Why are the latest cartoons pusing the gay agenda part 2

Last thread
There was a riveting conversation about this topic. Let's see how far we get this time.

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to Sup Forums

From the bottom of my heart, kys

Go back to Sup Forums

Ya like jazz and complaining about someone "pushing their agenda" because it doesn't agree with you even though that thing they're "pushing" is commonplace in society now so it isn't really an "agenda" because it's just two "different" characters being themselves and you think people who put LGBT characters in their works are trying to brainwash the youth because you browse a board for kids cartoons and don't go out much?

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to Sup Forums

...

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to Sup Forums

Kids don't care. Ruby looks like a dude

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to Sup Forums

It's Beautiful

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to /po/

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to Sup Forums

>commonplace in society now

Except that just because it happens doesn't means it's commonplace, you fucking nigger. Do you want also cumsluts and stoners into cartoons?

Truly, God has forsaken the human race.

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to Sup Forums

>Why are the latest cartoons pusing the gay agenda
They aren't.
It's just that all the people who wanted to tell gay stories in the past were more limited. Nowadays, it's less of an issue so they simply get all out now.

Also, There is zero issue with something having an agenda unless it promote something you disagree with. As long as it is well written, then it's completely okay.

How can you look at Simone and Julie being happy together and tell me that's wrong?

Ok then

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to Sup Forums

We reached a trascendental level of Sup Forumsposting. Once this thread dies there will be no more homophobia.

>Except that just because it happens doesn't means it's commonplace
And? It doesn't means creator can't include it if they want to.

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to Sup Forums

The creators can include anything they want, but we do have a rating system for a reason.

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to Sup Forums

>but we do have a rating system for a reason.
For creators to toy around and constantly test its limit?

Go back to Sup Forums

What a disgusting couple.

Go back to Sup Forums

What does rating have to do with I don't know what you are specifically talking about?

Go back to Sup Forums

Do you remember when comics and cartoons used to be a fun mean of escapism, leisure and enrichment of the mind?


Me neither.

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to Sup Forums

Fap fuel.

Parental bonus is not an excuse to dismiss the system. Especially since they are made in a way to bypass it.

Go back to Sup Forums

There recently was a spic super-hero comic representing America.

Look clealry like escapism to me.

Go back to Sup Forums

Yeah I love scooby doo and it has all 3 of those things.

Go back to Sup Forums

I still fail to see your point.

What does the rating system have to do with presenting gay people?

Go back to Sup Forums

That if you want to push an agenda you should make a teen/mature cartoon/movie. Target people who already have a political base.

Go back to Sup Forums

>Parental bonus is not an excuse to dismiss the system.
No one is dismissing the system in the first place, though.

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to Sup Forums

FAGGOTRY.
IS.
NOT.
POLITICS.

go back to Sup Forums

That sexuality is not a children issue. Would you be okay with a whore, a stoner, I dunno a couple fucking appearing a cartoon? Because those things also happen in commonplace.

If yes, then whatever floats your boat. But the majority of people doesn't.

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to Sup Forums

>That if you want to push an agenda
Just featuring gay people isn't agenda pushing.

GI Joe PSA were more agenda pushing than this.
Fuck, Captain Planet LITERALLY is more agenda pushing than a show simply featuring a gay couple.

Incidentally. Steven Universe IS a show targeted at teenagers, so it's not even a good basis to complain about that, there.

Read the comment I replied to.

Faggotry is pure politics. Like racism.

Go back to Sup Forums

Go back to Sup Forums

>Sup Forums went from having a board dedicated to posting pictures of girls with dicks to getting upset about the existence of gay fictional characters

Really gets the noggin joggin.

lololol
There
Now go fuck yourselves

OP's back in Sup Forums. Our job is done, boys.

>>Sup Forums

The fucking scum

>This thread was moved to

>Just featuring gay people isn't agenda pushing.

Featuring a minority that deviates from the norm while doesn't adding anything to the plot is agenda pushing. It's literally there just for progressive points.

Also ecological agenda =/= sexual one. Removing those two episodes of course (gang war and aids that were fucking terrible).

>That sexuality is not a children issue. Would you be okay with a whore, a stoner, I dunno a couple fucking appearing a cartoon? Because those things also happen in commonplace.
I am quite certain I have seen whores and drunkard in tex avery cartoon. And why d o you bring a couple fucking? There are no more gay couple fucking in kid cartoon than there is Straigh tcouple fucking in kid cartoon.

>Because those things also happen in commonplace.
That's beside the point. If straight couple can be featured in PG in kid cartoon, Gay couple cna be featured the same.

>If yes, then whatever floats your boat. But the majority of people doesn't.
The thing is, you seems to have figured many thing wrong.

Welcome to Sup Forums

Enjoy your stay

>If the normal standard nuclear family can be featured in PG in kid cartoon, mentally ill freaks should be featured the same.

A fucking waffle.

> implying it wasn't always like this

Why is Sup Forums always so stupid?

>Featuring a minority that deviates from the norm while doesn't adding anything to the plot is agenda pushing.
100% bullshit. that's like saying there is somehow a default race. There is no reason to restrict your character palette.

>It's literally there just for progressive points.
Or maybe it's there because that's what the writer wanted.

>Also ecological agenda =/= sexual one.
That's beside the point. The point is, there is nothing wrong with having an agenda unless the agenda itself is wrong.

> ya like jazz

This fucking meme

it's not a metal illness.

And freak are featured a lot in cartoon

Go back to Sup Forums

>100% bullshit. that's like saying there is somehow a default race.
>he really believes that heterosexuality isn't the standard sexuality

Wow, yeah I'm sure that those genetic deadends do a lot for your country.

>Or maybe it's there because that's what the writer wanted.
Yeah, for progressive points. I'm sure a writer would go 'you know, I want to put a gay couple in a split second there because I think that would enrich my story'.

>there is nothing wrong with having an agenda unless the agenda itself is wrong.
Good thing faggotry is wrong then.

>it's not a metal illness.
>recessive condition that only affects a small part of the population resulted from a hormonal imbalance and that leaves people genetic deadlocks, failing at nature most basic objective

Yeah, sure.

It was practically yaoi people.

The faggot got his shitty thread moved to Sup Forums. Kek.

Go back to Sup Forums

hahaha, was this a Sup Forums thread originally?
good to see all those SU bait threads are getting cleaned out

It was
Now it's in /realtrash/

IMBECILE