Hitler kills mostly religious and common Jews...

>Hitler kills mostly religious and common Jews, eliminates 80% of Haredic Jews (who were stridently anti-Zionist and disavowed secular "worldly" Jews) in Europe etc. instead of the "international Jews" somehow responsible for Germany losing WWI because of Germans delusional belief that they were winning the war on the frontlines (LOL) but were betrayed at home
>Hitler literally deluded himself into thinking that if you lose the war, you win
>the Nazis were so full of slave morality that they considered their own weaknesses and incompetence virtuous and hated the Jews for being successful and therefore "evil" (similar to leftist sentiment today that white people are unjustly "privileged" and therefore must have done something evil)
>plunged Europe into a devastating war that resulted in the loss of life of millions of Germans and crippled and humiliated his own country - condemning it to an even worse condition than it was in the (actually relatively fair) Treaty of Versailles era, literally half of the country a Communist satellite state
why do you guys worship this hack?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=RddqP0ABzwM
youtube.com/watch?v=eJtz9kYLpT4
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

It's ironic

bump

Hitler did nothing wrong.

should've killed all of them desu

Because he gave a damn.

Himmler was gassing the kikes behind Hitlers back Uncle Adolf just thought the Eienstangruppen was killing the commie Jews and other partisan Jews

>Flag

The shitposting is Canada tier. Do better next time.

From Goebbels diary:
>February 14, 1942: The Führer once again expressed his determination to clean up the Jews in Europe pitilessly. There must be no squeamish sentimentalism about it. The Jews have deserved the catastrophe that has now overtaken them. Their destruction will go hand in hand with the destruction of our enemies. We must hasten this process with cold ruthlessness.
>March 27, 1942: A judgment is being visited upon the Jews that, while barbaric, is fully deserved by them. The prophecy which the Führer made about them for having brought on a new world war is beginning to come true in a most terrible manner. One must not be sentimental in these matters. If we did not fight the Jews, they would destroy us. It's a life-and-death struggle between the Aryan race and the Jewish bacillus.

Was he making things up in his own diary?

why wouldn't he be? that's a great way to have something to point to to shift the blame off of himself because faggots like you will buy it

>and hated the Jews for being successful and therefore "evil"

Stopped reading there. This is patently false.

He's describing the Eienstangruppen killings, slave labor and progroms on the eastern front

OMG I need to start keeping a false diary like ASAP, thanks user!

If he wanted to push the blame off himself why would he write such a glowing endorsement of the extermination of Jews?
>no Nazis ever denied the Holocaust during the trials, just tried to plead that they weren't personally responsible
>multiple Nazis wrote and gave speeches about the destruction of the Jews and the Final Solution

Is that why he's using the phrase "the Jews" exclusively

>kys shlomo.

Probably most of the Einstagruppen executions/progroms and slave laborers were easten european Jews

It's an interpretation of the underlying psychology of the mass movement. I don't deny that Jews have been responsible for a lot of negative things, but the ideology constructed by the Nazis ended up placing the "noble German" as an oppressed underling of the conspiring, rich Jew - who has reached his success through evil ends. Essentially constructing a moral narrative for two things
1. Why we're not in power - it's because we're good
2. Why it's okay for us to destroy the enemy and take their power - because they are evil and don't deserve it
Pure ressentiment.

So?

There were systems in place to remove Jews into concentration camps, just as gooks were in the US. The problem comes in when you start asserting that those systems were designed for wholesale genocide - they clearly weren't.

> condemning it to an even worse condition than it was in the (actually relatively fair) Treaty of Versaill

Not knowing how shitty Germany was post WW1

There is literally a direct correlation between the diplomatic anal raping Germany received and the rise of aggressive nationalism. The people were desperate to be great again and Hitler offered that greatness to them on a plate that was made from a golden mirror designed to enhance your own beauty to eliminate lack of confidence.

>There is literally a direct correlation between the diplomatic anal raping Germany received and the rise of aggressive nationalism
No doubt. In terms of realpolitik, it wasn't particularly prescient

>The problem comes in when you start asserting that those systems were designed for wholesale genocide - they clearly weren't.
lol. How do you explain testimony from former SS officers like Josef Klehr, Oswald Kaduk and Oskar Gröning - who all emphatically condemn denial of the Holocaust and gas chambers?

>believing the testimony of someone whose life is on the line

I don't care what was claimed by the cowards after the war. There are immutable facts that cannot be denied. The gas chambers were not airtight, nor did they have the capacity to pull off what was claimed.

