an argument therefore deserves no counter argument.

Don't agree with his analysis at all.

I believe apolitical people are the real non-racists.

The Left and Right tend to both be racist in differant ways, making a bunch of assumptions about what various racial groups do to other racial groups, it's just the left and right disagrees about who are the primary victims. Basically if you start looking at politics along racial lines, you will eventually start believing racist things about what each group is doing to another, and how true these things are will vary.

Since the lefts views on race are more delusional than the rights atm, the left are indeed the "real racists". It's not just "no U" or defensiveness, the left has a very real and very chronic racism problem which is causing them to victimize majority groups who they accuse of being racist. They have many policies which systematically discriminate against Whites and Asians, which they do nothing about, and which they celebrate as a victory for equality.

If you want to be non-racist, be apolitical, don't think about the color of peoples skin, don't favor them because they're a certain color, don't shun them for being a certain color.

We're BOTH racists, just that they deny it.

Our form make sense - we want to be separate.

Their form is dreadful - it's "LET'S USE OTHER RACES FOR THEIR VOTES AND PRETEND TO LIKE THEM AND THEIR DIVERSITY, BUT KEEP THEM THE FUCK AWAY FROM ME AND MY NEIGHBORHOOD UNTIL WE HAVE FURTHER USE FOR THEM!!!" shit.

At least those on the political right can be HONEST about their racism, liberals just lie about their love of diversity but instead, want nothing to do with it beyond using black/brown votes to keep their retarded elected officials in power.

>when his specific brand of identitarianism/ racialism is tiny and shows no signs of growing.
Compare the growth of DS and TRS with that of The blaze, NRO, etc. That's what I thought.

It's such a silly argument.

Firstly, it's not true and, secondly, "racist" is a made up cultural marxist word to take over Western civilization and shouldn't even be seen as an insult.

>racist is a bullshit manufactured term
Pretty sure it means discriminating against certain "people" based on race.

Hell no they can't live up to white standards. History shows this. To be fair, some blacks and Latinos and even a few Muslims are very talented. The vast majority are not so talented.

Liberals have so much guilt for their own racism that they're happy and content creating a make-believe reality.

Also best Wall Street Journal fansite.

>mexicans will do our bad jobs for us!

libs use people, reps want separation.

But they are. Maybe in a different way but they most certainly are.

Liberals are demonstrably the real racists.

Democrat party in the US was pro slavery, pro segregation, pro Jim Crow laws, voted down the GOP Civil Rights Act in the 50's and filibustered the democratic Civil Rights Act in the 60's.

They never changed, and their welfare policies are intentionally designed, as is their abortion policy, to marginalize and murder blacks.

Because you're a cuck too bro.

>0,02 SchultzBucks have been deposited into your account

They're correct on this.

>“Liberals are the real racists” is not a winning argument.

It absolutely is. Give everyone a copy of Mugged by Ann Coulter. Best sourced book I've ever seen on the real racism in America. The democrat party.

Solid point.

If the point makes sense to say, I feel the left in their act to beat racism is in act of it itself. When you defend someone who is being beaten up by a group of another race because they simply don't like that race, that defence is justified, and can be accepted by all. But when you are combating racism by holding one race higher because of a simple pity factor of the past, it's actually encouraging racism, for you are no longer holding a person accountable for their equal roll in society.

Well yeah they like their minorities as a second class voting block.

DS and 8cin solicited antifa to kill TRS.

Telling people they are victims just enforces the victim mentality. Race tensions were smaller before the social justice movement went mainstream. The right is very correct when they say that viewing people as just being American rather than hyphenated-Americans will bring people together.

LOL. What percentage of blacks vote for the GOP after years and years of "Dems R the Real Racists" rhetoric?

That's how well your strategy "works."

Stop cucking and start thinking clearly.

Ben Carson
Black Man
Pretty well respected in most conservative circles

Thomas Perez
Dominican Man
Liberals pitch a fit when he takes the DNC chair over Ellison because, while he's nto white, he's not quite UNwhite enough for their liking.

I agree

They are though. The whole reason that the white nationalist movement is growing in the first place is as a reaction to liberal anti-white racism

People need to differentiate between normal Democrats who are sane and batshit liberals

Do you really think that white southerners in the post-Civil War era instituted policies like segregation because they were mean evil racists, or can you see that perhaps they had actual reasons (crime, disorder, etc.) for doing so?

Do you actually think it was BAD or IMMORAL that southern Democrats opposed policies such as school integration in the 1950's and 60's?

I mean, do you find that stance to be objectively wrong?

Why?

>If you feed a terrorist or fund a terrorist, you're a terrorist

>dailystormer

Into the trash it goes

My perspective is as a white disabled guy.

The thing is, when you're disabled, the people that treat you the most prejudiced are the left who fall over themselves to not offend you and treat you like you're made of glass.

You know what's a real fucking weird experience? Being treated as an outsider with nothing useful to add to a conversation because you're a fucking white male, but as soon as they hear you're disabled, their interest is piqued. Isn't that just fucking funny? How SJWs don't care about you because of the color of your skin, until you TELL them you're a member of a disadvantaged group? I just think about it, and really, if I tell an SJW all my struggles, they will be dismissed UNLESS I also tell them I'm disabled. They will leap over people with visible disabilities, and visible minorities, but they make assumptions about you based on the color of your skin. They assume you haven't struggled. Then, when you tell them you are disabled, they go right to the other extreme, they believe you're far more of a victim than you actually are.

The left can be very prejudiced, just in a different more patronizing way than the right is. Part of why I'm on Sup Forums is escaping all that. They have absolutely messed up views on race, and it's not going to change until people are willing to confront them, be called evil by them, and just not give a shit.

Dems racism works in favor of blacks