What's even more ridiculous is that it's claimed all of this was done openly, while Jews unironically posit that millions of Jews were cremated (using millions of pounds of coal and petrol) to hide the bodies.

If the aim were mass genocide, the Nazis would have dug mass Graves, lined the Jews up at the edge and put a bullet in their heads. Thus whole notion of death camps is ridiculously inefficient - even laughable - if you consider that it happened in the middle of a war where Germany was struggling to get enough petrol or coal.

>The gas chambers were not airtight
Source? The oft-spoken of "wooden doors" weren't the entrance to the gas chamber proper, but the bathrooms outside of them. There are photographs of airtight metal doors outside the gassing rooms from the liberations of the camps.

>If the aim were mass genocide, the Nazis would have dug mass Graves, lined the Jews up at the edge and put a bullet in their heads
That would waste a lot of bullets - six million at least - on non-combatants.

>because of Germans delusional belief that they were winning the war on the frontlines (LOL) but were betrayed at home
we offered peace in 1917 but the warmongers of Britain rejected it

>offers shitty peace conditions after wreaking wanton havoc across the continent because Serbia didn't accept 1 condition of some humiliating unnecessary treaty
>Britain told them at the start of the war that they could avoid it if they just left Belgium, or else they would have to declare war
>didn't leave Belgium and in fact raped and destroyed the fuck out of it
>WAAAAAAAHHHH BRITAIN = WARMONGERS
german persecution complex at work

I've never seen a single picture of an airtight gas chamber.

6 million bullets would be much cheaper than the chemical weapons, masturbation machines, and crematoriums. To say nothing of the cost of transporting, feeding, clothing, and medical care for 6 million people. The claims are so ludicrous that questioning the story was made illegal in a dozen countries and social suicide in the other 200.

Hitler was my nigga.

Stalin was the real criminal all along.

>6 million bullets would be much cheaper than the chemical weapons, masturbation machines, and crematoriums.
It also would have been cheaper not to start the largest war the world ever saw over some shitty eastern european land and racial dogma. Why is it difficult to accept the idea that Hitler was not necessarily rational in all of his decisions, especially ones so close to something he was very obviously charged and passionate about? All of those things were well within his means to do.

Watch this with an open mind youtube.com/watch?v=RddqP0ABzwM

What is the point of keeping them alive if your aim is to eradicate them? Why warehouse them? Why waste resources housing them?

The of course, you run into the biggest problem: there are millions of bodies missing and factual inconsistencies around how people were killed: all the way from masturbation machines to burned alive in crematoriums.

The military on both sides obviously knew how to efficiently kill people, why would Hitler piddle around when it came to the Jews?

...

I'm sorry, but it's a little long for me at 2 AM.

Some points made in the case of this side are alright, but overall I can't help but attack the viewpoint I quoted that seems to be arguing based on pure rationality, which it's very obvious that much of that era's happenings were far from purely rational.

>What is the point of keeping them alive if your aim is to eradicate them? Why warehouse them? Why waste resources housing them?
Forced labor? Convenient mass-execution and disposal? Twisted satisfaction? It's not like these kinds of camps are uncommon, nor something out of the ordinary for an authoritarian government.

>The of course, you run into the biggest problem: there are millions of bodies missing and factual inconsistencies around how people were killed: all the way from masturbation machines to burned alive in crematoriums.
What kinds of factual inconsistencies, from what sources?

>The military on both sides obviously knew how to efficiently kill people, why would Hitler piddle around when it came to the Jews?
Why did he first dick around with the idea of forcibly removing them to Madagascar if he could have just killed them in the street unopposed, then? Why did he do a lot of the things he did, and make the mistakes he did in general?

Yeah, it's almost as though the camps were labor camps who suffered massive casualties because of supply shortages - especially towards the end when the allies were bombing supply lines. Then the Jews completely fabricated stories and grossly exaggerated the casualties in order to gain sympathy...

There are so many holes in the (((official story))) that criticism is illegal.

>It's an interpretation of the underlying psychology of the mass movement. I don't deny that Jews have been responsible for a lot of negative things, but the ideology constructed by the Nazis ended up placing the "noble German" as an oppressed underling of the conspiring, rich Jew - who has reached his success through evil ends. Essentially constructing a moral narrative for two things
This is the equivalent of "yo white boi muh dik". Nobody hates the Jews because they have power. Do you think there would be an uproar if they used the hegemony they yield in the media to portray a stable white nuclear family living virtuously?
youtube.com/watch?v=eJtz9kYLpT4

>Hitler did nothing wrong
>lost the war
>but nothing wrong

WE NO HAT
PLS